Openspace Announcement Discussion with Jack Linden
|
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
|
10-29-2008 13:30
From: Valkyrie Eclipse Snowflake, please keep your comments relevant to this thread's issues or move them to private e-mails. I suggest you do the same. I keep seeing a lot of swipes against me taken by posters with 10 posts or less. This suggests to me that posters are using alts to hide the fact that they want to drag someone down who has a different opinion than theirs, or they may have been disciplined for making threats. I am not here to win a popularity contest. I am here to discuss the latest change. I bring to it my own opinions and my own past experiences with LL. I am not here to do anyone's research for them or answer questions about why they are being "punished". To keep on topic, do you agree with the price increase Valkyrie? And FYI if people do a little research they will see that the backpedaling HAS already begun, with Jack entertaining a suggestion that people may be able to convert their OS's to full sims for free, from the protest yesterday. I got the info from a chat log of the protest posted on a blog.
|
Boaz Sands
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2007
Posts: 37
|
Boaz Sands Raises her hand
10-29-2008 13:31
From: Rebecca Vacano lol its not speculation at all - read everyone's comments......
I would say I have a fairly successful business in SL and I will be abandoning 3 of my sims over this. Everyone I know in the same position as me, will be doing the same - watch this space, people just cannot afford the increases, which will mean people not having a choice over this.
Yes stability is important but no point having a stable grid if there is no one using it! Well I will be giving up my open sim and if they increase the full sim prices I will give that up too......Lets get a show of hands now on this blog with who will be dumping their OSS and how many.
|
Meade Paravane
Hedgehog
Join date: 21 Nov 2006
Posts: 4,845
|
10-29-2008 13:32
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow I got the info from a chat log of the protest posted on a blog. URL? I haven't seen that one..
_____________________
Tired of shouting clubs and lucky chairs? Vote for llParcelSay!!! - Go here: http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SVC-1224- If you see "if you were logged in.." on the left, click it and log in - Click the "Vote for it" link on the left
|
Imsaho Fleury
Registered User
Join date: 3 Feb 2007
Posts: 17
|
What does LL mean by 'load'
10-29-2008 13:33
I must admit to getting puzzled by this.
My understanding is that when LL set up OS, they anticipated that a sim that ran on 1/4 CPU would absorb 1/4 of a CPU's resources (25% load). In reality (they say) the load is more like 50%.
What puzzles me is why this costs LL. To me, load is : physics & prim drawing, texture, script and avatar handling. If i'm wrong, others more expert than me will correct me.
So
The prims and textures are based on 1/4 of a full sim .. I don't see how that can end up as '50% not 25%'. That leaves scripts and avatars. I can well believe that once you get 65k sq m to play with you can spread a lot more scripts about (birds, bees, etc etc). On a normal sim excessive scripts results in sim slowdown (the CPU can only handle so much so scripts run more slowly and more importantly, the information on the sim is updated more slowly.. i.e lag). In other words it's the sim (and the 3 others running on the same CPU) that suffers, not LL. A laggy sim doesn't cost them anything .. it just annoys the hell out of the residents of the other 3 sims.
So .. why the 66% price increase? The only thing I can think of is that to get sim lag to more reasonable levels on the the overlagged OS sims they plan to upgrade the sim server, which costs money. But this is only one solution (throw performance at the problem). What's more, it isn't a Linden problem, it's a resident problem. It doesn't affect LL's bottom line. It just affects residents enjoyment of their sim, and believe me, a 50 USD price hike puts a severe dent in this as well
So, IF this is the case (and as has been noted elsewhere, LL's clarity as to the actual cause of the problem is a bit lacking), there are some solutions, in keeping with the spirit of SL. 1) Limit avatars (yes, i know they contribute to lag) 2) Provide a means for establishing who your sibling sims are (the 3 others on the same CPU as you) 3) Provide tools for accurately measuring load on OS sims, and of measuring the source of load on your own sim 4) allow residents to submit tickets if they believe they are being adversely affected by another sim. This means LL doesn't have to spend resources identifying and policing (which costs money) 5) In the long term, introduce true load balancing .. a sim only gets 25% of the CPU processing power. That way lag becomes the sim owner's problem.
