Why would a person in a child avatar go to a parcel marked 'Brothel'? Because the current rules permit it, that is why.
The current rules prohibit it.
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Jack - Why allow child avatars on Zindra? |
|
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
![]() Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
06-28-2009 22:40
Why would a person in a child avatar go to a parcel marked 'Brothel'? Because the current rules permit it, that is why. The current rules prohibit it. _____________________
![]() http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-28-2009 22:45
The current rules prohibit it. _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
![]() Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
06-28-2009 22:52
Milla the rules prohibit the child avatars from being within eyesight of Adult Sexual activity or equipment. Brothels Do not have that equipment of the first floor (even BDSM) places will keep those devices in the dungeon). SO no rule will stop a child avatar from stating 'yeah I saw it was marked Brothel in Adult search - but I did not go upstairs where the actual sexual activity was going on so I did not break any rules' Child avatars are prohibited from being "in proximity to 'sex beds' or other sexualized graphics, objects, or scripts". Being inside a brothel certainly places them in proximity to all of those. There is nothing that says they must be within eyesight. A resident explaining their presence as a child avatar in the first floor of a brothel to the G-Team by saying all the naughty stuff was on the second floor would find themselves on the fast track to a suspension. It is clearly prohibited under current policy. Any sane brothel owner would also prohibit child avatars from the parcel. _____________________
![]() http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... |
Adz Childs
Artificial Boy
![]() Join date: 6 Apr 2006
Posts: 865
|
06-28-2009 22:54
Milla the rules prohibit the child avatars from being within eyesight of Adult Sexual activity or equipment. Brothels Do not have that equipment on the first floor (even BDSM) places will keep those devices in the dungeon). SO no rule will stop a child avatar from stating 'yeah I saw it was marked Brothel in Adult search - but I did not go upstairs where the actual sexual activity was going on so I did not break any rules' What a narrowly defined scenario. Wait... what's on each floor of a typical brothel, again? I'm confused. _____________________
http://slnamewatch.com — Second Life Last Name Tracking — Email Alerts — Famous People Lookup — http://adz.secondlifekid.com/ — Artificial Boy — Personal Blog
Hmm, there's nothing really helpful there, but thanks for pasting. |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-28-2009 23:04
Child avatars are prohibited from being "in proximity to 'sex beds' or other sexualized graphics, objects, or scripts". Being inside a brothel certainly places them in proximity to all of those. There is nothing that says they must be within eyesight. A resident explaining their presence as a child avatar in the first floor of a brothel to the G-Team by saying all the naughty stuff was on the second floor would find themselves on the fast track to a suspension. It is clearly prohibited under current policy. Any sane brothel owner would also prohibit child avatars from the parcel. You have interpreted the rule to yourself to include "There is nothing that says they must be within eyesight". That is your personal interpretation - LL made their policy (as you say) Clear. A person reading that policy may not choose to assume there is adult content out of site in a parcel and enter anyway. Because these child avatar people have caused chaos before - LL should make sure these folks know what is acceptable depictions and what is not. . _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-28-2009 23:05
What a narrowly defined scenario. Wait... what's on each floor of a typical brothel, again? I'm confused. _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Daniel Regenbogen
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2006
Posts: 684
|
06-28-2009 23:40
Why would a person in a child avatar go to a parcel marked 'Brothel'? Because the current rules permit it, that is why. Child Avatars are the only avatars directly mentioned in the TOS for a reason. One can look back in these threads and see their response to this issue and understand that they have a problem figuring out what is an inappropriate depiction of child avatars/ Sadly Zindra will prove once again that people wearing child avatars need special restraints in the TOS so they do create more negative publicity for the entire platform. Sorry, this is stupid and you simply are lying. Show me ONE SINGLE QUOTE from all this discussion where a kid/teen avatar says anything like "I want and will go to a brothel's lobby because the actual sex doesn't happen there but in other rooms.". You won't find one. The closest to that is what many said: that the street INFRONT of the brothel is public space and therefore everyone is allowed there. Oh well, I don't expect an answer to my question. You don't answer questions that put your own behaviour in doubt. Remember? In the other thread? You were asked dozens of times about the truth of a chatlog where you promote making up fraudulant AR's to get rid of kid avatars... I'll be nice and repost the question here. Not that you will answer it... *** [22:16] L... L.......: to keep the child avatars out we have to have impromptu Sex Hud parades through Zindra ... [22:17] L... L.......: if you run into one of the little bastards get a picture of them next to the parade *** |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-29-2009 00:01
Sorry, this is stupid and you simply are lying. Show me ONE SINGLE QUOTE from all this discussion where a kid/teen avatar says anything like "I want and will go to a brothel's lobby because the actual sex doesn't happen there but in other rooms.". You won't find one. The closest to that is what many said: that the street INFRONT of the brothel is public space and therefore everyone is allowed there. Child avatars on Zindra or adult verified only flagged parcels are obviously adults. A child avatar can be in a porn hall because they are adult verified and assumed to be adult. However, a child avatar can not have sex in the above mentioned porn hall because they are in a child avatar even though they are a verified adult. I see it as this: Kid AVs can see teh pr0nz because no RL kids are involved. (^_^) Kid AVs can’t be seen in teh pr0nz because the depictions impact the economic potential of SL when presented to the public at large and may affect the ability for SL to be accessed in some foreign countries. (^_^)y _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
06-29-2009 03:12
Why would a person in a child avatar go to a parcel marked 'Brothel'? Because the current rules permit it, that is why. http://www.silive.com/southshore/index.ssf/2009/02/staten_island_restaurant_cant.html# And really most sexual places do not have it in-your-face as soon as you cross the threshold. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-29-2009 03:19
But if they do, is it actually a brothel? Or is it a restaurant What, no porn on the walls, no dance poles, no "come hither" cuddle couches? You really are sounding more and more desperate. _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Ian Nider
Seeds
Join date: 20 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,011
|
06-29-2009 03:31
Still asking you Lias, did you write this below, the constant no answer is a loud comment too.
