Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Upcoming Changes for Adult Content: Main Forum Thread

Rene Erlanger
Scuderia Shapes & Skins G
Join date: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2,008
03-21-2009 09:49
From: TLMars Bookmite
This WE know because it is simple logic. But based on the spin in the press we saw they are not going to think again. This new change they are making comes across as a fresh progressive idea. "Second Life is not dead and is now more user friendly for businesses and residents. Come see the NEW Second Life that will roll out in early Summer where you won't accidently wander into any content that you might find offsensive. Linden Labs has taken the steps necessary to make sure your Second Life experience is more predictable."

They have the press they wanted. It's already gotten them what they appear to want.


Yep...the proposed policy is driven for the desire of good PR in the media amongst other things.
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-21-2009 09:58
From: Rene Erlanger
Well that's the one ray of light from this policy...the verification will surely increase the number of PIOF from where it is now. Let say a realistic but hypothetical 10% of all accounts (excluding Bots) are now PIOF....it could well be that this Adult policy might drive it up to say 30-40%. For the overall economy that has to be a good thing....but it will be offset by the numbers that choose to either leave, and the non recycled cashflow from those working in the Adult Sector right now.

To be honest, payment on file should have been kept from the outset....which kind of highlights that a lot of LL policy changes are shaped around the desire of wanting to be "positive PR " centric.....that policy change gave them the desired login numbers, the increase in number of new accounts to boast to the Media about......now that same policy has kind of backfired on them big time!! ......and this is not to include the "Traffic Bots saga" into the equation due to the opening of the same floodgates.

Had they maintained "Payment on File" from the outset, the total logins today would possibly be around 30-40k+ from natural growth alone, but it would be a pure figure.....no bots, no freebie hunters....the economy would most likely be in stronger shape than what it is today. The grid for one would be a lot smaller ...not the 30k sims we have today, with a large percentage of Yellow!....the population density possibly better than what it is now.


M.Linden wants RL Businesses (mid-size i presume) here because he believes there is a market of holding business meetings, internal training and ultimately operational costs savings for those companies.....he also wants Educators here......and most importantly he wants good company PR in all the media, he wants the image of "Second Life" to change for the better......the non-regulated Adult sector kind of gets in the way of his vision!

if we move on....and lets say LL achieved their sanitised Disney World they so desire and lets say hypothetically the Adult porn sector is virtually non-existant...we now arrive to the next stage, which is Phillip Linden's vision of wanting "RL Teens to be included into the Main Grid because its now become safe for them to do so"
(Yes, for now LL are denying merger, they have a lot of "sanitisation" to do before they could merge it.....but nowhere has it been said "that it will never happen";)

If that were to occur, or if this were the actual Roadmap for SL.....it would be a huge PR disaster waiting to happen and all the work that M.Linden achieved prior to that would be wiped away at a single stroke! You cannot have RL kids on the same platform as RL adults and hope not to recieve lots of negative media....particularly from Europe. What is in the Media today is what matters, it doesn't matter about all the glowing reports about SL prior to that......People have a tendancy to quickly forget old media!

Peadophiles do exist, we have seen/ read/ heard stories surrounding IRC Chat channels, Myspace and other social networks were both sets mingle together....regardless of how many appear on Central Agency listings there are always ones that remain undetected. Its a bit like the analogy of "Suicide bombers"as one dies, there are many in the background ready fill that role!

These perverts will hang in PG areas, the same areas where RL kids are being contained in. Go figure!


Just like the policy of "free acounts" has now backfired on SL forcing them to go into reverse gear......the same would happen to their PR in the media if they intergrated RL kids into the main grid. One wonders when will LL ever learn!
Do they just "play business" ?



This single sentence highlights the problems with this latest policy! It is really worth reposting .....it sums it all up neatly for me in just 1 sentence.!!!


