New controversial kid-avs-in-Zindra thread!

They CHOOSE to spend their time on this, instead of doing something that actually might protect real life children from real life predators. You're right, it's a colossal waste of time. Adults roleplaying children has nothing to do with anything.

She's farkin' insane. There's no other explanation.

Lying again.

Here this might clue people in to some factors:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Cambria
Should have called Zindra Cambria instead.

You can haz multiple personalities naow?

She's either nuts, sincere but completely misguided and in need of a course in Logic, or in it for the LOLz... or possibly some combination.

Rabid frothing at the mouth?

Well, they refuse to make their data public - so I doubt it is fabricated.

They told me to post about pedophilia in SL and see what happened - and you saw the response. No one wants it to be true, especially the people masquerading as children in SL. I assumed people would err on the side of caution and want to make sure it was under control. Instead they say 'just let LL handle it'. SO now I know why these folks took matters into their own hands.
These folks look for virtual pedophilia - not RL Pedophilia - there is another group taking up that cause.
Ageplay is a BDSM Term used to soft peddle virtual pedophilia. And it is alive and well in SL.

One Island owner that runs a nude beach that allows nude child avatars there said he was security at a place that was closed by LL for virtual pedophilia and he took all of those homeless members into his nude beach group when he opened.
You cannot have virtual pedophilia in SL without virtual children in SL.
They even let me go undercover with them. I grabbed one of my 2006 alts and went to a place. the undercover vouched for me and I saw the relationships there - quite disturbing.

So I research before blindly believing.
The RL pedo activities will become a real threat to the main grid if LL does not ban the use of child avatars before they merge the teen grid with us.

Now the issue is the virtual pedophilia that adults masquerading as children engage in. That problem can be dealt with now by banning the child avatar from the grid.

I think those folks have been undercover so long they do not want to come up for air. It seems as if LL will happily take their reports, hide them and continue the secret relationship until the end of time. I just feel the time is up for the child avatar.

Linden Lab does not think so. That is why the community standards address this group and their activities.

Not a mantra Katheryne. Copy from the Linden TOS clarification about ageplay. Deal with it )

Maybe the explanation is so simple that when I say we, there is more than one person in the picture?

Nope, Lia(r)s. You accuse a group of people to be criminals, again and again. If you did this in RL, you would need to back up these accusations *very* quickly or shut up - or you would find yourself facing the judge faster than you could type another of your lies.

But we shouldn't even need any laws or judges. It is the most basic type of respect in a civilized discussion when I make claims (especially such big and dramatic ones like you do), that I also back them up with facts. *Especially* when I claim that there *are* facts and that I know them.

But not you, Lia(r)s. You always change topic when you are asked to backup your mindtwisted fantasies. Your answer (if one comes at all) always is "it is!" (because *you* say so).

Lia(r)s, there are reports for "Ageplay" on the Incident Report (it isn't called police blotter anymore for many, many months now) once in a while - LL does not remove or hide them. There simply aren't that many, and nobody denied that there *are* some. They are just not the widespread problem you, Lia(r)s, try to make out of them. *You* claim that *every RL adult* using a kid avatar is a pervert. Seeing that there are thousands of kid avatars around, the Incident Report should be flooded with "Ageplay" violations. Nah. You simply are a liar, Lia(r)s.

Quite seriously, what research do you suggest people should carry out before blindly believing your account of this mysterious group, should they wish to emulate your admirable skepticism about unsubstantiated claims?

A few people noted that the picture in question may not have really been appropriate for the forum. But only one person has expressed outrage about the image - and I seriously question that person's status as an adult.

Nah, far too many grey areas, Lias. What you should be campaigning for is compulsory pubic hair for men and women, thick and luxuriant. Perhaps beards too. Nobody sees a good bushy beard (on a man _or_ a woman) and thinks "is that a kid?"

The hell you don't. You're the one coming in here and making outlandish claims - claims which you have consistently failed to substantiate. It is not our responsibility to prove your claim for you. *You* make the claim, *you* back it up. Your credibility in these forums has dwindled to nil. Nobody with a brain is going to take what you say at face value anymore; so either put up or shut up.Nice try, but didn't you, just a few pages ago, claim that LL does not file alleged pedophilia claims in their IR tracker? What exactly would this program then accomplish?

So we should be up in arms about other activities that Linden Lab addresses, like, say, the sex industry?

Admission. The word is admission.

English. Do you speak it?

Blame the victim much?

Yes, that is the most convincing way of thinking I ever saw. Anyone refusing to make their data public, must have correct data. See the stupidity in this Lias?


Let me start by saying that no one in this thread says it is not true. Of course there will be virtual pedophilia in SL, everything is available somewhere in SL. BUT:
- The problem is not as widespread as you want the world to believe. Incidents are not the same as mainstream.
- The way you make a connection between all child avatars, and these incidents, is simply sick and twisted. And that is the friendly way of putting it. Slander it is.
- Of course there are bdsm-ers that engage in ageplay, where the sub 'plays' a younger age. But wtf does that have to to with soft peddling virtual pedophilia? Are you insane or just playing insane?


So wow you found a place where these things happen. Well, AR the place and go on with your life. Yes places like that will exist, no one says they do not.


That made me laugh, even though it is too sad to laugh over.
Research? S you find a place where virtual ageplayers hang out and that is your reason to ban child avatars. You would do great as a police officer... not.
Why not banning all adult avatars? That would stop the ageplay between adult avatars and child avatars as well. Because if all child avatars are pedos, then all adults must be as well.

There is so much wrong with your way of thinking that don't even know where to start. And the thing is, I can't figure out whether you are simply stupid, or just love pouring oil on the fire.

The more I think about it, the more I think you are a potentially dangerous person. The fact you have a narrow mind is not the problem. The fact you are willing to punish a group of people over a few bad apples, is dangerous thinking though.

THE WAY LIAS THINKS:
===============
- a couple of priests were found to molest young boys. Let's ban priesthood all together.
- a couple of black people were found to be criminals. Let's somehow ban black people.
- a couple of women were found to be prostitutes. Let's chain all women, they are all potential prostitutes.

If THAT doesn't show you how twisted your way of thinking is, nothing will.

I think she started off for the lulz; but as time progressed, she began to actually *believe* the bullshit she'd been posting.... and, well, here we are today.

I remember that thread. That's the one where you insisted that kids weren't allowed in RL nudist camps and that the cops would bust RL nudists if kids showed up, and you didn't even have the bloody grace to apologize when offended RL nudists showed up in the discussion and totally debunked everything you wrote.

And... it turned out that the assertions you are making in this paragraph were fabricated. Your lies in the previous thread are still archived for anyone with the stomach to look them up.

I would just like to take a moment to congratulate Dakota on one of the most successful Troll-bait threads in recent memory. Who would have thunk it, that a 'controversial' post, that was self-admittedly not controversial at all, would turn out to have a certain reality challenged individual twisted around the axle to the point that I can hear their gnashing of teeth as said poster tries to dig out of yet another hole of lies, half-truths and hate-mongering.

Well done Dakota, you played it as a master.

That thread was good for one thing though: It showed that as soon as Lias sees nude children, she thinks about sex. What would that say about her, I wonder...