Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

a Newbie with a Kid avvie

Jessica Robertson
Registered User
Join date: 3 Dec 2004
Posts: 412
01-25-2005 08:33
Personal fantasies are fine, everyone has them.

The sexual exploitation of children, even simulated, is not.

I can assure you, If LL choses to accept this behavior (and by 'accept this behavior' I mean turn a blind eye and not do anything) I will spend my 10 dollars a month somewhere else, and I hope others feel the same way. Yes, this is a society which has no limits, but there are connections between SL and RL. This behavior should not be allowed, in any way, shape, form, or fashion to happen and/or continue. I can't even believe that this topic is up for public debate in the forums.

I would really like to know what LL's stance on this issue is.

I stand by my original post. Censorship for this kind of activity, absolutely. It should not be allowed. Seek Professional Help.

Jess
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
01-25-2005 08:36
From: Talen Morgan
not afraid about any fantasy....I get angered though by asshats that have fantasies about children. Although you don't act out your harsh fantasies others do....just the other day I saw a pic on a website of someone cutting their penis off becaue it turned them on....hey if thats your thing go at it....but children are a different story.


...

...


...ow... :eek:
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
01-25-2005 08:37
From: Kyrah Abattoir
its where my perception of things and yours cannot match, because its not an adult behind the child AV, so you must agree you dont care if its an adult or not, but only the picture disturb you, and then it has again nothing to do with pedophilia.

and as its a consensual relation, there is no sense of rape or anything, wich is the pedophilia problem (well for some peoples its more because they believe childrens have nothing to do with sex)

looks like its a pointless debate


it is pointless if you belive as the original poster does. They stated they enjoy a Japanese form of animated man/boy sex.


Pedophilia is not defined as just the sexual act of raping a child. It encompases FANTASIES of doing so.

Pedophile: According to the American Psychiatric Association: "A person who over at least a 6 month period has recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (age 13 years or younger). The fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children. Not to include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12 or 13 year old (straight or gay). Individuals with pedophilia generally report an attraction to children of a particular age range. Some individuals prefer males, others prefer females, and some are aroused by both males and females. Pedophila involving female victims is reported more than pedophilia involving male victims." 1

Pedophila: A condition in which an adult, usually male, is sexually attracted primarily to pre-pubertal children -- those aged 13 years or under. It is derived from two Greek words: ''pedo" means "child;" and "philia" means "love for." Most are attracted to children in a specific age group (e.g. 5 or 6). Fewer are attracted to young people of any age up to puberty.
Moleculor Satyr
Fireflies!
Join date: 5 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,650
01-25-2005 08:37
From: Reitsuki Kojima
A couple points.

In general (There are always a few exceptions), Furry AV's aren't "Animals", per say, any more than, oh... A Faerie AV is a butterfly because it has wings and antenna. Furries are sentient, adult (Well, normally) humanoids that have some animalistic features and traits. Your a DnD'er, so think of a furry as a Gnoll. A human having sex with a Gnoll may be disturbing, but it's not beastality just because a gnoll happens to look like the bastard child of Ross Perot and a cocker spaniel.


And an adult who dresses up in childrens clothing is no more a child than a wolf in sheep's clothing eats grass and goes "baaaa".

From: someone
Now, if someone had sex with someone wearing Cubey's zebra AV, yes, that would be beastality, I guess, or at least VR-Beastiality.


You really think so? I don't. But ok. A person in a zebra costume is not an animal, no matter how much they walk around on all fours.
_____________________
</sarcasm>
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-25-2005 08:38
From: Jessica Robertson

The sexual exploitation of children, even simulated, is not.



yup.
_____________________
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
01-25-2005 08:38
From: Reitsuki Kojima
...

...


...ow... :eek:



He actually cut the head off and held it in his palm like it was a mushroom cap.....makes me wince ....he was also missing other extremities....obviously his fantasy involved amputation :eek:
Robin Linden
Linden Lifer
Join date: 25 Nov 2002
Posts: 1,224
01-25-2005 08:42
It should be very clear that child pornography, or engaging in any act which is illegal in the real world, is not allowed in Second Life (Terms of Service, 5.1(iii) states: users will not take any action or upload, post, e-mail or otherwise transmit Content that violates any law or regulation). If we suspect any instance of child pornography or exploitation in SL, we will report it immediately to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
_____________________
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
01-25-2005 08:45
From: Moleculor Satyr
And an adult who dresses up in childrens clothing is no more a child than a wolf in sheep's clothing eats grass and goes "baaaa".


Your missing the key difference, though, I think. Furries aren't even pretending to be animals, is the thing... So it's not beastiality in any form, even sim-beastaility.

From: Moleculor Satyr
You really think so? I don't. But ok. A person in a zebra costume is not an animal, no matter how much they walk around on all fours.


