Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Upcoming Changes for Adult Content: Answers to Questions

Ryanna Enfield
Registered User
Join date: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 225
04-18-2009 21:40
From: Ceera Murakami
Mature (revised meaning):
Sex that is NOT available to the general public or being offered for sale is allowed. Private bedrooms and sexually themed content whose use is only by invitation of the parcel owner, for their household and guests is fine, as long as not "extreme". Sexual and violent content should be out of a direct line of sight from adjacent parcels. "Be a good neighbor" applies. Could include descrete merchants vending adult-oriented content that is not graphic, such as skin vendors, sex beds where trying the bed poses is not allowed with clothes off and genitalia attached, pose balls stores (same guidelines, no trying them with clothes off and genitalia attached). Merchant vendor graphics might include full frontal nudity, but no images that would exceed an "R" rating in the movies. Can include outdoor nudity, like public nude beaches and nude hot tubbing, where no sex is taking place. Publicly visible images should be limited to R rating or less. No XXX hardcore images on display. Can include controlled combat areas where combat is not extreme/gory. "TV Western" or "Cop TV Show" violence, where someone who is shot or killed with a sword just falls down, instead of their head blowing up or blood fountaning.





I do not like your proposed definition. Sorry, but I live on mature mainland and will not qualify for the free move to Ursula, yet you are still proposing to remove my freedoms as to what I do in the privacy of my own home within SL? So then this will effect even more people under this definition, and I'd definitely be moving to the Adult Continent. Lindens have already stated that they will do nothing to help those of us not forced to move, but simply wanting the same amount of freedoms they currently enjoy on their mature parcels. I don't think we should be trying to include more people into a this move, but screwing them over even harder in the deal. Why make the targeted audience for land extortion larger?
_____________________
~*Ryanna Enfield*~
Waterstar Eilde
Registered User
Join date: 12 May 2007
Posts: 404
04-18-2009 22:08
From: Eydie Vantelli
Well, that opens up another whole area...I for one had not heard about a tightening or changing of the PG definition.

Is this official and does this mean that not only is there going to be an exodus from Mature to Adult sims...

But that those who currently reside in PG sims and have been known to change outfits within the privacy of their own homes without ensuring they put on underwear layers before removing outer layers (so now would be in voilation of the absolutely no full frontal nudity rules) will need to sell up and move to Mature areas or fear the wrath of the LL enforcers?

In the Educators' Brown Bag meeting, JP Linden said this (I've transcribed verbatim from the audio transcript):

“...and we’re also going to create a separate PG designation which is going to be an option for anyone that wants what you’d think of as a truly clean somewhat more maybe isolated experience so that they don’t have to associate if they don’t want to with any other sort of y’know gameplay that goes on that might not be adult but might appear in that sort of mid-range category of region designations.”

followed by:

“it’ll create a healthy layer of assurance that kids - minors - are not going to get into regions and parcels that have real adult activity y’know going on in them, and you’ve probably read about some of the stuff we’re seeing already; that stuff that we don’t want kids to get into and they’re places that frankly, the owners of that land and the operators of those businesses don’t want kids to be in so we think that’s a win/win. And finally, by creating this PG designation, we - we pave the way to other potential use cases, other ways to um y’know set educators or other y’know groupings of PG activity apart, whether y’know that means in search, or conceptually, or some other way. We don’t know exactly where that’s going to head, but we think it’s a good idea to begin that discussion where we see PG clean experience that may have y’know special uses in Second Life and - and ah, y’know, of particular interest to some people."

When questioned at a subsequent meeting, LL said that there are no plans at this stage to introduce a new super-clean PG rating on top of what we already have, but that a PG continent would be considered if there was enough demand.

Making existing PG 'cleaner' is full of holes, given that Mature and PG parcels exist side by side. I think LL has a very clear plan of its ultimate intention, but doesn't plan to share that with us anytime soon - hence the continued muddying of the waters. :(
Cory Korolev
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2007
Posts: 3
But could a Lindn plase verify this....??
04-18-2009 22:32
From: Brieanne Bomazi
The estate/Region will be JUST like living on current mainland that LL controls, except, by Default, it will be Flagged ADULT, requiring age verification and/or payment info on file/used

This means... Your Group owned land, will stil be group owned land, BUT... none of your employees will be able to access it unless they are age verified and/or payment info on file/used...We are still waiting for them to clairfy this.


