Child girl AV, sex with Adult male AV? is this right???

For the most part, furries don't look like real animals--they walk upright and talk like humans do, and are something that can't actually happen in real life. It's more like a cartoon.

The whole slavery thing--adults roleplay this sort of thing all the time--it's consentual.

Having a child avatar is quite different than an adult dressing like a child. When an adult dresses like a child, it's pretty obvious that it's an adult dressing like a child. A child avatar doesn't look like an adult dressing like a child, it actually looks like a child.

I've known a few people who constantly read stories about kid-adult sex, and they jack off regularly to them. I get really disturbed by it, and whenever they've wanted to show me those stories, I tell them to keep that kind of crap to themselves. Luckily, to my knowledge, they have never acted out on these sorts of fantasies. Something like SL allows people to act out those kinds of fantasies without actually molesting a child, which is a good thing, but I still find the fact that people are attracted to that sort of thing to be disgusting.

I can see why people might want to ban that type of behavior (child avatars having sex with adult avatars or other child avatars), and I don't like it either, but I feel strongly that SL should be a free-for-all sort of thing, and that people should do what they wish. I have the freedom to walk away from places that have that type of activity.

.


to some people SL is a game

to others its not a game

some people are here to meet other people

some are here just to have fun

others are here spending some relax time away from 1st Life

while others are here just to create havoc whenever possible

and probably for most people, SL is an opportunity
for that occasional Xciting cybersex romp in 3D ...

which really makes SL a Porn Site,
(though most will neither admit it, nor discuss it in those terms.

to Linden Labs ... it probably doesnt much matter,
since SL is a free-for-all, in cyber-techno-tinkerings,
war games, ripoffs, crime, obscene commercialism and cybersex.

(psychopaths, predators, fakes, racketeers and sex addicts are welcome.)

LL however, at this rate, should forget about patting themselves
on the back with their sense pride and self-eletism, as well as
any lofty notions of getting any Corporate interests on SL.

they havent created a Utopia, but instead they've manufactured a monster.

but you wouldnt know it, listening to their interviews in the Welcome Areas ...
in fact they appear to be rather in denial of it.



oh the self-righteous moral indignation of it all ...
the intolerant vs the tollerant ... its really quite amusing

for some, it depends on what kind of Porn youre talking about

ageplay is no good, but a little BDSM is just fine

to others, Gor is simply disgusting,
but a public romp in Heaven is just great for the newbies.

now, which way is it to the nearest PG Area?
just turn right into the next chatzone, past the anal sex pose balls.






*.¸¸.·´¨*Arsenic




.

Wow this topic is going the whole nine yards!!!... again

Do some people just copy and paste from previous topics?

Im an adult who's played a Kid in SL since i arrived last October,... I read these posts everynow and then to be aware of what the Irrationalists are currently thinking.

Perhaps its time to start ignoring these repeated Topics as the majority arnt being convinced of the malicious intent of Child AV's that the minority would have us believe.

QFE Once more

*shock and horror!*

You mean some sickos have sex in the open air? That is disgusting! They ought to be genitally mutilated and thrown out of Second Life!

In a sense if the people are into this stuff in real life its wrong to a degree. I'd rather have them reading text or looking at modified pics then out on the streets preying on real children. There is a difference between Child pornography and pedophelia by the way and i dont condone either but. Child porn is images and most of what is seen on the internet is digitally altered to make girls look like kids (there is some real stuff but thats just wrong to so many degrees). There are some people that are arroused by this and its in the comfort of their own home (still real child porn is wrong). However with pedophelia it's someone acting on the arrousal on a real life child and harming that child or actually doing sexual things with that child (just wrong beyond comprehension)

However. SL falls under the digitally altered category. It looks like a child but its technically an adult. People may view it as wrong but if people have that impulse its better they get it out in a game enviroment with another adult acting as the child rather then going on aim or something and stalking a real child. I highly doubt there are many pedophiles playing second life on the mature grid as they know its an adult and there for it ruins that. If people want to age play its their business. If its a age play community and its out in the open cool (most likely its marked as being such) and if they wanna do it in private cool. If they do it in public view in a place not marked for it (private rooms work to as a place) then i'd have a problem with it, but that goes for all public forms of sex really.

