Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Upcoming Changes for Adult Content: Geographical Separation of Adult Content

Wynochee LeShelle
Polykontexturalist
Join date: 3 Feb 2007
Posts: 658
03-15-2009 10:55
Several universities, metropoles and rl-companies are represented in game. So far no complainings from them about problems with mature/adult impressions. This can have 2 possible reasons: at hour they're baking complex cakes for an PG event, or they are busy on a campus-orgy.

It seems LL is lost and lonely with its idea...

I see no support from the commercial or educational target groups, hehehe ;-)
Gunslinger Jackalope
Registered User
Join date: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 2
03-15-2009 11:27
From: Jp Linden
We’ve carefully researched the anticipated impact the geographically separate Adult “mainland” will have, and our goal is to provide Adult goods or service providers the means to continue their activities without long-term disruption or loss of business. In the coming months, we will announce the plan to help the affected Residents and Merchants get set up on the new mainland. While this move will only be required of mainland Residents who wish to continue to provide Adult content or engage in Adult activity, estate owners with Adult content on their land will also be required to flag their estate appropriately. Estate owners or tenants will not be required to move to the new Adult mainland, though certain estate tenants wishing to reside on a parcel of a maturity setting appropriate to their desired activity may need to move to an appropriately flagged private estate.

What is important for us to consider in this regard from a Resident perspective?


From what i have gathered reading Linden Informational posts, and some (not all) replies, they are attempting to isolate PUBLIC sexual (actual active concensual sexual acts) like sex beaches and such from being "accidently" seen by someone that is TPing from shop to shop and or out casually exploring. They are also, it seems, concerned with "coorporate" entities not wanting to spend money on SL Land because they "might" find people (lets be blunt) fucking in their office building.

Another option I have had an ephinany on during my light nap - Make a coorporate / G Sim instead of an adult sim.

Benefits to this...MUCH MUCH MUCH less lag created on what would be a new mainland than what would happen on a new adult scripts enabled mainland ( which wont work, btw...no one would be there due to the lag leading to a MAJOR loss of monies not to the vendors, but to you at linden labs as the far reaching implications will be someone else starting a new game that allows and is dedicated to adult play actions - not a great business strategy in the long run but hey, this IS your business ( and yes, if that happens, i will be taking my sim and going there where i dont have to acquiesce to the moral majority and their overt attempts at forcing me into their ranks with legal threatening and inablility to police their children because they are more interested in controlling my johnson)
I understand you penchant for making this a "friendlier" and "safer" environment - which sounds to me like one of your lawyers is a prudish force my values on the world and anyone who is a nudist is a perverted sex offender thinker - but this move anything even remotely sexually pornographic in nature mentality to a special area will, in the long run, make SL a "dead" planet, as people will leave in droves when ( not if...when, cause someone will make a new game similiar to this one if they havent already and i just havent heard of it) leading to your eventual collapse, which could be traced back to this single event of telling adults that we, as a group, are not intelligent enuff to act like adults and allowing those few who have chosen to not learn tolerence and where the tp button is to take control. My main thought is...did they walk to the :offending: sites? Or...did they TP in and forgot how to TP out?

Another option....simply police your rules and lands. But, considering you will not ( please note...not can not but will not) police griefers, bots and bot makers, spammers, ad farms, gambling casinos, people assaulting others randomly, stalkers, harassment in IMs and or chat, and i am sure i mised a few others...why should we expect you to enforce any other rules and or TOS additions you make? I was a security agnet at one time for multiple sims...and the ONE time i asked a Linden for help, and actually got it, I was treated as a inconvenience and an irritant...where i thought i WAS the reason for th support and not a cause of it. Seems your support people have forgotten the basic concept of the customer is the reason we are getting paid, not the cause of the problem. WHile i will not agree the customer is always right, I will say the customer should have the higher priority than building some linden tower or another realistic plant. BTW ... everything i stated above, I have had to deal with personally without linden help because when asked to help, they were ALL ignored - totally - with the exception of the one event stated where i was accused of harassing the linden by asking for help.

I almost hope someone DOES make a new game based off this one where adults are expected to be adults, and children are not welcome. If i want my kids here with me, I wouldnt BE here...i would find another venue to share with them, or heaven forbid...if i had children and wanted to spend time with them, get off my lazy ass and take them to a park where we COULD play games safely without them seeing a couple screwing in a tree.

