Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Furry ban in Cologne cathedral

Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 12:42
From: Gordon Wendt
oddly enough it is 12:30 SL time so the build should be open to viewing and the entire sim appears to be locked down as well as the surrounding sims despite the fact that the map clearly shows that there are people on the main sim (and no not enough to make it full by the look of it). So much for the purpose of doing a build like this to get people to look at it especially if they won't even open up the sim when they say it'll be open.



Well with all the hoopla its entirely possible the sim may never be reopened and no one can ever see it. Since that I think the masquerade argument was used as a defense about furry avatars and saying we are all masquerading its entirely possible that they convinced all the right people that everyone in sl is masquerading and its a disrepect to the church and that the build be torn down and the sims sold. This is just a wild guess but looking at some of the logic in this thread and looking at what possibly could happen this seems very possible in my eyes. /shrug
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Gordon Wendt
404 - User not found
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 1,024
09-04-2007 12:45
From: Wilhelm Neumann
Well with all the hoopla its entirely possible the sim may never be reopened and no one can ever see it. Since that I think the masquerade argument was used as a defense about furry avatars and saying we are all masquerading its entirely possible that they convinced all the right people that everyone in sl is masquerading and its a disrepect to the church and that the build be torn down and the sims sold. This is just a wild guess but looking at some of the logic in this thread and looking at what possibly could happen this seems very possible in my eyes. /shrug


I honestly don't care either way whether they stay or go but from a distance (just over the sim line) it looked like a cool build and I wished I could see it at least once... oh well I guess I'll have to spend all my time hanging out at the ANWR Rig (one of the linden builds).
_____________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/GWendt
Plurk: http://www.plurk.com/GordonWendt

GW Designs: XStreetSL

Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 12:47
From: Gordon Wendt
I honestly don't care either way whether they stay or go but from a distance (just over the sim line) it looked like a cool build and I wished I could see it at least once... oh well I guess I'll have to spend all my time hanging out at the ANWR Rig.


Me too i wanted to see it but everytime i tried to port this weekend I could not as it was full of protesters and now it appears to be closed.
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Jessica Elytis
Goddess
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,783
09-04-2007 12:51
Hmmm....I go sleep, go to work and this thread is still going?

After the matter has been resolved by those involved?

Wilhelm, I think maybe you should open up your own thread (or even blog). I'm not being "cute" or "flaming" with saying that, just you seem to have a lot of opinions, but is derailing from the overall view here.

1) The OP started a thread to cain public awareness for a dispute and discussion of the policies of the sim in question. With concent of the sim-owner. No, don't take my word on that, ask him yourself. If you won't ask him, for whatever reason, then you have no way to refute that.

2) You keep stating that nothing else was tried prior to the discussion/protest. How do you know that? Unless you were there from the start, you can't. I certainly don't know, but I do not dismiss the possibility out of hand. It's also possible you are correct. Until one discovers teh facts on this, however, any discussion on that fact is moot.

3) You continually restate what you would have done. Quite frankly, that doesn't matter. What matters is what the sim-owner DID do.

4) You continualy call for respecting the sim-owner, but apparently do not want to respect him for how he handled this situation. Why?

5) The dictate from the begining was misunderstood. I agree there. Both on the side of those beleiveing they were discrimated agasint, and those psoting the rules due to lack of understanding of the social network of SL. That was what the discussion helped for each side to understand the other (If I have understood that portion. I wasn't at the discussion, so am "guessing" at what went on there, same as you).

So, since all sides are done and done with this, why would you continue to "drum the march to war"?

If you have other issues, wouldn't a different thread be more logical for discussion?

~Jessy
_____________________
When your friend does somethign stupid:
From: Aldo Stern
Dude, you are a true and good friend, and I love you like the brother that my mom claims she never had, but you are in fact acting like a flaming douche on white toast with a side order of dickknob salsa..maybe you should reconsider this course of action and we go find something else to do.
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
09-04-2007 12:53
From: Wilhelm Neumann
Since that I think the masquerade argument was used as a defense about furry avatars and saying we are all masquerading its entirely possible that they convinced all the right people that everyone in sl is masquerading and its a disrepect to the church and that the build be torn down and the sims sold.


