Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Upcoming Changes for Adult Content: Answers to Questions

Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
04-27-2009 14:56
From: Vania Chaplin
Sorry, but this is not true.

LL is saying that some people, those not verified, cannot see some content in SL. There IS censorship, not a simple zoning.



Censorship would imply a right. No one has a right to be in SL.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Persephone Loon
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 29
04-27-2009 14:56
From: Mosley Sperber
You may be right .... I just can't keep up with this thread (I skipped at least some 100 posts in the middle). If I've been replying to an obvious troll, then I apologise ... in any case, I think I've said all I wanted to say anyway, and will now return to lurking :)


I've been reading every post since about page 167, so I've seen that avatar's posts before and how he engages others in the forum. Seems reasonable on the surface, but not when examined more closely. Sort of like the amanita "destroying angel" mushrooms that are dead ringers for harmless button mushrooms -- until consumed. (Pun intended.)

~~ joins you in lurkerdom ~~


Persephone
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
04-27-2009 14:58
From: Meade Paravane
.......

I would rather they didn't do this plan if it's not going to accomplish a goal. Saying "well, they HAVE TO do something" doesn't cut it - the current plan causes more harm than good and gives people a false sense that kids are being kept safe when they're really not.
......


The problem is that there is a huge underbelly of unthinking that is driving this thing.
For this sort of mentality, doing "something" actually counts enormously. The effectiveness or the appropriateness of the "something" is neither here nor there.
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
04-27-2009 15:02
From: Shockwave Yareach
At least it would show LL isn't completely overrun by mindless Ogres who resort to MBA manuals to solve problems.


My Dad says that MBA stand for Management By Aggression
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
04-27-2009 15:06
From: Ceera Murakami
To be specific, all version 5.0, 5.01 and 5.01a SexGen beds that were rezzed in-world a few weeks ago lost a MAJOR chunk of their data storage scripts. The asset deletion gutted those items, and made them worthless. It was repairable, but required people sending their beds to Stroker for repair.

I know. It wiped out SIX beds that I own! All repaired, now.


He is not happy with LL after breaking his scripts when we spoke to him tonight having all those repairs to do. I think he will be very busy over the coming days.
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Blondin Linden
Linden Lab Employee
Join date: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 381
04-27-2009 15:06
From: Fawn Foxtrot
Originally , I was under the impression the required age was to be 18 yrs of age, now I am hearing rumors that it is to be age verified at 21 being able to access adult content, could someone please IM me inworld with the link to where i might find this information , or tell me which is correct, (has interest in adult contented sim is why i am concerned) I am im my 40's so i am definately old enough LOL. Thank You in advance for your help.
Fawn



Those are just rumors. 18 is the age.
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
04-27-2009 15:09
From: Mosley Sperber
I fail to see with what train of thought you're bringing bots into this, but well, you already alleged that I make tits only for the "cute joke", so ...


No clothing vendor has their classified saying nothing but "Clothes." If I were to search for birds, I would certainly pass over classifieds that do not list what birds they have, as I would assume that their birds either are not realistic representations of RL bird species, or that birds aren't their main product.


Again: Currently more than half of my birds are tits, as tits make up the majority of songbirds where I live. And yes, I have had customers (yes, more than one) tell me that they were happy to find blue tits, and that they had searched for them specifically, and making people come to my store to find out which birds I sell as opposed to telling them right in my classified or in my parcel description is a disservice to the potential customer.d.)


With due respect, you do not advertize your robin or nightingale separately either, even though they are arguably at least as famous as the tit if not more, nor do you specificly advertize the wren. Even though the tit may be a significant portion of your inventory, why it and not the others? Although there are many advertizing birds, there are only two others advertizing songbirds, and noone advertizing specific genus or species.

It is not like you really need to make that extra level of distinction over your competition.

Nice birds, though...
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
04-27-2009 15:10
From: Alexander Harbrough
None of the three actual songbird vendors adversize specific species rather than songbirds generally, and a total of 3 vendors is sufficiently small that it seems most passing strange that people looking for genus Petroica would be unable to find the poster's shop.


