Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

No kids in the real SL, EVER!

Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
11-10-2004 18:29
I am 100% unequivocally against Zombie minors in SL. They can't even support their own brain eating habits yet!
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Jules Palmerstone
Registered User
Join date: 1 Oct 2004
Posts: 3
11-11-2004 02:54
undefinedNO KIDS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad:
splat1 Edison
Registerd Nut
Join date: 6 Sep 2004
Posts: 353
11-11-2004 04:33
Being only 18 myself, and taking into account that a hell of a lot of people as it is are not mature (not saying i dont have "relapses" of being stupid).

I am fully for having younger people in sl but not in the main stream. allready in my shot time here I have seen what a pain in the backside younger people can be.

A few sims off to one side of the grid that younger people cannot leave would be perfect, that way people can enjoy sl and older people can teach the young ones new things but this has its down sides with this adversily advertising sl to younger people and them just getting a parent to lie about thire age.

The only nice solution i see for this at the moment is having a diffrently named client to the grid with sims that can only be visited with that client, this way very few changes are needed to the grid and the sl client. It would realy just be sl with a sticker over the name.

But with younger people in sl there are a lot of rules and problems that crop up that are not as common in sl as it is now. One of the main problems will be preditors of an unhealthy nature, these cause a huge problem with some of the stuff I work on and can be hard to keep under wraps. So a lot of thinking would need to go into it but from a code point of view very littel would need to be done and LL open up a nice source of income (got to love kids spending loads of cash on games)


Any comments (Other then digs at my age or spelling) ?
_____________________
Splat Soft - We exsist in the RL to!
Gigas Bunny (Mule)
####
You see, our experts describe you as an appallingly dull fellow, unimaginative, timid, lacking in initiative, spineless, easily dominated, no sense of humour, tedious company and irrepressibly drab and awful. And whereas in most professions these would be considerable drawbacks, in chartered accountancy they are a positive boon.
Dismay Wilde
Bleed Designs Owner
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 1,771
11-11-2004 07:03
I have 5 SL kids and they are fine.. lol
Burke Prefect
Cafe Owner, Superhero
Join date: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 2,785
11-11-2004 07:57
My Two Cents::

AOL, There, TSO, Unreal Tourney, Counter-Strike, Everquest, Neopets, and Outwar... the kiddies have enough ruin already. (don't bitch about missing names here)

In a couple years, when SL is running on next-next-gen hardware, and Disney, AOL, Yahoo, Google, and Neopets are outsourcing them for branded versions, we'll have to deal with kids. We will, of course, have Credit-Card Age Verification for SL proper.

What about the present? Same rule I have about kids in SL, keep them on a short leash and plenty of valium. But how you raise you little ADHD zombie is your own business.
Kiri White
Second Life Resident
Join date: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Okei... calm again...
11-13-2004 01:32
Okei so maybe I was a little harsh on my other post. I was just pissed off after reading all of these posts. A very simple solution is mark the minors so you know who they are. And I wish people would stop saying that SL is such a bad place for a kid. Children are having sex, getting pregnant, doing drugs and getting into all sorts of trouble without SL. What bad would allowing them SL do? Then they could relieve themselves of all their stupidity in a virtual world instead of the real one.

Oh and that comment someone said about kids who get raped having sex just because is bullshit. I was raped. Do you see me going out and having sex with random people? NO. You can't stereotype people that way. Generalizations just don't work. Every person is unique and you can't banish good kids just because some of them act stupid.

Again, I apologize for my previous post. I should have calmed down before venting at the thread.

The bottom line is: SL residents can't be held responsible for the actions of these minors. Any legal problems could be resolved in contract at the time of registration and alternate sims just for minors isn't a bad idea, either. Some of you just aren't thinking about how many minors are ALREADY in SL. I personally know over a dozen. Have they actually affected anyone in a negative way yet? You tell me.
Haley Mandala
Registered User
Join date: 11 Oct 2003
Posts: 9
11-13-2004 03:41
From: Ferran Brodsky


Integrating minors is a TERRIBLE idea for.....

