Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Yay for discrimination in SL! \o/

Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
03-22-2006 09:12
How is 'be a human av' a strict degree? Its the DEFAULT avatar. Its not hard to hit 'detach all' and get rid of all the furry attachment parts..There is no arguably strict degree present.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here

I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid

You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 09:31
I'm going to simplify this for all the furries out there who think they have a right (HA!) to wear whatever they want in gorean sims.

You don't.

THEY built the cities and architecture.
THEY bought the land and pay the teir fees.
THEY obey their own rules. Why can't you?
THEY did not force a furry AV on you. No one did. You did. Hell, it's not even a permanent thing. You can EASILY go back to human any time you like and then right back to furry.

You may NOT compare this to racial discrimination in real life, it is not even close.

This is not the equivalent to a black person not being allowed to stroll through a government owned park.

This is more akin to a store owner putting up a sign saying NO CLOWN COSTUMES ALLOWED . Ya know what? If you walk into his store in a clown outfit, he can deny you service for that reason alone. You can A) Leave, or B) TAKE OFF THE GODDAMN CLOWN COSTUME!

This post goes for anyone else who thinks they have a right to tell other people how to do things on other peoples' land.

For the record, I have nothing against furries, and I am not Gorean, but this is just BS.
Rose Madonna
Registered User
Join date: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
03-22-2006 09:53
It is certainly argueable, since their rules force you to change your appearance even as a non-participant. I've never wanted to play as furry, and here most of the costumes just look rather blah to me personally- but to many fo them that is their avie, that is how they want to appear, and very much their "skin".

I do see what you're saying, I just think though we have to look at it from their perspective too. You are right, it's their bills, and their rules. But that isn't to say their rules aren't a little silly either..
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 10:15
From: Rose Madonna
It is certainly argueable, since their rules force you to change your appearance even as a non-participant. I've never wanted to play as furry, and here most of the costumes just look rather blah to me personally- but to many fo them that is their avie, that is how they want to appear, and very much their "skin".

I do see what you're saying, I just think though we have to look at it from their perspective too. You are right, it's their bills, and their rules. But that isn't to say their rules aren't a little silly either..


Silly or not, those are the rules set forth by the people who built and maintain the land. Period. Don't like it? Leave. But don't go waving around some banner saying it's your right to F-up what they've worked so hard to build. (Not saying you personaly are.)

*EDIT*

From: someone
that is how they want to appear, and very much their "skin".


No, it is the costume they choose to wear. Every AV in game, furry or not, is a costume. The gorean clothing is a costume, even if it's just a human in ancient clothing. It's the costume goreans want you to wear in their sims. You don't like their costume? Then you don't need to be in their sims.
Ghoti Nyak
καλλιστι
Join date: 7 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,078
03-22-2006 11:11
From: Buhamut Bligh
Silly or not, those are the rules set forth by the people who built and maintain the land. Period. Don't like it? Leave. But don't go waving around some banner saying it's your right to F-up what they've worked so hard to build. (Not saying you personaly are.)


I partly agree. They built it, they fund it, they set the rules. Fine and dandy. But then, they put stores up and allow visitors, but only visitors that meet their specific criteria. Its called bigotry. A bigot is "one who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ." Yes, they have every right to be this way with their sims, but IMO, they should make their sims private if someone with a tail just visiting can utterly destroy thier immersion.

From: someone
No, it is the costume they choose to wear. Every AV in game, furry or not, is a costume.


No. You are wrong. That might be your view, but many people consider the appearance of their avatar to be their 'skin'. The original meaning of 'avatar' is 'the incarnation of a Hindu deity, especially Vishnu, in human or animal form.' Our avatars are our incarnations in the SL world, and changing that embodiment at the whim of some other group is taken as an afront.

From: someone
The gorean clothing is a costume, even if it's just a human in ancient clothing. It's the costume goreans want you to wear in their sims. You don't like their costume? Then you don't need to be in their sims.


And yet... its okay for 'human' avatars to wear the 'visitor' flag as the only required 'costume'. So long as their skin is 'human', its all good. Yet, place the same flag over a furry head, and they will still get abused and kicked from the sim. Take a furry and stick them in the burqa of a Gorean free woman, and they're still not good enough to even visit in Gor.