I'm not involved in age play and not everyone playing children in SL are having sex (at least not as a child av). I for one dont condone it but i respect their right to do it. I'm not involved in age play and i dont want to see people performing age play but they do have a right to do it.

*chokes on her tea and coughs hard*

...Sorry, got something stuck in my Zoo- er, throat.

I would abuse report it.

Unfortunately this is one of the negative aspects to an uncensored world, sometimes freedom is exploited. I would definitely report it.

Hey... if it looks like child porn... it *is* child porn.

I question the mental state of anyone interested in child-av sexuality. It shows an interest in child sex, and is beyond disgusting.

As far as I am concerned... if you are into child-av sexuality... you are a pedophile at heart, if not in practice.

The OP was snooping about on private property. LL have stated themselves its not against anything. They allow it because of the fact its 2 adults. And while you may find it sick they dont. Whats right , wrong , gross or not gross are all subject to opinion. Whats wrong with 2 adults rp'ing and one chooses to be a child in all honesty. It may be gross but morally it doesnt say a thing about the person. Thats the point of RP to do things you normally wouldnt do in real life. Look how much BDSM stuff is in SL and Gorean stuff. Half the people involved there arnt out and part of the bdsm community and gor doesnt even exist in the real world. I dont advocate them doing it but i do honor their right to do it.

We can look thru history back awhile. It wasnt uncommon for a girl to be wed at 9 to someone 18 or older. And yet in today's society its frowned upon simply because people say its wrong. Its not subject to public approval in SL especially if they were on their own freaking land. The OP shouldnt of gone on the land and shouldnt of been snooping in their house. If offended just leave and leave it at that and dont bother with the person. Thats not what you did though you came here and tried to start an uproar over what you think is icky. I personally am not involved in Age play but i do at respect their right to explore that avenue. And no it doesnt make them a pedophile at heart or in practice becuase pedophelia is acting on those urges not having them.

If they have those urges they were born that way. This isnt the real world and these arnt real children and no one is getting hurt by this. Grossed out from seeing it mabye but you can port away fast if you dont like it. Your not forced to sit there and watch it or listen to it. The question is who are you people to judge? Wrong or Right its all subjective to your personal thoughts and thats what makes it as such. Its wrong in your eyes there for it has to be wrong for everyone else and if they dont accept that they are evil. You have your own quirks im sure people find disturbing in the virtual world as well as the real world do you want people to ban you for that?

I dont think they need your approval to do what they do in private. Thats why they were doing it in private. As i said if you dont like something you can simply leave, even in real life if you dont like something you can simply walk away from it. Its quite an easy concept to understand really. Im more disgusted by the people outraged by this because for starters the post started with prying into someone's privacy they arnt here waving your face in it. They arnt asking you to join in they simply do what they do and dont hurt anyone and yet you have the gull to judge everyone involved in it as being evil or a pedophile simply for RP'ing a certain way.

It is by no means child pornography nor is it pedophelia. If you dont like it then dont get involved in it quite simple point. SL is built on the concept of openness and yet you come here and are totally close minded to RP. In real life an adult can dress up as a child here and adult can be a child but its still all make believe. Like i said i find it more appaling the beligerence of a group for living a certain way in SL. I wont call you people stupid or anything your entitled to your own opinions but really look at it from an SL standpoint not a r/l standpoint they have nothing to do with one another in the sexual aspects and the rp aspects.

Man cannot judge one another lest ye be judged yourself.

using the same logic, is anyone who uses this phrase interested in inscest?

Judge me all you want... I'm not the one getting off on the image of a sexualized child. If someone like the images of sexualized children in SL, they probably do in RL too.

=( that settles it, thanks taco, now I KNOW I'm a perv.