Thank you Brieanne, the answer as you describe is just as I expected, but I would like to see a statement to this effect by a Linden. Can you refer me to one? That is, that Linden controlled settings on Ursala will be public access with Age Verification (either by Aristotle or Payment Info) required at the estate and region levels??
Brieanne Bomazi
Don't forget the *E*
Join date: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 383
I'm just sayin.....*I* am Adult Content
04-19-2009 00:21
From: Cory Korolev
Thank you Brieanne, the answer as you describe is just as I expected, but I would like to see a statement to this effect by a Linden. Can you refer me to one? That is, that Linden controlled settings on Ursala will be public access with Age Verification (either by Aristotle or Payment Info) required at the estate and region levels??


We are all waiting on concrete answers form the Lindens... what i told you is quoted from Blondin's posts earlier in this thread :)
Tcko Cazalet
Less Freedom=Exodus
Join date: 16 May 2007
Posts: 163
04-19-2009 01:18
From: Brieanne Bomazi
We are all waiting on concrete answers form the Lindens... what i told you is quoted from Blondin's posts earlier in this thread :)

U have to be kidding....Mr Blondin is in hiding.....only thing they have is paper thin...everyone needs to wake up! money talks and shit walks...they could care less about what we say
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
Double-primmed land in Ursula
04-19-2009 01:29
Will it be possible to trade single-primmed Mainland for double-primmed in "Ursula City"?

As described below, I think it would be best if this were the case, although I honestly don't know what ratio of trade is "fair" here. On the surface it would seem that 2-for-1 would be fair, but that may be short-changing LL of tier, so maybe it should be 1-for-1 to require the same monthly fee from the owner. But that ignores the (probable) value of the double-primmed land, so maybe 2-for-1 or even some higher ratio would be more appropriate.

Anyway, whatever is fair, I think it's important that this be possible. Ursula is getting pretty large now, and unless there's some way to encourage existing Adult content to settle in the "urban" center from the start, that part of the continent is going to fall prey to the same market forces that have made Bay City and Nautilus City such dismal failures: a sparsely settled "city" that looks like a futuristic "For Sale" sign adfarm on steroids.

It's not that all nor even most of the Adult landowners will want an urban setting with a futuristic theme. I expect many of the larger landowners will want the space and thematic latitude of a full or half-sim of Gothic grandeur. That's cool. But unless that city area is pretty much filled from the start, it's going to be just another expensive eyesore--and another lost opportunity for making the Mainland competitive.
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
04-19-2009 01:31
From: Storyof Oh
*****
A while back i did try posting in some groups about proposed changes and the need for views to be expressed....as a result i was even banned from one lol.... some people you just can't help...hopefully more will now understand the implications and have a desire to get their views counted.

As a further 'aside' without backreading has the situation been aired where someone owns AND ALSO rents land for 'adult' purposes? Whilst the land exchange would cover ownership what of the possible prim losses from the rental portion? especially if the landlord doesn't want to transfer to adult or may not be aware their land is used for the purpose.


Renting was covered at the brown bag and basically if you rent it is up to the landowner to decide how they want to go, adult or mature. Basically LL said that they will not help renters. The exact wording i cannot remember, i just wish they would hurry up and make the dam recording available to everyone.
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
04-19-2009 01:39
From: Valerius Constantine
<snipped for brevity>

LL has done everything bass-ackwards.


As they always do :)

From: someone
<snipped for brevity>
Hell, if LL had said something like "Hey guys, we really would like to clean up the mainland and start verifying all accounts, but we want to do it without dropping the anonymous freebie account. You see, we're trying to attract some business elements and they're kinda straight-laced, and well, we can't have flying penises everywhere. "

Do you think that they would have gotten much of an argument from any of us here? We would have made the same suggestions that we're making now- for *effective* non-disruptive ways to accomplish their goals.
Contrary to what some might believe, just because you want to get your freak on once in a while doesn't mean that you're a fan of flying penises. :)

LL is the one who said that they wanted our our opinion. we're giving it to them. One of our opinions is that they haven't thought this through carefully enough, and they need to go back a few steps, gather more and better information, and try again with a fresh plan.