Does anyone have contact with the land owners/builder to see what's going on?

If they have "suddenly realised" that everyone in SL is a bunch of pixels and not real people ... then either they completely missed what Second Life is, or the development company did a really bad job of explaining it.

I would guess it's more a case of "how do we get round this one".
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
Keeran Blackadder
Registered User
Join date: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 30
09-04-2007 13:02
From: Cristalle Karami
Point is you are uninformed. Quit beating your chest and see that you weren't being singled out intentionally out of bias.


And let me refer you back to my post - which evidently you skimmed briefly in order to pad your post count with relies haphazzardly shot off from the hip. I am not a furry. Don't play one, but am friends with quite a few, and my annoyance with this situation is that someone out there is attempting to apply their RL view on a world populated with mythical creatures...a world where we all have extraordinary abilities which would probably have us all burned at the stake in front of said cathedral in RL for using witchcraft.

It is arrogant, and quite frankly dangerous, for these people to place a religious theology in SL assuming that the Christian God wouldn't want furries, or anything other than homo sapiens, paying their respects in his house. I'm still not seeing a refute to this point...but am keeping my ears open. Feel free to enlighten me.

But, like I said - which you did quote correctly and in context - their land, their rules. I just find it disgusting that they're dragging a religion which embraces love, compassion and inclusion through the mud with them, and won't be visiting this area, nor the region condoning this misplaced bigotry.
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 13:09
From: Jessica Elytis
Hmmm....I go sleep, go to work and this thread is still going?

After the matter has been resolved by those involved?

Wilhelm, I think maybe you should open up your own thread (or even blog). I'm not being "cute" or "flaming" with saying that, just you seem to have a lot of opinions, but is derailing from the overall view here.


~Jessy



I dont think telling a bunch of people to leave someone alone cause they are gonna get his sim crashed with this is derailing sorry its totally on topic

I also have a blog thanks and a bunch of other stuff anyhow i find you dont actualy get what i'm saying and feel that the way to get things done is by being the squeeky wheel and polarizing a community on an issue before there actualy is one is a good way to go but that's fine

If someone asking people in a thread to not get so worked up because your griefing the guy and he's not actually bothering you is off topic so be it. Its part and parcel of the problem. When someone says come protest here and here is a link to the place your asking for trouble and inviting it. Having been around for awhile I have watched enough of this stuff turn ugly and was trying to get a group that looks like they dont get it to get it (my mistake next time they can attract the mobs of hoodlums and I will say nothng and the sim can be crashed)

Anyhow such is life carry on

lets open the door to some other guys sim build and invite trouble for him becaus surely he deserves it because he wont let people wearing blue shirts in shall we?
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Alyx Sands
Mental Mentor Linguist
Join date: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,432
09-04-2007 13:12
From: Chip Midnight
The term "furry" originates in English so even if the sign was in German it references terminology they likely didn't fully understand. The point being that neither your or I know what they were thinking when that original sign was created so you can't assert as fact what is only your assumption. This whole issue was due to people jumping to conclusions in the absence of facts.

But what could you possibly confuse "furry avatars" with???? I can't think of anything they couldn't understand even if they looked up "furry" in a dictionary.
_____________________
~~I'm a linguist. RL sucks, but right now it's decided to be a little less nasty to me - you can still be nice to me if you want! ~~
->Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis.<-
Conan Godwin
In ur base kilin ur d00ds
Join date: 2 Aug 2006
Posts: 3,676
09-04-2007 13:13
From: Alyx Sands
But what could you possibly confuse "furry avatars" with???? I can't think of anything they couldn't understand even if they looked up "furry" in a dictionary.


Human avatars with excessive facial/body hair perhaps?
_____________________
From: Raindrop Cooperstone
hateful much? dude, that was low. die.