I totally agree with you on this and that is why we do not have all our resources just in SL. SL is small part of the advertising budget and stays for now as we both enjoy it and have many friends here but whatever happens we will constantly watch and follow what LL decides and when and if the time is right we will bail out with the RL adult company from here and go back to just using SL as the great 3d chat program it always has been and as long as i continue to receive value for the money we put into the SL each month we will stay :)

The problem is SL is not RL and many people forget that and treat it as RL and think they have rights here and laws to protect them as in RL, well they do as far as consumer laws and rights are concerned but thats it and no one has has any rights over what LL decides to do as we all signed the TOS when we started and agreed to all the terms and clauses therein. Don't forget they could stop people cashing out L$ tomorrow with no warning and we as customers would have no recourse, tho that won't happen i am sure ..... but i will never say never with LL. We are the biggest beta software test group any company could have and we have even paid to make LL what it is today and purchased most of its grid for it lol

That is why the only way to vote for change is with your feet if you disagree with LL as they will always only ever pay lip service to the customers. They show this time and time again. Sure there are some great Lindens here that care, but upper management doesn't care about anything other than what it can make from the customers and whilst they are the only real viable 3d grid at the moment they can do just about anything they like.

One day that will change but until then people should learn that its not our world, our imagination its LL's to do with what they want and when they want

Great post BTW :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Phoenix Welles
Multiple Avatar Disorder
Join date: 6 Jan 2007
Posts: 111
03-21-2009 09:58
From: GreenKnight Kaul
Now the main property is 97% "G" rated. publically accessable I have things that I have been told were obscene, picture of 2 men kissing. One may not like it but to me it is nothing to be offended by.


I snipped out this portion because it helps illustrate exactly how hard it will be to define 'adult content'. Especially if we try and be fair to everybody.

The sad sad fact is, to some people in extremely conservative circles, the act of 2 men kissing is so offensive an act as to be eternally punishable.

Then there are those of us who could care less.

Who, in the end, will the definition of adult be based on? And will rules be applied across the board to be fair when the act itself may not be offensive in general terms, but a minority get bent out of shape when certain conditions are met? Male-female kissing polite public fully clothed, generally not offensive. Male male, or female female same conditions a fully clothed quick polite kiss and some people go to cover junior's eyes.

pinning down 'adult content' is already hard enough, but these definitions will have to be carefully thought out and implemented in an extremely delicate manner or there will be cries of discrimination.
Rene Erlanger
Scuderia Shapes & Skins G
Join date: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2,008
03-21-2009 09:59
As if to prove the point any further regarding M.Linden's vision.....we have this today on the Blogs


https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/grid/blog/2009/03/19/three-questions-for-diane-berry-ceo-of-tpma-on-an-event-in-second-life
TLMars Bookmite
FemDom Artist
Join date: 6 Aug 2008
Posts: 35
LL are lines now more clearly drawn?
03-21-2009 10:10
Perhaps Saturday is not the best time to post this. But, after this week of thousands of posts maybe LL is now able to give us a clearer picture.

Before I log on and begin moving my main gallery with my home & office to my new safe haven in a Gorean Vampire RPing estate that will be flagged Adult as soon as the new policy is in place, I'd like to offer myself as a baseline since I do truely believe that I will be one of those that will be forced to locate my mainland galleries. (This situation is sure making some strange bedfellows eh? ;-P )

LL please do let us know if I am correct in my belief. It could help those who are unsure make a better assessment.

I was asked yesterday why I felt I would be on the list. So here is why based on what LL has put before us...

First, the word "intent" was used and art was included. There is no question that my art is erotic as well as sexually graphic in many cases. So obviously the intent is to arouse on a sexual level.

If I just displayed and sold my R rated pin-up style pieces, I'd probably be ok.

My assumption is that it is the rest that will tip me over that line. It's the images of nude males in bondage - shackles, cages etc.. It's the nude males with exposed bloody whip marks and bruises. It's the anal plugs and strap-ons worn by the Dommes. It's the images of actual sexual activity.

I believe that no matter how well I have attempted to create an attractive build that blends into the surroundings, no matter that I have done my best to alert any random passer by who might wander in about what is inside so they can aviod entering unprepared, it won't matter.

I feel that based on what hazy lines are already drawn and my unwillingness to remove my more graphic pieces that I will be forced to relocate my mainland galleries to Ursula even though I'm a gallery owner not a sex club.

