Yay for discrimination in SL! \o/
|
Memir Quinn
Registered User
Join date: 7 May 2005
Posts: 306
|
03-01-2006 09:21
From: Jonas Pierterson ... Did someone say something? See how easy that works? I mean I've been using the ignore feature on him since his withering display of tact, grace, open-mindedness, and lets not forget 'logic' in the platform thread.  Just another fresh born person whom thinks they know everything with in three days of logging in and refuses to listen to anyone else's view. Very likely be a distant memory in a few more months, not worth fretting over.
|
CrystalShard Foo
1+1=10
Join date: 6 Feb 2004
Posts: 682
|
03-01-2006 09:22
From: Grace Loudon As a Gorean Sim owner... [text text] Don't like it? Don't visit...it's that simple. Grace, that sounds like a pretty bad method for moderation. If you want people to agree to conform with your rules before entering your sim, you may want to concider just turning it off from the public view and make it invite only. Its an Estate menu checkbox away.
|
Gabe Lippmann
"Phone's ringing, Dude."
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 4,219
|
03-01-2006 09:22
From: Artemis Fate Then what if I appear in a woman av and i'm told you can't do this and you can't do that and you're still inferior even though you wear a titler? Whoa, now we have problems. What conern is it to anyone but goreans how well they follow the books or how well they actually RP as goreans? In the case above, if they provide you with a non-RPer title and allow you in the area, then acting out abusive, misogynistic behavior towards you should be reported when it crosses the line. Similarly if they do not make the RP situation clear and allow visitors, who are subsequently treated in this manner. This doesn't take away from their ability to determine how you should look to engage with them in their PRIVATE land. Banning you from their PRIVATE land is not abuse. Two different issues.
_____________________
go to Nocturnal Threads 
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
03-01-2006 09:22
From: someone Just another fresh born person whom thinks they know everything with in three days of logging in and refuses to listen to anyone else's view. Very likely be a distant memory in a few more months, not worth fretting over Sounds like a good desription of that comments author. SL is an RPG.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-01-2006 09:24
From: Justice Armistice Heh, have you ever considered that such a rule tends to cause more problems than it solves? Hence why you get people that set bombs across your sim or et cetera. Er, that's hardly a reason to stop, is it? That people might grief you?
|
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
03-01-2006 09:25
Ordinal.. people do the same thing to fur sims..and they don't have that rule.
the rule doesn't seem to start or stop it.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-01-2006 09:26
Which makes it even less of a reason to stop....
|
prak Curie
----------
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 346
|
03-01-2006 09:26
From: Justice Armistice just like you would consider it rude if I told you to "shut the fuck up" (not that I am telling you this mind you.) Incorrect. It is perfectly valid advice. You are cutting yourself off from a world of valuable information if you insist that nothing told to you is 'negative.'
_____________________
-prak
|
Gabe Lippmann
"Phone's ringing, Dude."
Join date: 14 Jun 2004
Posts: 4,219
|
03-01-2006 09:27
From: CrystalShard Foo Grace, that sounds like a pretty bad method for moderation. If you want people to agree to conform with your rules before entering your sim, you may want to concider just turning it off from the public view and make it invite only.
Its an Estate menu checkbox away. This is purely an opinion, though. Many places choose not to ban people or create invite only situations. They just remove the offenders as they present themselves. Your stance is one about HOW they choose to enact the policy, not whether the policy is valid or not. This is a fine suggestion, but should they choose not to use it, they remain able to do it the way they have chosen.
_____________________
go to Nocturnal Threads 
|
Justice Armistice
The Legendary Leg-Humper.
Join date: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 36
|
03-01-2006 09:28
From: Jonas Pierterson Oh but you see, that would have left your ignorant view on land ownership and their controll of access rights unhindered. Which leads newbies to the opion that you were right - which you weren't.
edit:
then detach the attachments. Much of the same can be said about your views, but I won't be saying it. By the way, when you have been wearing those attachments as long as me, they are kind of a second skin.
|
prak Curie
----------
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 346
|
03-01-2006 09:29
From: Justice Armistice Heh, have you ever considered that such a rule tends to cause more problems than it solves? Hence why you get people that set bombs across your sim or et cetera. "...look how she was dressed."
_____________________
-prak
|
Artemis Fate
I'm a big stupid-face.
Join date: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 746
|
03-01-2006 09:29
From: Gabe Lippmann What conern is it to anyone but goreans how well they follow the books or how well they actually RP as goreans?
In the case above, if they provide you with a non-RPer title and allow you in the area, then acting out abusive, misogynistic behavior towards you should be reported when it crosses the line. Similarly if they do not make the RP situation clear and allow visitors, who are subsequently treated in this manner.
This doesn't take away from their ability to determine how you should look to engage with them in their PRIVATE land. Banning you from their PRIVATE land is not abuse. Two different issues. The point I was making was that this "Change your appearance or leave" mentality can't work always. What if they tell me to change my skin colour because there's no black people in gor? (there are, but they're usually treated less than animals in the books) And this is on a notecard in the entrance. Not that they do it, but the idea i'm trying to make here is that owning the land does not give you the absolute right to say what is allowed in the sim.
_____________________
 Ko Industries, unique clothes for the unique woman: Ko Industries: Nexus Prime Gibson (main) store"Be still like a mountain, and flow like a great river" -Lao Tse "Deus Ex Machina" "Dom Ars Est Vita Est" "Stand tall and Shake the heavens" -Xenogears
|
Justice Armistice
The Legendary Leg-Humper.
Join date: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 36
|
03-01-2006 09:29
From: prak Curie Incorrect. It is perfectly valid advice.
You are cutting yourself off from a world of valuable information if you insist that nothing told to you is 'negative.' You are a very smart person.
|
Pyrii Akula
NO PANTS!
