Abortion "rights" unpopular

Hey! Yet again, we agree!

By your own logic then, does that mean you admit that I understand you?

Yeah, you favor letting women kill babies because they feel like it. You are SOOO pro-choice.


If you read what I have said in the past you would already know, but you are too busy stereotyping anyone who disagrees with you.



Who uses the term "moron" except teenage girls?



More stereotyping. You really should stop judging everyone based on your assumptions.



Amazing, you found one article 2 years old of an attempted attack on an abortion mill. The rest were much older, like 1984. You crack me up. Your left wing propaganda is deafening.

Actually, the word has a long, proud history. It's much more exact for certain things than simply calling someone stupid.

No, I'm not in favor of baby-killing, and yes, I am pro-choice. Did you even read my post? Or do you not understand anything with which you disagree?


How is making a logical point a sterotype? Answer the question - or don't, I really don't care, to be honest.


Wow. Even your responses not directly related to this topic make no sense, congratulations. I hear it used all the time, but then I listen to people other than myself.


Amazing how any point you don't understand is a sterotype, or a judgement, or an assumption.


What you wrote implied that you did not believe there had ever been any pro-life bombers. You didn't write "Find me a pro-life bomber from the past two weeks"; you wrote "find me a pro-life bomber." Must be nice to never be wrong, even when faced with facts that clearly contradict your so-called point. Your inability to concede even a centimeter of ground in an argument makes me think the moron label is even more apt.

Actually, you're right, most left-wing propaganda is supplied by FOXNews.

It either means stupid or it's an offensive word no longer acceptable....

mo·ron ( P ) Pronunciation Key (môrn, mr-)
n.
1.A stupid person; a dolt.
2.Psychology. A person of mild mental retardation having a mental age of from 7 to 12 years and generally having communication and social skills enabling some degree of academic or vocational education. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive.

It's considered offensive. That doesn't mean it's not acceptable.

What's ironic is those who use the term fit it's definition.

Not at all. Advanced insults take an advanced mind.

I used to be pro choice, but morally opposed to abortion. Kevin has resoundingly turned me pro-aborition, and I have, based on his arguments, decided that I beleive life begins at birth, rather than life begins at conception. There are too many people in the world anyway. So why bother with birth control at all-just have sex, get pregnant and have a bunch of aboritions, its save easy and painless, after all.

If the term moron is considered an advanced insult to the person using it, it would be evidence the user is not developed past that of a 12 year old child.

Most 12 year olds aren't thinking about chemical defects in the brain.

I'm glad I forced you off the fence. Either be hot or cold man. Get a backbone.

Where in the defintion does it suggest anything about chemical defects?

Genetics, then. Which are just chemicals, when you get right down to it. Or any of the other possible causes of mental retardations.

Only retarded (or children) people would use "moron" as an insult imho. Of course, any personal insult used in a debate setting would indicate either a very low level of education or some kind of retardation.

That's your opinion, as you say. Since when has this been a debate setting, by the way?

Debate: To engage in argument by discussing opposing points.

Isn't that what adults do here?

I would argue that there has very very rarely been any true discussion on these forums.

That wouldn't be because this isn't a debate setting. It would be because several posters misuse the forum. Forums are for discussion. In fact, one can be banned for insulting other posters after several warnings.

So that should make it clear these forums are not for any kind of rudeness or insults.

I agree much childish behaviour happens, but that doesn't mean that's what these forums are for. That would be like saying schools are not for learning, just because a few unruly kids get out of hand.

I would disagree with you though, some good discussions happen here even through the snot slinging.

You're one of a kind, Klein.

Thanks Gabe. I try to be unique. Everyone is so worried about "fitting in" they don't dare step out and say what they think is the truth if it goes against the group think.

I see no need to criticize other people personally, let their actions speak for themselves.

But, if someone uses an insulting word to describe an opponent, that word becomes available to the opponent to examine and use. However, it would be in bad taste to just return the insult. But rather to use the word in an instance that allows the insulter to be targeted generally. It takes some skill, but with time you'll get the hang of it.

You're not exactly hitting the target.

You see, it isn't that he's wrong and inconsistent, he's a true pioneer and like all pioneers: the ones that build perpetual motion machines, or carburetors that make cars run on tap water, or dianetic electropsychometers, or time cubes they are mocked by their contemporaries because they are just so far ahead of their time.

Keep fighting the good fight, brother, your reward awaits you in Valhalla.

50 years.......


Odin will be waiting. Right?