Originally Posted by Feral Mistwalker Gotta love it when "people" flat out admit they are going to file false abuse reports LOL [22:16] L... L.......: to keep the child avatars out we have to have impromptu Sex Hud parades through Zindra ... [22:17] L... L.......: if you run into one of the little bastards get a picture of them next to the parade And from Chris Norse, asked a few times now, I assume in relation to your fear campaign I have asked you at least 3 times Lias, please provide a link to a non SL or non game related news site that contained any news, more specifically outrage at kid AV's, about the Zindra opening. Can you do it? _____________________
Playin' Perky Pat
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
06-29-2009 03:31
Naughty Neva, Hard Alley - The sexual content is not near the the rez point - the shopping malls are - But the orgies are are there and everyone knows it. Why is an accurate description of many sexual areas in SL desperate? A child avatar at the Naughty Neva property is completely inappropriate - even if they cannot see the sex balls. Remind me where Naughty Neva and Hard Alley have been residing for the last few years? Are they on adult sims, oh silly me no of coure they aren't yet, they've only just introduced adult sims. The scenarios you keep describing could have happened any time over the last few years, it's now going to be harder for trouble makers to cause any sort of rumpus. You know this but you keep ignoring it. |
Lias Leandros
mainlander
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
06-29-2009 03:36
Remind me where Naughty Neva and Hard Alley have been residing for the last few years? Are they on adult sims, oh silly me no of coure they aren't yet, they've only just introduced adult sims. The scenarios you keep describing could have happened any time over the last few years, it's now going to be harder for trouble makers to cause any sort of rumpus. You know this but you keep ignoring it. _____________________
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs |
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
06-29-2009 03:47
The Lindens have made it clear that child avatars CAN go to the Adult parcels as long as they do Not see the sexual activity or the devices - Before on Mature mainland a child avatar could play stupid and pretend they teleported to Naught Neva's by mistake. How the heck does one teleport to Naughty Neva's by mistake, it's as clear as day what's going on there. Now if it happens it will completely deliberate and legal under the current TOS rules for child avatars. These rules need to address ADULT PARCELS and let the child avatars know they cannot enter these parcels marked adult for no reason - even if the Adult Content is not visible to them. This is different to the current scenario how? In just what way has a damn thing changed other than it's now even more clear that land on a certain continent may contain adult material? There is even less chance of the absolutely hard to swallow chance of someone accidentally teleporting to a place like Naughty Neva's. The situation is getting better not worse, people need to be account verified to get to Zindra, they need to be set to access adult land and they need to have the adult search box ticked to even find places. This is one of the few positives to come out of this and you refuse to see it. The scenarios you're so offended by are even less likely to happen. |
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
|
06-29-2009 05:08
Hey, my adult content is a restaurant - If its in Zindra on a parcel marked Adult - Child avatars should assume it contains Adult content and should NOT ENTER. Naughty Neva, Hard Alley - The sexual content is not near the the rez point - the shopping malls are - But the orgies are are there and everyone knows it. Why is an accurate description of many sexual areas in SL desperate? A child avatar at the Naughty Neva property is completely inappropriate - even if they cannot see the sex balls. Guess what Lias? Naughty Neva's just happens to sell things that are perfectly OK for a child avatar to be around, yea, even own in their own treehouse. They have good reason to be there buying said products. A legitimate reason. This is why Linden Lab has actually exercised the foresight (yes, I actually said it, foresight, even coming from Linden Lab!), to state that child avatars are in fact welcome on Zindra. They have the sense to know there are actually reasons why a child avatar would have a legitimate purpose in being there, so why can't you see this? START THINKING ALREADY! |
Daniel Regenbogen
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2006
Posts: 684
|
06-29-2009 05:12
. I stand correct on this, sorry for calling you a liar about it. Still it changes nothing, a kid/teen avatar being in the lobby of a brothel would already be in deep shit under the already existing rules dealing with sexual ageplay. |
Briana Dawson
Attach to Mouth
![]() Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,855
|
06-29-2009 05:13
oh wow, Lias PMd me AGAIN!
