Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

RC Questions

Renzo Goodliffe
Registered User
Join date: 3 Jan 2006
Posts: 8
06-01-2009 14:20
From: Kirsty Shoreman
That doesn't make sense. Either sex is banned or it ain't. The idea that i am going to feel comfortable on mature land having sex after this change is ludicrous. Of course i am going to feel totally uncomfortable about it. The bed i bought cannot be sold in mature anymore so how can it possibly be used in mature. Why is using it less of a problem than selling it. This is so making me angry. As far as i am concerned it doesn't matter what the definitions will be. It is absolutely clear 1. they will never make any definitions and 2. this is a big mess. The entire concept of 'mature' land is now meaningless as of now. We might as well just have PG and adult. What is the point of mature land if you cannot work out what rules apply to your use of it?

K


I agree that the current definition given to us that allows sex and sex toys in private on mainland but not on public hardly makes sense in terms of predictability of people's experience, but I am happy to don't have to move my personal home to Ursula in addition of already half my business. Forbidding Sex and Sex-related material in all mature Mainland including private homes would have mean that 90% of the mainland would have had to move to Ursula and they seems to have keep enough reason to not push their flawed plans that far...

There will be without doubts official definitions of what is allowed or not in Mature places, they have to as otherwise they won't have a basis to punish those who don't respect them. From what I get, those definitions may even get added to the TOS.

Let's hope that the additional delays they are taking to publish those definitions means they are realizing all the problems that will spring from those changes and starting to soften their stances a little so that adult people's life are moderately disturbed and witch-hunts are avoided.

What worries me more if that one Linden in Oatmeal 15 explicitely stated that "anything goes" in adult places, including griefing and hate speech if you judge from his lack of reaction to some griefings and TOS Violations committed under his eyes when he said that.

LL are lucky that there isn't yet another adult-friendly virtual world ready outside here whose technical possibilities are equivalent to SL's one, as their "business decision" on adult content would have then caused a massive exodus that would have simply killed their platform. But this betrayal of the trust of the adult communauties who did so much to build a freedom Utopia in here won't be forgotten and this may happen anyway the day that alternative solution gets on the market.
Renzo Goodliffe
Registered User
Join date: 3 Jan 2006
Posts: 8
06-01-2009 14:34
From: Shockwave Yareach
So we'll have thousands of ads that point to little 16m parcels in Ursula, and place a LM giver there to point to the Adult Stores we "secretly" keep on Mature Land elsewhere. Thus we obey the letter of Linden Law.

What was the objective of this whole thing again? Make the grid more predictable?


It wouldn't work, if the mature parcel in mainland with the Adult Stores is in public access to everyone, it will be considered public and thus illegal. The rule seems to be "private only" AND "not advertised". I am unsure if the fact it has a "commercial aspect" is taken into account or not, but I think not at the current state of their reflections. Good question to Ask Blondin and Jack btw, I add it to my list...

Maybe it can work if access to that mainland parcel is restricted only to a private group, for example the client group you have for your business, but from the talks I had with Blondin it seems a private group is no more private once it reach a certain size... Quite arbitrary, don't you think ?

That's one of the reasons why I wait the precises rules on what is "public" or "private" with a lot of impatience, because they are key to know what is still possible or not when you want to make your activities abide by the rules.
Couldbe Yue
one unhappy customer
Join date: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 1,532
06-01-2009 14:36
From: Renzo Goodliffe
I agree that the current definition given to us that allows sex and sex toys in private on mainland but not on public hardly makes sense in terms of predictability of people's experience, but I am happy to don't have to move my personal home to Ursula in addition of already half my business. Forbidding Sex and Sex-related material in all mature Mainland including private homes would have mean that 90% of the mainland would have had to move to Ursula and they seems to have keep enough reason to not push their flawed plans that far...



This is a staged implementation according to cyn. businesses are the first step. I firmly believe the the current kb6010 is what we'll have at the end of this. So it's quite possibly move the businesses, move the residents and then change the rules so only Aristotle verification gets you in.

Why do I think this? Because they had a third party draft 6010 and it was agreed by LL before being published. As you saw with SL6B, they really do want to have that degree of cleanliness on the grid.

Whether non business residents will be offered a swap or will be just told they have to clean up or pay extortionate prices for land on ursula is the subject for discussion when phase 2 happens.

It's going to be a long, turbulent 6 months.
_____________________
Satiated Desires: Toys for Grown Ups.
Inworld: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Norf%20Haven/186/132/55
XSL: https://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=77743&&sort=age&dir=asc
Blog: http://satiateddesires.wordpress.com/
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
06-01-2009 15:11
From: Renzo Goodliffe
Based on Blondin's recent declarations, it's not all sex that is removed from the mainland but publicly advertised sex places. He precisely said in one of his office meetings that you can still have a swinger party at your home , so i guess it's ok too for any kinky sort of group orgy in private as long it is not "advertised". Jack also made clear that anyone whose sim is affected by the changes will be offered a free swap to Ursula.


No surprise when the Lindens last night said mostly the opposite of that (they thought you would need to put 'those words' in the land description for some reason). Or that they were hesitant about saying if strip clubs were ok or not.
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!