-Ghoti
_____________________
"Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 11:37
From: Ghoti Nyak
I partly agree. They built it, they fund it, they set the rules. Fine and dandy. But then, they put stores up and allow visitors, but only visitors that meet their specific criteria. Its called bigotry. A bigot is "one who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ." Yes, they have every right to be this way with their sims, but IMO, they should make their sims private if someone with a tail just visiting can utterly destroy thier immersion.


Err, no, this is not bigotry in any way.

They are doing you a FAVOR by not making them private. They COULD just make them private and take the easy way out, but they choose a more difficult, yet rewarding path. They want to share their world, their immersion with EVERYONE. All they ask in return is you not BREAK that immersion through SIMPLE and TEMPORARY means. Is that really so difficult to grasp? If you don't like it, then YOU can treat them as sims that you're not allowed to enter and then everybody who cares is happy. Hooray!

From: Ghoti Nyak
No. You are wrong. That might be your view, but many people consider the appearance of their avatar to be their 'skin'. The original meaning of 'avatar' is 'the incarnation of a Hindu deity, especially Vishnu, in human or animal form.' Our avatars are our incarnations in the SL world, and changing that embodiment at the whim of some other group is taken as an afront.


It's a costume, a costume, a costume. They may consider it a PERFECT REPRESENTATION of themselves, but it is not directly them. It can be changed to be something totally different, and many SLers I know still haven't found the perfect avatar/costume for them.

From: Ghoti Nyak
And yet... its okay for 'human' avatars to wear the 'visitor' flag as the only required 'costume'. So long as their skin is 'human', its all good. Yet, place the same flag over a furry head, and they will still get abused and kicked from the sim. Take a furry and stick them in the burqa of a Gorean free woman, and they're still not good enough to even visit in Gor.

-Ghoti


YES DAMNIT- Because the HUMAN part of the avatar does not break the immersion they've worked so hard for! The furry form DOES. They do not care if you are a male/female in RL, if you play a furry 99% of the time, or anything else ASLONG AS YOU PLAY BY THEIR RULES ON THEIR OWN LAND. If you cannot abide by these rules, IT IS BY CHOICE.

Not bigotry. Don't even TRY to lump it into this discussion.
Nala Galatea
Pink Dragon Kung-Fu
Join date: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 335
03-22-2006 12:01
*in before the lock due to non-constructive dialog*
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
03-22-2006 12:06
I think this bears repeating: If you gorean sorts want want that immersive environemnt, you aught really make the islands invisible. Talk about saving all kinds of greif and strife - one island for "public" contact, the rest for total, uninterrupted, do-as-you-wish role play.

By the by - doesn't having an av tooling around with "I'M JUST A VISITOR" floating in red text over thier heads wreck immersion too? Seems like it would, to me.
_____________________
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 12:16
From: Jillian Callahan
I think this bears repeating: If you gorean sorts want want that immersive environemnt, you aught really make the islands invisible. Talk about saving all kinds of greif and strife - one island for "public" contact, the rest for total, uninterrupted, do-as-you-wish role play.

By the by - doesn't having an av tooling around with "I'M JUST A VISITOR" floating in red text over thier heads wreck immersion too? Seems like it would, to me.


A small sacrifice they make to share their sim, in addition to having to police rule breakers.

And yes, they aught, but as I just stated, they don't. For the benefit of many.

The problem here is, you all just don't have the self control to stay out of those sims if you don't like the rules. No, you don't get to tell them to pick up the slack for you and babysit your actions by locking their sims. Get over it.
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 12:18
From: Nala Galatea
*in before the lock due to non-constructive dialog*


The dialogue so far has been ontopic explanations and argument for the last few posts. Please don't start this.
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
03-22-2006 12:26
From: Buhamut Bligh
The problem here is, you all just don't have the self control to stay out of those sims if you don't like the rules. No, you don't get to tell them to pick up the slack for you and babysit your actions by locking their sims. Get over it.
Wow. Here I thought I was making a constructive suggestion.

Do I get to refer to goreans as "you all" when I complain about the ones who parade thier nude slaves around my proerty in a PG sim? This is getting to be commonplace. Talk about no self control.
_____________________
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 12:33
From: Jillian Callahan
Wow. Here I thought I was making a constructive suggestion.

Do I get to refer to goreans as "you all" when I complain about the ones who parade thier nude slaves around my proerty in a PG sim? This is getting to be commonplace. Talk about no self control.