What you fail to grasp (among other things) is that specific products can also be included in Search (that's what that little check box on the first page of the object edit dialog means, btw), and people who are specifically looking for certain products won't be able to find them due to the overzealous filtering.

BTW, my search turns up 10 places, not just 4. http://search.secondlife.com/search.php?s=Places&q=songbirds&submit=Go

Even still, why should anyone's business be impacted negatively by something which won't serve the purpose it was intended in the first place?

From: someone
But of course I suppose such patrons would never think to simply search for 'songbirds' as the great masses of would be purchases of such beautifully rendered tomtits would not even think of them as songbirds, and that anyone wishing to purchase a tomtit, upon finding none at all in search would immediately conclude that there were sadly none to be purchased.


Maybe they will. Maybe they won't. Why risk it not having your business found because customers run into an imaginary, invisible brick wall? Mosley has already said that he got a customer who specifically was looking for a blue tit, which 1) happened to tell him (how many don't?), and 2 )he probably wouldn't have gotten without the search term.

Maybe you don't believe in the business notion of attracting as many customers as you can, but don't project that onto everyone else because, I assure you, I don't share it.

From: someone
Interestingly enough, 'Albatross' does not get any hits either... and they are sea bird flavoured...


I wouldn't know; I've never eaten an albatross. Well, a REAL one, anyway. :)
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
04-27-2009 15:10
From: Vania Chaplin
Sorry, but this is not true.

LL is saying that some people, those not verified, cannot see some content in SL. There IS censorship, not a simple zoning.


Sorry, but it is true.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
04-27-2009 15:12
From: Chris Norse
Censorship would imply a right. No one has a right to be in SL.


QFT.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
04-27-2009 15:12
From: Ciaran Laval
....
This can be fixed if Linden Lab actually show the will to make it work, but so far they've shown those objections the finger and that simply is not about respsect.


This!
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
04-27-2009 15:13
From: Talarus Luan
Even still, why should anyone's business be impacted negatively by something which won't serve the purpose it was intended in the first place?


Because it also provides better clarity to both those looking for tit (songbirds) and tit (body parts). In other words, it does not neccessarily adversely affect this particular business. Note I have not questioned all examples.
Jamie David
Registered User
Join date: 8 Jun 2006
Posts: 123
04-27-2009 15:13
From: Blondin Linden
Depends what Princes Leia does with that golden bikini. :-)

I don't see this impacting the Star Wars rp community at all.

But there is sex in Star Wars just as there is sex in Gor and in Pony play but oddly not in Furry according to the list.

Where is the hard core definitions of what is PG vs mature vs Adult? Too damn hard isn't it? Where mature and PG were hard enough to define now there is the 3rd for a supposed Adult community.

Is not violence Adult? So battles, weapons and killing are Adult and that is what Star Wars is about? Or has lindenlab definition of Adult found that killing is ok yet sex and tits are not? Make war not love kids.

This is as well thought out as the invasion of Vietnam, Afganistan or Iraq. The holes in the reasoning of this are big enough to drive a mac truck through. It will be a long miserable battle that costs too much in the end and requires a pull out.
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
04-27-2009 15:14
From: Chris Norse
Censorship would imply a right. No one has a right to be in SL.


No, it doesn't, actually. Nothing in the definition of the word implies "rights".
Ayla Holt
Registered User
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 70
04-27-2009 15:16
From: Kalderi Tomsen
Thank you for asking. I have actually stated my viewpoint a few times, but I have no problem repeating it and adding to it here.

I think that Linden Labs have a vision on where they want SL to go. They were visionaries who built the infrastructure for this world, visionary enough that everyone posting here and a whole lot more have come and terraformed and primmed up their little corner of the world. LL did it so well that the "residents" have felt a sense of ownership of their creations (not just IP stuff, but they feel it's "home" to them). In these cynical days that is quite an achievement.