'O predictable experience,
O predictable experience,
Never shalt we define thee.
Our users think that means no lagging,
But we say they want no shagging.
O predictable experience,
O predictable experience,
We love you null expression.'
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
06-01-2009 15:12
From: Shockwave Yareach
So we'll have thousands of ads that point to little 16m parcels in Ursula, and place a LM giver there to point to the Adult Stores we "secretly" keep on Mature Land elsewhere. Thus we obey the letter of Linden Law.

What was the objective of this whole thing again? Make the grid more predictable?


That would be just *too* hilarious if it were the result. :)
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!

'O predictable experience,
O predictable experience,
Never shalt we define thee.
Our users think that means no lagging,
But we say they want no shagging.
O predictable experience,
O predictable experience,
We love you null expression.'
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
06-01-2009 15:21
From: Adorabella Felisimo
Hi Kristy,

I asked both Blondin and Jack the same question at the last office hours and got pretty much the same answers from both. The next thing to happen is the rollout of the new viewer. At the same time this happens they will start allowing us to visit ursula. Blondin says 2 weeks after that, and Jack says one to two weeks after that we will be allowed to start requesting our move.

I did not ask about the particulars of making the request. However, my understanding is that there will be a special ticket type for that. At last nights Lindenpalooza I think it was Cyn that said they would not move anyone without first talking to them. So it looks like we submit our ticket then wait for them to contact us inworld for this talk. In one of the brown bag meetings I heard that we should have a list of three preferences of locations in ursula we would like to move to.

Adorabella <-- First time posting after weeks of reading and attending office hours


Be sure to check in at the SLapt.me wiki as well :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
06-01-2009 15:25
From: Couldbe Yue

The next "scam" will be them trying to convince those who are moving to go to an island instead. While the price of ursula should remain reasonably high (if any of the other new land like bay city and nautilus are anything to go by) the resale value of private islands is poor.

So an increase in tier and a decrease in resale price is what they'll be offering. At the moment there doesn't look like there'll be any incentives offered except that you can part exchange if you want to go the island route and don't own a whole sim.

For those of you who are considering it, this is a case of buyer beware.


We will not go back to a private estate unless they peg the price at the mainland price of 195USD for me as we got rid of our islands after the OS fiasco and went back to just 1 mainland sim holding so I am not going to go back to 295USD a month thats for sure.

I hope others follow the lead there with us :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Shambolic Walkenberg
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2008
Posts: 152
06-01-2009 15:26
From: Renzo Goodliffe
Based on Blondin's recent declarations, it's not all sex that is removed from the mainland but publicly advertised sex places. He precisely said in one of his office meetings that you can still have a swinger party at your home , so i guess it's ok too for any kinky sort of group orgy in private as long it is not "advertised". Jack also made clear that anyone whose sim is affected by the changes will be offered a free swap to Ursula.


A slightly different implication to what I read on the previous, locked, thread. But only slightly different, and less than convincing!

I'm only going by the latest Jack office hours transcript, where he seems to bang on about "content" and "commercial" with regards to land swaps, where it appears (almost) anything goes on mature land so long as there's no money being made from it.

From: someone
However we still wait for the clear definitions of what is "Public/private" and what is considered "advertising" that he promised us to be out soon for quite some time now...


This is the crux of the matter for me. A distinct lack of respect for resiedents by *not* getting the hell on with clear definitions after promising them, and a complete lack of ability of residents to have a clue what impact this will all have until said definitions are released. It could be only sellers of smut have to move, ridiculing the notion this is "to make for a more predictable experience" as buyers of such material can use them on mature land. It may be a party becomes a club if there's >x attending, maybe, just maybe, the definitions *will* only state that the most extreme content needs moving as originally claimed, and that extreme will mean truly extreme, and not just what may shock Mary Whitehouse on a sensitive day.

I don't like many of the answers and statements made so far by LL on this, and find their handling of it catastrophic. Two years of grid walking? Many months of planning, and faki... sorry, gathering opinions that require this shift? Thousands of hours since the announcment "discussing" with residents? And what is there to show for it? Mixed messages, residents mushroomed, and a feel of chaos. I'm struggling to work out if they truly are that incomeptent, or if this lack of cummincation and creation of panic is part of their plot. Either way, it doesn't exactly make you want to fall on your bank account and keep handing over the cash, does it..
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
06-01-2009 15:29
From: Shockwave Yareach
So we'll have thousands of ads that point to little 16m parcels in Ursula, and place a LM giver there to point to the Adult Stores we "secretly" keep on Mature Land elsewhere. Thus we obey the letter of Linden Law.

What was the objective of this whole thing again? Make the grid more predictable?


LOL I have just said to someone that we will cut some of our new sim for just such things if I can build into the overall design of the new sim :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Blondin Linden
Linden Lab Employee
Join date: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 381
06-01-2009 15:30
Hey All.

Just posted a new blog. We;re going to close this thread and continue the discussion over there! Follow this link: https://blogs.secondlife.com/thread/1315