Not crude or lude, just nude!

Ah! Wrong argument! What you SHOULD be saying is "since we are agreed that emotions or feelings are the result of chemical processes in the brain, then we can also state that the 'feeling' of orgasm (as opposed to the physical orgasm that produces ejaculation) is the result of a chemical process that occurs in the brain. Orgasm is therefore unnecessary, in that 'feelings' or 'emotions' are unnecessary."

10,000 BC sucked balls.

Yes I know that. I know what "external stimuli" do for me, but I have no clue what they do for you. A puppy playing makes me smile, but that doesnt necessarily give me a chemical high.

I assume you are talking about the female orgasm specifically. Personally, my orgasm tends to confine itself to my groin only. I have yet to experience this "feeling" you are talking about.

and didn't even have any emotion after.

Yes it does. The fact that you smile proves it. THe puppy is the stimuli, a chemical is released in your brain when you see it, the chemical makes you happy, you smile.

/me giggles and laughs....

So a runner gets the runners high before he starts running and that makes him run?

Ha ha. Good one. I was sucked in right up until this post. Think of it! A troll of my many years of experience being trolled in turn. That's what I get for trying to have a serious conversation, I suppose. I guess I could stretch to feeding you one last time;

no. The running is the puppy, the stimuli. This causes chemicals that give you the high (what you insist on calling the "feeling". Last time, I swear.

why does it make more sense to give up emotions than to keep them?

This whole "waste of biological processes" is stupid

Following your own logic in an earlier post...

Your body is there anyhow. May as well give it something to do.

No I am not trolling you. Only trying to get you to see our side of this conversation.

Having never had a male orgasm, I wouldn't know. Apparently it's fairly enjoyable, else why do it? If all you wanted to do was procreate, you could surgically remove your sperm, put them into a test tube, etc. Since men apparently enjoy sex, it must therefore impart some sort of nerve stimulation. Since all nerves transmit to the brain, they cause a chemical reaction, which is then translated into a "sensation." Your brain translates this into "pleasure." Obviously some people have different stimuli than others, in that "pleasure" may be caused by the receipt of bodily harm. Who knows? My point is: why have sex (and therefore an orgasm) if it's not necessary (which feelings are not.)

I think I will bang my head against the wall in the hopes of that endorphine euphoric feeling and float off in a dream. Oryx would you like to join me?

Nope. Got a job interview in a few minutes. It's generally considered bad form to show up high. Laterz, kids.

Why go to all the effort of sterilising a test tube and all the other paraphenalia when we come equipped with a handy sperm injection device right on our very person? Personally, I pursued casual sex to see if it was enjoyable. It wasn't. It wasn't unpleasant either. Just pointless.

I didn't pursue casual sex because I was of the belief that sex and emotion are unrelated. Quite the reverse - I believe sex and emotion are unrelated because I pursued casual sex and found that that was the case. My stance is based on experience, not wishful thinking.
I take no emotional pleasure in sex at all.

don't be nervous , that would be some brain chemical fooling around with your biochemistry.

If that were true, you would not be twisting what I am saying. You keep suggesting that I have said that the high comes before the stimuli. I have never said any such thing.

Knock them dead sweetie.

Where the hell is Trout when we need him, the voice of reason. At least now and then.

Yes you do. You wanted enjoyment out of it. Enjoyment is an emotion.

Nope. I said I pursued it to see if it was enjoyable. It wasn't, so I stopped pursuing it.

Dammit, where's my lucky bra????

Okay, seriously I'm outta here.

Your relationship partner must not want emotional fulfillment either, since you claim not to offer any.

Sounds really bland.

Originally Posted by Kira Cuddihy
Right, so emotional attachment is not just a chemical high then. The feeling brings that on.


__________________
I must have misunderstood this then. It looks to me like you said the chemical stimulus comes first before the feeling. Am I wrong? I didn't twist what you said, I quoted you.

Again, you misunderstand. I didn't say I don't offer any - just that I don't gain any myself. She get's everything she could possibly need and/or want.

Trout has it in his parachute remember. I am checking out of here too.. that man is too confusing.