Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Upcoming Changes for Adult Content: Geographical Separation of Adult Content

GreenKnight Kaul
Registered User
Join date: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 55
03-13-2009 03:15
From: Imago Aeon
Why not just have a common area. Little place the Lindens create. Make a little amusement park, some rides, and populate it with clowns and people in mouse costumes and then let the n00bs hang out there?



lol I like to explore and love amusement parks, been to a few on SL frankly was thinking next time I will need to bring my cricket soundbox. Some noise, considering it was a weekend evening and only 3 other people in the sim, and one of them was with me. Was really a great park too, kind of depressing really.

Sadly I think I will need the cricket box for a lot more locations after this move by LL.
Cal Kondo
Low impact
Join date: 7 Oct 2006
Posts: 143
03-13-2009 03:15
From: Blondin Linden
I like your post. It brings up a good point. How much of the mainland would be affected by this in your opinion?


The problem you will have is if you re-locate the 4% most hardcore content. The owners of the next 10% of more moderate content are probably going to want to move also, just to make themselves feel safe from interpretation or future rule changes. Then you have others that have mixed content that may want to move to keep it all together, and others that just want to be near that stuff. So before you know it, to remove 4% of content you actually lose say, 20% of content. That's a lot of disruption and not good for land prices.
Renegade Gray
Registered User
Join date: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 26
This should not apply to all adult products in general
03-13-2009 03:18
If you are reffering to adult content in general I would say the 2-4% is nothing close to the real numbers. Anyone who has been active on second life for a while knows, a big percentage of the second life™ economy is driven by the adult scene.

Add to that, responsible "adult" content creators on mainland usually manage their stores appropriately in the case that adult products are a division of their business. Take for example my main store, from the landing point and all over the ground floor there is nothing "sexual", explicite or not, if a visitor has no problem being exposed to "adult" content they can do so only if they choose to, even by doing so, the content they get exposed to is nothing extreme, so i dont see that me or anyone who creates quality "adult" content responsibly being 'forced' to move to a continent that everyone is already reffering to as the "Getto" an appropriate step for business.

While you say you will make the transition to the new continent smooth and swift, for most it will not be, take into consideration creators that include their landmarks in the product package, how much work will that be to alter the landmarks inside 100+ products, or regular visitors that already have the landmarks and pass it on to their friends, when they arrive and find out that their favorite store is nowhere to be found.

What about the new search ranking, to my knowledge the land "age" does have a relevance on how high a business appears in the search results. Seems to me like movers are going to start over from scratch, unless they are willing to invest a big chunk of their profits on advertisments and/ or placing bots and camping places in hopes to retain the position they once had in the new search.

To sum this all up, I only support this decision if it will only effect the minority that come up with really extreme sexual or voilent content, specially if it does not hold any artistic or intellectual value, I won't be suprised if such content is in most cases created by minors.
_____________________
______________________________
VIRTUAL ARTWORKS since 2006

www.virtualartworks.biz

[email]renegade@virtualartworks.biz[email]



Island (Main Branch): http://slurl.com/secondlife/Virtual%20Artworks/74/223/35

Mainland: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Trapper/114/224/22/
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
03-13-2009 03:20
From: someone
I don't understand why people are so upset that they can't use technology to have sex when they could just go do it in Real Life.


Well lots of possible reasons. They are not 'out' about their RL preferences. They are housebound or ill. They are elderly. They are shy. They would be discriminated against in their RL town. They are afraid of RL physical dangers attendant to this RL activity. In other words this is not always an option.

From: someone
This technology is expensive and it took many years to develop.


Okay but it was designed to be shared with the populace, and the people voted with their virtual feet - and minds, they created and went where they personally wanted to go.

From: someone
I think it should be used for a higher purpose, to educate, inform and enlighten human beings.


One could argue it already is, but depends on one's personal definition.

From: someone
The sex industry in SL is just as bad and demeaning as it is in RL. Except sometimes even more violent. The Buddha said that everything comes from the mind alone. Do you really want things like this in your mind.