-V-


That i think is pretty close to the mark based on LL history with this sort of thing although this is one of the biggest cock ups to date imho :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
04-19-2009 02:17
From: Valerius Constantine
I fully expect that someone other than Blondin will be in charge of final decisions! :) But LL has left *way* too much undecided and undefined to be as far along in the process as they are.
To expect them to handle the moving of the laughable "2%-4%" of mainland parcels to Ursula without pain, agony and angst, Sturm und Drang, Donner und Blitzen, and above all *drama*...

Well that just goes against the historical record of the last couple of years, doesn't it? :)


Totally agree with you its the crazy figures they have put forward as i would say maybe in the extreme corner yes it maybe close, however in the overall adult content picture i would imagine its a number much higher than LL supposes or even we as customers imagine.

From: someone
I'm really trying to participate in the discussion here, but there's really not enough info from LL's side of the table- that leaves us planning for the worst case- because that is what we have learned to expect around here.


I agree it is hard to participate in any discussion or debate when you do not have all the facts on the table to discuss also the last brown bag which i attended has a lot of answers to questions here, yet still as of posting this reply it is not available for everyone to listen to and that is what makes me cross.

From: someone
I firmly believe that if LL does things on a "first come first served" basis, then the lot of us will either pay through the nose for land or have to settle for unsuitable locations, because some freakin' *bot* will have bought everything before we can get there.


Jack said at the meeting that they would not let the land speculators in until everyone was moved that had to be forced move, now how true that pans out to be is another matter, but i hope for everyones sake it is correct. We own a sim and do not particularly mind where we go except we would like flat green, so we are easily pleased and we are also in a position to rebuild in a fairly short time as we run a business from home so we do have the time and could easily re-build in the 9 days, but many are not that lucky thats for certain. Again Jack said that the 9 days were not decided for sure and they would judge things on a case by case situation.

Again they need to make this and other facts clear as i am just another customer like everyone else here and shouldn't be having to impart information from a meeting 5 days ago to my fellow customers. LL should have taken care of it especially when it was said that the audio would be available in a couple of days after the meeting. Although as i attended the meeting i feel responsible to say what was said that i can remember, but to still be doing it 5 days later is crazy lol

From: someone
LL has a metaphorical *gun* to our collective heads. we're simply trying to decide *when* they will pull the trigger, not *if*. Either way, SL as we know it will be over.
This is an *unforced* change made at the whim of someone in the organization, and it flies in the face of the Linden Tao. They have abandoned their principles and now we are seeing it.


I cannot disagree with this statement at all and SL will be a totally different place after the changes, but good or bad well imo that is still to be seen. But i do not believe the sky is falling in as yet.

From: someone
I didn't get into SL for philosophical reasons- I'm not one of the new frontier, I am here to have fun and maybe make a few bucks along the way. But LL *did* do this for philosophical reasons. SL has been up to it's eyeballs in "magical mystery tour" jargon and attitudes since I first heard about it years ago. In fact, one of the reasons I didn't come here at first was because I couldn't see the utility of a virtual world where I coulg go and just "be". :)


Haha i am becoming an oldie now after trying it out in 03 then re joining in 05 after RL took me away with work for 2 years, but that is not the point. It matters not if someone has been here for 6 years or 6 weeks, this affects us all directly or indirectly and that is what matters and as i have stated over and over i am for the separate adult content, but NOT this forced move situation, but this should have been done a long time ago and not now the way they are doing it with no honest thought for those affected imho and certainly LL should be more Honest with us as customers.

From: someone
Obviously, I changed my mind, but LL has no excuses here.

They founded their company on a philosophy, and sold their product to their customers with that corporate philosophy as a part of the product. They sold people a big box of electronic tinker-toys and said "Go play! No limits!"