EVERYONE

So unless SL wants to be another greek statue covered up in a museum because it has exposed genetalia then yeah....
Bring the kids in... we'll show em a good time. =\




Very Nicely Said!!!!


hmmm hope i did this quoting thing right....

Haley Mandala
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
11-18-2004 03:58
From: Kiri White
Okei so maybe I was a little harsh on my other post. I was just pissed off after reading all of these posts. A very simple solution is mark the minors so you know who they are. And I wish people would stop saying that SL is such a bad place for a kid. Children are having sex, getting pregnant, doing drugs and getting into all sorts of trouble without SL. What bad would allowing them SL do? Then they could relieve themselves of all their stupidity in a virtual world instead of the real one.

Oh and that comment someone said about kids who get raped having sex just because is bullshit. I was raped. Do you see me going out and having sex with random people? NO. You can't stereotype people that way. Generalizations just don't work. Every person is unique and you can't banish good kids just because some of them act stupid.

Again, I apologize for my previous post. I should have calmed down before venting at the thread.

The bottom line is: SL residents can't be held responsible for the actions of these minors. Any legal problems could be resolved in contract at the time of registration and alternate sims just for minors isn't a bad idea, either. Some of you just aren't thinking about how many minors are ALREADY in SL. I personally know over a dozen. Have they actually affected anyone in a negative way yet? You tell me.


Kiri,

That was me that said about children who are molested being more promiscuous than other children owing to the fact they are introduced to sex too early.

So you've been raped and you're fine afterwards? Uh, great? The fact is yes rape and early sex and stuff DOES damage children, so I don't care if you are 'fine' after being raped, I am here to protect. And it is a fact that children who are rushed into sexual things too soon do suffer damage, including sleeping around a lot, which isn't their fault really, it is because of the damage done to them as children.

I find it deeply disturbing you'd say you were raped, and try use that to trivialise the effect of rape, molestation and too early exposre of children to sexual things. If you've really been raped, then you more than me should want children OUT of SL to avoid them being placed into dangerous, questionable, and just generally not healthy situations.

*** I don't care if anyone has been raped, shot, hung, executed, I will not stand by while people hurt people ***
Malachi Petunia
Gentle Miscreant
Join date: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
everything in moderation
11-18-2004 04:08
"How about just one or two?", he asks - amazed at the longevity of this thread.
Willow Zander
Having Blahgasms
Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 9,935
11-18-2004 04:09
Ya know, good topic.. but guys.... I think your TOO late to stop kids being in SL :p
_____________________
*I'm not ready for the world outside...I keep pretending, but I just can't hide...*




<3 Giddeon's <3
Tharkis Olafson
I like cheese
Join date: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 134
11-18-2004 20:08
I realise my avatar might be new to SL, but I am not. Though this is a story for a diffrent occassion, I must state that I do not believe SL in it's current form is in any way shape or form suitable for children. I realise that there are PG sims and R sims, but many cross the boundaries into both worlds. Most people have the sense enough to keep their genitalia in their pants while in a PG sim, but there are those who don't. There are many adult subjects portrayed in SL and I personally don't believe it's at all suitable for children. I may have a slightly slanted view on the subject as I have 2 small children of my own, but the belief remains that the current form of SL is not the place for children.

Aside from the children, what about us adults? To many of us, SL is our escape from the real world. That includes our children. It gives us the freedom from inhibition, to do things we normaly would not do when our children or other's children were around. We act rude, crude, and lude.. And we like it that way.

That being said, there are some things you could do. Create a separate set of sims which are segragated from the main sim farm. If you truely believe that this is a possible money maker, I don't see why you wouldn't go this route. You could also implement a form of censoring, but in this world, censoring doesn't make much sense as it's main appeal is freedom. There may be other ideas, but I still think the segragated sim would be the best approach.

