Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Child girl AV, sex with Adult male AV? is this right???

Sunspot Pixie
dread heliotrope
Join date: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 493
08-10-2006 11:47
From: Mondo Kongo
I done gone an lernt somtin'... Thank you! Tell me where to pitch my tent in the compound, I'm going to go get my Nike's and space suit now! Don't serve the Kool aide without me!
More patronising. How unexpected!

From: Mondo Kongo
I didn't expect you to get the tree thing baby-girl (in my best Bill Clinton Accent)
No, I got it. Your point was I would disagree with you for the sake of disagreeing. Wrong. There are probably a good deal of topics we would agree upon. See, it's not all or nothing with me. You aren't my sworn enemy because we disagree on this topic. I can see though, that you apparently think that way.

From: Mondo Kongo
Here's some help on your next post.
1)quote me and disagree with EVERY point if there was one, now or in any future reply.
As long as we're on this subject, that's a likely scenario. Does that damage your fragile ego? Too bad.

From: Mondo Kongo
2)skim the top of the content and say "WTF"
I don't skim, which is why I generally do point by point replies. Figure it out.

From: Mondo Kongo
3)give another analogy like your typing to a child...
You mean the tree in the forest one? Or the Clinton one?
Sunspot Pixie
dread heliotrope
Join date: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 493
08-10-2006 11:50
From: Mondo Kongo
Have to say I'm sorry you were subject to something like that.

But just like I have dealt with the harsh... we've picked our sides. Right?

Oh right, you've been called something equivalent to "smelly pedo"? Maybe I should accuse you of being Lost? Would you like that?

:rolleyes:

Editing my message to say that I am through discussing this. It's become pointless, We're not going to agree, and you're just going to hypocritically accuse me of doing the things the anti ageplayers have done, without even providing one quote to back it up.
Lina Pussycat
Texture WizKid
Join date: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 731
08-10-2006 12:00
From: Mondo Kongo
Have to say I'm sorry you were subject to something like that.

But just like I have dealt with the harsh... we've picked our sides. Right?


I'm not picking a side. I respect their rights and i think their rights should be honored. I think its gross i even stated i did. I dont agree with it but i dont think we have the right to say if it is or isnt allowed at the same time. Im somwhere in the middle here. Not on one side or the other. But i feel strongly that rights and privacy were violated by statements made here. It wasnt the OP's business and like arsenic said we cant even prove its true. I know some age players in r/l and in sl and for the most part i have found they hold the same moralistic views in SL as they do in real life. Most view pedophelia as wrong and child molestation to. They often advocate against it in fact, as i have pointed out before.

There is a need for some people to act out a fantasy as a child and they are more free to express that in SL without so much public scrutiny as they may recieve in real life because more people in SL are open to such things. I understand feeling different is the basis im coming from i think its gross and perverse but i find other things gross and perverse like foot fetish's but i dont think people should not be allowed to do them simply for that reason.
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
08-10-2006 12:04
Thread closed--same as previous ones like it.

Private discussions – the forums are a public area for the Second Life community’s use. Individuals who have a dispute with each other have other channels of communication to discuss their differences or communicate – private messaging, IM within Second Life, or chatting within Second Life. Also, threads that are addressed to a single individual or group are inappropriate on the forums, this includes slander or "naming names" in a posts title, starting polls about a particular resident or group, etc.

Flaming, Spamming, Trolling – Flaming (posting a message that is intended to incite anger or directly attack a person or persons), Spamming (multiple posts of the same topic or discussion), and Trolling (a post with an intentionally contrary opinion written with the intent of inciting or getting argumentative opinions) are strongly discouraged. If you think your post might be over-reactive, or that it might fall into one of these definitions, please reconsider posting.

/invalid_link.html
_____________________
1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44