Boot him/her. It's your land, it's your right. :)

If ya want a fun RP argument just boot the slave and wait for the master/mistress to come start something for touching their precious piece of property. Then boot them too. ^^

And yes, it was a constructive suggestion. Just got into stint for a while is all. My apologies. Still, there's no reason they have to limit themselves because others can't play by the rules. Nor should you have to deal with goreans who break the PG rules aswell as your own on your own land.

And you may only use "You all" in reference to goreans who break those rules. :P Just as I used "you all" in reference to people who expect to be allowed to break gorean rules on their own land.
Rose Madonna
Registered User
Join date: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
03-22-2006 14:42
From: Buhamut Bligh
A small sacrifice they make to share their sim, in addition to having to police rule breakers.



That's a heck of a "small sacrifice" to have a whole different set of rules for visitors, and more importantly enforce them. It seems like a lot of hassle to me to operate under if someone were so strict on maintaining an immersive environment, especially when as it's been pointed out how someone can so easily keep an island sim private and just avoid those issues...

.. unless there is another motive for staying public?
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-22-2006 14:53
From: Rose Madonna
That's a heck of a "small sacrifice" to have a whole different set of rules for visitors, and more importantly enforce them. It seems like a lot of hassle to me to operate under if someone were so strict on maintaining an immersive environment, especially when as it's been pointed out how someone can so easily keep an island sim private and just avoid those issues...

.. unless there is another motive for staying public?


And...well...dwell...for the moment anyway. Heh.

*WARNING- THIS PARAGRAPH IS DIRECTED TO THE RULE BREAKING BODY AS A WHOLE AN NO ONE IN PARTICULAR*
Yep, they probably need some form of dwell to help keep the sims going. Perfectly valid reason to keep the sims open to visitors. But please, no arguments entailing "The gors need me to keep their sims open! I can wear what I want!" No, you still can't. Yes, the store owners need customers, but not customers in clown suits disrupting business. :D

*Disclaimer* I have nothing against clowns. :P

And I was refferring to the Visitor title above their head as the "small" sacrifice. Policing is no easy job. ;)
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
03-22-2006 16:25
From: someone
Rose:It is certainly argueable, since their rules force you to change your appearance even as a non-participant. I've never wanted to play as furry, and here most of the costumes just look rather blah to me personally- but to many fo them that is their avie, that is how they want to appear, and very much their "skin".

I do see what you're saying, I just think though we have to look at it from their perspective too. You are right, it's their bills, and their rules. But that isn't to say their rules aren't a little silly either..


No, its not arguable. The default avatar is a click away, its extremely easy. Its a Gorean Roleplay sim and last I checked there arent a shortage of nongorean rp sims..there is -no hardship- in using a default human av. As far as it being their 'skin.' Thats their perception. Its a costume, same as any avatar. your perceptions don't make you an exception to the rules.

From: someone
Jillian:Do I get to refer to goreans as "you all" when I complain about the ones who parade thier nude slaves around my proerty in a PG sim? This is getting to be commonplace. Talk about no self control.


Nudity isn't allowed on public on pg land. Abuse report or warn..your choice
_____________________
Good freebies here and here

I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid

You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
Rose Madonna
Registered User
Join date: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 12
03-22-2006 17:05
From: Jonas Pierterson
No, its not arguable. The default avatar is a click away, its extremely easy. Its a Gorean Roleplay sim and last I checked there arent a shortage of nongorean rp sims..there is -no hardship- in using a default human av. As far as it being their 'skin.' Thats their perception. Its a costume, same as any avatar. your perceptions don't make you an exception to the rules.




But isn't it is silly to regulate the appearance of their non-participants, regardless of how easy it is to change avies or whether they are within thier Linden-given right to do so?
Noh Rinkitink
Just some Nohbody
Join date: 31 Jan 2006
Posts: 572
03-22-2006 17:13
At the risk of overly extending a really stupid thread, as a furry I can't help but wonder if the same folks saying the Goreans have to bend to the wills of non-Goreans would be as adamant about, say, human avs having the right to walk around in furry-only lands* without putting on furry avs, and go on about how the furries are bigoted, racist, and the other assorted negative labels that have been slapped onto the owners of Gorean sims that want to maintain the purity (for lack of a better term) of the RP environment for which they're paying real-world money, just because the furry sim owners might want to maintain a consistent RP environment.