The real world intruded a couple of times over the years- no age play, no unchartered banks, no gambling, restrictions on the currency, but those were all from *outside*.

There were screw-ups too- Openspace for one.

But this is the first time that LL simply *decided* to make a change this big without consultation with the residents over whether it *should be done, isn't it? I mean, they poll residents about which *bugs in the viewer to fix first* for crying out loud!

Don't you think that there should have been one tiny little poll? One little splash screen notice? maybe a blue drop-down card that says "Hey gang, we had a thought-..."

I mean, *something*?

Why should I have any confidence in LL these days? different people are running the railroad, and the Tao has been revised and redacted.

-V-


I agree they should have polled everyone from the start and started these brown bag meetings long ago, in fact as i have said a while back, resident feedback could have been sought from those of us that run adult content and those that would have been affected. I would have signed an NDA if it meant that i would have had better input on these changes before they happened as i am sure would many others. LL has at its disposal the best bunch of brains and skill sets at their disposal who are passionate about this crazy world and who i am sure would gladly donate their time for free to issues such as this but do they want to take advantage of this fact...... No they sure don't seem to want to, so go figure ;)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
04-19-2009 03:04
From: Cory Korolev
Question 1: Who then will control access settings for the Estate and Region in which the club's new parcel on Ursala is located? I would suppose that would be LL.


Governor Linden

From: someone

Question 2: If the answer to question 1 is as I suppose, then what will be the LL default Estate and Region access settings on Ursala? Since the estate and region access settings are applied first and are not under control of parcel owners, the answers to these questions will obviously have great impact on the viability of the move for a parcel-based business.


The existing estate controls will be as for all mainland - i.e. allow everyone regardless of PIU/PIOF or Aristotle verification.

The matuiry rating of a region, which can currently be set to PG or Mature will include a new rating of Adult. All land on Ursula will be set to Adult (rather than Mature or PG). The new server code will prevent access to any region (mainland or private) which has a maturity rating of Adult, unless the user has set a checkbox in the viewer to say that they wish to see Adult content. When access is denied in this fashion, a message explaining way will be displayed by the viewer. Only those who are PIU/PIOF or Aristotle verified will be able to change this setting to allow access to adult content.

Matthew

Please try to clarify this... we are not all large corporations owning islands, estates, regions, etc. Some of us just operate from a fair sized mainland parcel, and I have not seen this simple situation addressed at all though there has been voluminous discussion of how to set estate and region access controls.

Thanks in advance for any clarification you can give.[/QUOTE]
Matthew Dowd
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,046
04-19-2009 03:25
From: Eydie Vantelli
I wanted to ask a (possibly stupid) question:

What will be the difference between the new (cleansed) Mature sims and PG sims....or will the 'Mature' & 'PG' categories now be merged?


This was how Blondin answered that question

From: Blondin Linden

1) Are there any clear, uncontroversial, unanimous agreed, examples of activities which are "mature" but not "adult"?
ANSWER: Nude beaches, Dance clubs with "alcohol" and dancing, combat sims, lingerie shops, private builds with furniture and accessories.


However, in practice:

Anyone running a nude beach outside of Ursula will find themselves ARed frequently enough to want to move anyway.

A dance club with (fake) "alcohol" and dancing, I thought was currently PG. (I'm sure I've seen even G rated films where someone drinks in a bar or dances). Certainly I'd have no problem drinking alcohol in front of my grandmother or even with my grandmother (the current PG test).

Combat sims covers a wide ground. Most of the discussion on Adult content has concentrated on sexual content, so it is even less clear what the intention for violence and combat is. I would have thought that a combat sim might be deemed PG or Adult (as well as mature) depending on the level of violence - e.g. a paintball or snowball combat sim would probably be PG (again throwing snowballs passes the grandmother test for PG), whereas a combat sim with particle effect blood letting and strewn with dismembered bodies would probably be Adult.

I wasn't aware that lingerie shops were not allowed on PG land - unless the vendor images were particularly explicit (but in that case, those images might push it into Adult). Again you'll sometimes see lingerie shops in G rated movies.

