Ban Child Avatars Being Used for Sexual Purposes

I'm not skilled enough to have done anything so dramatic as to blow up anything at all within SL... but if my threads may cause some perverts some grief, then perhaps all the posts saying that my posting here is not going to have any affect are premature.

seriously --call your therapist.

I'm sure Osama feels that same sense of pride when the Infidels are struck at.

While specifying, you did not change my original argument. In fact, you supported it.

The percentage of destroyed eggs here is meaningless, considering it's as if they never existed. We're discussing fertility.

The reasoning would be the same, either way. You're more suggesting that women are more likely to get pregnant from sex in a certain time span because of regularity (accurate), but that does not eliminate their fertility overall. We're still talking the timespan where women are most likely to concieve, which would be a span from 16-25 basically, combined with fascination with the female form.

So one way or the other, your post supports that women have reason to be sexually appealing from the age of 9 to their mid-twenties. The original crux of my post.

That's where your argument falls apart because as much as you may want to classify everyone who'd engage in such behavior as a pedophile who'd like to take their fantasy into the real world there's simply no rational basis for it. It's exactly the same as someone playing mafia hitman or a psychopathic robot... unless of course you believe in the concept of guilty until proven innocent. Roleplay is roleplay, period. You can't judge the mental state of the participants based on your own distaste. It's simply not logical.

You go one believing that and maybe it will make it so...

*edited*

Turning off the computer would be a better first step.

Please answer the question instead of avoiding it.

I would expect real pedophiles to argue in any venue where they happened to be. But that doesn't mean I think they're on this forum posting comments in these threads. Yet you specifically say "here" as if that's significant. You also used the word "obviously" reinforcing "here". Hence the question you're not answering.

It's a simple question. Please answer it.

Similar to bella, Osama probably also has some misplaced blame problems that vent themselves through action and words.

Well, maybe not AS misplaced but still expressed poorly.

bella, crusading to change a virtual world that is having no effect on anything isn't going to make up for anything or prevent anything from happening to anyone else. Dr. Phillip McGraw has a network of people that look for RL paedophiles. If you want to make retribution and influence a part of your continual recovery and an expression of your compassion, I'd suggest writing his show and expressing your interest.

But don't grief people here any further just because you don't like how they think behind an alias on their own time, without affecting RL.

I don't see your point. Either we have laws or not, whether someone can get around the law in some fashion doesn't mean we can't write the law... Banks are still robbed and people are still murdered... personal freedom does not mean lawlessness.

I would say, unless you have proof that anyone here is a pedophile, that all you are doing is libeling a whole ton of people in an attempt to discredit them.

Ironic, no?

ok, I have to admit that I'm only skimming now but what the hell has menstruation got to do with avatars, child or otherwise?

More, "fertile at all" would be the proper design of the argument.

You're deluding yourself if you think we don't get the breeding drive going the moment it's possible, as a survival instinct.

The terms "if it can bleed, it can breed", "if there's grass on the field, play ball", and the prevalence of social humor involving whether or not someone is "legal" are sociological expressions of this.

But, fascism is diametricly opposed to personal freedom.

As was put so thoughtfully and eloquently earlier in this thread. SL does not exist in a vacuum. An adult who gets off having his adult avatar have sex with an avatar that is clearly and admittedly (as in the profile says, I am an 8-year-old raccoon, like the one I saw) a furry, is actively living out a fantasy of animal rape. He is getting off on the sexual images he is actively causing to appear on his computer screen. At the same time, he is living in the real world where there are real animals who cannot protect themselves if he chooses to take that fantasy a step further.

In game, most people taking part in sexual activites are living out fantasy that they would like to live out in rl... To pretend that it is even slightly possible for a person to get off on watching an adult avatar have sex with a furry avatar and not have a propensity for that behavior is moronic.

Shooter games and other fantasy games that include killing and maiming are not the same thing because they don't include a channel into sexual desires, they feed a different urge. Playing games where you are a protagonist or an antagonist in a world where everyone is out to kill/stop you is a situation where there is an understood theme and the game is about skill and drama. As a rational adult, one could find playing a role as a mafia hitman or a psychopathic robot while a wealth of challenges are thrown at you, to be simple entertainment. As a rational adult, one could not find engaging a small furry in sexual intercourse as something remotely entertaining. You would have to be a zoophile or metally ill in some way to want to engage in that behavior.

seems you never felt the pleasure of killing a virtual person with a shovel ^^

I just want the trains to run on time and be free of perverts.

Thank you, that is one I haven't written to yet about this behavior on SL... I'll get right to it.

Don't be too hurt when he laughs at you a bit and explains the difference between "age-play" and child abuse.

Not to mention, 150 years ago, when people lived to around the ripe old age of 40 something (vs. today's age of 70 something), they were married off a much younger age than would be acceptible today. On that topic, google the age of consent laws, you may be a bit shocked by what is actually allowed. I know I was.

DISCLAIMER: THIS POST DOES NOT MEAN I AM A PEDOPHILE OR THAT I AM DEFENDING THEM. PLEASE WHEN YOU CONSIDER IT, TRY TO DO SO WITH THE CONTEXT OF CORVUS' POINT IN MIND.

I'd say that someone expressing an amoral fantasy through a virtual reality with another, consenting individual is a healthy activity, not an unhealthy one. In fact, it may prevent someone from really trying it.

Taking that fantasy into RL is entirely the personal responsibility of the person doing so, with all reprocussions coming from it.

As heinous as child rape is, it's still a crime like any other, and obesance to the punitive system designed for those crimes.

Reverting to the original argument, since no children are involved in these actions on SL, no child rape is occurring...

As a CTA rider, I have to agree.

Nevermind that, how about smacking them upside the head with a toilet, like in HL2 multiplayer using the gravity gun?

I mean, how much more of a shitty deal can you get than getting killed by a toilet? People shouldn't have to take that crap, it's a piss-poor way to die, and unlike in SL, TP won't save you.

Thanks for taking my post and editing it without noting what you were doing. I'm sure even the posters here how dislike me might think that is out of line.

In terms of "furries," I don't understand that but furries don't exist in real life... I would argue that yes, anyone who is fantasizing about having sex with a furry for some reason other than being funny, would probably get off on having sex with a person dressed in a furry costume. Do you disagree?

Oh wait... not that I recall, there was a show on HBO that featured adults dressed in furry costumes having sex... so yes, it does lead to that.

In fact, go on his show for it. Give us the airing date, we'll all tune in.