But it's still LL's product, and they have the say on which direction it is going to go. Like any monarchy/dictatorship, we residents have the right to petition to ask for our points of view to be taken into consideration, but we have no RIGHT to have our views implemented.

LL have stated what their goal is - to build a separate continent for Adult-rated material. They asked us for advice on how best to go about doing it. It seems like 90% of the answers were "don't do it", and then those answering like this have been surprised that LL didn't listen to them. The question wasn't "should we do this?" it was "We're going to do this - how can we make this work best?". Discussions about "why" aren't something they are going to get into with us, either - they don't owe us any reasons, in my opinion.

Have LL handled this well? No, not at all, in my opinion. They should have framed these discussions much better, provided summaries of points made, and made sure that questions answered were documented in an easy-to-reach place. Not only that, but any clarifications provided in threads like this should be appended as examples to the official documents (which are going to be used to decide on policy down the road) - this ensures that the various members of the Linden team don't talk at cross-purposes and that the people in charge of policing it are going to be reading from the same page.

Also, I think they should have been a lot more transparent about the process they planned to use from the start - a Roadmap if you like - it has taken a LONG while to get this established, and it's still not finalized yet.

What will this move do to SL? I don't think anybody can know for sure (and I am skeptical of those that think they do). I am personally glad that they are not banning Adult content completely, which would be completely within their rights, and would fall in line with some other so-called "Virtual Worlds" (and I'm not going to get into a fight about that one Argent ;) ) - instead they are actually talking about concentrating it into a set of areas, not with the purpose of dropping a nuke, but instead, apparently, to actually promote it. If I want my dose of Adult Content, the idea of being able to go to a place that I know is adult-oriented and just walk the streets, exposing myself (!) to some stuff that I may not have seen before is thrilling to me. Search is boring because of all the botting and other gaming of the system - I don't even like to shop that way - I like to go to a place and walk around a bit....

There is going to be a LOT of dust generated by this - and I think that's unavoidable - but I do think there is actually potential here to make SL better - not from the point of view of creating "Prude World" but instead concentrating all the "good stuff" in easy-to-access places - like a Red Light District in a city. I think that could be good for business owners and clients, if it is done well. I kind of like the idea of dressing up in my super-slutty outfits, perhaps with my partner, and taking a walk through the streets....

So I see short-term turmoil and upset people, but I also see a potential for things to be better after all the dust clears.

And the bottom line, for me, when it comes to my opinion (which doesn't matter much, in the grand scheme of things) - LL decides what direction SL is going in - that's their right as owners of this world. I have the right to decide whether I am going to "play" in it, and spend my hard-earned money here. I would like to see what LL can do with this, and help guide them into doing it as well as they can... then see what the world looks like afterwards and decide whether I am going to stay and play or not.

OK, just a couple of comments about the rest of your post:
They've been doing that since the first reply of the first thread...

Or they don't feel it's important enough to post about, or they feel intimidated by what they perceive as the dynamic on this forum. There could be many reasons. Just because people don't post doesn't mean you can infer anything they are thinking from that.

Wow, that was long.


LOL that was long. But.... I found that I agree with you on most of what you said. I guess if I step back I don't see the move as a whole as being so bad. I think I am put off by the unknown.
I hate the thought of doing something wrong. I don't want to get AR'd and I don't want to do anything that is not by the book or following the rules. I even make sure I always file rl taxes on all of my SL earnings. But when they don't have clear guildlines then it makes me nervous.
If I had some facts (THIS IS WHERE YOU CAN JUMP IN BLONDIN) then I would feel alot better about it. I know its going to happen. I am not trying to stop it really. In fact my viewpoint on it is changing all the time.

Thanks for the inside to the other side of this issue :)
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
04-27-2009 15:16
From: Chris Norse
Censorship would imply a right. No one has a right to be in SL.