Someone let me know when the attempt to tell me that the religious zealots and their attempt to control us is over, so i can get back to having a free and simple life without thought control being a part of it.
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
03-15-2009 11:59
From: Alisha Matova
IIf you really think it through, this is part of the "clean up" plan. To get customers to a "non adult" store, one has to clean up the *whole* island. This will result is many many clean PG shopping sims that fit SLs new image perfectly...


If it is the case that an island has to be set to adult for every parcel, then yes this is backdoor cleaning up and I guess those residents who run adult ventures on estate land will get no help from LL.
Marlenus Constantine
Registered User
Join date: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Just a simple question...
03-15-2009 12:08
I'm not happy to read about LL geographically putting 'Adult' 'things' someplace else. Didn't they JUST say they were closing down the Teen Grid? WHY in Second Life would they want to close one to open another???

Too many changes too quickly have been made or are in the 'works' and when this starts to happen, the whole mess begins to spiral out of control...eventually to fall apart and become basically worthless. I'm still leery about LL taking over SLX, there just seems like there is something else to it. Greed will drive you to do strange things.

Being on the razor edge of do I stay or do I go, my whole Plaza is filled with Gorean shops and I have a suspicion anything to do with Gor will be moved to the 'porn ghetto' as it was so eloquently put. NO thank you!
Ian Undercroft
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2007
Posts: 86
03-15-2009 12:12
"If it is the case that an island has to be set to adult for every parcel, then yes this is backdoor cleaning up and I guess those residents who run adult ventures on estate land will get no help from LL."

And that applies in the case of a reasonable island owner. An unscrupulous island owner may believe that the threat of him designating the island "Adult" presents a wonderful opportunity to extort money out of existing buninesses and residents!
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-15-2009 12:16
From: Phil Deakins
I've just gone through all the orange (Linden) posts in that thread and I haven't seen any that mention the cost of moving to the new continent. I'd assumed that LL will sell the land to movers, and all movers will be out of pocket, while LL will be very much in pocket, but you seem to say that the move will be free - presumably a land swap. Where have you seen that, Qie.


I cant find the post lol but:

Originally Posted by Blondin Linden
The people who will be made to move won't have to pay.

HTH
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Katheryne Helendale
(loading...)
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,187
03-15-2009 12:20
From: Cal Kondo
I think you are right. The new Adult classification makes M classification close to irrelevant. The problem with that of course is most mainland is M.
This. Right there. That should be a very clear sign to LL and all casual observers that most of SL's residents do not *want* a clean, sanitized world. I have a feeling that, if this proposal happens, 75-90% of the grid will move to "Pornopolis", either voluntarily or by force. In the end, the only thing this proposal will actually accomplish is to essentially turn the grid into a ginormous, densely-populated red-light district. LL can brag all it wants about how 90% of the grid is clean, safe, and sanitary; but there won't be any content there because 90% of the grid's *residents* will not be living there! Why not just paint a big bullseye on the grid so that the media can simply teleport to one place and proclaim to the world that "Second Life is all about porn"?
_____________________
From: Debra Himmel
Of course, its all just another conspiracy, and I'm a conspiracy nut.

Need a high-quality custom or pre-fab home? Please check out my XStreetSL Marketplace at http://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=231434/ or IM me in-world.
Erie Runningbear
Registered User
Join date: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 8
03-15-2009 12:25
Leave SL alone. Make a new continent for corporations and people who can't handle an occassional nude, furry, porn picture, etc. and make those few move to the new disneyland.
Izo Ryba
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 2
03-15-2009 12:33
From: Cory Edo
From what I'm reading, it does seem like the new continent is only for the most extreme sexually-oriented or violent businesses or activities. I'm fine with that. Frankly, "extreme" in SL is pretty damn extreme, and generally, no, people don't want to move into an area with your supersexrapevorewhatever club smack in the middle of their sim, sorry.

I have a hard time believing that the majority of SL users want to be able to find hard core sex play wherever they go, and the people that want content that doesn't involve that should be restricted. Blondin said sex beds in your own house are fine - just like you can have sex in your own house but if you're gonna dance naked on tables down at the bar and advertise it, you better have a permit from the city.


A word about all these ghetto/Australia comments - man, have some perspective. Australia was a far-away continent that took weeks to reach - this new continent in SL is going to be exactly 1 teleport away, just like everything else is. Sorry random people aren't going to be able to stumble across your sex club anymore, but maybe they'll end up sticking around Second Life in general for longer if they don't. Ghetto? Please - sex in SL is a sizeable portion of the economy, I have a feeling these regions will be plenty well occupied.


