I realized the same thing happened as last week: Pep leaves work and here we are with the Sharpies rather than the washable crayolas all over his thread. My god, we are discussing snot 


These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Monogamy - does it make sense in sl? |
|
|
Malia Writer
Unemployed in paradise
Join date: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 2,026
|
09-11-2009 11:15
I realized the same thing happened as last week: Pep leaves work and here we are with the Sharpies rather than the washable crayolas all over his thread. My god, we are discussing snot ![]() ![]() |
|
Seven Okelli
last days of pompeii
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 2,300
|
09-11-2009 11:17
I could tell you tales, I can assure you. And YOUNG men are just as bad. I swear. I had this bloke - a real charmer in company and in our line of work. Well, when he gets home with me, he gets all silent and sorta dumpy. Anyway, I put on "Pride and Prejudice" and he had teh f**king audacity to say "tell me when the funny bits come on". Immediately my hackles rose. Anyway, some time later (as they say), there he is in bed (big oaf) and my God, his body sounds like Battersea Power Station on a busy night. Belching and farting and carrying on. Snoring away. Really badly. So I did my trick of pinching his nose coz a friend said that worked for her. And he went all diffy and stopped breathing!!!! So I jabbed him really hard. No. This is absolutely true! And he woke up all cross like a big ferret, with "whatdyadothatfor??" "Coz your a f**king animal, you moron!" I said. HE was ordered to the guest house, I can tell you. Was his name Onslow by any chance? . _____________________
:
: I met most of the people I know in Second Life through these forums. : I learned most of what I know of Second Life through these forums. : When I couldn't get inworld, these forums were the next best thing. : And sometimes these forums WERE the best thing. : |
|
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
|
09-11-2009 11:38
Well . . . yes. And no. The Universe gave women a free will; and then men took away much of their ability to act upon it. "Free will" is the "culture" part of the equation. And for a very very very long time, "culture" was pretty much monopolized by masculine authority. I don't want to be reductive about this: of course there were benefits to women from monogamous relationships. Nor do I wish to suggest that women were utterly without power in the various different incarnations of "culture" that have existed in the past (I speak largely of the West here; I'm not qualified to comment on other cultures.) But there are cultural reasons, enforced by a male-dominated society, that explain why female "virtue" and "chastity" and "fidelity" have always been more highly prized than the male equivalents. In a culture, for instance, where inheritance laws rely upon patrimony, it was important that the male ensure that it was HIS offspring that inherited. Men have always been allowed (or even encouraged) to "sow their wild oats" before marriage; women have not, because women were viewed as a sexual commodity (who wants "damaged" or "used" goods?), and premarital promiscuity was viewed as a sign of potential marital infidelity. Isn't that, though a result of the fact that when a woman has a child it is usually pretty obvious, whereas when a man sires one, there are usually few consequences on the man? As a result, women have a greater need to be warned and/or discouraged by society from unwanted pregnacies. Not saying that is fair, or that the manner in which women have been warned or restricted has been fair, merely that it is biology and until the development of effective birth control, was seen as a neccessity by society. Note that regardless of the male domination of society in theory, that has not kept strong women out of leadership roles. Elizabeth (I and II), and Victoria were very popular rulers. Isabella did fine in Spain, Cleopatra is of course well known of Egypt, Bodecea... and less successful rulers such as Eva Peron (noone speaks of her husband that much, she is usually the one associated with that period in Argentina), Indira Ghandi, etc, etc, etc... And that is not even covering the addage that behind every great man is a great woman. It may be offically a male dominated society, and indeed many women *have* suffered as a result, but many have held their own or better, too. There is another addage... men like to feel like they are in charge, regardless of the truth. *grins* I know I am that way . |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
09-11-2009 11:48
Was his name Onslow by any chance? . LOL! In North America "Keeping Up Appearances" is on practically every night on PBS. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Smith Peel
Smif v2.0
Join date: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,597
|
09-11-2009 11:49
True, but it's because of the *cough* um...sensations *blush* they provide. It's definitely not because we are trying to reproduce the male presence in our boudoirs. Hell, the best thing about those things is that there's no man attached! ![]() LOLz... keep on truckin' sister! ![]() _____________________
Wanna live in a giant wang? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/210/210/22/ Or just be bad in public? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/222/22/22/ |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