Linden's am I correct?
_____________________
Love is the Law. Love under Will.
Rene Erlanger
Scuderia Shapes & Skins G
Join date: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2,008
03-21-2009 10:16
From: Lord Sullivan
I totally agree with you on this and that is why we do not have all our resources just in SL. SL is small part of the advertising budget and stays for now as we both enjoy it and have many friends here but whatever happens we will constantly watch and follow what LL decides and when and if the time is right we will bail out with the RL adult company from here and go back to just using SL as the great 3d chat program it always has been and as long as i continue to receive value for the money we put into the SL each month we will stay :)

The problem is SL is not RL and many people forget that and treat it as RL and think they have rights here and laws to protect them as in RL, well they do as far as consumer laws and rights are concerned but thats it and no one has has any rights over what LL decides to do as we all signed the TOS when we started and agreed to all the terms and clauses therein. Don't forget they could stop people cashing out L$ tomorrow with no warning and we as customers would have no recourse, tho that won't happen i am sure ..... but i will never say never with LL. We are the biggest beta software test group any company could have and we have even paid to make LL what it is today and purchased most of its grid for it lol

That is why the only way to vote for change is with your feet if you disagree with LL as they will always only ever pay lip service to the customers. They show this time and time again. Sure there are some great Lindens here that care, but upper management doesn't care about anything other than what it can make from the customers and whilst they are the only real viable 3d grid at the moment they can do just about anything they like.

One day that will change but until then people should learn that its not our world, our imagination its LL's to do with what they want and when they want

Great post BTW :)


Good post too!:)

I think finally our opinions are beginning to merge into an agreement of where this is all heading and how to cope moving forward!
Oceanna Sands
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2007
Posts: 10
Question about action
03-21-2009 10:35
I have a question. I have no doubt that whatever is decided in LL to be done will be done. I have observed in the time ive been in SL that resident input really hasn't had much affect on actions taken. Maybe it should be that way. It is, after all, a business and until losses start occuring listening to customer input is not necessary.

I am a resident who doesn't like to be constantly confronted by vampires sending unsolicited offers to bite, extreme language etc. I choose not to go to the places where that happens. If i am at a venue and have a problem with it, it will discuss that with the venue owner. Sometimes the venue owener is appreciative and changes are made and other times it just becomes a place i choose not to be.

Getting around to my question. What will be done to enforce PG on linden land? I also am a mentor and love helping new residents. I have started avoiding welcome areas however, because they are by far the worst and most offensive places in SL. When I am there and wear my mentor tag, I am subject to abuse from the regulars that hang out there. We are told to AR .......and I do. I also seem to spend most of my time there teaching others how to mute. While these are important skills to teach new residents, my time mentoring should be spent answering questions.........and helping new residents find their way in SL. I know that if i was a new resident , coming into SL for the first time, and didn't realize there was more to it, I would not have come back if my first exper4iences were the horrors of most of the welcome areas.

Oceanna Sands
Nicolette Lefevre
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 21
How to do it without changes to the client-software
03-21-2009 10:36
From: Da5id Weatherwax
Given the assumption that individual sims would be rated PG, Mature, Adult and the "max level" viewable will be set dynamically by viewer preference here's a few thoughts:


First of all: I haven't read all the latest postings here yet. I'm still on page 60, so please bare with me if this point has been already mentioned somewhere. I just didn't want to wait until I'm through with reading everything, because by then, I might have forgotten that I wanted to write about this :-)

You don't need to make ANY changes to the viewer at all. All you need is a change in the server-software and the possibility to choose on the My-Account web-pages which kind of content you want to see.

It's the server that sends informations about prims to the client, so it is not the client which decides what it shows to the user, but the server which decides which information to send to the client.

