Bring Back Prokofy Neva

SLCC was way after the Nolan/Others outing incident.

coco

Prokofy has continually bashed and harassed Cristiano, Aimee, CrystalShard and others in his blog for months since being banned, and also posted comments about them on the SLH. Why should Prokofy be allowed to come back and continue the harassment here?

Prok told me the article was coming out. He did not "coach" me.

Who coaches you?

coco

It seems like I am advocating pure anarchy.

What a storm over one post!
I feel like.... Ulrika!

Oh? Name me even one other person that posts 3000 words a day attacking and slandering specific groups and individuals, day in and day out. I sure can't think of anyone.

Since this was addressed to me (or at least followed a quote of mine), I will say, again:

I do not advocate the return of Prokofy.

coco

If Prokofy's dearest friend thinks it's a foregone conclusion that unbanning from the forum would ultimately result in banning from SL at large, that should tell us all something important.

Meaning you were just trolling?

Yes, it should, Enabran.

coco

P.S. I don't believe I am his dearest friend.

Hmmm yes let's see if it's worked:

Recent posts on his blog:

"Direct, profane attacks aren't especially effective, but you can understand how the pigheadedness and bloody-mindedness of these tekkies exasperates"

"Well this stupid little bitch doesnt know anything of what she's talking about."

"Wow, the writing life is going to be SO difficult with the FIC now consolidated in one big mega-FIC-blog, requiring daily, if not hourly rebuttals to stay chipper ROFL."

"This is such a dumb-ass, narrow-minded, arrogant fucktard point of view you have about spreading crap throughout the world"

"Freeview is a PIECE OF SHIT as we've established."

"Listen, dumbass."

"Beau, welcome to the Dumbass Club yourself."

"It's amazing how stupid you all are for claiming you are so smart. You'd rather group-think and circle your dumbass wagons that let in the truth."

"It's not about "slander," it's about reporting on the continued assholery of people inworld in this clique, and your utterly contemptible continued defense of them."

"Once again, Freeview is a piece of shit."

"Really, with this widespread IT asshole culture, our country is doomed."


Okay.....personal attacks? Check. Insane fixation on imaginary shadow governments? Check. Spreading rumours and libel against users and their products? Check, and double check.

Yep. Prokofy is exactly the same as before if not worse.

Why on earth did you copy from a blog and post it here? Especially in response to my post. You're appearing obsessed and trollish to me.

Ostrich much?

Back off of me. I don't drink koolaid.

I was simply giving examples to prove that Prokofy hasn't reformed or changed at all from when he was banned.

It was in response to your earlier post stating "enough time has past for an evaluation of the effectiveness of the action to be in order" I took this as a forum equivilent to a parole meeting in a prison. You bring a prisoner up, see if they've changed from when they went in to the prison and if they have maybe they'd get let out. But if you bring a prisoner in for murdering little girls with a knife, and 5 years later at parole he expresses his deep desire to find a little girl and buy a knife, they say "Nope, not changed at all, throw him back in".

Since there's no better sources to get examples of his behaviour after the banning, I pulled quotes from his blog to showcase how much he's remained the same if not gotten worse.

So basically you're supporting your own ban, then?

"enough time has past for an evaluation of the effectiveness of the action to be in order"

Hmmm. I took that to mean the effictiveness of the actions on the forums, and the new rules, rather than the effectiveness of the action on the person it was used on.

coco

WTF is that supposed to mean. Bury your head in the sand all you like. Prok is an asshat and was banned for her own actions and continues to savagely attack others in-world.

You are wearing your bias on your sleeve Margaret. At least I can admit to bias.

Good point, it could be taken that way too.

But I stand by my evaluation.

I cannot imagine why you would take enjoyment in feeling like an attention whoring troll.

Nor can I imagine you as the type of person who would prefer the constant bile to the relative calm that has been in existence since that psychotic was banned.

Let's just say you're surprising me in unpleasant ways.

Hehe, we agree to something.

One of the big differences I see between Prok's posts (yes, I went back into the archive to take a look) is that the people I consider malcontents here have more finesse in how they say things.

That doesn't mean the knife doesn't cut as deep, it's just not as direct.

For the record, I have no position on the topic. I don't care one way or the other.

Questions like this should have a poll attached.

And pie graphs, then we could make a pac-man!

I can't imagine how or why anyone would actually take enjoyment in calling another poster an "attention whoring troll."

Nor can I imagine how or why anyone could take pleasure from calling someone else "a psychotic" or other similar sorts of names we frequently hear tossed about here.

What I really can't figure out, though, is why people get away with doing that on these forums time after time, all the time. It's plain uncivilized.

coco

I was talking about the state of the forum since the ban as Dianne did in her original post. I never confused an action taken here as being intended to contol all of the internet. I've taken a stand against posting links ealier in this thread. To go beyond that and bring actual quotes here?

Calls were made to ban Coco when it was suspected that she was being used to channel Prok's posts. Should you be banned for blatantly defying LL and posting his blog here?