That's why I said VR-beastaility :) No, of course it isn't 'real'.
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
01-25-2005 08:46
From: Robin Linden
It should be very clear that child pornography, or engaging in any act which is illegal in the real world, is not allowed in Second Life (Terms of Service, 5.1(iii) states: users will not take any action or upload, post, e-mail or otherwise transmit Content that violates any law or regulation). If we suspect any instance of child pornography or exploitation in SL, we will report it immediately to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

I think this says it all. Bravo Robin thank you.
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Liona Clio
Angel in Disguise
Join date: 30 Aug 2004
Posts: 1,500
01-25-2005 08:47
Just to point out, for some people innocence is very cherished...not because they want to violate it or desecrate it...but because they see the joie de vive that the innocent has within them.

Sex with children is a total desecration of this innocence, and that is indisputable, IMHO. But I can understand where the cherising of childhood comes from. Lewis Carrol, J.M. Barrie...and yes, even the oft-maligned Michael Jackson all felt more comfortable with kids than with grown-ups. That doesn't make them pedophiles...yet a lot of people want to brand them as such by simple association.

I'm not saying that this excuses molestation or anything...but I do feel people are quick to judge adults who easily interact with children.
_____________________
"Well, my days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle."
David Valentino
Nicely Wicked
Join date: 1 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,941
01-25-2005 08:47
If the sex or simulated sex is between two consenting adults, then it is fine. You can roleplay child/parent or whatever else you want. And no, pixels are NOT child pornography, nor is anime. No child is involved, thus no "child" in the child pornography. Does it encourage child molestation? I really doubt it, since most people sick and harsh enough to actually do something like that to a child would probably not need any encouragement. But who knows..?

While I would kill anyone that touched my son in an innapropriate manner, or severly beat any child molester I ran across, I still believe roleplaying between consenting adults is thier business and thier right. As long as one is able to seperate fantasy from reality, and act in a responsible way, then live and let live.

Also, on a side note, not that many years back in human history, 13 years old was the acceptable marrying age, right or wrong. However, I strongly stress that any sexual activity, even roleplaying, AV sex and cyber, take place only between consenting adults.
_____________________
David Lamoreaux

Owner - Perilous Pleasures and Extreme Erotica Gallery
Kyrah Abattoir
cruelty delight
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,786
01-25-2005 08:48
From: Robin Linden
It should be very clear that child pornography, or engaging in any act which is illegal in the real world, is not allowed in Second Life (Terms of Service, 5.1(iii) states: users will not take any action or upload, post, e-mail or otherwise transmit Content that violates any law or regulation). If we suspect any instance of child pornography or exploitation in SL, we will report it immediately to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.


wich mean what exactly?
there is no child in SL

i second your point David
_____________________

tired of XStreetSL? try those!
apez http://tinyurl.com/yfm9d5b
metalife http://tinyurl.com/yzm3yvw
metaverse exchange http://tinyurl.com/yzh7j4a
slapt http://tinyurl.com/yfqah9u
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
01-25-2005 08:50
From: Lecktor Hannibal
I think this says it all. Bravo Robin thank you.


Actually, unfortunatly, it doesn't adress the point at all... Thus far, thankfully, nobody has had the gall to suggest involving real child pornography, which is what Robin seems to have been talking about
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
01-25-2005 08:51
From: Liona Clio
Just to point out, for some people innocence is very cherished...not because they want to violate it or desecrate it...but because they see the joie de vive that the innocent has within them.

Sex with children is a total desecration of this innocence, and that is indisputable, IMHO. But I can understand where the cherising of childhood comes from. Lewis Carrol, J.M. Barrie...and yes, even the oft-maligned Michael Jackson all felt more comfortable with kids than with grown-ups. That doesn't make them pedophiles...yet a lot of people want to brand them as such by simple association.

I'm not saying that this excuses molestation or anything...but I do feel people are quick to judge adults who easily interact with children.


Any adult that wants to be around children such as Michaell Jackson does.....has a problem. He goes on trial soon they'll be picking the jusr next week. Supposedly they found some child porn in his house so we'll see.

There were major concerns about Lewis Carrol by his peers as well.

I easily interact with children but I don't have them around me 24/7 and I certainy don't sleep in the same bed with them like Jackson does.....he admits to doing this and he called it a beautiful thing.....makes ya wonder.
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
01-25-2005 08:52
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Actually, unfortunatly, it doesn't adress the point at all... Thus far, thankfully, nobody has had the gall to suggest involving real child pornography, which is what Robin seems to have been talking about

Well, the aforementioned article in the SL Herald involve a build in world. The build contained anime 'depicting' child pornography and was dealt with and removed from world by the Lindens. I disagree with you and still say Robin addressed this thread entirely.
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
01-25-2005 08:54
From: Lecktor Hannibal
Well, the aforementioned article in the SL Herald involve a build in world. The build contained anime 'depicting' child pornography and was dealt with and removed from world by the Lindens. I disagree with you and still say Robin addressed this thread entirely.