And i had not even posted a single word directed at him/her this entire thread to begin with! The power of pictures! Lias WINS! ![]() THREAD OVER! _____________________
|
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
![]() Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
06-29-2009 05:18
You missed my point...
...Child Avatars are the only avatars directly mentioned in the TOS for a reason... The TOS is over here >> http://secondlife.com/corporate/tos.php (=_=) _____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
![]() Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
06-29-2009 05:25
Sorry, this is stupid and you simply are lying. Show me ONE SINGLE QUOTE from all this discussion where a kid/teen avatar says anything like "I want and will go to a brothel's lobby because the actual sex doesn't happen there but in other rooms.". You won't find one. The closest to that is what many said: that the street INFRONT of the brothel is public space and therefore everyone is allowed there... I have a very long draw distance. So, I can cam over by about 2 to 3 sims before any major detail is lost. Meaning, I can be in a PG sim and cam over to a Mature sim to see someone's private bondage photography collection. (^_^) Does that mean I got my child avatar involved in sex? No. (^_^) Does that mean I exposed children to porn? No. (^_^) Once the camera leaves the avatar, the fourth wall is broken. At that point, it's just an adult, on the internet, manipulating a camera artifact in a 3D simulation. Just because a child avatar's CAMERA is focused on sexually explicit material, it doesn't mean that the child avatar is involved at all. (^_^)y _____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
![]() Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
06-29-2009 05:26
Naughty Neva, Hard Alley - The sexual content is not near the the rez point - the shopping malls are - But the orgies are are there and everyone knows it. Why is an accurate description of many sexual areas in SL desperate? A child avatar at the Naughty Neva property is completely inappropriate - even if they cannot see the sex balls. Child avatars are not permitted at Naughty Neva's. The descriptions for those places also make it perfectly clear they are completely inappropriate for child avatars. _____________________
![]() http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... |
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
![]() Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
06-29-2009 05:29
Hey, my adult content is a restaurant - If its in Zindra on a parcel marked Adult - Child avatars should assume it contains Adult content and should NOT ENTER... Now be a good little avatar, enjoy your parcel, and don't be too butthurt when bumping into my banlines. I'm just putting them up to protect you. (^_^)y _____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
|
06-29-2009 05:33
Child avatars are not permitted at Naughty Neva's. The descriptions for those places also make it perfectly clear they are completely inappropriate for child avatars. Oh. I didn't realize this was the case. I still think Neva's got some things that are fine for child avatars, but if she's already banned them then it's a non-issue anyway (which strangely seems to be Lias's favorite target for making an issue of). |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
06-29-2009 05:35
The Lindens have made it clear that child avatars CAN go to the Adult parcels as long as they do Not see the sexual activity or the devices On the other hand there's at least one mature region where there's a building marked "brothel", because that building happens to be part of a stage set for a western town. It's got no adult content or activities, no sex beds or porn. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
Imnotgoing Sideways
Can't outlaw cute! =^-^=
![]() Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 4,694
|
06-29-2009 05:38
Oh. I didn't realize this was the case. I still think Neva's got some things that are fine for child avatars, but if she's already banned them then it's a non-issue anyway (which strangely seems to be Lias's favorite target for making an issue of). Now, an estate sim? Sure. In fact, they can put it in the estate covenant. "This is a sexually oriented sim, child avatars are not allowed." No harm. No foul. I know plenty of places like that. But, as for mainland, it's completely up to the individual PARCEL owner to maintain their PARCEL rules within the boundaries of their own PARCEL. (^_^)y _____________________
Somewhere in this world; there is someone having some good clean fun doing the one thing you hate the most. (^_^)y
![]() http://slurl.com/secondlife/Ferguson/54/237/94 |
Daniel Regenbogen
Registered User
Join date: 9 Nov 2006
Posts: 684
|
06-29-2009 05:40
Child avatars are not permitted at Naughty Neva's. The descriptions for those places also make it perfectly clear they are completely inappropriate for child avatars. They do have a kids department, called "Kid Kreations", at one part of their 4-sim mini continent. |