Scenario: A user who has selected NOT to view adult content enters (or is near) a sim with such content. The server then only sends the terrain-data to the user's client. No prims, no sound, no chat emenating from that adult-sim will ever be sent to the user's client. So the user will not see, hear or read anything from that sim, thus sparing him/her from this "horrible" experience :-)

That user can freely enter that sim though. Walk around, fly around. He/she doesn't even collide with objects there. The server acts to the user as if the sim were completely empty. That user can do everything that he wants, BUT: Nothing that this user does in that adult sim will be sent to the other users in that sim that DO want to see adult content. So the whole existence of that user in that sim is hidden to the people who allow adult-content. It will be handled by the server as if these two groups of people are in totally different universes. They can't see each other, they can't talk to each other.

That way users who don't want to see adult content, would just see some empty sims. Just empty landscape.

Users who want to see adult content wouldn't be hindered in any way. The two groups don't even know of each other being there in the same sim.

End-result: No more naked noobs or other adult-content disturbing some people. And no-one would have to move at all.

And I agree to previous posters who said that it would be a good idea to have (P)G-rated and Adult-rated continents of their own. For people who *voluntarily* want to have land there. It would benefit everyones SL experience a lot if there were more strict building codes in some parts of SL too. Some parts of the mainland really look ugly. Not necessarily because of adult content. They are just... well... ugly :-)

But of course there should still be places where people can build freely. Even if it's ugly. :-)
samatha Congrejo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 188
03-21-2009 10:52
From: Lord Sullivan
The same could be said for gambling which imho was far bigger than the adult business or at least on par with it and when it was banned yes a lot got hurt some got burnt and other's sales dropped but in the grand scheme of things it all picked back up and the economy grew again and the people that are in SL now that joined after the gambling ban are none the wiser and continue to contribute to the economy.



Gambling was less than 4% of users total (and that was traffic, not that all of them gambled.)
samatha Congrejo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 188
No it isn't
03-21-2009 10:56
From: TLMars Bookmite
I don't know samatha since I don't personally know Neptune. But from what has been posted, I think Neptune is the lone voice on this thread of those that LL is attempting to provide that more "predictable experience" for. It doesn't seem to me to be about personal financial gain on Neptune's part.


No we talked. Turns out he wants to get rid of an ugly sex club building near by. Not a problem with it being a sex club, just the building. Do you blame him.

This again is the Lindens. No building code, no regulations on much. The mainland is their baby and they just let it be a free for all mostly.

On Private sims, most are managed.
samatha Congrejo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 188
Instant good Press
03-21-2009 11:02
Want instant good Press:

Annouce that all new accounts to Second Life will require payment on file information as age verification.

Simple and direct and works within what they want.

Current users are not effected, they get grand fathered to adult status if they want.
They don't have to be forced to choose.

All new users come in to the service knowing they have to provide that information and Lindens get some great press.

As for the Mainland. Well gee why not try coming in world and actually managing it. Make up building codes. Require all NEW buyers to agree to it as part of the purchasing process. Slowly manage each sim into somethign better. Encourage some larger land owners to explore improvements.

I will add to this. Allow people to tie their alts to their main account. So if you register an alt later you can just link it, but you also would be required to do some verification for a new alt. Wave goodbye to a lot of the griefers this way!!!

Want to get adult off the mainland grid as it stands? OK make it attractive. Not just some lump of un-teriformed land.

Sell them the new land at 1l per m, and give them two weeks free teir....

will nto cost that much and they can sell their old plots off.

BUT FIRST get a damn building code for all mainland!!!
Sapphire Hissop
Registered User
Join date: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 9
*I* an Adult Content
03-21-2009 11:10
From: Blondin Linden
So in other words, even if an account was verified, they would still have to opt-in to access adult content?


I am not sure who else has replied to this part of your posting Blue - but I would like to say a huge resounding YES to this!! I came to SL from AOL because I liked the idea of a virtual world and I also liked the idea that SL was ADULTS only. I got really tired of the A/S/L comments in chatrooms where I used to RP (Role play) on AOL. I am an adult. I am also adult content because my female toon (avatar) looks like an adult human female. Meaning I have all the bits and parts a real human female has. Do I like adult content? Yes. Do I prefer mature sims? Yes again. Am I capable of deciding what I want to see or experience? Also yes. It's called being responsible enough to turn off the tv, radio, etc or even *gasp* change the channel when there is something there I don't want to see or hear. I am with a lot of the others who have suggested an opt-in for adult content. If you want children and teens on the grid - which by the way I was told would not be present when I joined just over a year ago - then keep them in the G and PG worlds on SL and let me have the freedom and ability to opt-in to access adult content. If someone doesn't want to see adult content then they won't. Simple. If they opt-in then they have no reason to complain.

