Jack - Why allow child avatars on Zindra?

I would argue that it's an even smaller proportion of the adult avatars that are confused over what's appropriate or not. Almost minuscule, even. (^_^)

Bullshit. You're making stuff up again. My usual avatar is shorter than any of Immy's, and its DEFINITELY adult.

This is a lie. Please provide proof. Start by describing the shirt I was wearing. (^_^)y

Immy has clearly stated she was in her short adult form. She wore the avatar, I'm sure she knew which one she was wearing.

She is.

Yes? Where is the conflict here?

Pretend? In other words you are calling her a liar? Well then I need to ask: WERE you present when she entered, and do you have any proof of whether her avatar at the time was a short adult or a child? Just curious here.
Again, you seem to imply she is lying, I'm assuming you will back that up with fact.

I fail to see how entereing a practically empty build with two poorly make penis-like sculptures by the entrance effects much of anything.
My point? You kept saying "unattended children on Zindra". I was merely wondering what difference it would make to you whether they were attended or unattended.

A joke! I even lol-ed!

No Argent, that is a lie. She said she was wearing her smallest Adult avatar -which is Immy's regular child avatar she usually wears.
And why would any of you waste keystrokes trying to pretend that Immy was not depicting herself as a child when she entered an Adult Parcel in Zindra that had no Adult content in it (just two large penises at the entrance)? Immy has stated in these forums that she interprets the Linden Sanction on child avatars to say she IS allowed to do what she just did while wearing a child avatar.
This morning I posted the coordinates to two large penis in Zindra. Immy then teleported to that location as a child avatar and commented on it in these forums. This seems to fall into a the inappropriate category.

Immy never lied and said she was not in her regular child avatar form when she netered. This point does not have to be debated here ad naseum.
Well that is the cusp of the debate. If it is in Zindra and is clearly marked adult content (or has two large penis at its entrance) I do not feel anyone should rp as a child avatar entering such parcels. it is an inappropriate depiction of children in Second Life. Just as the depiction of children having sex with adults is inappropriate. Linden Lab has banned that depiction. LL needs to expand upon the child avatar sanctions even further.

no, she didn't. read what people say and stop trying to change it hoping that others won't look back or call you on it.



oh. oops. didn't realize the two of you were friends with such a long history that you know exactly what she does at any given time.

If she refers to it as a short adult, then why are you referring to it as a child?

Is my short adult avatar (above) a child?

People, stop. She went there while I was still logged in there. I took pictures of the area but there is no reason to post them here. If I did post them here I am sure you would be yelling entrapment.
Immy is not denying she had her regular avatar on when she entered that place. That is NOT the issue. Immy, and several of you, believe that child avatars are allowed to do just what she did today. So we go back to the Ops query to Linden Lab; why are such inappropriate depictions allowed in Zindra? Linden Lab needs to realize their child avatar sanctions do not go far enough to deter this sort of thing.

then you really do need to read more carefully, not just what she said but what you have as well.



it's not under debate. what is under debate ad naseum is if you have the ability to separate facts from your opinion without perverting the words of others.

No it's not. You're the one that's lying. (^_^)I was in my short adult avatar. Not my child avatar. Not my loli-imp avatar. Not my vampire avatar. Not my cyborg avatar. Not my police avatar. Not my UR avatar. (=_=)

Really. I won't be the one to report this thread. But, please reconsider slandering me or risk a lock on this discussion because I'm sure someone can see through your lies. (=_=)

You didn't show up on my 96 Meter Mystitool scanner. (^_^)y

Immy, if you feel you were in the right to enter that parcel as a ten year old child - then why the denials that you were there in that avatar?
A forum lock is not the end of the issue, Immy. Your actions will assure that.

Inappropriate depictions of children in proximity to sexual content or activities are not allowed in Zindra because they are not allowed anywhere on the grid. What you and the OP are demanding is that completely innocent, appropriate, and harmless depictions ALSO be outlawed simply because you think the region rating is somehow magic, making the exact same pattern of pixels inappropriate just because the word "Adult" shows at the top of the page.

I find it more offensive that you compare the concept of a child walking past penis sculptures to a child having sex with an adult.

This is where everyone's personal sensitivities come into play. You consider a small child entering a build that has two large penises on either side of the door as "completely innocent, appropriate, and harmless depictions". I see it as extremely inappropriate.

My avatar just had her 18th birthday... Everyday. Check my profile picks.. Item two... It's all there. (^_^)

And, yes, I was in between the "penises"... Hardly... They were wonky, poorly made sculpts. Even a freenis would put them to shame. (^_^)

I had a fine chat with an escort that was right around my height while I was there. Apparently, she reads the forum as well. "Hi! How ya' doing!?!?!" (^_^)y

if there was any truth to this, you would have been in the forums, on every blog you could reach, typing at the top of your lungs "SEE! I WAS RIGHT!". you've already admitted to as much over the past few weeks. it's easy to claim all matters of evidence as long as you never have to produce any.

I'm glad you decided to grow up.

We only have your word... and your word has proven itself unreliable at best in this thread... that the avatar Immy claims was adult wasn't. Would you consider it inappropriate for me to do so in my "small adult" avatar? I'm even shorter than Immy.

23, I am right - but according to the rules - there was no sex balls or sexual activity on the parcel so Immy was in her right to enter the parcel in a child avatar. I am speaking on the current rules - not Immy's actions. The Linden rules about child avatar depictions should be expanded to make what Immy did an ARable offense.

I grow up and down depending on how I feel. But, I rarely assert an age. I made my short adult shape for some "barely legal" RP. One of the aspects of being barely legal and catering to that kink is to be just coming out from your 18th birthday. So, it's one of the rare occasions that you'll see me use an actual number. (^_^)

Regardless. I was still not in my kid avatar. The face is close, because I made both shapes. But, upon sizing up, I get a whole bunch more curvy and a obviously a bit taller. (^_^)

You still never addressed the shirt I asked about. =^-^=

Showing up in a parcel with ugly sculpties that might roughly resemble penises as a doorway decoration in a short adult avatar should be an ARable offense? (O.o)

Actually... There may be a chance to AR that map on the floor. It surely was pulled from the LL website and I don't know what copyright was held on it. Who knows? (^_^)y

Adult avatars are now to be banned from Zindra if they're "too short"? How about my ferrety self? Do I need to be protected from prim cocks?

Wow, OK.
Ask again. I could not find where you asked about a shirt.