Seems the reverse - that this virtual world comes from what already IS in people's minds. But these changes are not only about the SL "sex industry" and there would be other ways to address anything found 'objectionable' there, anyway. (Actually SL already has rules which do.)

From: someone
I am trying to help people and educate them, and it just looks silly to have a Strip club right next door to my campus.


Could again be solved with sim by sim zoning, "this sim is for residences, this sim is for businesses, this sim is for educational purposes of the university sort" like in real cities, (i.e. one sim equals one RL city block) rather than the (IMO) drastic measures being taken with this. (I have a serious question - can universities not create their own virtual world/server for their students and teach there, instead of in a borrowed world like SL?)

Also, though, it's a virtual world, is segregation really the answer there any more than in the 'real' one?
Tegg Bode
FrootLoop Roo Overlord
Join date: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,707
03-13-2009 03:31
From: DagnyT Dagger
Another question that comes to mind is. What happens when the land they have set out to hold that magic number of a maximum of 4% of displaced entities fills up? Will they make new land available? Or will that be the end of any new adult themed entities?

Umm it's just a wild stab in the dark but I suspect there may be the slightest possiblity of a second continent when the first is full, selling land is good money afterall and this land would actually have value without needing any moles to landscape it.
_____________________
Level 38 Builder [Roo Clan]

Free Waterside & Roadside Vehicle Rez Platform, Desire (88, 17, 107)

Avatars & Roadside Seaview shops and vendorspace for rent, $2.00/prim/week, Desire (175,48,107)
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
03-13-2009 03:34
Tegg what about land already being vacated. It all costs money for LL to upkeep on their servers, right? Wouldn't building more land on top of that further drain their resources?
Photon Tokyoska
Registered User
Join date: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 16
PG & Adult Business Owner Has His Say
03-13-2009 03:36
I sell prefab houses(PG) and run a house rental business (Adult - Mature).

In principle I'm all for people who don't want to be exposed to adult concepts like sex, bdsm, sex, violence, sex, furries, sex, vampires, sex, gorians, sex, etc.... having a place away from all of the 'minorities'.

Unfortunately when u put all these 'minorities' together I think you will discover that they far outweigh the vocal "Disneyland" folk. If you forcefully move what u consider adult, even if its 15% u will alienate over 60% of your user base. U will loose revenue, major revenue, both short and long term - and create further problems with policing content on large land masses, as well as dealing what others start to think of 'offensive'......

As a business owner, it i was forced to move, i may consider closing shop and LL loosing $200 USD in teir per month from me......... what if that was 2,000 business owners that decided the same?

Not to mention how u would actually relocate the ones that didn't close their doors.........

As suggested previously the best way is to:

1) Create a "G" area - where anyone can go - this is where u police for infringing adult content. (Perhaps the new continent u r creating for the 'adult' category)

2) Anyone wanting off the G island must go through adult verification (Premium accounts/payment details/Credit Card Details)

3) The rest of SL is by default M, ((all forms of sex) in homes, u can say FUCK in public, - just no sex in open public - allowed in secluded places however)

4) BDSM/Gore/Carnivore/Sex Clubs/Escort Areas - to be marked as Adult (New Category) - and a Blue warning to pop up when entering the area's - this popup can be disabled in the viewer settings.

(Actually the blue popup showing G, M, and Adult should be a warning, which can be turned on/off in the viewer)

I would seriously not be merging the teen grid with the main grid - the potential for abuse of children, and also children pretending to be adults would bring a legal and litigious hammer down on LL's head - DONT DO IT for everyones sake.

The above is an overview, smaller details to be worked out, but I think the above will work out the best for everyone assuming LL pursues their goal.

Cheers' Photon
Zigadena Gabardini
Registered User
Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 27
Yes! we cant judge anything for ourselves aymore
03-13-2009 03:38
“I believe that man’s natural enemy is the mega-organization
because it robs him of the vital necessity to feel responsible for his fellow-man,
restricting his possibilities to show solidarity and love
and instead turns him into an agent of power,
that for the moment may be directed against others,
but ultimately is directed against himself.”
Stig Dagerman October 5, 1923 - November 4, 1954) Swedish author

The `(double)moral disgusts me in this new "idea" from LL
Its Orwell and all others put together


"Your world "-bah!