.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
09-04-2007 13:15
I reread this thread.

Im having trouble finding the spot where people stirred up hate, Im having trouble finding calls to grief the sim. Besides the terms Bigot and discrinmatory - I dont even see any really inflamatory language being used that is directed at the Church, exactly.

I dont see calls for people to join in the protest, precisely.

The OP complained about the situation, which is within her rights.

The OP mentioned there was a protest going on which there was.

They had a dialog with some of those involved on the other side - evidently they were happy with how it went - that is mentioned.


Other people have expressed their opinions on banning furries in this situation and whether it makes sense.

Some people have since early in the begining decided this thread was destructive, and have continued on in that vein.


All in all - its a fairly mild thread as Resident Answers "Flame fests" go.

Its unfortunate there was griefing. I dont really see how this thread CUASED it.
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
09-04-2007 13:22
From: Keeran Blackadder
And let me refer you back to my post - which evidently you skimmed briefly in order to pad your post count with relies haphazzardly shot off from the hip. I am not a furry. Don't play one, but am friends with quite a few, and my annoyance with this situation is that someone out there is attempting to apply their RL view on a world populated with mythical creatures...a world where we all have extraordinary abilities which would probably have us all burned at the stake in front of said cathedral in RL for using witchcraft.

It is arrogant, and quite frankly dangerous, for these people to place a religious theology in SL assuming that the Christian God wouldn't want furries, or anything other than homo sapiens, paying their respects in his house. I'm still not seeing a refute to this point...but am keeping my ears open. Feel free to enlighten me.

But, like I said - which you did quote correctly and in context - their land, their rules. I just find it disgusting that they're dragging a religion which embraces love, compassion and inclusion through the mud with them, and won't be visiting this area, nor the region condoning this misplaced bigotry.
Do not assume anything about me. I am not making it personal - don't drag this discussion down that way.

The dress code itself has nothing to do with religion. I hate repeating myself but I will: The problem is that they are not seeing SL as SL - they wanted a mirror of RL. This is where the disconnect is. And you and others are branding them as being biased when it's not true. The break between RL and SL is the cause here, but many all too happy to assign an evil intent. In SL the avatar is not necessarily a costume and is very much a representation of the personality. I get this. THEY may not. But that doesn't make them biased.

and lets get something straight:
From: Monalisa Robbiani in post #334 on page 23
I posted an invitation to an open debate with the owner. Half of it was held in English to make the non German speakers comfortable. The builders speak excellent English. Besides that I insisted in scripts being turned on and handed babblers out to everyone on request, so the German conversation can be followed.

The church builder is now in really bad position. He wants to open the church for all but he is still uncertain about the reactions of the church administration itself which did not respond to the cause so far.

We reached a compromise though: There will be an additional sign that says "until the church itself decides over the policy in their virtual building, RL rules will apply which means only human avatars". Most furries were OK with it.

Someone tried to grief the debate meeting but it was handled with reason - we just ignored them.
The builders were the one that Monalisa encountered. There has been no response to the issue thus far, but there is sympathy for the issue, as there should be. It is merely another set of people unfamiliar with SL trying to impose RL conditions, when it's misapplied. All the talk about "discrimination" "skinheads" and the like are as yet UNFOUNDED, but because it's a church, it has been open season on imputing evil intent. And you have not done any better.
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 13:26
From: Colette Meiji
I

All in all - its a fairly mild thread as Resident Answers "Flame fests" go.

Its unfortunate there was griefing. I dont really see how this thread CUASED it.



yeah i'm stupid and blind and dont get it. Actualy no i'm not but anyhow.

other then that I can't make a blind man see so i will just watch people pat themselves on the back and pretend like they did the right thing ^^
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Jessica Elytis
Goddess
Join date: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,783
09-04-2007 13:30
From: Wilhelm Neumann
I dont think telling a bunch of people to leave someone alone cause they are gonna get his sim crashed with this is derailing sorry its totally on topic

I also have a blog thanks and a bunch of other stuff anyhow i find you dont actualy get what i'm saying and feel that the way to get things done is by being the squeeky wheel and polarizing a community on an issue before there actualy is one is a good way to go but that's fine


What I think the continuation of this thread is doing, is throwing more fuel on the fire and causing even more angst, with the possible result of people greifing this poor guy.