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
10-29-2008 13:33
From: Lady Sakai 1. raise the tier on mainland to 249usd and lower the private estate to same amount. This way levelling the playing field Not unless we get estate tools on the mainland it won't. It's like saying a dry baked potato should cost the same as one with the works, because they're both potatoes.
|
Ann Otoole
Registered User
Join date: 22 May 2007
Posts: 867
|
10-29-2008 13:34
Remember those open space sims that were called out as an example of LL overusing open space sims themselves? Well they are no longer open space sims.
This has gone way way into a very bad territory now.
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
10-29-2008 13:35
From: Imsaho Fleury My understanding is that when LL set up OS, they anticipated that a sim that ran on 1/4 CPU would absorb 1/4 of a CPU's resources (25% load). A sim with 1875 prims, yes. A sim with 3750, that came later, along with a bunch of people going "wait a second, what about the overhead"? Well, surprise surprise, that overhead matters after all.
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
10-29-2008 13:37
From: Leo Mill How exactly does this help the grid?
Does it reduce camping? no
Does it remove the 30,000+ camping accounts that use vital network resources doing nothing? no
Does it reduce mainland lag? no
Does it reduce the asset server struggle? no
Does it increase bandwidth availability? no
Does it provide better service to those who own OS sims? no
Does it help any single SL user? no
What exactly does it do to improve the grid what so ever other then put more money in the lindens pockets for more of the same lag and same unreactive or non responce.
The only thing that it will achive to do is cause people to leave SL in large numbers, people who count, the people who have and do spend the money every month to keep this tired old train running... further reducing revenue.
Stupid reactions to issues get negitive results. SL should learn from what happened to other online services that treated the customer base like tools. She hopes it will send people back to her rental business.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
nikita2 Denimore
Registered User
Join date: 28 Oct 2008
Posts: 130
|
10-29-2008 13:37
From: Baloo Uriza It's within their right. They did not mislead anyone by offering the open space sims. The only people who are complaining here, are ones who don't understand the commonly accepted definition of an open space. See wikipedia if you are similarly uninformed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/open space If you're living or running a business on an open space sim, you brought this on yourself by making the Lindens cost higher than expected. Hardware and bandwidth is not free. Furthermore, it's kind of hard to feel much sympathy for people who clearly aren't literate and ran a business from what was supposed to be an open space as a greedy move for cheap commercial space. That's just a bad business decision. Sorry you're wrong,the only ones complaining are not only the ones who abuse OS by opening businesses. They are probably complaining the least,it is we who do not abuse OS islands that have had this increase shoved down our throat,i think it is us who are complaining the most,besides the estate owners who now have to shove it down their renters throats The ones operating businesses will just pack up and move on,leaving those of us who love our islands with a choice of whether to pay or give up
|
Walentine Gazov
Registered User
Join date: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 85
|
10-29-2008 13:37
From: Ann Otoole Remember those open space sims that were called out as an example of LL overusing open space sims themselves? Well they are no longer open space sims.
This has gone way way into a very bad territory now. OMG! That is so bad in so many levels for Linden Labs. They really destroy for themself right now
|
Viktoria Dovgal
…
Join date: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 3,593
|
10-29-2008 13:38
From: Meade Paravane URL? I haven't seen that one.. Try Prok's blog, I'm pretty sure there was a copy of that chat posted there.
|
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
|
10-29-2008 13:38
From: Rebecca Vacano ummmm no...... Hundreds of people with their SL names on the forum saying both inworld and here that they will have to leave because they cannot afford the tier is not speculation. In fact some people have already made the decision to leave, if you read through all the comments. I am not going to say anything more on this - if it makes you feel better, I will agree with you  Thank you Rebecca.  I freely admit that my thoughts that this will help the grid and economy are purely my own speculation. I will believe that people are leaving the grid en masse when I see statistics on it actually happening. http://secondlife.com/whatis/economy_stats.phpas of October 28: Total Residents 15,657,054 as of now: Residents Online Now 66,426 I remember when the grid used to crash if there were 10,000 people. So far it seems to be up and running.