Actually, in a followup post on that article, it turns out the lindens didn't remove it, it was taken down by it's creator.
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
01-25-2005 08:54
From: Reitsuki Kojima
Actually, in a followup post on that article, it turns out the lindens didn't remove it, it was taken down by it's creator.

Ahh, missed that.
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Kyrah Abattoir
cruelty delight
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,786
01-25-2005 08:56
anime child porn is even harder to detect you know, mainly because the child porn and lolita porn separtation line is ... thin and blurry
_____________________

tired of XStreetSL? try those!
apez http://tinyurl.com/yfm9d5b
metalife http://tinyurl.com/yzm3yvw
metaverse exchange http://tinyurl.com/yzh7j4a
slapt http://tinyurl.com/yfqah9u
Moleculor Satyr
Fireflies!
Join date: 5 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,650
01-25-2005 08:57
From: Lecktor Hannibal
Well, the aforementioned article in the SL Herald involve a build in world. The build contained anime 'depicting' child pornography and was dealt with and removed from world by the Lindens. I disagree with you and still say Robin addressed this thread entirely.


The reason LL would have removed said images was because they were in full view of passers-by, which is a violation of content rules, so Robin has said nothing about this thread.
_____________________
</sarcasm>
Kyrah Abattoir
cruelty delight
Join date: 4 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,786
01-25-2005 08:58
then we are a bit going off topic
_____________________

tired of XStreetSL? try those!
apez http://tinyurl.com/yfm9d5b
metalife http://tinyurl.com/yzm3yvw
metaverse exchange http://tinyurl.com/yzh7j4a
slapt http://tinyurl.com/yfqah9u
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
01-25-2005 08:59
From: David Valentino
If the sex or simulated sex is between two consenting adults, then it is fine. You can roleplay child/parent or whatever else you want. And no, pixels are NOT child pornography, nor is anime. No child is involved, thus no "child" in the child pornography. Does it encourage child molestation? I really doubt it, since most people sick and harsh enough to actually do something like that to a child would probably not need any encouragement. But who knows..?

While I would kill anyone that touched my son in an innapropriate manner, or severly beat any child molester I ran across, I still believe roleplaying between consenting adults is thier business and thier right. As long as one is able to seperate fantasy from reality, and act in a responsible way, then live and let live.

Also, on a side note, not that many years back in human history, 13 years old was the acceptable marrying age, right or wrong. However, I strongly stress that any sexual activity, even roleplaying, AV sex and cyber, take place only between consenting adults.



Research has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that molestors don't start with the act...they start with fantasising and certain materilas depicting the act....not in every case but the vast majority. I have no problem with role playing but the way the origial poster worded the post disturbed me and then to find out they enjoy a particular anime of the act didn't make me any less disturbed.

Yes, I know it is just drawings .....but it is much more than that .....I know many people that have anime and comic books but they don't enjoy seeing adults with children depicted in drawings.
Roberta Dalek
Probably trouble
Join date: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 1,174
01-25-2005 09:01
From: Robin Linden
It should be very clear that child pornography, or engaging in any act which is illegal in the real world, is not allowed in Second Life (Terms of Service, 5.1(iii) states: users will not take any action or upload, post, e-mail or otherwise transmit Content that violates any law or regulation). If we suspect any instance of child pornography or exploitation in SL, we will report it immediately to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.


What about those who aren't American? Surely the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children only covers the US?
Lecktor Hannibal
YOUR MOM
Join date: 1 Jul 2004
Posts: 6,734
01-25-2005 09:01
From: Moleculor Satyr
The reason LL would have removed said images was because they were in full view of passers-by, which is a violation of content rules, so Robin has said nothing about this thread.

Very well you win. Feeling non-combative today. :o
_____________________
YOUR MOM says, 'Come visit us at SC MKII http://secondcitizen.net '

From: Khamon Fate
Oh, Lecktor, you're terrible.

Bikers have more fun than people !
Ingrid Ingersoll
Archived
Join date: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,601
01-25-2005 09:02
From: David Valentino
And no, pixels are NOT child pornography


But they are representations of children. You don't find this wrong?
_____________________
Moleculor Satyr
Fireflies!
Join date: 5 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,650
01-25-2005 09:04
From: Talen Morgan
Research has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that molestors don't start with the act...they start with fantasising and certain materilas depicting the act....not in every case but the vast majority.


So what?

Link me to an article/research paper that shows that REMOVING the chance of fantasies or materials depecting such decreases the likelyhood of someone acting on such impulses, and THEN you'll have a point. Until then, all you've just stated is that 99% of people who die in plane crashes ate peas at one point in their life, and therefore eating peas causes plane crashes.

From: Ingrid Ingersoll
But they are representations of children. You don't find this wrong?


But they're not.

They're a representation of an adult pretending to be a child.

I guess some of us can seperate reality from fantasy a bit easier than others. *shrug*
_____________________
</sarcasm>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14