Point of fact, they ARE leaving him alone. Most are just arguing with you, not him. *shrugs*

From: Wilhelm Neumann
If someone asking people in a thread to not get so worked up because your griefing the guy and he's not actually bothering you is off topic so be it. Its part and parcel of the problem. When someone says come protest here and here is a link to the place your asking for trouble and inviting it. Having been around for awhile I have watched enough of this stuff turn ugly and was trying to get a group that looks like they dont get it to get it (my mistake next time they can attract the mobs of hoodlums and I will say nothng and the sim can be crashed)


The protest/discussion was handled in an adult manner. The griefing came from others who have IQs smaller than their shoe sizes. What side, or who they were is unkown, and unlikely we will ever know due to LL's non-disclosure policy.

I have already offered my help if needed. It is actually quite easy to make a sim crash-proof and render griefers ineffectual. Aside from the incident during the discussion (where scripts ahd to be enabled for visitors to use the translators) I have not heard of any griefing on the sim.

It sounds to me like the sim-owner is quite capable of handling such things.

Though I do indeed agree. Anyone who would stoop to the grieifng level is gutter trash.

From: Wilhelm Neumann
Anyhow such is life carry on

lets open the door to some other guys sim build and invite trouble for him becaus surely he deserves it because he wont let people wearing blue shirts in shall we?


You're missing the whole point. Saying a person needs to be human to go to this sim is not a problem. Saying only furries (or those with masks) can't is silly, bordering on discrinminatory when taken within the SL Society.

If the sign had read "Please maintain a human only appearance in keeping with the theme and solomnity of this establishment." I highly doubt anyone at all could have complained. They would have been laughed off the forum if they had.

Saying no blacks, gay, furries, green martians, robots, dogs, cats, birds, rocks, etc, etc IS discrimintation. Allowed, yes, but if in a public view, one must concider the reaction of the public or deal with the fallout.

Apprently, and thankfully, this WAS dealt with, and in a calm manner.

My point is it's over. Why isn't it for you?

~Jessy
_____________________
When your friend does somethign stupid:
From: Aldo Stern
Dude, you are a true and good friend, and I love you like the brother that my mom claims she never had, but you are in fact acting like a flaming douche on white toast with a side order of dickknob salsa..maybe you should reconsider this course of action and we go find something else to do.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
09-04-2007 13:33
From: Wilhelm Neumann
yeah i'm stupid and blind and dont get it. Actualy no i'm not but anyhow.

other then that I can't make a blind man see so i will just watch people pat themselves on the back and pretend like they did the right thing ^^



Give it a rest - between this and the insulting references in your other post to me, I have lost my patience with you.

I dare you to find 1 single post that tells people to perform a Grid Attack in the sim the cathedral is in.

I couldnt even find one that HINTED at it.
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 13:35
I think since I can't drag people to go look up the forum guidelins and this forum is turning into a personal battle ground for a few groups right now i'm going to copy raymonds post and stick it here

"Forum Guidelines
Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc."


have fun

send people notecards next time first before risking getting a guy griefed by trying to out some guy and his so called horrible actions on a public forum. See now rules are made because human nature requires they are there and this is one of those examples where there is only going to be one ultimate outcome and congrats for helping it ring true..

arggh
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 13:37
From: Colette Meiji
Give it a rest - between this and the insulting references in your other post to me, I have lost my patience with you.

I dare you to find 1 single post that tells people to perform a Grid Attack in the sim the cathedral is in.