|
Manuela DeVinna
Registered User
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 3
|
10-29-2008 13:39
From: Boaz Sands Well I will be giving up my open sim and if they increase the full sim prices I will give that up too......Lets get a show of hands now on this blog with who will be dumping their OSS and how many. i have leased two OS sims and i will dump them and i doubt the estate owner will find someone new for them so they will probaly disapear
|
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
|
10-29-2008 13:42
From: Boaz Sands your point that we pay for welfare is a prime example of my point we dont eliminate all welfare just because there are those that abuse it..the govt does try to identify the abusers and punish them albeit not very effectively but that is what they do. LL is not a government though, I also pointed out that they are a for-profit business. I think a lot of people will feel better when they start thinking of LL that way instead of a government that provides welfare.
|
Lucinda Bulloch
Registered User
Join date: 2 Nov 2007
Posts: 33
|
10-29-2008 13:43
the abuse was all done by "most reputable Real Estate Co" pushing prices so low and not caring what they were used for, just so they could get rid of their useless full sims, well now their chickens have come home to roost. if this hike gets rid of them then great.
|
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
|
10-29-2008 13:44
|
Wyatt Weatherwax
Registered User
Join date: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 59
|
Money
10-29-2008 13:44
At approx. $150 USD for the new OSS monthly tier payment this bill will be more that my:
heating bill (excluding peak season) water bill Satillite TV telephone electric (non peak cooling season) Trash bill Internet bill (I could go on)
At $300 USD for a Full Sim we are near my car payment
And this is for a virtual experience which means I get nothing tangible and nothing I can resell with any assurity as LL can devalue it at any time.
I think it is time to re-evaluate where my money is going. As I said previously, to many the issue is cost and disposable income vs. the SL experience. Leaving my OSS means a degradation of that experience and, therefore, SL becomes of less value to and interest to me. Increasing the probability that I move on to something me enjoyable and less hassle.
|
Ray Weyland
Singer/Songwriter
Join date: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 16
|
10-29-2008 13:44
From: Baloo Uriza Furthermore, it's kind of hard to feel much sympathy for people who clearly aren't literate and ran a business from what was supposed to be an open space as a greedy move for cheap commercial space. That's just a bad business decision. Sorry, Baloo ... and I'll try not to get insulting ... (deleting insulting comments) .. Lastly, I think most of the people I've read here are using OS sims sparingly, for simple WIDE-OPEN spaces and elbow room away from the masses on the mainland and some other crowded estates. These are the RESIDENTS (not Mall owners) who are getting burned by this. But, I do agree with you that it was a bad decission for businesses to use OS sims. So, LL should contact them, explain the situation, and give THEM them choice ... scall down or get out.
|
Imsaho Fleury
Registered User
Join date: 3 Feb 2007
Posts: 17
|
Overheads
10-29-2008 13:44
From: Argent Stonecutter A sim with 1875 prims, yes. A sim with 3750, that came later, along with a bunch of people going "wait a second, what about the overhead"? Well, surprise surprise, that overhead matters after all. Ah OK, so what LL are saying (reverse engineering them a bit) is that the overhead of running 4 sims on one CPU doubles the load. But my point is still there .. why does this cost LL? It costs the CPU processing power which has the effect of making the sims laggy .. but why should this affect LL's bottom line? Unless .. people living on a laggy OS sim might give them up which means that LL loses revenue stream so the obvious thing is to up the price and price people off the OS which means LL lose .. er .. hold on a minute, something not quite right here 
|
Kaedy Ferraris
Registered User
Join date: 6 Jun 2007
Posts: 1
|
Mixed Emotions
10-29-2008 13:46
Ok I have mixed emotions about this. Although I dont think its right that everyone should be "punished" for what a few (or maybe its many I dont know) have done I do think that there needs to be tighter restrictions on these openspace sims.
My husband and I pay over 300 US dollars per month to rent what was supposed to be a private class 5 sim. An island. No neighboring sims, just ocean view as far as the eye could see. When these open airs became readily available recently our sim owner added a bunch of them to her land holdings and now we are no longer an island but connected to another 30+ sims all of which are being rented out! Now we deal with constant trespassers and have no privacy. Now I love our sim owner dearly but I have no problem saying I felt doing that was completely unfair. We've considered moving but at this point whats to keep it from happening again and like I said, I really like the sim owner and aside from this issue she has been very good to us. So now, we just moved our nightclub and shopping mall to the island where our home is and had some of our friends move on to the island with us. Might as well make the best out of an iffy situation.
