These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Stay Off My Property! |
|
|
Cunundrum Alcott
A Sardonic Pessimist
Join date: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 773
|
03-19-2008 13:37
As a native Californian I know how tricky those men can be..
_____________________
![]() |
|
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
|
03-19-2008 13:38
what we need is an area with banlines, 24 orbs--o-security-deth, 436 Face Lights, Lotsa Bling, American Idol Billboards, and a shouter. You forgot pregnant female avs with fetuses that talk to them - in chat! The most unarguable defense of Roe v. Wade I have ever encountered. |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-19-2008 13:42
As a native Californian I know how tricky those men can be.. I am a guy but I do tend to hang out in West Hollywood or Silverlake. ![]() _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
MoxZ Mokeev
Invisible Alpha Texture
Join date: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 870
|
03-19-2008 13:47
ok lets tighen this up... Do you add your residential neighbors to your Land access if you are using access controls? I don't give them access to my land but I have set the orb to group so my neighbors don't get orbited if they take a happy little yiffy fly around the sim. Oy feck! I can't believe I'm reading this whole thread! It would seem I'm wayyyyy behind. LOL Meh.... ![]() |
|
Trout Recreant
Public Enemy No. 1
Join date: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 4,873
|
03-19-2008 13:47
pics or it didn't happen Why this cracks me up, I have no idea, but nevertheless, I lol'ed. Can we not get into the whole I have rights, no you don't yes Idonoyoudon'tyesIdo...blah, blah, blah crap? It gets old. Respect others. If they don't want you on their land don't go there, and if you accidentally do, leave ASAP. It doesn't matter why they don't want you there. The end. Argument over. Now can we move on to something more pleasant? _____________________
A Trout Rating (tm) is something to cherish. To flaunt and be proud of. It is something all women should aspire to obtain! |
|
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
|
03-19-2008 13:54
Why this cracks me up, I have no idea, but nevertheless, I lol'ed. Can we not get into the whole I have rights, no you don't yes Idonoyoudon'tyesIdo...blah, blah, blah crap? It gets old. Respect others. If they don't want you on their land don't go there, and if you accidentally do, leave ASAP. It doesn't matter why they don't want you there. The end. Argument over. Now can we move on to something more pleasant? No, because there are too many people who want to milk their neighbor's cow - for free, of course. |
|
Cunundrum Alcott
A Sardonic Pessimist
Join date: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 773
|
03-19-2008 13:58
I looked up West Hollywood Men, this was the first thing I saw
![]() ![]() _____________________
![]() |
|
Trout Recreant
Public Enemy No. 1
Join date: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 4,873
|
03-19-2008 13:58
No, because there are too many people who want to milk their neighbor's cow - for free, of course. I don't want to milk my neighbor's cow. I want to grind it up into hamburger and have a giant BBQ - I'll invite my neighbor, of course. All I meant was that the argument has been done to death, and it's getting a little old. I wasn't taking a strong position one way or another. The facts are that a landowner has the ability to put up whatever security means they want and it's within the TOS, so it doesn't really matter why they want to do it. If you aren't wanted on someone's property, don't go there. It's as simple as that. We don't really need to argue about it. _____________________
A Trout Rating (tm) is something to cherish. To flaunt and be proud of. It is something all women should aspire to obtain! |
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
03-19-2008 13:58
No, because there are too many people who want to milk their neighbor's cow - for free, of course. you just had to bring Mari's neighbors into this. |
|
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
|
03-19-2008 14:00