I couldnt even find one that HINTED at it.


hrm i did i found several in a space of two minutes maybe they got removed as well.

you give it a rest you seem to want to reply to everything and so does everyone else. Trying to change my viewpoint tough luck wont be changing anytime soon.

Here i will repost for your broken page back finger and eyes!

I got tired of cutting and pasting examples for you after post #74

I'm sure your going to close your eyes on this but in an attempt to talk reason to someone who says they were not crying racism here are a few examples of it and a bit of name calling for good measure

From: Incanus Merlin
I love going to see interesting builds. But I will NOT be going to see this while they have such a disappointingly small-minded/prejudicial ban in place, and I will be IM'ing all my contacts to explain why.

Yours,

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells



From: Annabelle Babii
Exactly my point. So they have to include scalies, too.
Then what? Black avatars?
Short avatars?
Non-registered-as-white-middle-to-upper-class-catholic avatars?


Why am I not surprized that this bigottry comes out of Germany?



From: Ann Launay
Schmucks :mad:



From: Chas Connolly
Banning furries is just the same as banning black avatars, or avatars with red eyes. Everyone here is a member of the SL universe, including furries, robots or whatever.



From: Wren Murasaki
If I were really paranoid I would say this doesn't bode well for the future. You start by excluding them, then relocating them, then finally you usher them into the gas chamber?

Goverment project for community interaction and they are banning portions of the community? I'm glad this isn't my goverment.
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
09-04-2007 13:42
From: Wilhelm Neumann
hrm i did i found several in a space of two minutes maybe they got removed as well.

you give it a rest you seem to want to reply to everything and so does everyone else. Trying to change my viewpoint tough luck wont be changing anytime soon.


Huh? So you are saying they were all deleted?

Or you saying you found them just now within the space of 2 minutes?

How did none of them get quoted by other posters.

IM not trying to change you veiwpoint. IM extremely annoyed at you that you publicilly questioned the type of person I am , becuase of my opinion on a thread where you cant even find the references Im supposed to become offended by !!!!!!!!!!!!! :confused: :confused: :confused:



----------------------------------------------------------
Note of the quotes you added later Mention organizing a protest, using said protest in a harrassing manner, NOR griefing the SIM
Asher Bertrand
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 41
09-04-2007 13:43
K, so, I haven't read this whole train wreck. Sorry. I cite RL and time. However...

I have been to the cathedral in question in real life, quite a few times, and never once did I see someone in a fursuit there. ZOMG discrimination? Or, just people being respectful?

Sounds like the people who created this in SL wish to have visitors show the same sort of respect as visitors in the real world show to the cathedral. That's why they don't want you going in wearing stripper gear with a cigarette hanging out of your mouth while your wings of Mael beat ominously behind you. You know, modicum of respect.

I sure as hell won't go there in my vamp character and pretend to be undone by the sight of the cross and the proximity of holy water. That'd just be rude.

I probably will go, though, and play by their rules, because I respect this building in real life, and I respect the people who took time to make it in real life.

:shrug:

What's the big deal here?
Ceera Murakami
Texture Artist / Builder
Join date: 9 Sep 2005
Posts: 7,750
09-04-2007 13:47
I don't particularly appreciate some sim banning Furries for no apparent reason, but it's their sim, and they can set the rules.

As an SL architect, I would have been interested in examining their work. But since their sim is off-limits to my primary forms, I probably won't bother to ever go there. If I did, I would respect their wishes and go in one of my Human forms, much as I do when business requires me to visit a Gorean sim, or somewhere else that Furries are less than welcome in.
_____________________
Sorry, LL won't let me tell you where I sell my textures and where I offer my services as a sim builder. Ask me in-world.
Wilhelm Neumann
Runs with Crayons
Join date: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,204
09-04-2007 13:47
From: Colette Meiji
Huh? So you are saying they were all deleted?

Or you saying you found them just now within the space of 2 minutes?

How did none of them get quoted by other posters.