If you are not mature enough to decide for yourself were to tp , then you really have a problem.And in the case such persons really exists-Well build vanillatown for them.

I dont agree or like a lot of things inworld- I just avoid to go there
Adult? arnt we all that in here??
Tegen Barzane
Registered User
Join date: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 8
Costs?
03-13-2009 03:52
Will there be some mechanism to exchange existing land for equivalent land on the new continent?

Or will adult businesses have to sell their land (probably at a loss) and buy what will likely be more expensive land on this new continent.
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
03-13-2009 04:02
From: Tegen Barzane
Will there be some mechanism to exchange existing land for equivalent land on the new continent?

Or will adult businesses have to sell their land (probably at a loss) and buy what will likely be more expensive land on this new continent.


My reading of the blog post is that this is what LL really want us to discuss. Having come up with their new scheme, they've realised that there is a gaping black hole (namely how to do the relocations), and are hoping that we will come up with some magic solution (at the very least LL can then blame us if it doesn't work).

However, it doesn't seem to be going very well - at the moment everyone has just pointed out all the obvious problems and asked how LL is going to resolve them!

Matthew
Ian Undercroft
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2007
Posts: 86
03-13-2009 04:13
Try as I might I remain somewhat confused as to what precisely the proposed changes are aimed at or why they are necessary. The aim appears to be to prevent fragile and sensitive souls being caused offence.

However, whether something is offensive depends entirely upon the context and the environment in which it is displayed or takes place. Nobody entering a clearly marked lap dancing bar or naturist beach can be offended by nudity there because in such an environment nudity is expected. In contrast, the sale of small quantitities of genitalia at what is ostensibly an "innocent" clothing store may well cause offence because it is unexpected and likely to shock. In other words, the fact that the predominant use of or activity at the location is innocent directly causes the offence.

As it seems to me, the problem arises because mixed use continents and locations have been permitted to grow and develop. In particular, M sims have been permitted grow and develop adjoining PG sims. Surely, so far as those locations are concerned, it is now far too late to try and impose development control. It would seem much easier to encourage the growth and development of a new exclusively PG continent upon which educators and their students and other apparently sensitive souls could wander around freely and safely admiring the architectural granduer of the competing educational establishments and the religious buildings which would no doubt soon appear. It may be a place as dull as dishwater, but that is what those folks appear to want, and so why not give it to them?

When the residents of the new continent become adventurous, they might choose to explore elsewhere in SL. That ought to present no problem as surely they could be provided with PG only viewers which prevent them from entering or seeing into a non-PG sim and prevent any non-PG results from appearing in any search they might conduct.

I regularly marvel at the creativity displayed in SL. I love the animals, the birds, the scenery, the environmental sounds, the AOs, the realistic skins and clothing and, yes, on occasions, the sex animations. I think of myself as a relatively normal adult fortunate enough to live in RL in a liberal and tolerant western democracy. I take responsibility for my actions and would never intentionally set out to offend. As matters stand, I think that those with particular sensibilities ought to take responsibility for their own actions too and in the absence of viewer restrictions should take care only to enter PG sims. By reducing their draw distance, they could go some way to ensuring they could not be offended by any adjoining M sim.

The proposals seem to me to infringe on the freedoms of the liberal majority of SL residents to "protect" what is very much a conservative and (perhaps overly) sensitive minority.
DagnyT Dagger
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 20
03-13-2009 04:13
From: Jago Constantine
Anyone claiming that this will apply to private land is wrong. That kind of comment will surely help nothing.

People making analogies to the forcing of minorities into ghettos are similarly unhelpful as well as being in bad taste.

This is a simple matter of zoning - indeed expanding the existing zoning system which we already abide by.