We don't really need to argue about it. Um, you're familiar with us, right? We need to argue about everything. _____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things. Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut. |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
03-19-2008 14:03
I looked up West Hollywood Men, this was the first thing I saw ![]() ![]() Now who took that pic of me? _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Cunundrum Alcott
A Sardonic Pessimist
Join date: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 773
|
03-19-2008 14:04
Thats guacamole right? *gets chips*
_____________________
![]() |
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
03-19-2008 14:05
Nosir. I have three sims. My own home and I share The Lost Furest and Sables d'Alliez with my partner. I've never owned a security orb, I've never put a banline up. EVER. That is not the issue. The issue is this sense of self-entitlement that leads people to think that they can impose their nonexistant rights of land access over the already existant rights* of landowners. (Can we not get into the "You don't have rights" distraction, everyone? That's been done to death. Rights, in this instance, meaning the PAID FOR ability to do something, according to an agreement with Linden Labs. The landowner has this agreement with LL. The person that thinks that they should be allowed to go wherever they want, even though no one promised them this, does not.) You don't get to tell anyone what to do on their own land. You don't even get to ask why they want to do it. As I said, you don't have the moral authority to do this. I think that the majority of people who like me, wander about and explore SL do not have any expectation or concept of a "right" to go anywhere. My parcels have always been open. I have used eject/ban only twice in over a year. My parcels have been open because I choose to allow it. I don't consider that anyone has a right to come on them. I do absolutely have the option to close off my land with ban lines, uglify the neighbourhood and make things difficult for people passing through the neighbourhood. It is true that LL allows me to do this on land that I pay for. They allow it not because this is the best way or even a good way of doing things. They allow it by default as they haven't the brain/soul/resources to amend access restriction to work in less ham-fisted and less ugly way. Label what LL allow as a "right" for want of a better term. However, I don't believe that rights come independently of responsibilities. We have responsibilities towards other residents. It is irresponsible to put up ban lines that affect everyone in order to lock out a small minority of abusers. Anyone wanting to keep known avatars out can ban those avatars. Anyone wanting to keep people in general out can use a security orb, or a hive of bees, or a bunch of grannies with brooms. It's true that it takes a little more effort to set up a security orb, but that's where a sense of responsibility to society at large comes in. |
|
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
|
03-19-2008 14:06
I don't want to milk my neighbor's cow. I want to grind it up into hamburger and have a giant BBQ - I'll invite my neighbor, of course. All I meant was that the argument has been done to death, and it's getting a little old. I wasn't taking a strong position one way or another. The facts are that a landowner has the ability to put up whatever security means they want and it's within the TOS, so it doesn't really matter why they want to do it. If you aren't wanted on someone's property, don't go there. It's as simple as that. We don't really need to argue about it. Oh. I agree with you completely. Problem is, as someone pointed out earlier, there are always new people coming in who haven't seen the twenty gazillion other previous threads on the subject. They don't know the history, so we are doomed to repeat it. : ( Plus, there are people with personal agendas involved. |
|
Cunundrum Alcott
A Sardonic Pessimist
Join date: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 773
|
03-19-2008 14:08
I think I'd rather have a neighbor put up ban lines than ugly huge prims with awful landscape textures.