I do not own a store or build but I do shop. A LOT! I buy Lindens and use them on XStreet and also in world. Plus I pay tiers on a parcel of land I rent on a private estate. I also have a premium account. So am I stimulating the economy of SL? Yes I am. And are some of my purchases adult? Absolutely. I work at a BDSM club as a hostess and dancer so yes I dress my toon in sexy clothing. I love being able to customize my SL experience and to me that includes adult content. And the pose balls everyone is mentioning have this little thing attached to them called free will. No one makes you click on the pose ball. If you don't want to know what it does, don't click on it. And if it is something you are not interested in, don't click on it. And if it bothers you to see those things, don't click on it. See the pattern there? And if adult content bothers you - then stay on the G and PG sims. Simple.

I think it is unfair to put those that enjoy adult content into the equivalent of a ghetto. Seems to me the Nazis did that some years ago and look how that turned out. :( Most of my friends - actually all of my friends in SL enjoy the same things I do. And many of them own shops, sims, clubs, homes and they all enjoy adult content too. And there is some absolutely amazing music, artwork and clothing to be seen on SL - and yes a lot of it qualifies as adult content. I even have some of the artwork hanging in my SL home. And do I listen to music with adult content - absolutely! I should have the right to do this if I choose in the clubs that I choose to dance in or party in. I should have the right to see the artwork I want to see and listen to the music I want to hear. Does everyone else have that right too? Absolutely! But don't force your music or views on me and I will not force them onto you. Seems fair to me.

So yes, please add an opt-in to the sign in page for SL or make it something we can click on the website as a one time choice that can be changed at anytime we wish to change it. This is an amazing world built by amazing adults and we should have the choice to experience SL in the way that best suits us. Thanks for you time.

Sapphire
Dev Lewsey
Registered User
Join date: 5 Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Adult?
03-21-2009 11:13
I understand and support guidelines to protect our children, but when we start treating adults like children there is a problem. An adult should now that if they are hearing or seeing something they don't like they can turn off, walk away, whatever to stop exposing themselves to it. I can understand a corporation trying to protect its customers from things they don't like. I can't understand how you plan on defining Adult Content. If you say a "dirty" word in a movie it goes from a PG to an R rating, but you can't stop a person from swearing in SL. I am all for protecting the innocent, but the only way it can be done is to keep them separate, if you don't want adult content, don't log in to Adult SL. If you don't like Rap don't listen to it, if you don't like nudity, don't watch it. To impose other peoples ethics on everyone is the very definition of Facist. Are you going to create an SL Storm trooper squad that will show up and delete the sim if it doesn't abide to your rules. Once you start censoring something you can't stop until it is all censored. The Bible is adult content, I find parts of it to be offensive, I'm sure there are others who find the whole thing offensive, are these people who whine about adult content including all christian, muslim, morman, bhuddist, hindu, and scientology sims under adult content. You have stepped on the slipperiest road known to man and Governments and if you blow this your empire will implode or burn. Tread lightly.
Nany Kayo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 301
03-21-2009 11:15
haha!

Check this box to use Second Life to masterbate.

Check this box to use Second Life for education or business.
Nany Kayo
Registered User
Join date: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 301
03-21-2009 11:17
There are a LOT of people here who use Second Life as a tool for masturbation, that is true.


I read the other day that masturbating using Second Life is the only sexual activity some of these people have. It is very important to them.
TLMars Bookmite
FemDom Artist
Join date: 6 Aug 2008
Posts: 35
03-21-2009 11:44
From: samatha Congrejo
No we talked. Turns out he wants to get rid of an ugly sex club building near by. Not a problem with it being a sex club, just the building. Do you blame him.

This again is the Lindens. No building code, no regulations on much. The mainland is their baby and they just let it be a free for all mostly.