Take a deep breath everyone and resist the knee jerk reactions.

I think Cory put this very well, and it is about time and long overdue that LL started doing some zoning. Much of the mainland is a jumble of garbage with some nice spots here and there. It is in LL's own best interest to clean up the mainland just as it is in your own land value's interest not to be stuck next to builds/themes that detract.......the same kinda rules that apply in RL real estate apply in SL too, which is why the estates and homestead sims are popular : most folks don't want to wade thru PUBLIC displays of garbage.
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
03-15-2009 12:43
From: Izo Ryba
Take a deep breath everyone and resist the knee jerk reactions.

I think Cory put this very well, and it is about time and long overdue that LL started doing some zoning. Much of the mainland is a jumble of garbage with some nice spots here and there. It is in LL's own best interest to clean up the mainland just as it is in your own land value's interest not to be stuck next to builds/themes that detract.


Whenever I've been at Linden office hours where zoning has been discussed it has been stated by Linden's as well as residents that zoning existing land would be problematic, but most people didn't see a problem with zoning new land.

The new adult continent fits the bill of new zoned land, the policy unfortunately also tries to zone existing land and therein lies the problem. Zoning by consensus would be great, if everyone who owned a parcel, or heck even just didn't object, to their sim being zoned I think you'd find consensus.

People purchase mainland knowing the rules of that land, to many that's the appeal, moving the goalposts is always going to make people unhappy.
Izo Ryba
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 2
03-15-2009 12:47
From: Ciaran Laval
People purchase mainland knowing the rules of that land, to many that's the appeal, moving the goalposts is always going to make people unhappy.


True, but i'd be interested in knowing how much of the mainland is vacant right now. I'd bet that is a factor.
Linda Sautereau
Registered User
Join date: 5 Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Geographical Separation of Adult Content
03-15-2009 13:02
I'm not a prude (nor do I frequent "adult" areas), but it seems to me that if you're going to put the "Adult" folks on a separate continent, then you have to put the PG/family-oriented people on a separate continent as well. I don't have any kids and don't WANT any kids in SL, so why should I have to deal with folks dragging their little tykes all over the place? So put them on their own "geographically separate" continent, so that they can have play dates and that sort of thing without bothering the rest of us. Now...that sounded harsh didn't it? The same can be said for those who want to put the "adult" content off on a "geographically separate" area by themselves. 2-4% of the content is NOT worth all of the inconvenience this would cause to the rest of us who, frankly, don't care. This seems to be another PC move to make sure that people don't run to the press to talk about the "Adult" things that happen in SL. No one MAKES someone go to an "adult" area. And if you hadn't gotten rid of Orientation island, you would have had a method to orient new residents before they found themselves on a nude beach by mistake. Who's next for being put on a "georgraphically separate" continent because of someone's "sensibiilties"? All the furries? This does not bode well for developing a sense of "community".
Cudaboy Lockjaw
Registered User
Join date: 8 Jan 2008
Posts: 8
03-15-2009 13:04
I just spent some time going through all the info I could find on this insanity. What it appears to me is LL is trying to cater to schools and business not the general public. Out of courousity I started digging on the open grids for schools and business to see who is there. Well that became a pita but still using approximate numbers figure each opengrid had a school or business related lot. Using 3 as a base line and then doing a quick count there is 15 grids with known content on the wiki page. so 15x3= 45. (so ill say all numbers guestimated )
Now from a business stand point loosing even 10 islands or sims to another grid is a financial loss. Again estimated numbers because we all know LL cuts deals for schools and big business. But at 1k per island thats 10k lost plus the 300 (rounded up) a month fees. that adds up to a big chunk of change. Now if the 45 is a more realistic number you can see why they want to kiss butt and redo all the ratings and shuffle everything around. It looks like a typical IBM business model. Cut the freebee fat get the big accounts then the big accounts ring smaller accounts and get all the business and schools students and employees reeled in. Bam more profit. Pfft the fittle guys who delt with all the headaches and there meanial money. Another thing is has anoyne ever checkd to see how big the population is on the teen grid vrs the adult grid. I couldnt find much but this is right off the wiki page
"[edit] Economy
Teen Second Life has somewhat different economy compared to Second Life. Land prices and in-world object prices are known to be different, as the average income for the people that play these grids differs.
LindeX (The Linden Lab endorsed trading service), however, takes from the same pool of Linden Dollars (L$) for both Second Life and Teen Second Life.
Teen Second Life economy revolves around avatars, accessories, weapons, armies, scripts, and land barons (Residents who squat land in order to resell it, usually at an inflated price). The majority of Teen Second Life's residents are basic accounts without weekly stipends, so the L$ has slightly, nearly significant, more value on Teen Second Life than on Second Life, but due to lesser demand on content, content can be bought for significantly less than on Second Life (Comparing sources such as Second Life economy and Teen Second Life economy + Content). For example, a "Second Life-quality" car with similar features can cost L$400 (400 Linden Dollars) on Teen Second Life, while it may cost up to L$10,000 (10,000 Linden Dollars, or 10k) on Second Life.
"
If you notice the 6th line down says "WEAPONS" hmm thought that weapons constituted as guns , knives , etc.
Alisha Matova
Too Old; Do Not Want!
Join date: 8 Mar 2007
Posts: 583
03-15-2009 13:05
Just pushing the "adult" stuff off the mainland will not make it pretty. Every mainland sim is completely overloaded with scripts, litter, abandoned parcels, crap in the sky,etc etc... of course there are exceptions(somewhere).