_____________________
![]() |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-19-2008 14:09
Oh. I agree with you completely. Problem is, as someone pointed out earlier, there are always new people coming in who haven't seen the twenty gazillion other previous threads on the subject. They don't know the history, so we are doomed to repeat it. : ( Plus, there are people with personal agendas involved. At least this thread got Mickey to come out of Hibernation. /me waves _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
|
03-19-2008 14:23
I'm out of the loop... Is it time for this one to come up again? Here. I'll fix the OP for you. What is the obsession with insisting that you should be allowed to go somewhere that someone pays good money for, when you clearly aren't? Moreover, what makes you think that you are entitled to pass judgement on someone whose proprty you want to use? Regardless of what folks can and can't do on the land, it's still someone else's property that they spend hard earned money on to pay for the ability to have some privacy, real or imagined, and do whatever they want. What ever THEY want. Not you. You don't get a say. When you pony up the bucks and get your own place, then you get to say what happens there. Until then, you don't get to tell anyone what they can and can't do on their own land. You don't even have the moral authority to question their motives. WHY they want to do things is, quite frankly, none of your business. Shoot! And the winner of this thread is Mr. Mickey McLuhan himself. Sir, you have my utmost respect. I've seen a few really good posts but this one rates up on top. As he mentioned, what's the obession with insisting you should be allowed where you don't belong. Or to pass judgement on someone who's land you wish to use or because they use whatever means they like to keep intruders off. Clearly, these indiviuals don't or won't comprehend people are entiltled to do as they wish with their property, especially when they're paying dollars for it. You don't owe anyone any explanation whatsoever for keeping unwanted people off your place. I especially love the last paragraph he posted above. This is custom made for TINKERBELLE who loves questioning why I do what I do with my land. Who called me paranoid for not wanting intruders on my land. This is for you, Tink, come get some! He not only fix the op as he said, he also fixed all the self proclaimed "explorers." |
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
03-19-2008 14:29
Oh. I agree with you completely. Problem is, as someone pointed out earlier, there are always new people coming in who haven't seen the twenty gazillion other previous threads on the subject. They don't know the history, so we are doomed to repeat it. : ( Plus, there are people with personal agendas involved. Here's a thought.. Don't post to any threads like this. ![]() |
|
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
|
03-19-2008 14:32
A while back there were just a small handful but as of late I have been seeing more and more people defend their right to keep unwanted intruders off their land. Good for you, you don't owe anyone anything.
I'm so touched. /wipes away tear. |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-19-2008 14:33
And the winner of this thread is Mr. Mickey McLuhan himself. Sir, you have my utmost respect. I've seen a few really good posts but this one rates up on top. As he mentioned, what's the obession with insisting you should be allowed where you don't belong. Or to pass judgement on someone who's land you wish to use or because they use whatever means they like to keep intruders off. Clearly, these indiviuals don't or won't comprehend people are entiltled to do as they wish with their property, especially when they're paying dollars for it. You don't owe anyone any explanation whatsoever for keeping unwanted people off your place. I especially love the last paragraph he posted above. This is custom made for TINKERBELLE who loves questioning why I do what I do with my land. Who called me paranoid for not wanting intruders on my land. This is for you, Tink, come get some! He not only fix the op as he said, he also fixed all the self proclaimed "explorers." /me elbows Ricardo.....Mickey is a She. ![]() _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
03-19-2008 14:33
I'm so touched. I've always thought so...... _____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com |
|
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
|
03-19-2008 14:45
He enjoys pissing people off unapologetically as himself, he wouldn't stoop to hiding behind an Alt. You know me well. |
|
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
|
03-19-2008 14:46
He he,,yeah, they play right into his hands, don't they? Yes, usually. Don't you just love it? |
|
Ricardo Harris
Registered User
Join date: 1 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
|
03-19-2008 14:47
/me elbows Ricardo.....Mickey is a She. ![]() Oops. Sorry about that, Mickey. Wow, felt very strange using that word. But post was so good I've made an exception just this once. |
|
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
|
03-19-2008 14:47
...... As he mentioned, what's the obession with insisting you should be allowed where you don't belong. Or to pass judgement on someone who's land you wish to use or because they use whatever means they like to keep intruders off....... What's the obsession with insisting that anybody is demanding to be allowed here they don't belong? It's like some demented securocrat fixation. There are no hordes of barbarians/triffids that require a fence of shiny red lines to keep them out. The obsession you mention is one of your own imagination. Its not real. There is no body of people with the obsession that you imagine. From memory, there has been only one (possibly two?) poster(s) in all of there threads who claimed some sort of right to go anywhere. I'd class them as either unreasonable or trolling. What's the obsession with putting quotes around """""""""""""""""explorers""""""""""""""" in order to implicitly label passerbys as abusive intruders? What's the obsession with living in a world where every stranger is assumed to be a threat? Are your lives so sad and empty that you need to manufacture threats? Have you been brainwashed by the negativity of TV news programs? |