And private builds, we then have the problem of what constitutes private versus public. If you remain on mature land and have adult content up in a skybox, then you can't advertise events or locations on that land, even if they are in places on that land where there is no adult content. Again most people with adult content will consider Ursula just to be on the safe side.

Matthew
Kirsty Shoreman
Registered User
Join date: 22 Dec 2008
Posts: 44
crazy crazy
04-19-2009 03:32
This post is now crazy long and nothing concrete is happening. Is it possible that LL have realized their adult continent plan is unworkable and have quietly dropped it? And just letting us rant while they are getting on with something completely different?

just a thought

K
Kalderi Tomsen
Nomad Extraordinaire!
Join date: 10 May 2007
Posts: 888
04-19-2009 04:47
From: Deltango Vale
Offer land in Ursula to existing mainland residents who DEFINE THEMSELVES or their businesses as 'Xtreme'.

Use the carrot instead of the stick. Offer incentives (fee tier for a year, an escrow service for internal parcel swaps should businesses conflict etc.). Market Ursula as a garden instead of a ghetto.

Sell the remaining land via auction (full sims, various sized parcels) to all residents who are account verified (CC/PayPal/Aristotle/alternatives).
I have edited it heavily, but this is possibly one of the most sane posts I have seen on how this could work better. Deltango, thank you for posting this idea.
_____________________
Kalderi, General Manager, Hosoi Ichiba and Hosoi Design

- - -
Hosoi Ichiba - High Quality Classically-styled Asian buildings, furniture and home decorations in an old-fashioned Japanese market garden on Japan Kanto. http://hosoi-ichiba.blogspot.com/

Hosoi Design - High Quality prefabs and furnishings, plus commercial buildings.
Dogboat Taurog
Registered User
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 133
04-19-2009 04:49
From: Kirsty Shoreman
This post is now crazy long and nothing concrete is happening. Is it possible that LL have realized their adult continent plan is unworkable and have quietly dropped it? And just letting us rant while they are getting on with something completely different?

just a thought

K


nope, their aims are twofold, to clean up second life and to make more cash, when LL are quiet it just means they have stopped communicating with its residents.
As someone pointed out, one solitary linden cannot be trusted to speak for LL, "blondin" is just PR giving lip service and he's not good at it.
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
Ursula content pack
04-19-2009 05:28
Will the Moles distribute a content pack corresponding to the Linden infrastructure on Ursula, most especially including as many as possible of the textures used in their builds?

A common palette of textures available for use in new builds on the continent can go a long way in reducing download delays and making rendering more efficient, as well as encouraging some thematic coherence.

This was done in Bay City and Nautilus City, and should be done for Ursula, too.

In fact, it would be helpful to have that content in advance of the moves if it can be ready, so that it can be incorporated in some builds from day one.
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
04-19-2009 07:43
Why are they themeing Ursula? From what I've read here it's supposed to be a futuristic theme? Not everyone who is being told to move has their place in such a setting, do they?
Isn't making people move and then putting theme in a setting they may not want adding insult to injury?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Eydie Vantelli
Registered User
Join date: 9 Jun 2008
Posts: 10
I wonder if anyone at LL has considered....
04-19-2009 07:59
From: Waterstar Eilde
In the Educators' Brown Bag meeting, JP Linden said this (I've transcribed verbatim from the audio transcript):

“...and we’re also going to create a separate PG designation which is going to be an option for anyone that wants what you’d think of as a truly clean somewhat more maybe isolated experience.....”

followed by:

“it’ll create a healthy layer of assurance that kids - minors - are not going to get into regions and parcels that have real adult activity y’know going on in them..."

....Making existing PG 'cleaner' is full of holes, given that Mature and PG parcels exist side by side. I think LL has a very clear plan of its ultimate intention, but doesn't plan to share that with us anytime soon - hence the continued muddying of the waters. :(


....That one of the consequences of making the new 'Adult' areas only accessible to 'age/identity verified', will be that the new PG & 'cleaned up' Mature areas will the hangout for any who don't wish their identity traceable.