The mainland is in this state because up until the last few months the estate manager(LL) could care less.

LL could learn a lot about sim/resource management and diplomacy by watching the private estate owners and their managers.
Phant Nabob
Registered User
Join date: 31 Dec 2005
Posts: 17
03-15-2009 13:25
From: Lord Sullivan
I cant find the post lol but:

Originally Posted by Blondin Linden
The people who will be made to move won't have to pay.

HTH


You'll notice that is a very vague statement however. It could mean any number of things. It could mean they all get a straight m3 for m3 land swap, it could mean they won't get charged any extra fees for moving but will still have to buy new land... who knows. Until we get a detailed answer on what it means, I'd be wary of making any assumptions.
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-15-2009 14:04
From: Phant Nabob
You'll notice that is a very vague statement however. It could mean any number of things. It could mean they all get a straight m3 for m3 land swap, it could mean they won't get charged any extra fees for moving but will still have to buy new land... who knows. Until we get a detailed answer on what it means, I'd be wary of making any assumptions.


I wasn't making any assumptions lol i will wait until i get an invite to move and then see i have been around long enough not to trust LL totally when it comes to their "smart" lol ideas
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Dante Moreau
Registered User
Join date: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 6
03-15-2009 14:31
From: Blondin Linden
No



I don't know if that is possible but we want to make the moving process as painless as possible.



The idea is to make it be as fair as possible.



Those that are forced to move won't be expected to pay for it.


thanks for your response Blondin. I think that's pretty much all most people wanted to know.
Marcuw Schnook
Scripter
Join date: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 246
03-15-2009 14:49
From: Katheryne Helendale
This. Right there. That should be a very clear sign to LL and all casual observers that most of SL's residents do not *want* a clean, sanitized world. I have a feeling that, if this proposal happens, 75-90% of the grid will move to "Pornopolis", either voluntarily or by force. In the end, the only thing this proposal will actually accomplish is to essentially turn the grid into a ginormous, densely-populated red-light district. LL can brag all it wants about how 90% of the grid is clean, safe, and sanitary; but there won't be any content there because 90% of the grid's *residents* will not be living there! Why not just paint a big bullseye on the grid so that the media can simply teleport to one place and proclaim to the world that "Second Life is all about porn"?


Hmm... That made me think in a REALLY twisted way...

Whatif this would be the GOAL for LL?

A safe, sane, clean mainland, also LAG free that gives a "good" look and feel to "business" and those with $$$ in their eyes to come over and fall into the trap?

Or am I now too sarcastic ?
Nimue Jewell
Unabashedly Leggy
Join date: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,745
03-15-2009 15:19
From: Phil Deakins
I've just gone through all the orange (Linden) posts in that thread and I haven't seen any that mention the cost of moving to the new continent. I'd assumed that LL will sell the land to movers, and all movers will be out of pocket, while LL will be very much in pocket, but you seem to say that the move will be free - presumably a land swap. Where have you seen that, Qie.


Here is a link to the post by Blondin, Phil.

/352/38/311510/27.html#post2354513

The Linden quoted is Blondin, responding to Miss Ristow:
From: someone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
Are we going to go into the weekend with no word on wheather we will have to re-buy land and carry double tier for the old until we re-sell it?