On Private sims, most are managed.


I did notice that he'd said in one post that "it would look better". That was why I didn't feel it was about financial gain. :-)

There is no way LL can do anything about that issue even with new zoning and building codes. What one person finds ugly another does not. There is no way attractiveness or beauty can be regulated. We all have such different ideas and ideals.

An example is that one of my galleries is located next to another "normal - pg" gallery. I personally love how imaginative and whimsical the artist is. Lots of funny flying alien-like things, interesting statues etc.. The Mistress with a FemDom RP house down the road from my place asked me, "How can you stand being next to that ugly eye sore? It's hideous!"

Where she would never have chosen my location. I chose it partically because I enjoyed what my neighbor created.
_____________________
Love is the Law. Love under Will.
Savirti Zeid
Registered User
Join date: 3 Jun 2008
Posts: 2
03-21-2009 11:57
forgive me if this has been adressed in a previous post, but has anyone, or a LInden addressed how this will effect private sims? From what I gather this is mainly just the mainland that is the most effected.

Just curious, and sorry again if it's been answered already.
Ian Undercroft
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2007
Posts: 86
03-21-2009 12:15
If after the changes any part of a private island carries "adult" as defined, the whole aisland will classify as adult. No resident without PIOF or age verfication will be able to visit any part of the island. However, the Lindens are reviewing this apparently. But that's how it presently stands
Rene Erlanger
Scuderia Shapes & Skins G
Join date: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2,008
03-21-2009 12:20
From: Ian Undercroft
If after the changes any part of a private island carries "adult" as defined, the whole aisland will classify as adult. No resident without PIOF or age verfication will be able to visit any part of the island. However, the Lindens are reviewing this apparently. But that's how it presently stands


I think it's even worst than that...think it is at Estate level....meaning if your Estate has 30 Estate sims belonging to it....whatever you tick applies to all 30 sims with the same Estate name (not sim name!). That how it was described during the 1st round of the forums....the idea is absurd, but there you go! I guess its due to camera abilities, even from Sim to Sim
Ian Undercroft
Registered User
Join date: 3 Nov 2007
Posts: 86
03-21-2009 12:24
I think at times the concepts of SIMS, islands, regions and estates has a tendency to get confused. But I see the logic in what you say although it seems very harsh
Savirti Zeid
Registered User
Join date: 3 Jun 2008
Posts: 2
03-21-2009 12:30
From: Ian Undercroft
If after the changes any part of a private island carries "adult" as defined, the whole aisland will classify as adult. No resident without PIOF or age verfication will be able to visit any part of the island. However, the Lindens are reviewing this apparently. But that's how it presently stands



:) Thank you for that. I wasn't sure if there was a for sure, set in stone choice on private sims or not.


So really, since it seems to me that this is happening no matter if the vast majority of their client base likes it or not, all that's left is to see if they go with the extream christian right definition of " Adult" in which case.. we're all screwed :P
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-21-2009 12:31
From: samatha Congrejo
Want instant good Press:

Annouce that all new accounts to Second Life will require payment on file information as age verification.

Simple and direct and works within what they want.


Great we need to go back to pre unverified accounts thats for sure

From: someone
Current users are not effected, they get grand fathered to adult status if they want.
They don't have to be forced to choose.


Everyone should if they want the adult services put PIOF as there are bound to be teens etc. already on the grid and ensuring everyone verifies ensures they get caught out and moved to the teen grid

From: someone
All new users come in to the service knowing they have to provide that information and Lindens get some great press.


If everyone does it then it shows the press that LL is serious about the changes

From: someone
As for the Mainland. Well gee why not try coming in world and actually managing it. Make up building codes. Require all NEW buyers to agree to it as part of the purchasing process. Slowly manage each sim into somethign better. Encourage some larger land owners to explore improvements.


Bad idea for existing sims and Lindens have already said zoning will only apply to new sims sometime in the future beauty and Art is subjective, one mans beauty is anothers ugly.

From: someone
I will add to this. Allow people to tie their alts to their main account. So if you register an alt later you can just link it, but you also would be required to do some verification for a new alt. Wave goodbye to a lot of the griefers this way!!!