Complaining doesn't help. Pointing out practical problems and solutions does.


No, Jago, you are wrong. I have private land, that I rent from my friend, who owns it. It is mainland. I have a dock. Under the current "Adult Content" guidelines, I cannot lay on my dock, naked. So, if anyone thinks what they do on their own parcel will not be affected, they are dead wrong, and in for a rude awakening.

I agree with the ghetto statement. This is more like the Lindens creating SL's version of the "March of Tears" and sending all the undesirables to reservations.
Monalisa Robbiani
Registered User
Join date: 9 Jul 2007
Posts: 861
03-13-2009 04:13
From: Photon Tokyoska

In principle I'm all for people who don't want to be exposed to adult concepts like sex, bdsm, sex, violence, sex, furries, sex, vampires, sex, gorians, sex, etc.... having a place away from all of the 'minorities'.


What is it with the furries? Did you know that the oldest furry area in SL is PG? I didn't know that vampires are now adult stuff too.
_____________________

Dances, animations, furniture for Loco Pocos Tiny Avatars.
Group dances, circle dances. Sculpted neko furniture. Prefabs, mediterranean styled beach houses.
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Inochi%20Island/201/225/21
DagnyT Dagger
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 20
03-13-2009 04:22
From: Tijn Erde
In order to ensure the no long-term disruptions or loss of business, the following conditions MUST be met:

- Automatic updating of all landmarks in notecards (including those in inventory and those (recursively) embedded in prims).
- Automatic updating of all landmarks in landmarks (including those in inventory and those (recursively) embedded in prims).
- Automatic updating of all landmarks in scripts (including those in inventory and those (recursively) embedded in prims).
- Automatic updating of all landmarks encoded in non-standard ways in scripts (including those in inventory and those (recursively) embedded in prims).

All this is required to simply keep objects/inventory in working order.
Not meeting all of the above conditions will result in the guarenteed breaking the functionality of some scripts and objects.
If such affected objects and scripts are in somebody's inventory, such disruption will not only be "long-term", but in fact "permanent".
If any of the above conditions is not met, long-term disruption or loss of business is guarenteed.


OMG! Tijn!!! You kill me! that's a great laugh for the first thing in the morning, thank you VERY much for that.
::wipes a tear::
Mysty Saunders
Registered User
Join date: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Follow the Money
03-13-2009 04:30
From: Tegen Barzane
Will there be some mechanism to exchange existing land for equivalent land on the new continent?

Or will adult businesses have to sell their land (probably at a loss) and buy what will likely be more expensive land on this new continent.


Look at it from a LL perpesctive. I have a big feeling that they are just going to auction off new "adult" mainland but not enough to meet the demand so prices are high and then our existing mainland which is worthless now anyways will be even more worthless because of the exodus out of the new purified Disneyland continent. Its capitalism at its finest and another way for LL to start auctioning off mainland at a premium while having plenty of cheap land for the "Universities and Businesses" they hope to attract.

Adult content always has money behind it not the other way around. Unfortunately that is IMHO why LL isnt making a new G rated area.
Neptune Shelman
Registered User
Join date: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 329
03-13-2009 04:32
From: Cyn Linden
Thanks for all the feedback guys.

Marianne: Second Life is an 18+ service, and that majority of the content is PG or Mature. You will most likely stay where you are.

Shockwave: For the vast majority of Second Life, this will not affect your daily life, very few people will need to move or make any changes to their current behavior. Remember, this is highly explicit content we are talking about :)

Christiano: Mature and PG stay the same, only Adult content (explicitly sexual or extremely violent content) will be affected by changes in search.

Eli: What you do on your property is largely your own business. We are concerned with public activities and content that are explicitly sexual or have extremely violent content.



I like the sound of this, it will be nice to have an area for specifically adult themed stuff, seperate from other mature and PG sims.