As long as they keep taking my money I do.
_____________________


http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick
All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain...
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
04-27-2009 15:16
From: Blondin Linden
Depends what Princes Leia does with that golden bikini. :-)

I don't see this impacting the Star Wars rp community at all.


Unless there is phonetic banning. Then Princess Layher ends up on the banned list, next to Heiniken Skywalker.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
04-27-2009 15:17
From: Chris Norse
Censorship would imply a right.
Censorship is a fact. The right to be free of censorship is limited.

So:

* Linden Labs has the right to censor their service, but
* This doesn't mean that what their doing isn't censorship.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
04-27-2009 15:17
From: Milla Janick
As long as they keep taking my money I do.

You can stop giving them money at any time and continue to use SL, or walk away. It's our choice.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
JaneD DeCuir
Registered User
Join date: 4 Jun 2008
Posts: 35
prude and pig-headed
04-27-2009 15:19
From: Anabella Spark
I repeat this proposition again because there was no response either from LL or other residents:

Would you agree to all the changes to adult content except one - age verification/payment info on file. if someone want to access adult content, the window will pop up and then they will need to answer YES or NO.

In my opinion it is a good consensus in this situation. Watch carefully what LL answer will be. If they answer 'no' then it is obvious that descrtuction of adult content creators/business or at least significant reducton of this content is the main purpose of this new policy

Originally Posted by Blondin Linden
Many others would simply need to remove a word or two from their land info or search tags and they would be fine on Mature.

You are publicly stating that we should 'play' with the keywords in order to be rated as mature. Now watch carefully of what you are writing here, because this way almost every adult content creator can remain on mature by simply using different keywords. this will lead into complete chaos. Some places will post content on mature region and of course some will be removed by you but since you publicly stating that you won't be able to monitor all content then this will spread into a very nasty thing. Censorship never works. All sl residents, new and old have the same right to access adult content exactly like it happens over the web. Watch playboy magazine website, all you need to do there is to click "Yes, I am over 18 and I agree to see adult content" There is no verification required. You actions are obvious. The significant reduction of adult content in SL is your goal. You do not want to protect anybody. You just want to send the clear message: do not involve in adult business in SL because it is not worth it.


Exactly my thoughts, Annabella ;)
When all the people who are interested in adult content have been pulled out from SL thru the double-faced morality this company has, we can start our own SL - and keep the prude americans out from it! :p

Far simpler for a working verificiation would be to make a contract with one of the big adult content providers like x-check is. If this lindens could think, they had asked us in advance how to get a straight and simple "plugin" for this purpose. But this behaviour LL shows up confirms my thinking about them. Its far not possible to work with americans and to assume a well balanced economy. Lindens, your minor portection has been fully failed.
Shame over you!
And your handling of adults seems to be failing too!

You're trying to keep out this people who maded SL so great and unique - independent if they are interested or seeking adult content or not! Learn to ask and trust the right people.
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
04-27-2009 15:21
From: Viciously Llewellyn
Oh, if I was on the Board of Directors, I would be very pissed off.

Whomever allowed PG land and Mature land to be intermingled all over the place ... gone!
....


Double YESSS!
whatever about the past, from the time that the whole IDV thing got surfaced in LL - at least a year ago? - mixing M and PG sims in any new continents or adds to continents--- WTF?
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Talarus Luan
Ancient Archaean Dragon
Join date: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 4,831
04-27-2009 15:21
From: Alexander Harbrough
Because it also provides better clarity to both those looking for tit (songbirds) and tit (body parts). In other words, it does not neccessarily adversely affect this particular business. Note I have not questioned all examples.


I type in a search for "blue tit", and get "REQUEST DENIED, BAD WORD DETECTED!". I then type in "blue tit songbird", and get "REQUEST DENIED, BAD WORD DETECTED!". Eventually, I get through the stupid filter and type "songbird" or "songbirds", and get a list of 4 (or 10, or 1000, it doesn't make that much of a difference to the following point). I STILL am looking for a blue tit. But, nothing in search can show up with the "bad word" "tit" in it, even with the product search. Do I now have to teleport to X number of places to find it? What's the point of SEARCH again?