Yes, it will make the new 'Adult' areas safer, but will not offer any real safeguards about who is roaming the rest of the grid.

Those whose intent is not benign will be only able to operate within the areas that supposedly being 'cleaned up' by this move.

If the long term intention (or wish) of LL is actually to open the main grid to non-adults (teens) and offer a 'healthy level of reassurance' about what those teens may encounter...

Then...
- either LL will be looking to also monitor ALL Voice, IM and Media content
or
- it will be an inevitable necessary step to require age/identity verification of ALL residents throughout the grid and this is probably something residents should be aware will be in the pipeline.


[A radical alternative would be to require identity verification of those allowed onto the new PG & Mature sims (so they can be held accountable for keeping their behavior 'decent') and let those who wish 'to walk in cloaks of mystery' only to access the crimson lit streets of Ursula - caveat emptor.]
Couldbe Yue
one unhappy customer
Join date: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 1,532
04-19-2009 08:01
I just thought I'd add this to the mix. It's the LL ToS for XSL.

From: someone

· Do I have to mark my items as Adult? And, why?

The following items must be marked as Adult: Patently offensive, obscene, vulgar, or profane language. Visual depictions of death, dismemberment, or serious bodily injury. Visual depictions of patently offensive sexual conduct including, but not limited to, sex acts between consenting parties and masturbation. Visual depictions of nudity including, but not limited to, exposed pubic area,genitalia, buttocks, and female nipples.

This is because we are not a members-only website and are open to the public. Therefore, under law we must make sure that only PG rated material is available to the casual browser.


so there you have their definition of pg. The question arises as to what out of the exclusions are mature vs adult.
_____________________
Satiated Desires: Toys for Grown Ups.
Inworld: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Norf%20Haven/186/132/55
XSL: https://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&MerchantID=77743&&sort=age&dir=asc
Blog: http://satiateddesires.wordpress.com/
Waterstar Eilde
Registered User
Join date: 12 May 2007
Posts: 404
04-19-2009 08:11
From: Eydie Vantelli
...[A radical alternative would be to require identity verification of those allowed onto the new PG & Mature sims (so they can be held accountable for keeping their behavior 'decent') and let those who wish 'to walk in cloaks of mystery' only to access the crimson lit streets of Ursula - caveat emptor.]

Now THAT I'd like to see! ;)
Waterstar Eilde
Registered User
Join date: 12 May 2007
Posts: 404
04-19-2009 08:12
From: Couldbe Yue
I just thought I'd add this to the mix. It's the LL ToS for XSL [cut quote] so there you have their definition of pg. The question arises as to what out of the exclusions are mature vs adult.

umm... not a lot, by the look of it...

I came to the conclusion a while back that the only direction in which LL could ultimately be heading was to make existing mainland fully PG.
Wynochee LeShelle
Polykontexturalist
Join date: 3 Feb 2007
Posts: 658
Say Blondin...
04-19-2009 09:09
What will be the new slogan on the website-header, since Your World. Your Imagination is not true?
Da5id Weatherwax
Registered User
Join date: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 90
04-19-2009 09:12
From: Cory Korolev
Thank you Brieanne, the answer as you describe is just as I expected, but I would like to see a statement to this effect by a Linden. Can you refer me to one? That is, that Linden controlled settings on Ursala will be public access with Age Verification (either by Aristotle or Payment Info) required at the estate and region levels??


This is exactly what they have been saying all along... It will be impossible to access the entire Ursula continent unless the av attempting to do so is considered a "known" adult - PIOF/PIU or Aristotle age-verified. Parcel flags restricting access will be applied as they are now, so parcel owners can fine-tune who in that larger set may access their land - age verified only or payment info on file only - but there will be no unverified and NPIOF users on the continent, because those folks will be prohibited from travelling there.