The people who will be made to move won't have to pay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
Is there going to be an even trade for an EXACT same land mass as one currently has?


That would be ideal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
Are old landmarks in the database going to be changed to reflect ones new location?


That would be a lot of LM to change. I am not very technical, so I do not know if this is possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
If you have an entire mainland sim (I do) can it be moved and keep it's same sim name?


Like I said above, I'm not very technical so I don't know if moving the entire sim would be possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
Is there any possibility if one has an entire mainland sim of getting it changed to an island with no additional up front cost although moving to island tier level?


Flagging content and moving wouldn't result in any increased fees. Would you really be interested in transferring to a private island?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mliss Ristow
If landmarks can not be redirected/relabeled in the database will we have an option of holding the old land for a month or two with a LM giver/redirect signage there with no additional tier?


That's a good idea and a definite possibility.
_____________________

Prim Pincher: Low Prim Furniture for Home, Garden, & Skybox
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Nimue%20Isle/173/155/27
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
03-15-2009 15:20
From: Marcuw Schnook
Hmm... That made me think in a REALLY twisted way...

Whatif this would be the GOAL for LL?

A safe, sane, clean mainland, also LAG free that gives a "good" look and feel to "business" and those with $$$ in their eyes to come over and fall into the trap?

Or am I now too sarcastic ?


If they wanted this, the easiest way would be to build a large G-rated continent. Move all the welcome sims and most of the PG infohubs into that continent. Perhaps relocate some of the Linden office sims there too.

Matthew
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-15-2009 15:25
From: Dante Moreau
thanks for your response Blondin. I think that's pretty much all most people wanted to know.


Thanks Dante i couldn't find the original post as i had to much dam RL going on lol
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Cheri Falworth
Registered User
Join date: 2 Mar 2008
Posts: 1
03-15-2009 15:49
There are already several tools in place that could be used limit the veiwing of content that is deemed 'extreme, 'adult', etc... Why not use them?

Age Verification / Account Verification - use 'em. Disallow any who can't produce verification of their assumed maturity from leaving a 'G' rated area.

Guidlines for PG and Mature themed sims - Enforce them, help builders and merchants by giving them tools to manage this in their items for trade. As of now, you can't stop me from wearing my xcite bits or other 'morally questionable' content in a PG rated sim, but they can be made to not accept input, and auto hide their prims in these areas (xcite products can already do this btw).

And for those that are concerned about having questionable content as their neighbor, we have land covenants. Why are they not used as a zoning tool? That way Miss Prissy Prude can be asured that when she buys a parcel of mainland, and reads the covenants, she will know that she will have at least x number of meters between her property line and the nearest Ronald McNasty's Adult Smut Shack, or Mal-Mart. The Lindens may have less resistence to rezoning mainland parcels, and offering comparable land NEAR where they are already located, with a discount in tier to cover possible loss of business and general inconvenience of having to relocate. Besides that, rezoning might actually make mainland seem more like a community in ALL it's differences than the convoluted mess that it is now. It's my opinion that the so called 'Urban Devolpment' team could be better tasked with this than the completely useless highway system they are building.

I am personally involved in alot of 'Adult' activities in SL, and even so, I understand what others may feel about it, so I act appropriately in areas that aren't geared to my SecondLifestyle. I've been at the other side of the spectrum, being offended by more 'moral' activities happening in a parcel adjacent to mine on quite a few occasions. But I know that crating them up and shipping them off to a new continent is not the answer.

I definately agree with the previous posts about having a G rated continent for all who are new to SL, and/or not age verified, and/or choose to live, edjucate, and do business there. It won't put a stop to risqe' behavior there, but at least they wont have available to the them content to do so, and MAYBE it will lessen the immature behavior of some individuals on mainland.

Of course it's all been said before, but count my vote against Adult Ghettos
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
For Attention of Blondin Linden
03-15-2009 15:56
From: Blondin Linden
The people who will be made to move won't have to pay.


Flagging content and moving wouldn't result in any increased fees. Would you really be interested in transferring to a private island?



I certainly would consider going back to a private estate in exchange for my mainland sim holding if that is an option and not going to cost me anything other than the tier payment change, but would LL consider that an option for those that want to?

