Abortion "rights" unpopular

A wise man once told me, "If you beat your head against a brick wall, you'll just fuck up your head".

Now you know how I feel whenever I read one of your posts.


Nope, wrong again. One side is anti-choice and one side is pro-choice.


Irrelevant to this argument, but OK, yes, you accept the basic facts of reality. Congratulations! Do you also believe the earth is spherical, and rotates around the sun? Welcome to the 19th century!


And continues right up until they rob a liquor store.


So why is it bad to kill babies, but OK to kill adults who work at abortion clinics? Riddle me that. I think anti-choice people are passionate because they're fanatics. Like most fanatics, they want to inflict their views on the rest of the world, and don't care what anyone else might think. Pro-choice folks do care what others might think; they're not trying to impose their views on anyone, merely allowing people the freedom of choice. Which is more in line with the Constitution and traditional American values, pray tell?



I've never met, or heard, of anyone who's pro-abortion, so I have no idea WTF you are talking about. Anyone who uses that phrase has only a simplistic understanding of the issue at best, and an inability to comprehend any view other than their own at worst.



Wow, something reasonable! Amazing! Too bad it was marred by your silly pro-abortion label, which negates anything intelligent you might ever say on this topic. Your use of that term is not only insulting to those of us who support freedom and choice - basic values of this nation, I might add - but indicates a failure to grasp even the most basic parts of the issue.

Moreover, why is it that it's the so-called "pro-life" people who end up killing the most people? You don't see a lot of pro-choice bombers, do you?

Wrong, one side is pro-human life. The other side is anti-human life unless that human happens to be a fully grown woman who chooses abortion.


So very typical of the left fringe, anyone who disagrees with you is still in the dark ages. You are so enlightened. Are you the elite we should follow? We need you to tell us what to think.

Yeah, we want to force our view babies deserve a chance at life. But you don't want to force your view that anyone who opposes the killing of a fetus is a fanatic, right?

I think the constitution supports the protection of human lives, over your opinion is supports your right to do what you want, even if someone has to be killed to make your life more comfortable.



This is evidence you ignore anything once you hear the term pro-abortion.

Your bias astounds. You can say we are anti-choice, and that seems reasonable to you. So we can either call your side pro-abortion or anti-life. Don't like it? Too bad.

Yeah, like the uni-bomber? Tell us all the pro-life bombings. Where are all these pro-life bombers?

Continue with your left wing fringe propaganda, I'm so used to it.

Testosterone is a class-3 controlled substance.

Your mistake is thinking there are only two sides to the issue.



Did he say it was?



From their perspective, you are commiting murder. So, to use your same logic, one side favors murdering people, the other side favors not murdering people. Which do you think is more in line with the Constitution and traditional American values, pray tell?

See how fun it is when we stupidly believe everything is black and white and there are only two extremes of opinion?

75% of Americans are above average in intelligence. 82.9% of the people who use "liberal" as an epithet are non-practicing Oedipus wannabes. 42% of Oedipus wannabes will eventually yield to their desires. Only 12% of patricides result in conviction. Nearly 80% of mother-son copulations yield conception; about half of such conceptions are brought to term thus passing on genes for incestuous lust. Most of these conceptions which are brought to term are done because of ideological reasons.

Ergo, in a number of generations, the country will consist primarily of in-bred, moralistic, incestuous, patricidal, self-proclaimed "conservatives" who believe deeply in "family values".

Your sick

Nice personal attack

Very interesting indeed. Prove it!

Calling people dumb now???

Its a statistical math thing, Magnum. You know, that whole "logic" thing. As much as it kills me to say it, Kevn's got a point on this one Of course, Introvert knew that when he said it, so

Way to ignore the other 90% of my thread.

Want to try again?

Your statistics were extremely biased from the start.

Game over. kthxbyecomeagain

Me? biased? You must be joking!

No hes not and yes you are biased.

Nope, you're still wrong. I'm in favor of human life and abortion rights. I also oppose abortion. What was that? Was that the sound of a small, closed mind I heard exploding with the complexities of my views?



So very typical of the right wing, to accuse any who disagrees with them of being the elitist, leftist fringe.



Hey, I never wrote either of those things. Nice job making stuff up. I wrote that people who want to impose their view of the female reproductive


So you're agaist capital punishment then, I assume?



That's because only morons use it.



Actually, I wrote it because most people who are "pro-life" are really more anti-choice than anti-abortion. Many "pro-lifers" are against abortion, with certain exceptions - so they're not really against abortion per se, but against people being able to choose abortion. I call that being against choice, therefore anti-choice. Let me know if you want a rewrite of that with smaller words.
But most people who are pro-choice don't want to see abortion happen - but it's probably not worth trying to explain that to you.


Do you seriously not know anything? Do you ever, like, read the paper? OK, here goes:

FOX News on James Cohn
About.com on Eric Rudolph
Abortion Vigilantes
Newsweek article on Michael Griffin & Paul Hill

Nice job with the mind-reading, but that's not what I thought at all. I not only think there aren't just two sides, I think there aren't really sides at all.
Interesting way to argue, though, based on what I haven't written. You run with that.



Nope, that's not using my logic at all - in fact, that's not using any logic at all, because it's based on an illogical premise. Nice rhetorical attempt there, though. A for effort.


Did I say he said it was? No, I just brought up the topic. A good attempt at misdirection, though. It's relevant because I prefer to have less terrorists agreeing with me. So, again, why is it that so many people against "murder" in the form of abortion have no problem committing murder if they hear the "voice" of god?


See how fun it is to pick apart good points based on logical inanities and not actually respond to the issues?

I learned from the master...



That premise is no more illogical than yours. It just doesn't agree with you this time.



The attempt at misdirection was yours - getting people to answer for the guilt of others is a common tactic I've noticed around here.



I do a better job of it.

Besides, if the logic isn't sound, the point becomes dull - get your logic in order before you try to win an arguement.

Holy Irony, bat man!

Uhh....right. Not really, but whatever.

Now that's funny!

Seriously, I've totally given up trying to understand you at this point......oh wait. I never tried to understand you. Heck, I don't even understand me!

Oh, I understand you perfectly. Agree with you? No. Understand? Yes.

No, you don't. If you understood me you'd agree with me.

Thank god that's not true!