How have you been griefed?

There is no "general feeling" of animosity towards me. Just a few misguided souls who apparently enjoy demonstrating their ignorance.

Pep (I don't need to deflect animosity your way; you have enough of it anyway.)

One swallow doesn't make a summer.

Pep (You are despicable and comtemptible.)

Perfect! I expected exactly that!

You've already stated your belief that at least one other person holds this view.



Far be it for me to agree with you.

Obviously I intended to answer the second part of the original question. But if you want to try your asshattery (the new word of the day), at least try to get it right.

Regardless, this leaves you in the position of enjoying playing with the ambiguity of words and sentence structure when you think it will make others look foolish, but suddenly try to call foul when it backfires on you. I am most amused.

Oh but there is. You obviously don't read too well. And still you come back with the idiotic attempt to "transfer" it onto me. You're really struggling, pap.

I also expected that.



Indeed. Phil and I got into it once, but he's not even close to being reviled by me. I would hazard that is also true of quite a few people.

A few of the loonies got frothy at the mouth over his bots, but they are definitely less numerous than those who pity Pep.

And Pep: trying to get under Phil's skin by bringing up bots is a complete swing and a miss. He's faced people who are passionate about them - you are a drop of tepid water in a bucket by comparison with your faux outrage.

Hey, Phil's bots piss me off, but I'd rather hang out with Phil than Pep any day. I mean, even bringing the comparison up is kind of insulting to Phil.

This post is GOLD!

Oh, sorry, now *you* want to determine what gets discussed here, eh? My contention is that *no* behaviour *ever* warrants such an "outburst". The only way to discuss that is to assess the content of the "outburst".

Pep (Alternatively you could give your opinion that I deserve anything that I get. )

Haha. Are you already drunk? I said you are trying to divert an existing conversation. I never said I was trying to dictate the direction of other people's conversations. Unlike you.

Just as an aside - about me. This is for pap

Some months ago, someone started a thread about who people liked in the forum. Guess who was mentioned the most as being liked. /me takes a bow I can tell you, it surprised me a lot.

And my bots? About a week ago, I started a thread because I'd received a penalty from LL due to me having four of my bots as demo models on sex beds in a store on mature land. The penalty wasn't because they were bots - it was because of what they were there for - but they were still bots. I was surprised again because everyone in that thread supported me over it, and nobody wrote a single anti-bot word. The bots are back now, and the penalty was removed from my record.

A bit of education for you there, pap.

You *do* realise that if a person has a main and an alt they are still one person, don't you?

Pep (So who was the other person?)

PS I know you have difficulty understanding and writing; just try to be less impatient and take your time and you won't make so much of a fool of yourself in the future, perhaps.

I can't really say that I have ever felt griefed, though many have tried. I did get accused myself of griefing not too long ago even though it was not my intention. I stumbled accross an SL wedding and by this I mean the full ridiculous show (best man, bridesmaids, photographer and even a guy posing as a priest) I kept quiet, however was verbally attacked and asked to leave, the guests told me it was a private function and that being nude at a wedding was innapropriate.

I believe this might be considered a mixed metaphor . . .

Pep ( . . . or maybe just incomplete. See my comment about impatience.)

LOL! You mean forum personas? Something you are keen to talk about and differentiate when it suits you.

You can't stand being beaten by your own game. Something which happens a lot when you foolishly interact with me, isn't it?

Perhaps you should just stop posting to me entirely, so as to stop showing everyone just how stupid you really are. As you say, better to leave some doubt, eh?

You can say that again

I'd rather you hang out with Phil as well.

Pep (Much rather.)

Thanks Scylls. At least the alt tangent temporarily provided a diversion from the incessant rehashing.

I had this horrible vision of this thread *never* ending and the same people posting the same things over and over with slightly different wording, forever. And ever. And ever.

What "existing conversation"? I brought up the topic of Rhonda's attempted griefing of me with her posts wishing death by cancer upon me and you lot all joined in.

Pep (I don't force anyone to do anything; how could I, remote hypnosis? )

Have another.

But don't you see? It spares the other threads. We'll, reduces the contributed asshattery anyway. This thread is a public service to the forum.

/yawn

So you used your bots to mention you a lot beneficially, eh? Did they do a poll on who was the most reviled? You would have won that by a country mile.

Pep (I saw the other thread too, which only goes to prove that you are not quite as reviled as LL.)

You *are* slow today. Did you drink too much? Or not enough?

LMAO! Nope. I posted as Phil Deakins, and as nobody else - sorry. I know it's upsetting for you but I can't help it

Oh, I see.