* I don't know for sure if they exist on SL, but given what I've seen in other furry online environments like MU*s and such, I'd be surprised if there wasn't a "no icky hy00mans!" sim or two around.
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
03-22-2006 22:38
From: adem Echegaray
And guess what, in my Stargate Roleplay, HOW DO YOU ALLOW FURRIES AND KEEP THE INTEGRITY OF THE STARGATE UNIVERSE?? Are there any furries anywhere in Stargate? No. (unless you count the Nox lol)


Ace--I totally laughed when I saw this, I so got the reference.

And what about the Furlings? Will we ever see them?

To this day, I am still looking for a watermelon Priest-King av! Haven't found one yet, but it's on my list.

I suppose someone could get an island for "Furry Goreans"--it isn't out of the question; this is Second Life, after all.

Generally speaking about the broader issues, though: if someone owns land, they can ban someone else from that land and not even have to state a reason. It may not be nice, but that's within their landowner's rights.

However, if they were to ban someone who was a furry and proceeded to assail said furry with IMs of hateful and threatening messages, those would be personal attacks, and NOT allowed in Second Life as per the Community Standards.
_____________________
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
03-22-2006 22:46
Dunno - if someone wants to lock down a sim or any land they pay for in order to do whatever they want its AOK with me. I don't think its discrimination.

If they only wanted Ruth Av's in there to make a surreal village of the damned - I'd be down with that too.

So long as noone is forcing it down the throat of anyone else its AOK.

I don't subcribe to any of the 'lifestyle' malakia that goes on around the joint - and so long as the folks are polite when off their land I'm down with it..

I get folks sometimes refering to me as 'master' at my store - I say 'Siggy is fine' but I let them continue if they like.

The only thing I don't go for is 'Master/Mistress wishes me to communicate with you about x/y/z' - in those cases 'Master/Mistress' can wedge their arse outta the vampyrelfgothbloodthrone and come see me themselves.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
03-22-2006 23:15
Silly to regulate visitors and observers? Yes, to a degree. While observers wearing normal sized (or smaller) furry costumes shouldn't be restricted in my opinions, this with say..huge flashy wings, or standing 10 meters, etc should have to get to a 'normal' level. While a single feline walking by wouldn't distract me much, but a 20 meter furmech would detract too much form the rp environs.

Of course thats what I would do, and I don't own a sim.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here

I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid

You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
Buhamut Bligh
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 53
03-23-2006 17:28
Silly or not, dems teh rools. :)

This is really what SL is all about, doing and living the fantasies we can't ANYWHERE else. They just want to keep their fantasy pure and undisturbed. Be it by furries or modern techonolgy.

Sorry, one couldn't even call this furry discrimination. Robots, demons and maybe even goths need not apply. :P
Usagi Musashi
UM ™®
Join date: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 6,083
03-23-2006 19:01
From: Buhamut Bligh
Silly or not, dems teh rools. :)

This is really what SL is all about, doing and living the fantasies we can't ANYWHERE else.


Think about it?! people using live webcams to get real $?????? and at times BIG money for what i heard. And NO i don`t think Second Life had any real thought about reachin gto this low point. Sad indeed. :(
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
03-23-2006 20:23
'This low point'

I would say a Gorean sim (beautiful btw) is a HIGH point of SL..

I just choose not to do the Gor thing on SL.
_____________________
Good freebies here and here

I must protest. I am not a merry man! - Warf, ST: TNG, episode: Qpid

You killed my father. Prepare to die. - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride

You killed My father. Your a-- is mine! - Hellboy
Zoe Llewelyn
Asylum Inmate
Join date: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 502
03-24-2006 05:12
From: Torley Linden


I suppose someone could get an island for "Furry Goreans"--it isn't out of the question; this is Second Life, after all.



Its already planned and in the works actually. The sim is meant to represent an "Alternate Future" Gor set in a more sci-fi and cyberpunk themed period of Gorean history, and furries are more than welcome.

I discussed some methods for advertising the sim with the creator and owner just yesterday...so expect to be seeing information about it in SL soon.

Personally, I think its a great idea and offers a wonderful merging of three communities in SL that rarely ever mix...Gorean roleplay, Science Fiction roleplay, and the Furry community. I am looking forward to seeing how it goes.
_____________________
Jack Harker
Registered User
Join date: 4 May 2005
Posts: 552
03-24-2006 05:50
From: Gus Plisskin
Racism violates the TOS. Disallowing furries doesn't.


And how about sexism? I'm not seeing the difference.
1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 29