If they dont verify or get payment into in before this happens theres going to be a lot of dancers, hosts/hostesses and escorts suddenly out of work, because they wont be able to access the new location of their place of employment or anywhere else that their trade is permitted inworld.
Dogboat Taurog
Registered User
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 133
04-19-2009 09:18
From: Wynochee LeShelle
What will be the new slogan on the website-header, since Your World. Your Imagination is not true?


i suggest "our world, our rules and we can change them whenever we like so stfu"
Brieanne Bomazi
Don't forget the *E*
Join date: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 383
I'm just sayin.....*I* am Adult Content
04-19-2009 09:25
From: Brenda Connolly
Why are they themeing Ursula? From what I've read here it's supposed to be a futuristic theme? Not everyone who is being told to move has their place in such a setting, do they?
Isn't making people move and then putting theme in a setting they may not want adding insult to injury?



This whole thing is insult to injury. They give us nothing to go on, sit & let rumors run rampant, all while saying...."We care what you have to say" Yeah... I am calling BULLSHIT. They want the cash... it doesn't matter what we say. 5 years in SL is enough for me, and there's a lot that agree, and have realized as well, this is nothing more than them handing us a new $2 toy to play with while they go about their original plan, regardless of what we say or do. It amazes me that there are so many protest groups about this... yet when anyone offers up something concrete to hand LL as a united front, very few people are willing to add their name to it.

Blondin drew the short stick, and got stuck being lip service here... and Sorry Blondin, i know its a lot, but seriously dude, you could act like you at least care. If you take the time to read from the beginning to here, the story has changed, out of LL's own mouth, a few times. Its a clear case of the left hand is doing exactly what it wants while the right hand pats us on the head and pretends to give a shit.

There have been numerous GREAT ideas posted here, and as of yet, Blondin has sidestepped every single one of them to and done nothing but give vague answers to the questions He HAS answered.

From: someone

Originally Posted by Deltango Vale
Offer land in Ursula to existing mainland residents who DEFINE THEMSELVES or their businesses as 'Xtreme'.

Use the carrot instead of the stick. Offer incentives (fee tier for a year, an escrow service for internal parcel swaps should businesses conflict etc.). Market Ursula as a garden instead of a ghetto.

Sell the remaining land via auction (full sims, various sized parcels) to all residents who are account verified (CC/PayPal/Aristotle/alternatives).


and also...

From: someone

1. It has been stated that 9 days will be allowed move. It is entirely unfeasible. There are many full sim owners that simply can not pack up and move a full or even ½ sim in that allotted time. We propose a changed time limit of 30 days minimum, for anyone owning more than 2048 land. The original 9 days could be applied to anyone owning less than this amount. This allows existing businesses to still remain in business while the new location is being built and set up.

2. It has also been stated that LL will not charge a *dual* land tier while the swap is underway. While this is acceptable, there is also the time that we, current paying residents of SL, have to invest to rebuild/move. In compensation for this time lost, we respectfully request one months land tier credit, to compensate for our time, and loss of business this move will incur.

3. In consideration of the land swap, all group owned land choice should be given to the current group owner, or top contributor of donated land in the group.


HOW HARD IS IT???????

For the love of all that's freaking unholy, for ONCE, show your CUSTOMERS some consideration.


~Brie
Brieanne Bomazi
Don't forget the *E*
Join date: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 383
I'm just sayin.....*I* am Adult Content
04-19-2009 09:29
From: Da5id Weatherwax
This is exactly what they have been saying all along... It will be impossible to access the entire Ursula continent unless the av attempting to do so is considered a "known" adult - PIOF/PIU or Aristotle age-verified. Parcel flags restricting access will be applied as they are now, so parcel owners can fine-tune who in that larger set may access their land - age verified only or payment info on file only - but there will be no unverified and NPIOF users on the continent, because those folks will be prohibited from travelling there.

If they dont verify or get payment into in before this happens theres going to be a lot of dancers, hosts/hostesses and escorts suddenly out of work, because they wont be able to access the new location of their place of employment or anywhere else that their trade is permitted inworld.



And the fact that LL has not made any type of INWORLD announcement...nothing more than the blogs/forums... start visiting the Escort Agencies, The Strip clubs, the *pure adult venues* and simply ask... "So you have an opinion on the upcoming changes in SL about adult content and the new continent?" and see how many blank stares you get, and how many people brush you off, cause they simply do not believe its coming.

~Brie