Is Religion allowed in School?
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 17:00
In other threads the ideas concerning Intelligent design versus the world view of science has been the topic. In this thread I'd like to explore whether teaching religion is wrong or against the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Most have heard the term "Seperation of Church and State". I contend there is no such seperation found withing the Constitution.
The Constitution is a leash on Government, not on the people.
|
Chance Abattoir
Future Rockin' Resmod
Join date: 3 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,898
|
11-05-2005 17:19
From: Kevn Klein In other threads the ideas concerning Intelligent design versus the world view of science has been the topic. In this thread I'd like to explore whether teaching religion is wrong or against the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Most have hear the term "Seperation of Church and State". I contend there is no such seperation found withing the Constitution.
The Constitution is a leash on Government, not on the people. When the school is run by the government, how do you decide whose religion will be taught? To answer the question of the thread, not in public school.
_____________________
"The mob requires regular doses of scandal, paranoia and dilemma to alleviate the boredom of a meaningless existence." -Insane Ramblings, Anton LaVey
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 17:22
From: Chance Abattoir When the school is run by the government, how do you decide whose religion will be taught?
To answer the question of the thread, not in public school. All major religions should be taught.
|
Chance Abattoir
Future Rockin' Resmod
Join date: 3 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,898
|
11-05-2005 17:24
From: Kevn Klein All major religions should be taught. MAJOR? So in the U.S. that means one. Great use of democracy.
_____________________
"The mob requires regular doses of scandal, paranoia and dilemma to alleviate the boredom of a meaningless existence." -Insane Ramblings, Anton LaVey
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 17:25
From: Chance Abattoir MAJOR? So in the U.S. that means one. Great use of democracy. All major World religions, the top 10 or so.
|
Chance Abattoir
Future Rockin' Resmod
Join date: 3 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,898
|
11-05-2005 17:32
From: Kevn Klein All major World religions, the top 10 or so. lol. Anyway, if we can fire public school teachers for being Communists, I think it's safe to say that we can ban teachers teaching kids to value a belief systems that rewards victimhood and inaction, and glorifies ultimate nihilism.
_____________________
"The mob requires regular doses of scandal, paranoia and dilemma to alleviate the boredom of a meaningless existence." -Insane Ramblings, Anton LaVey
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 17:41
From: Chance Abattoir lol.
Anyway, if we can fire public school teachers for being Communists, I think it's safe to say that we can ban teachers teaching kids to value a belief systems that rewards victimhood and inaction, and glorifies ultimate nihilism. What part of the constitution allows the government to sensor teachers opinions? Whare does it say religion can't be taught?
|
Lianne Marten
Cheese Baron
Join date: 6 May 2004
Posts: 2,192
|
11-05-2005 17:52
Teaching religion isn't wrong. If it's just the history behind those religions and how they are treated today in regards to demographics and different sects of the religion, that's fine.
If any value judgements get put into the lesson though, it would open up a whole can of worms regarding students who feel offended by a possible misrepresentation, students who don't share the beliefs of the majority of other students and as such feel intimidated and left out... etc. Doing that just causes too many problems for the administration and the teacher would prolly be told to quit it or get fired.
|
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
|
11-05-2005 17:54
My goodness Batman, I've never seen such a gigantic can of worms!
|
Lianne Marten
Cheese Baron
Join date: 6 May 2004
Posts: 2,192
|
11-05-2005 17:57
|
Zuzu Fassbinder
Little Miss No Tomorrow
Join date: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,048
|
11-05-2005 17:57
From: Kevn Klein All major World religions, the top 10 or so. So, for christianity it would probably be Catholicism, right? I mean, we wouldn't want to mess with the minor denomination's views since they woudlnt be in the top 10.
_____________________
From: Bud I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.
|
Roland Hauptmann
Registered User
Join date: 29 Oct 2005
Posts: 323
|
11-05-2005 18:05
It's ok to teach religion from a historical perspective.. not from a scientific one.
For instance, knowing the historical aspects of Jesus are valid to teach, because he was one of the most important historical figures in history... But when you start talking about him being the son of god, you're over the line.
|
Tai Kongo
Registered User
Join date: 9 Apr 2005
Posts: 4
|
11-05-2005 18:08
From: Zuzu Fassbinder So, for christianity it would probably be Catholicism, right? I mean, we wouldn't want to mess with the minor denomination's views since they woudlnt be in the top 10. No, Catholicism isn't the biggest. Tho it would be in the top ten, seperate from say Protestant (protesters of Catholicism).
|
Tai Kongo
Registered User
Join date: 9 Apr 2005
Posts: 4
|
11-05-2005 18:10
From: Roland Hauptmann It's ok to teach religion from a historical perspective.. not from a scientific one.