That would be good and Blondin has agreed that its a good idea. If everyone is made to verify as suggested above that just shows LL as being serious about all of this as i previously stated. Those that don't want to verify just can't access the adult continent, we are going to verify all our alts this weekend

From: someone
Want to get adult off the mainland grid as it stands? OK make it attractive. Not just some lump of un-teriformed land.

Sell them the new land at 1l per m, and give them two weeks free teir....

will nto cost that much and they can sell their old plots off.

BUT FIRST get a damn building code for all mainland!!!


I am sure LL will make the move for those of us that have to attractive enough and i am looking forward to the news hopefully soon
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Nyoko Salome
kittytailmeowmeow
Join date: 18 Jul 2005
Posts: 1,378
03-21-2009 12:32
From: Ian Undercroft
If after the changes any part of a private island carries "adult" as defined, the whole aisland will classify as adult. No resident without PIOF or age verfication will be able to visit any part of the island. However, the Lindens are reviewing this apparently. But that's how it presently stands


hrrrmmm... now correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought the layout was to keep intact the 'pg/mature' rating of sims and parcels, but to add on/push more the 'adult/age-verified' on top of the other two... (i assume 'adult' means 'age verified' here.)

hrrmmm. looking now, under the land tab, 'mature content' should be moved to 'access/block access by'... and perhaps all three block checkboxes (along payment info, age-verifed) should be stacked into proper order... (reviewing this by my pg plot...)

i guess what i would expect, is that pg sims would grey out and not allow at least the mature/age-verified box, if not also the 'payment info' box...

but if not a pg sim in the first place, i would assume that sub-parcelling-and-age-verification would do just fine.

as i like to say, correct me if i'm wrong... :)
_____________________

Nyoko's Bodyoils @ Nyoko's Wears
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Centaur/126/251/734/
http://home.comcast.net/~nyoko.salome2/nyokosWears/index.html

"i don't spend nearly enough time on the holodeck. i should go there more often and relax." - deanna troi
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
03-21-2009 12:34
From: samatha Congrejo
Gambling was less than 4% of users total (and that was traffic, not that all of them gambled.)


Is that a LL figure or a samatha figure? just wondering as i tend to not believe a lot of figures chucked around these forums, i rather prefer raw data from reliable sources.

But thats just me
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Ilana Debevec
Registered User
Join date: 25 May 2007
Posts: 130
03-21-2009 12:35
From: Blondin Linden
I know and I know how this is a hot topic. I promised an answer to this shortly but I don't have one yet. Still working on it.


Durn tootin' and let's review the COMMON SENSE aspect to this problem.

1) if we have a PRIVATE SIM, what part of PRIVATE eludes people?

2) ok, we decide to set the sim ADULT, one good part of that is that it could cut down on griefers.

3) setting the SIM ADULT >> with COMMON SENSE << should do the following

3a) Parcels in the SIM will not show up on a 'non adult search'. Can't find them, can't get there

3b) If you are 'not adult', then those SIM's should NOT show up on a map search. Can't find them, can't get there.

3c) if you DO TP in (only way, can't fly in accidentally) and you are *NOT* "PIOF/verified" you should hit a LIMBO before materializing, with a nice BBOG (Blue Box of GHOD) popup. "You are about to enter an area that may have ADULT content. If you CHOSE to enter this area and accept responsibility for what you may find,click "ENTER", if you CHOSE not to enter this area, click "LEAVE" and you will be returned to your original location".

4) There is absolutely NO reason that a PRIVATE SIM (there's that word again) should have to restrict entry to 'no PIOF / verified' people. NONE. ZERO. look back a 3a, 3b and 3c. You can not ACCIDENTALLY get there from search.

5) someone said 'what about LM givers'. What about person a giving person b a LM. Solution to all of that.. see 3c) above.

6) "Well that won't stop people from going in to an ADULT area and getting offended and AR'ing people". See 3c). Did you go in via a LM? Did you click ENTER and ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY? Then you got nothing to AR, you knew what might be in there and went in anyway.
1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... 191