Do I support the Lindens cracking down on openair abuse? Absolutely. Do I support them punishing everyone? No. But how many people would they have to hire to monitor this situation? Whats next? The SL police? If people could act like grownups and play by the rules there wouldn't be a problem.
|
Joshe Darkstone
Registered User
Join date: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 44
|
url please?
10-29-2008 13:48
From: Viktoria Dovgal Try Prok's blog, I'm pretty sure there was a copy of that chat posted there. lol, nice one Viktoria, someone asks for a url to a post and you suggest they get that url from another post - without a url, too funny  url to proks blog?
|
Lynna Lebed
Registered User
Join date: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 9
|
Greed!
10-29-2008 13:49
I can honestly say...I'm shocked and disappointed! This..with no warning.. I saw your 'tester' enter my open space sim and they said absolutely NOTHING to me! A kind word saying...hey, you need to cut down on this or that...would have been fair. Price gouging, on the other hand, is not! My open space sims are not for rent, just for people to explore and play (usually small numbers of avatars at a time ex.. 5) My full sims are for renting and business, so essentially my open space sims are for personal use... I have not used up all my prim and I don't have any scripts that are extremely high (like to keep them below 0.100 each) and even on my full sim rentals my renters are told to keep theirs below 0.100 also. So, why the big increase? Why the 'punishment' of everyone instead of just those responsible. Plain and simple.... GREED!
Linden Labs should be ashamed...trying to blame us for their own greed, shame!...just be honest and say it! You just want to charge us more money for......what?....pixels! thanks! As simple as that, for if it were because we were abusing limits then we ought to have been told individually and given the opportunity to correct things. Many people may not realize the script count or the number of avatars on a sim causes the problems the lindens are having.. So, instead of just giving us the chance to fix things correctly...they charge more! right!
It's just greed folks! Don't let their excuse for raising the rates make you think it's nothing more than than their own greed for money... and I wouldn't even have known about this at all if it wasn't for my wonderful friend..... BANANA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wOOT!
|
Boaz Sands
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2007
Posts: 37
|
10-29-2008 13:49
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow I suggest you do the same.
And FYI if people do a little research they will see that the backpedaling HAS already begun, with Jack entertaining a suggestion that people may be able to convert their OS's to full sims for free, from the protest yesterday. I got the info from a chat log of the protest posted on a blog. Will this offer to convert OS to full sims only apply to those with 4 OSS? If not what about those of us that dont have but one....are we stuck? For those with less than 4 sims, they should offer to at least give us back our purchase price....heck I would take a refund of half my purchase price to get out of my OSS
|
Snowflake Fairymeadow
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 704
|
10-29-2008 13:50
From: Joshe Darkstone lol, nice one Viktoria, someone asks for a url to a post and you suggest they get that url from another post - without a url, too funny  url to proks blog? http://secondthoughts.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2008/10/jack-jacks-the.html
|
Adaarye Shikami
Registered User
Join date: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 15
|
Please don't turn this thread into a flame war
10-29-2008 13:51
From: Snowflake Fairymeadow Thank You Manuela.
I do understand that most of these people that are attacking me, are angry about something else but have chosen to focus on me.
That does not, however, make it OK for them to attack me. But that is their own personal issue. Yes it is a personal issue .. one that affects many people on many different levels. One must ask the question as to why you continue to post here and make matters worse. Is taking the attention from the issues and hijacking the thread your purpose or is this exchange entertaining you? You obviously aren't affected by this situation, so why are you posting here at all making comments about emotions and outrage felt by many subscribers. Perhaps you should walk a mile in the shoes of all concerned and remove yourself from the shooting range, unless of course you are enjoying all of this. I sincerely hope thats not the case because that would indicate that you are only an instigator and enjoying the chaos being created by these unfortunate circumstances and you are stirring the proverbial pot. I would hope that you have more compassion and sympathy for your fellow subscribers that are being affected by this to do something like that. To everyone that's been taking this bait, please stop the flame war and focus on the OS price/limitation issues and the impact that these changes will have on so many. As another poster stated earlier, allowing this thread to become a flame war is only counter productive.
|