Let me state emphaticly SL as it currently stands is absolutly NOT the place for children. It is very much an adult game/sim/whatever you want to label it. If I wanted to be in a child friendly sim.. I'd still be in "There".
Sophie Steptoe
Second Life Resident
Join date: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 48
11-18-2004 23:50
From: Tharkis Olafson
I realise my avatar might be new to SL, but I am not. Though this is a story for a diffrent occassion, I must state that I do not believe SL in it's current form is in any way shape or form suitable for children. I realise that there are PG sims and R sims, but many cross the boundaries into both worlds. Most people have the sense enough to keep their genitalia in their pants while in a PG sim, but there are those who don't. There are many adult subjects portrayed in SL and I personally don't believe it's at all suitable for children. I may have a slightly slanted view on the subject as I have 2 small children of my own, but the belief remains that the current form of SL is not the place for children.

Aside from the children, what about us adults? To many of us, SL is our escape from the real world. That includes our children. It gives us the freedom from inhibition, to do things we normaly would not do when our children or other's children were around. We act rude, crude, and lude.. And we like it that way.

That being said, there are some things you could do. Create a separate set of sims which are segragated from the main sim farm. If you truely believe that this is a possible money maker, I don't see why you wouldn't go this route. You could also implement a form of censoring, but in this world, censoring doesn't make much sense as it's main appeal is freedom. There may be other ideas, but I still think the segragated sim would be the best approach.

Let me state emphaticly SL as it currently stands is absolutly NOT the place for children. It is very much an adult game/sim/whatever you want to label it. If I wanted to be in a child friendly sim.. I'd still be in "There".


I totally agree. My decision to try SL was determined, in large part, when I read that it was for adults. Just about every online game out there is rated "teen".... can't adults have at least one good game to themselves?
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
11-18-2004 23:53
Another thought against having kids in SL occurred to me the other day; what about the forums? Some folks are upset that a minority of threads seem to be centered around negative subjects, just think how it will be with kids in here too...
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Benjamin Opel
Registered User
Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 83
11-19-2004 07:09
Well that is abit tight i think that kids would love to play Second Life so i think Second Life should make a little Game for these under the age of 14 who agreas ?
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
11-19-2004 16:17
NO! NO ONE UNDER 18! DAMMIT!

Any minors under 18 caught in SL should be banned immediately, AND sued for tresspassing! ALL OF THEM!
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
Juro Kothari
Like a dog on a bone
Join date: 4 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,418
11-19-2004 16:18
NO KIDS... we've enough already. *ahem*
Nick Fairlight
Humanoid Typhoon
Join date: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 494
11-19-2004 16:22
From: Benjamin Opel
Well that is abit tight i think that kids would love to play Second Life so i think Second Life should make a little Game for these under the age of 14 who agreas ?


No one agrees. :mad:
_____________________
I tried to find a topic, but I kept getting distracted by that slightly offensive photo of Arnold.

-Jeska Linden
Devlin Gallant
Thought Police
Join date: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 5,948
11-19-2004 16:24
He wants the age at 14 so he will be legal, grr. :mad:
_____________________
I LIKE children, I've just never been able to finish a whole one.
Darwin Appleby
I Was Beaten With Satan
Join date: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 2,779
11-19-2004 21:00
This thread is still alive? DIE! DIE DIE DIE.
_____________________
Touche.
Willow Zander
Having Blahgasms
Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 9,935
11-19-2004 21:03
oooo just personally attack or flame someone, that should get it done for ya :) or not, who knows in what wacky way these places work o.O
_____________________
*I'm not ready for the world outside...I keep pretending, but I just can't hide...*




<3 Giddeon's <3
vanler Everett
Registered User
Join date: 3 May 2004
Posts: 5
11-20-2004 23:41
From: Jay Knox
As a father of an eight year old i also do NOT want my child exposed to this environment until they are mature enoguh to fully understand the imiplications of their actions and what to watch out for when whacko predators are lurking out there trying to corrupt them.