Thats not true at all. For a minority of people it may be true but for the majority of age players it isnt true. Before you judge the age player community how about you actually learn something about it. I'm not judging you you have a right to your opinion but you shouldnt judge others for something you know very little about. You may find it gross but its RP its not an image of a child they know its an adult behind it. Its the same thing as digitalized child pornography its not hurting a child in any context what so ever. Its not even the image of a real child its a 3d representation of a child and it is just RP. It is the same as someone dressing up as a child and pretending to be a child in real life role play only in SL you can shrink yourself and make yourself look more like a child.

Its evil in your eyes but they have a right to do it without being banned for it. This isnt some place for underage people and thats why underage folks are banned from SL. Its two conscenting adults choosing to look a certain way and do certain things. There is nothing wrong with it. I dont approve of it personally and i think its gross but i do at least respect people's rights to do what they choose to do especially when its two coscenting adults and its not hurting anyone.

Not, it's not. It's pretty obvious that it's an adult pretending to be a younger person. It's obvious, because NO KIDS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE ON SL, except on Teen.
It can be safely assumed that the person playing the AV is an adult.
End of story.

As for the rest of it, the "Oh, if they do this, they're paedophiles" etc etc...

Read the rest of the thread. All of your points are debunked. All of them.

If you don't like it, don't look.

Do NOT judge what you don't know ANYTHING about.

tut tut tut

I sure am glad you're not in charge of lawmaking. "If it looks like X, it must be X." That's great. Facts be damned! You are guilty of looking guilty.

Go ahead, question anyone's mental state. Question mine. Question your own. I think a fair number of us in SL have various issues. Some of them are, yes, distasteful.

... so what? Are you so sure your predilictions are Moral Majority approved?

As far as being a pedophile at heart or a pedophile at practice? Easy to make blanket suppositions about people you've never met, I suppose. And just as easily, coincidentally, to make wrong suppositions. But I'll tell you this -- given the choice, I'd much rather they be one at heart than be one in practice.

With all this, "I'll report this to the police and it's illegal" threats, I'm interested to know is there a law in America the same as here in the UK that can see a person charged with 'wasting police time'?

You are concerned about children, yet you use words like these?

Do you understand what your saying? Not only is there a moral issue but a legal issuel. The subject of Paedofilia is a taboo, as for if it's legal on Second Life or not I do not know. I know people have gotten into legal trouble for drawing Anime with children performing sexual acts and they have actually received prison sentences, therefore why should it be acceptable in Second Life? It is exploitation of children and wrong, even you should know that. The fact is it's like me running around Second Life with a swastika, oh but it'd be so horrible to ban it because it's a game. Theres a limit to freedom and the line has been crossed. Do you think because people aren't getting involved that we should shut our eyes and pretend it's not happening, the point is it IS happening regardless of if people are seeing it or not to satisfy someones perverted mindset. Do you think if a child was molested by a paedofile that we should turn a blind eye and the person say "Oh if you don't like it don't look"? That's horrible analogy and I hope whoever is doing this disgusting act they call roleplaying stop and be punished.

WRONG. This line of thinking is what puts faschists dictators or wannabe-dictators into power. Putting limits on freedom is a slippery slope, and you know it.
What's next, you're going to be shouting "9/11!" at us?

Who said anyone had the freedom to go and kill someone? Right to self defense is one thing but overall a bit of common sense. What right does anyone have to exploit a child or harm a childs image? No one has the right to hurt the image of a child by exploiting them in a sexual matter to feed their lust.

Sure is. Don't know if you heard much about it up where you live, but we had a "runaway bride" who disappeared days before her wedding. Nationwide manhunt. Turns out she had cold feet or something and just gave herself a vacation. She was charged with filing a false police report and giving false information to police. Plead no contest, two-year probation, 120 hours community service and $2,250 fine. She got off easy.

Not unrelatedly, I sometimes think wasting Linden time with frivolous AR reports should be punishable, too.

Again, you're not getting it through your skull that THIS IS VIRTUAL AND THUS BY DEFINITION NOT REAL. We've pointed out that there are NO CHILDREN INVOLVED in any kind of age play.
Geez, this is making my blood boil.
Signed in blood,
Jesse Malthus

You're obviously having a problem distinguishing RL from SL.
Exploit a child: No right to do so.
Exploit a child's IMAGE: You've got every right to. IT'S NOT REAL.