Join date: 25 Nov 2005
Posts: 187
|
03-01-2006 09:29
I've see this thread has turned into petty insults from the side of the goreans. I'll admit I now have much less respect for goreans if this is the way they wish to talk to other people and behave, then nowonder threads like this are made. I tried to offer some advice to help both sides come out nicely, that's been completely ignored and it's gone back to "If you don't like it, F*** off" comments.
If this is how the goreans wish to present themselves in public, then just leave them be, they aren't worth the hassle, even just for a visit. I personally don't want to be around such ill-mannered people.
I know I shouldn't judge a whole group by a few people, but so many people on the gorean side of the argument are just making petty, insulting and flamebaiting comments.
|
Aliasi Stonebender
Return of Catbread
Join date: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,858
|
03-01-2006 09:31
From: Gabe Lippmann Possibly, this is true. They may disagree. I'm not going to worry about whether they are being foolish or not.
I happen to like hammers to the head, it distracts me from other stuff and I like stargazing. Certainly, they may disagree. That's my point; a right is something that should be universial, even if we disagree with how it is done. Which is exactly what's been said here all along.
_____________________
Red Mary says, softly, “How a man grows aggressive when his enemy displays propriety. He thinks: I will use this good behavior to enforce my advantage over her. Is it any wonder people hold good behavior in such disregard?” Anything Surplus Home to the "Nuke the Crap Out of..." series of games and other stuff
|
prak Curie
----------
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 346
|
03-01-2006 09:31
From: Justice Armistice I dunno, but you could have also done a positive thing and not said anything at all, Mr. Jonas. School would have been so much easier if only professors took that position.
_____________________
-prak
|
Justice Armistice
The Legendary Leg-Humper.
Join date: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 36
|
03-01-2006 09:33
From: Ordinal Malaprop Er, that's hardly a reason to stop, is it? That people might grief you? Might actually give people less of a reason to do so, Ord. In fact, this post would probably not exist if such a rule wasn't in place.
|
Justice Armistice
The Legendary Leg-Humper.
Join date: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 36
|
03-01-2006 09:37
From: prak Curie School would have been so much easier if only professors took that position. When did he become my professor?
|
prak Curie
----------
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 346
|
03-01-2006 09:37
From: CrystalShard Foo Grace, that sounds like a pretty bad method for moderation. If you want people to agree to conform with your rules before entering your sim, you may want to concider just turning it off from the public view and make it invite only. Or they could have all teleports into the sim start out in a box which clearly spells out the rules and then expect people to, I don't know, act like reasonable adults.
_____________________
-prak
|
Justice Armistice
The Legendary Leg-Humper.
Join date: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 36
|
03-01-2006 09:39
From: prak Curie Or they could have all teleports into the sim start out in a box which clearly spells out the rules and then expect people to, I don't know, act like reasonable adults. If we were all reasonable, we wouldn't be in a moment of strife.
|
CrystalShard Foo
1+1=10
Join date: 6 Feb 2004
Posts: 682
|
03-01-2006 09:39
From: prak Curie Or they could have all teleports into the sim start out in a box which clearly spells out the rules and then expect people to, I don't know, act like reasonable adults. Thats about as useless as giving someone a notecard on login. If you really care about moderating your sim access and behavior, invite only is your only real answer.
|
Memir Quinn
Registered User
Join date: 7 May 2005
Posts: 306
|
03-01-2006 09:40
From: Gabe Lippmann This is purely an opinion, though. Many places choose not to ban people or create invite only situations. They just remove the offenders as they present themselves. Your stance is one about HOW they choose to enact the policy, not whether the policy is valid or not. This is a fine suggestion, but should they choose not to use it, they remain able to do it the way they have chosen. So whom is arguing they don't have the right? They have the 'right' what doesn't follow (as has been said repeatedly) is that the action is right. Two separate issues, Foo's and other's opinion of the Gor sims being ill-handled while still within the rights provided landowners, is still a valid opinion. My personal view is if they allow guests and provide a Non-RP tagger, which is worn it shouldn't matter one wit what the guest wearing said tag has as to AV choice. They are _Non-RPers_ after all, to do otherwise is a form (in my view) of discrimination, not racial, but on the same level as your 'good looking people only club' example put forth earlier in the thread (page 3 I think it was). Not the most extreme kind of discrimination, but discrimination none the less. That said, they are as you point out, and no one that I can see is arguing the point with you, they are still perfectly within their rights to exclude anyone they wish without so much as a 'by your grace lord Phil.' Still doesn't make it right in my view, just that I'm that much less likely to go to a Gor sim even if just to admire a build or fix a script/vendor. They've got that right, distasteful as it may be.
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-01-2006 09:42
From: Justice Armistice Might actually give people less of a reason to do so, Ord. In fact, this post would probably not exist if such a rule wasn't in place. Frankly I'm not interested in why such people choose to do so. The fact that idiots are planting bombs because they feel hard done by (or for whatever reason) is immaterial to whether it is right to stop doing something or not. I certainly don't pay any attention to the infantile squallings of people who grief groups that I am in.
|
prak Curie
----------
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 346
|
03-01-2006 09:44
From: Justice Armistice When did he become my professor? You misunderstood.
_____________________
-prak
|
Ordinal Malaprop
really very ordinary
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 4,607
|
03-01-2006 09:45
From: CrystalShard Foo Thats about as useless as giving someone a notecard on login.
If you really care about moderating your sim access and behavior, invite only is your only real answer. If rules are made quite clear on entering and you are simply expected to follow them or leave, I don't see that that's useless. Most people aren't interested in causing trouble or actively breaking rules. You simply have to have a way of dealing with the few who are. It also has the benefit of treating visitors like grown-ups who can read, rather than potential sim terrorists.
|