It will allow people to continue exploring their fantasies, without putting them in the faces of other users:-)
Bhakta Thor
Escape from RL
Join date: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 291
this sounds lke bad news to me
03-13-2009 04:47
From: DagnyT Dagger
No, Jago, you are wrong. I have private land, that I rent from my friend, who owns it. It is mainland. I have a dock. Under the current "Adult Content" guidelines, I cannot lay on my dock, naked. So, if anyone thinks what they do on their own parcel will not be affected, they are dead wrong, and in for a rude awakening.

I agree with the ghetto statement. This is more like the Lindens creating SL's version of the "March of Tears" and sending all the undesirables to reservations.


Yeah, this could ruin SL for me. I love being able to do whatever I want on my land. I have marked it mature, and I like to swim naked in my ocean if I want to. Will SL force me to move, and where, I picked my land because I liked it. Is there going to be an Adult police force? My first reaction is Bummer.
BT
Simeon Beresford
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 31
03-13-2009 04:53
so in our Sim we discuss books. one week it might be Mary Poppins the next Leathersex, we separate not geographically but temporally. how will you accomodate this?
DagnyT Dagger
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 20
03-13-2009 04:53
From: Tegg Bode
Umm it's just a wild stab in the dark but I suspect there may be the slightest possiblity of a second continent when the first is full, selling land is good money afterall and this land would actually have value without needing any moles to landscape it.


We can *hope* this is what will happen. Given LL's apperant attitude towards adult oriented entertainment, my fear is, they won't. I also have to question if the new adult areas will be run on older servers. My fear is they are simply creating a way to get the adult stuff out (I know I know they certainly claim otherwise), but without actually kicking them out. Only making it such a horrible experience, they'll leave of their own accrod.
DanielRavenNest Noe
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,076
Dont make us move - GIVE US CHOICES
03-13-2009 04:54
From: Meagan Mertel
Are you planning on duplicating the land form exactly in the new sims and providing an automatic translation of the teleport addresses?

I spent a long time looking for my land and have inhabited it for almost 2 years. It has a waterway through it and steep mountains and gorgeous views. I purchased it at a very large premium over other land because of these features. And these features make my business very attractive to visit.

The cost to the sl economy to move will be enormous and will emotionally and financially injure the lives of many many real people.


Meagan makes a great point... Many builds are tailored to the land form, surroundings, and exact parcel shape and dimensions. Unless you can reproduce those features *exactly* the owner will lose out.

Also, many people have friendships they have built up, or working relationships with neighbors in the sim and don't necessarily want to lose those.

My proposal then is to make TWO NEW REGIONS, one landmass marked adult, and one marked G/PG, and *LET US CHOOSE* whether to move or not, don't force us to move.
Xal Dryke
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 150
@ Lindens about enforcement
03-13-2009 04:57
One question I had, that I did not see mentioned yet...

Once the migration has started, and the adult places are on the new continent, how will the policing of the new maturity standards be enforced???

Will they be based solely of abuse reports??

Will it rely on mainland residents voluntarily flagging their content??

There really seems like there is so much more to iron out with this.
Neptune Shelman
Registered User
Join date: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 329
03-13-2009 04:59
From: Mysty Saunders
Look at it from a LL perpesctive. I have a big feeling that they are just going to auction off new "adult" mainland but not enough to meet the demand so prices are high and then our existing mainland which is worthless now anyways will be even more worthless because of the exodus out of the new purified Disneyland continent. Its capitalism at its finest and another way for LL to start auctioning off mainland at a premium while having plenty of cheap land for the "Universities and Businesses" they hope to attract.

Adult content always has money behind it not the other way around. Unfortunately that is IMHO why LL isnt making a new G rated area.


LL will no doubt make a great deal selling off the new adult themed land, which no doubt will fetch a premium.
But I don't see the mass exodus you suggest from the existing mainland, most clothes, skin, hair and furniture shops etc. will most likely remain on the existing land, nudity homes with sex beds etc. will remain as they are mostly unchanged.