IM not trying to change you veiwpoint. IM extremely annoyed at you that you publicilly questioned the type of person I am , becuase of my opinion on a thread where you cant even find the references Im supposed to become offended by !!!!!!!!!!!!! :confused: :confused: :confused:



----------------------------------------------------------
Note of the quotes you added later Mention organizing a protest, NOR griefing the SIM


eh sorry i'm annoyed at this whole entire thread so we are in the same boat here. Perhaps I will go find the houses off all the people who say its okay to protest and post threads like this and protest their protesting and start news articles and gossip about them and see how they enjoy having their sl time wrecked.


oo and look now comes the spinnoff threads!

/327/df/208491/1.html
_____________________
From: Raymond Figtree

I know the competition that will come along someday is learning from LL's mistakes. But do they have to make so many?
Asher Bertrand
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 41
09-04-2007 14:07
Oh yeah, one more thing:

What's with the hate against us vampires? =(

You know we can't go to sims that have the sun up, yet you leave the sun up. What kind of fascist bull is that? Why you hatin on us? Why don't you set your sims to permanent midnight so *everyone* can go? I think it's bigotry and vampersecution at its worst *sniffle*

H8rs.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
09-04-2007 14:08
From: Asher Bertrand
Oh yeah, one more thing:

What's with the hate against us vampires? =(

You know we can't go to sims that have the sun up, yet you leave the sun up. What kind of fascist bull is that? Why you hatin on us? Why don't you set your sims to permanent midnight so *everyone* can go? I think it's bigotry and vampersecution at its worst *sniffle*

H8rs.


Vampires are a pain in the neck. :p :p :p
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
09-04-2007 14:11
From: Ceera Murakami
I don't particularly appreciate some sim banning Furries for no apparent reason, but it's their sim, and they can set the rules.

As an SL architect, I would have been interested in examining their work. But since their sim is off-limits to my primary forms, I probably won't bother to ever go there. If I did, I would respect their wishes and go in one of my Human forms, much as I do when business requires me to visit a Gorean sim, or somewhere else that Furries are less than welcome in.

Ceera, it's not like that. It's a misapplication of RL principles and expectations. Treat it like Gor.
Ann Launay
Neko-licious™
Join date: 8 Aug 2006
Posts: 7,893
09-04-2007 14:22
From: Asher Bertrand
Oh yeah, one more thing:

What's with the hate against us vampires? =(

You know we can't go to sims that have the sun up, yet you leave the sun up. What kind of fascist bull is that? Why you hatin on us? Why don't you set your sims to permanent midnight so *everyone* can go? I think it's bigotry and vampersecution at its worst *sniffle*

H8rs.


World>Force Sun>Midnight :p
_____________________
~Now Trout Re-Re-Re-Certified!~
From: someone
I am bumping you to an 8.5 on the Official Trout Measuring Instrument of Sluttiness. You are an enigma - on the one hand a sweet, gentle, intelligent woman who we would like to wrap up in our arms and protect, and on the other, a temptress to whom we would like to do all sorts of unmentionable things.

Congratulations and shame on you! You are a bit of a slut.
Slawkenbergius Slade
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2007
Posts: 133
09-04-2007 14:30
From: Asher Bertrand


I sure as hell won't go there in my vamp character and pretend to be undone by the sight of the cross and the proximity of holy water. That'd just be rude.

I probably will go, though, and play by their rules, because I respect this building in real life, and I respect the people who took time to make it in real life.

:shrug:

What's the big deal here?


Ok the builders of this particular Cathedral have made their wishes clear & it is right to respect that. But otherwise, why not? If your AV was a full-time Vampire, why not continue the role in a church build? It is not a church. And it is not a Cathedral. If the basic rule of SL is "do not behave in ways which you would not behave in in real life", why bother logging-in?

Any respect for the skills involved is due to those who built it in SL. Go to the RL original & wonder at the skills of those who built it. If you do, you'll discover that visiting the two are totally different experiences. And guess which is the more impressive when you're there.
1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23