New controversial kid-avs-in-Zindra thread!

Actually she looks remarkably like a woman I worked with several years ago in a pizza place. She was under 5 feet in height, red headed and if I didn't know better, I'd think she was Immys typist due to a hefty dose of Redheaded Attitude. She was also in her early 20's at the time I met her.

I wouldn't have minded gagging her several time, but I think a ring gag would suit better.

Sorry Lias, that can't be a picture of a child if it reminds me of an adult.

(I have to wonder if she's around in SL... Perhaps a blast from the past will get her attention?

"You think *that's* disgusting? Watch this!"

A person used an expired Driver's License from 1999 that did not belong to them to adult verify. Adult Verification just gets you into adult areas - it does not track your RL identity in case you start to pedo play while masquerading as a small child.

She worked in a pizza place with a ball gag in her mouth? Who owned the pizzeria, a Gorean Master?
It is a child in an sexualized adult situation.

If she is representing an avatar at or above the legal age of majority, then neither law enforcement, nor judges, nor politicians, nor even the media, have a damned thing to say about it.

And resorting to repeating mantras in every single one of your posts as the sole premise for your arguments excludes you from my list of reasonable-minded people with whom I can enjoy a civil debate, and lands you in the "has had one cup of Kool-Aid too many" category.

You're absolutely insane aren't you?

You might read what I posted again. and again. and again.


Liar.

Same skin, same shape; different hair, clothes, and lighting... You know SL has dynamic lights, right? The picture below was me teaching my flexi and lights class. (^_^)

And, I agreed to nothing. I said "Maybe". To expand... "Maybe in your distorted view of the world, but, not mine." But, I felt as though the prior response wasn't worth all the typing. Plus, with your habit of half-reading everything, I've been deciding to minimize words once in a while. (^_^)

Oh, and hey! You lack just as much common decency as I do... Let's go on a date and lack common decency somewhere together some day. We can put a tea table between the penises in Mosh and have a hoot. (^_^)y

You are wrong.

The system isn't perfect agreed, but the vast majority of people who are verified are verified using their real details.

=^-^=

If you feel the picture was not appropriate for this forum, then by all means, report it.

I bet you did that already. And seeing as how it has not been removed, it would appear you stand alone in your thoughts of the appropriateness of the picture.

Which is lucky for you, actually; for you see, had the picture actually have been a violation, you would have been sanctioned for quoting it and thus including it in your posts.

Have a nice day.

Actually... She, in her lack of Common Decency©®™, has been reposting it more than I have. =^-^=

Next thing you know... She'll provide a link to that Flikr image if me walking between the penises as "proof" of something again. Proof of what? We'll never know. (^_^)y

actually thats not true

this is the part that was left off of the definition in that quote..

The Adult designation applies to Second Life® Regions that "HOST"conduct or "DISPLAY" content that is sexually explicit or intensely violent, or depicts illicit drug use.

take those two words Host and Display out and ya it it changes the whole definition

but also to answer your question..you won't find anything that says mature or pg rated stuff cannot be on an adult rated land..

And comment on it as I have done. The picture itself illustrated how completely disconnected child avatar apologists are from what is considered broadly offensive.

Their wild defense of the image was used to protect their argument that they can do anything they want except have sex and it is not disturbing to anyone. This proved they will never make any concessions about anything unless it is forced upon them.

When you keep pushing the envelope to see what you can get away with before someone yells foul you usually end up over the edge.

I have. And I have dissected what I could from them. And there is absolutely *nothing* in there that could possibly be reconstructed to incriminate anyone.

On the other hand, anyone who sells sounds for a SL living should be very, very concerned.

Well, good! So the system works! What's the problem?

Oh... and referring to yourself in the third person? Kinda creepy, IMO.

I don't think it's appropriate for this forum, whether it's depicting a child or an adult wearing a ballgag. Saying "that's not a child" is not saying "that's an appropriate image", it's just saying "that's not a child".

QFT

Liar doesn't think it's appropriate either, yet she keeps reposting it oer and oer again.

Face it, she's batshit crazy.

As a fine example of your half-reading of things and agenda driven bias... Nobody ACTUALLY defended the image. Nearly ALL the repsonses from people were all stating that my avatar is not a child while you continued to insist that it is. (=_=)

See? You're getting it wrong again. (^_^)y

From a face shot how do you determine that it is clearing a child? You can not see any of the sexual identifiers to show that it is pre or post pubesent, or even tell height. I am sooo glad that you never are the ID checker at the local liquor store, else I would never be able to buy my whiskey and wine coolers!

Given what your SL business is I am sure you are going to get some interesting answers!

Baby Ball Gags..

That is a relief. It was beginning to look like more people than you did not know where to draw the line at broadly offensive.

it's cause we know she is 18..remember they could be in a 10 foot tall avatar and still be a child avatar if their profile rp's them as a giant child avatar hehehehe

she is a petite adult..same difference..

i'm 4'10 in rl
i tried to use that size in here and i couldn't get my avatar that small..maybe my thingy wasn't telling me the right size..i gave up anyways..lol