If yes contact me with pleasure i have IM'd my email to you :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
TLMars Bookmite
FemDom Artist
Join date: 6 Aug 2008
Posts: 35
prejudice made clear
03-15-2009 16:17
From: Terri Holrych
Not everything is about money, it's about quality of life and things like that. There are tons more important issues and causes in the world than cybersex. I don't understand why people are so upset that they can't use technology to have sex when they could just go do it in Real Life. This technology is expensive and it took many years to develop. I think it should be used for a higher purpose, to educate, inform and enlighten human beings. The sex industry in SL is just as bad and demeaning as it is in RL. Except sometimes even more violent. The Buddha said that everything comes from the mind alone. Do you really want things like this in your mind. Don't you want to do something more productive with your mental energy and technical resources? I do. I don't care if people call it a "ghetto" that they are forced to move to. I am trying to help people and educate them, and it just looks silly to have a Strip club right next door to my campus. We pay full price for the sim, we don't get an educational discount right now, and it's been that way all year since I took over. So excuse me, but I spend just as much money as you.




Hi Terri,
This is so offensive to me. Allow another Terri to challenge your point of view.

I too am an educator. I have provided recovery resources for survivors of sexual abuse and domestic violence online since 1996.

As part of my own recovery process, I began creating art. Being an educator yourself, you are already aware of the value of the arts to assist in the recovery from mental, emotional, and physical trauma.

Not only did creating art assist in my recovery, it also turned out that it could provide me a much needed income.

I have only been in SL a short time since August. In that short amount of time I have been able to find three little plots in different places on the mainland that have suited me and built three galleries. That has lead to a speaking engagement at a media event as well as an interview with a quility Second Life magazine. In both cases I was able to speak about how my erotic art came to be... my motivations etc. thus about more than just cybersex.

You encourage reckless and physically self-destructive behavior. One of the wonderful potientials about Second Life is that ADULTS have a safe place to come to explore those things that go on in their heads without having to engage in such destructive behavior.

I am one of those that will have to move. Even though I have utilized all of the filters that SL has in place as well as adding additional notices for unsuspecting people that may be sensitive to my work who wander into one of my galleries. Those of us who have put effort into being considerate nieghbors will have to pay for those who have not it seems.

It's wrong for you to pass judgemnet Terri. Not all of us who utilize Second Life to explore our sexuality are just sitting here with sticky hands. We are not just mindless sex fiends who deserve to be locked away in some ghetto or pornville as people are calling it.

There are a great many people who will be suffering financial losses that are NOT simply pervs that are here to mastrubate in voice chat. People who create art, who write, who design clothing, who design imaginative props, animation designers, etc...

You wrote:
~This technology is expensive and it took many years to develop. I think it should be used for a higher purpose, to educate, inform and enlighten human beings.~

As do I and THAT is what I do. But, since that is not the sole purpose of my work that means I deserve to be tossed into a ghetto? Since I create not just to educate and enlighten, but also for pleasure and enjoyment, I deserve to be tossed into a ghetto?

This Terri sits here shaking her head and heaving a sigh...
I hope this POV is not the POV that LL holds. I love Second Life and hope that LL does come through in some way that doesn't drive us all away. If it's too great a financial loss and we get treated the way that Ms. Holrych seems to feel we deserve to be treated why would we stay?

Maybe Ms. Holrych doesn't need to worry about money, but some of us do.
_____________________
Love is the Law. Love under Will.
Ishtara Rothschild
Do not expose to sunlight
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 569
03-15-2009 16:20
From: Brenda Connolly
Or say, just as a hypothetical stretch several friend, couples decide to engage in a little "swinging" in a private residence. What seperates that from a Free Sex Club? Does LL have the wherewithall to make these distinctions and stand by them?


Exactly. If this is about little Johnny, all sex equipment needs to be on flagged land, private homes or not. But if it's about John the Baptist/Educator/Investor, we don't need age verification. An additional checkbox in the classifieds and a simple warning message before entering land flagged "adult" would suffice. In both cases, LL's policy doesn't make sense.

I have the feeling this is neither about the protection of minors nor about giving adults more control over what they might get to see. This mixture of enforced age verification (either give up anonymity or no XXX content) and seperation of adult content into tolerable and ghetto-worthy looks like an attempt to rid the grid from certain forms of adult content only. An attempt to cut certain businesses off from their unverified clientele, i.e. from the majority of their customers.

Of course it could also be an attempt to earn more money by selling land on the new adult continent to people who are being forced to move. After making OS sims completely unattractive with the recent price hike. In any case, unless people can either verify their age anonymously with a simple button click, or all adult content is being treated equally, I can't believe that this content ghettoization happens for the reasons LL gave us on the blog.
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43