As a result, it DOES "neccessarily";(sic) adversely affect this particular business.
Sindy Tsure
Will script for shoes
Join date: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 4,103
04-27-2009 15:23
From: Sling Trebuchet
From: Meade Paravane
.......
I would rather they didn't do this plan if it's not going to accomplish a goal. Saying "well, they HAVE TO do something" doesn't cut it - the current plan causes more harm than good and gives people a false sense that kids are being kept safe when they're really not.
......

The problem is that there is a huge underbelly of unthinking that is driving this thing.
For this sort of mentality, doing "something" actually counts enormously. The effectiveness or the appropriateness of the "something" is neither here nor there.

Then I guess the fun really begins once some Fox 'news' reporter times how long it takes his kid to get onto the adult continent and it's measured in minutes...

What do we do then, Blondin? What's the next step after it's actually proven that this project doesn't do anything you guys say you're trying to do?
Kalderi Tomsen
Nomad Extraordinaire!
Join date: 10 May 2007
Posts: 888
04-27-2009 15:26
Censorship, according to Wikipedia, is the suppression of speech or deletion of communicative material.

Try going into a RL mall and holding a political or religious lecture - you WILL be censored. Try doing it in a public park - no problem.

Try yelling "fire" in the movie theater full of people - you WILL be censored. Yell it outside in the public park - no problem.

You want to go nude at a nudist beach? No problem. You want to do it down the High Street of your local town - you're going to have your freedom of expression "censored".

Censorship, by that definition, is reality everywhere, in one form or another - there are rules and standards that say what you can and can't say and where it's appropriate. Anyone who claims that the world should be otherwise is a raving anarchist.

Look at the rules for visiting a US mall sometime? It is FULL of things you're not allowed to do which could be considered censorship.

LL is not public property, it's private property. They have every right to say what we can and can't do in-world. Fact is, in this case they're even not saying you can't do it - they're saying "here is a place you can do it, and do not do it elsewhere".

If you feel that is unfair and want "action" be consistent and go and petition your local RL shopping mall.....
_____________________
Kalderi, General Manager, Hosoi Ichiba and Hosoi Design

- - -
Hosoi Ichiba - High Quality Classically-styled Asian buildings, furniture and home decorations in an old-fashioned Japanese market garden on Japan Kanto. http://hosoi-ichiba.blogspot.com/

Hosoi Design - High Quality prefabs and furnishings, plus commercial buildings.
Mosley Sperber
Registered User
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 87
04-27-2009 15:26
I know I said I would not reply to you anymore, but I will not let false information stand.

From: Alexander Harbrough
With due respect, you do not advertize your robin or nightingale separately either, even though they are arguably at least as famous as the tit if not more, nor do you specificly advertize the wren. Even though the tit may be a significant portion of your inventory, why it and not the others?

"Why it and not the others"? I am not advertising "the tits (note: multiple species of tits) and not the others" anywhere!

I am advertising all species of tits, as well as the nightingale, the robin, and the wren, in the same place: in my bird-specific classified, and in the All/Places search by having them set to "Show in search". (Currently, none of the species is listed in my parcel description, as the space there is rather limited.)

There is no place, and has never been a place, where I have advertised all of the the tits and none of my other bird species.

Posting false information in an attempt to discredit my opinion (or, more likely, to troll) isn't exactly helping this discussion.

From: Alexander Harbrough
It is not like you really need to make that extra level of distinction over your competition.

As said before, that is not the point. The point is that, for no other reason than being a false positive in an automated word filter, I may not be able to list all of my products in search in the future, or mention my products in my classifieds. It's not a question of whether I need to list my products, it's a question of whether I want to list them, or whether I should have the right to list them. (But I have a feeling that most others here understand that anyway.)
_____________________
.:SHD:. / Eleutheria :: Low-prim garden decor and various other things
-- Blog: http://shdragon.wordpress.com/