Good grief i hope this isn't coming down the line. I really like my SL.


i argee with you i dont wants kids expose too this i do have to admit there would be some benfits of having kid on sl but the downside out weighs the benfits if kid do get on i think they should be marked nothing to bad just maybe a diffrent color for there name because i would hate to find out some 13 year-old kid lied to me that he was 21 however i think it would be best as it is because let face we cant keep kids out of sl maybe if we keep the over 18 rule we can as sad as it sound keep child freaks form nowing kids real age i know it not a very good way but if it helps
_____________________
Joe Digeridoo
Registered User
Join date: 6 May 2003
Posts: 4
11-21-2004 00:11
From: vanler Everett
i argee with you i dont wants kids expose too this i do have to admit there would be some benfits of having kid on sl but the downside out weighs the benfits if kid do get on i think they should be marked nothing to bad just maybe a diffrent color for there name because i would hate to find out some 13 year-old kid lied to me that he was 21 however i think it would be best as it is because let face we cant keep kids out of sl maybe if we keep the over 18 rule we can as sad as it sound keep child freaks form nowing kids real age i know it not a very good way but if it helps


Wow. Punctuation? Spelling? Coherent thought?
Takara Eldritch
Registered User
Join date: 6 Nov 2004
Posts: 14
11-21-2004 03:34
I started playing this game to avoid them in other games. If the kids are allowed to play, no reason for me to. I'm out. Might as well play EQ2 or WoW.
Craig Altman
Second Life Resident
Join date: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 131
My ten-penceworth
11-21-2004 06:43
Ok so yet another reply to this thread is possibly unwanted but Im quite new to this game and only saw this thread today and had to reply, sorry...

I have played other online games, notably Ultima Online and I have to add another to that internet Fuckwad theory someone posted earlier

Good game + developers need/desire for more cash = bad game

If I were given the choice of either letting kids into the game or paying twice the subscription, I personally would pay twice the subscription, so far I think this game is great and I would hate to see it go downhill like UO did.

Please no kids in this game, I say that as a father of three
Joshua Nightshade
Registered dragon
Join date: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 1,337
12-02-2004 11:37
this stuff's all be reiterated over and over, but here's my take. lemmie tell you a story:

I started playing SL twoish months ago. I signed up for the free trial, liked it, etc. after playing it a few hours, I thought it might be something my sister, who's 14, would enjoy. I had glanced over the ToS and missed the part about the game being for 18 year olds or older, so I didn't expect there to be a problem. so she got our parents' card, signed up for the trial, and was off.

after a day she was giggling telling me about how all she had to do was wear skimpy outfits and the boys would give her money. it made me frown but knowing that's how she got around in UO I said nothing. after a day and a half she told me she'd started "working" as an escort at the edge and I flipped out.

thankfully, however, she's got a large mouth with not the highest level of sense and was telling everybody about how she was really only 14, and she was reported, and the account shut down and blocked. at the time I thought the reaction was extreme and a little silly, given the fact that her IP address was also blocked as well, but now with my experience of playing the game for a while I can say it's a good thing and to whomever did it I'm appreciative.

I'm all for children learning and knowing about sex, but of the less pornographic and normal variety. there's no real need for kids to understand the difference between "doggystyle" and "missionary," much less what the fuck fisting is. and I'm sure we can all agree that, especially as acts of graphic sex are concerned, SL is nothing but deviant. a quick search on sex in the find places gives you a plethora of options to choose from. I don't think there's any reason why kids should be subjected to that. it'd require sweeping changes across the platform and I'm sure you'd lose a lot of SL subscriptions. if you're sure the kids would make up for the loss then sure, but I can tell you if I had kids I wouldn't let them touch the screen.

that's just THAT subject.

comments on immaturity aside, as most people view SL as a chat medium you have to take that into consideration as well. I curse like a sailor. I say fuck. a lot. and I'll be damned if I should be censored for that because a minor chooses to occupy the same virtual space as me. I think even having PG areas is asinine because you've got to be an adult to play the game and all non-adults who'd be offended by such language shouldn't be there in the first place.

a week ago or so I was in the welcome area and someone said "shit," and one of the helper people got on his case about it, telling him not to use that type of language. really now. shit is a word you can say on cable television now days, it's totally PG. but that's beside the point. I know a lot of people who wouldn't enjoy hearing "watch your language, there're children in this sim." and they pay your bills.

but take comfort in this fact. without exploding body parts and weapons that rain nuclear fire and blow up buildings, kids are likely to get bored of SL really fast.
1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 24