The difference should be a few more explicit fantasy environments moving over to the new adult themed land.
Which should allow those places to be more open and thrilling for their users.
Sapphia Ducrot
Registered User
Join date: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Practicalities
03-13-2009 05:06
Some practical questions for Jp Lindon

Situation:

We run a women-only meeting and sex club. It's been in operation for a little over a year and has grown to it's present size of 4960 sq meters of mature mainland over the last year by word of mouth. Traffic at the moment is between 13K and 20K. depending on time, day etc. All is genuine, no campers, and my meter says 55,000 tps in over the last 6 months - it comes out as #6 on a search for 'lesbian' and is in 125 peoples picks.

We're popular. Very popular.

We're popular because it's a good, highly tuned and tasteful build (unlike most). About 40% the surface area is social with dance balls and couches, 20% is a mall, and the remainder is a sex area. We have a large number of pose-balls and sex furniture, and they are explicit, but nothing extreme and the light bdsm items could be removed (St Andrews cross, a spanking animation and so forth). There is a select of vintage, black and white, erotica/pornography on the walls all at least 50 years old and some 19th century. Interestingly at any one time about 80% of avies are in the social area.

The build is at 600 metres, with a 100 meter diameter giant spherical prim around it. It's flagged mature. No-one finds us unless they are looking for us - it clearly says sex on the search terms.

4960 is a lot of tier, but because of the mall - L570 a week for 18 prims on account of the traffic, and donations - we cover that. We don't wish to take a full sim or some such - 4960 would be as large as we'd want to go because any bigger would spoil the ambience. We're viable, we're discreet, we're popular and we provide a service and facility that people want.

And I just checked. Out of 20 people visiting over 10 minutes or so only 1 was age verified or had payment information on file.

So questions:

Are we defined as 'adult content'? If so would removing the few light bdsm items change that?

If we're adult will we have to move? Why can't you just designate any area above, say, 2000 metres as adult? Many such places are run in skyboxes and this would be an easy, non-disruptive solution. Moving upwards would be far easier than moving location.

If we do have to move are you going to swap the land for us or do we have to sell/repurchase? 4960 is a lot of land to buy, growth to date has been out of profits, and we couldn't afford to finance an outright purchase. Selling/repurchase would loose us traffic in the transition.

Will you be offering the land tier-free for a period whilst people get validated. 95% of our visitors are not validated so traffic will not support 4960 for a good while

If we do have to move, and it is viable to do so, will you be moving the build for us? There's a lot of prims, many of the items are no copy, and rebuilding manually would take days (and mess up traffic even more). And of course we don't even have perms on the prims in the mall.

Finally: should moving the club not be viable, and on the basis of what I see so far, especially in view of the age verification ratio, it does not look likely it will be, this premium account will be cancelled as it was set up explicitly for this venture. So you'll loose tier and a premium in addition to whatever other activity we generate. How does this fit with the Lindon's policy of increasing the number of premiums? Or rather does it fit extremely well with a Lindon policy or removing adult content?
Neptune Shelman
Registered User
Join date: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 329
03-13-2009 05:23
From: Xal Dryke
One question I had, that I did not see mentioned yet...

Once the migration has started, and the adult places are on the new continent, how will the policing of the new maturity standards be enforced???

Will they be based solely of abuse reports??

Will it rely on mainland residents voluntarily flagging their content??

There really seems like there is so much more to iron out with this.


LL should state clearly what is classed as adult themed or not, so users know exactly what is allowed or not.

To let users know exactly what constitutes as explicit material.
Photon Tokyoska
Registered User
Join date: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Clarification
03-13-2009 05:27
From: Monalisa Robbiani
What is it with the furries? Did you know that the oldest furry area in SL is PG? I didn't know that vampires are now adult stuff too.


I just highlighting the question of what exactly is 'adult'? Furies could be seen as adult (nakies & 'and abomination to god -warewolves etc') - same reason vampires could get the axe ..... its a question of what is 'adult' and what offends. I personally have no problem with either group, have friends in both groups..... but this is where censorship could take us..... and if we get taken there I will be leaving SL and LL will be the poorer (both monetarily and content wise) for it.

Cheers

Photon :-)
1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 43