For instance, knowing the historical aspects of Jesus are valid to teach, because he was one of the most important historical figures in history... But when you start talking about him being the son of god, you're over the line. Catholicism is not a Christian faith to many Christians.
|
Zuzu Fassbinder
Little Miss No Tomorrow
Join date: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,048
|
11-05-2005 18:15
From: Tai Kongo Catholicism is not a Christian faith to many Christians. ROFLMAO
_____________________
From: Bud I don't want no commies in my car. No Christians either.
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-05-2005 18:21
I see no problem with a Religious Studies class as part of High School or College curriculum as long as it's an elective.
~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-05-2005 18:22
From: Kevn Klein All major World religions, the top 10 or so. Oh, Kevn. What you lack in brain power you sure make up for in gumption.  ~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 18:22
From: Ulrika Zugzwang I see no problem with a Religious Studies class as part of High School or College curriculum as long as it's an elective.
~Ulrika~ I'm talkng about grade school. From first grade up.
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 18:24
From: Ulrika Zugzwang Oh, Kevn. What you lack in brain power you sure make up for in gumption.  ~Ulrika~ I'll take that as a compliment, the cup is half full 
|
Lianne Marten
Cheese Baron
Join date: 6 May 2004
Posts: 2,192
|
11-05-2005 18:27
From: Kevn Klein I'm talkng about grade school. From first grade up. Thing about that is, elementary school kids can't choose what classes they want to take.
|
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
|
11-05-2005 18:33
From: Lianne Marten Thing about that is, elementary school kids can't choose what classes they want to take. It would be World religions, in one class.
|
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
11-05-2005 19:00
From: Kevn Klein In other threads the ideas concerning Intelligent design versus the world view of science has been the topic. In this thread I'd like to explore whether teaching religion is wrong or against the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Most have heard the term "Seperation of Church and State". I contend there is no such seperation found withing the Constitution.
The Constitution is a leash on Government, not on the people. From: someone The Constitution of the United States
Article VI, Section 3: “...no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...”
Now onto the words of our founding fathers :From: someone Thomas Jefferson interpreted the 1st Amendment in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in January 1, 1802:
"I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State."
Some Religious activists try to extricate the concept of separation between church and State by claiming that those words do not occur in the Constitution. Indeed they do not, but neither does it exactly say "freedom of religion," yet the First Amendment implies both.
As Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom:
"Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."
James Madison objected to state-supported chaplains in Congress and to the exemption of churches from taxation. He wrote:
"Religion and government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together."
From: someone In a sermon of October 1831, Episcopalian minister Bird Wilson said,
Among all of our Presidents, from Washington downward, not one was a professor of religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism. A litte more light reading from our founding fathers :From: someone John Adams signed the Treaty of Tripoli. Article 11 states:
The Government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.
James Madison, introducing the Bill of Rights at the First Federal Congress, Congressional Register, June 8, 1789:
"[The] civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner or on any pretext infringed."
John Adams - Adams, a Unitarian, flatly denied the doctrine of eternal damnation. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson, he wrote:
"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses. "
James Madison, letter to Robert Walsh, March 2, 1819
"The Civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the Church from the State."
Current References found:I'd have to say based on all my research over the years, those who founded the Constitution would probably puke and raise hell at the thought of religion and state mixing. Most were deists who hated religion. So in a nutshell is it unconstitutional that religion should be separate from the state? I suppose you would base that on an interpretation of the Constitution itself. I personally have found it easier to comprehend over the years, after learning about and understanding those who wrote it. 
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
Siro Mfume
XD
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 747
|
11-05-2005 19:01
If you're doing only the top 10 (and you're one of those people who counts atheism or lack of a belief as some kind of organized belief) you'd use this list: http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.htmlOf which, Judaism is 12, so we'd have a tad difficulty explaining how the #1 came about. I can't wait for my kids to learn Juche I highly recommend wandering around the site I have referenced. You can easily see the USA is in no danger of losing religion. We're one of the countries with the fewest atheists(or agnostics/secularists, whatever you wanna call it) out there. So your churches are doing their job without being in school.
|
Ulrika Zugzwang
Magnanimous in Victory
Join date: 10 Jun 2004
Posts: 6,382
|
11-05-2005 19:06
Wonderful post, Pendari!
~Ulrika~
_____________________
Chik-chik-chika-ahh
|
Ghoti Nyak
καλλιστι
Join date: 7 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,078
|
11-05-2005 19:09
I agree with the Founding Fathers.  -Ghoti
_____________________
"Sometimes I believe that this less material life is our truer life, and that our vain presence on the terraqueous globe is itself the secondary or merely virtual phenomenon." ~ H.P. Lovecraft
|