09-11-2009 11:51
They do! And what's funnier is how they can be rip roaring around the house and then suddenly fall over asleep right in the middle. ![]() How like a man ... _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Smith Peel
Smif v2.0
Join date: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,597
|
09-11-2009 11:55
Well . . . yes. And no. The Universe gave women a free will; and then men took away much of their ability to act upon it. Gosh!! I been told there were some times in history when women dominated. And if you ask my mother, they still control the Earth (although by cleverly leading their husbands to believe they are in the charge, in most cases!!). "Free will" is the "culture" part of the equation. And for a very very very long time, "culture" was pretty much monopolized by masculine authority. I don't want to be reductive about this: of course there were benefits to women from monogamous relationships. Nor do I wish to suggest that women were utterly without power in the various different incarnations of "culture" that have existed in the past (I speak largely of the West here; I'm not qualified to comment on other cultures.) But there are cultural reasons, enforced by a male-dominated society, that explain why female "virtue" and "chastity" and "fidelity" have always been more highly prized than the male equivalents. In a culture, for instance, where inheritance laws rely upon patrimony, it was important that the male ensure that it was HIS offspring that inherited. Men have always been allowed (or even encouraged) to "sow their wild oats" before marriage; women have not, because women were viewed as a sexual commodity (who wants "damaged" or "used" goods?), and premarital promiscuity was viewed as a sign of potential marital infidelity. Alright, fair enough. But can't we let bygones be bygones? ![]() And there's nothing wrong with penises. I am quite fond of them myself. It's the baggage that comes attached to them that is the problem. ![]() You refer, of course, to the nuts? ![]() _____________________
Wanna live in a giant wang? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/210/210/22/ Or just be bad in public? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/222/22/22/ |
|
Laurin Sorbet
Stroppy Bollock-Chopper
Join date: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 844
|
09-11-2009 11:57
Don't worry, if he's offended, Pep is perfectly capable of telling us where to go, using lots of big words. ![]() /me hums a strain from Seneca Falls and wait for pep to turn up with the Cif ![]() _____________________
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 11:57
Isn't that, though a result of the fact that when a woman has a child it is usually pretty obvious, whereas when a man sires one, there are usually few consequences on the man? As a result, women have a greater need to be warned and/or discouraged by society from unwanted pregnacies. Not saying that is fair, or that the manner in which women have been warned or restricted has been fair, merely that it is biology and until the development of effective birth control, was seen as a neccessity by society. Oh, certainly: that biology dictated that maternity was a certainty, where as paternity was (until recently) more difficult to ascertain for sure definitely is part of the equation. But the point is that paternity only becomes important in the first place because property (i.e., inheritance) is involved. Had culture not dictated that the sons (usually through primogeniture) inherited the MAN'S property, being sure of the paternity of the children would not be nearly so important. Note that regardless of the male domination of society in theory, that has not kept strong women out of leadership roles. Elizabeth (I and II), and Victoria were very popular rulers. Isabella did fine in Spain, Cleopatra is of course well known of Egypt, Bodecea... and less successful rulers such as Eva Peron (noone speaks of her husband that much, she is usually the one associated with that period in Argentina), Indira Ghandi, etc, etc, etc... Hmmmm, yes . . . Elizabeth I was renounced as a bastard for much of her childhood because her father, Henry VIII, was so anxious to have a MALE heir that he trumped up treason charges against her mother, Anne Boleyn, and had her executed. And she only came to the throne, following on her half-sister Mary, after her much younger and less capable brother died. Victoria may have been popular, but she hardly "ruled" England, which was, in most respects, a constitutional monarchy by then. And, while he lived, her husband Albert, although only Prince Consort, was FAR more influential politically. Boadicea only rose in rebellion after she and her daughters were raped by Roman troops, and their property confiscated following the death of her husband Prasutagus, when the local Roman governor decided that a woman would be easy prey to his avariciousness. Eva, Cleopatra, and Indira were all, in some senses, "strong" women, I suppose, but not really very positive role models for powerful women . . . Isabella of Castile may be the one woman in this list who really ruled, unmolested by men, as a strong and important sovereign in her own right. And that is not even covering the addage that behind every great man is a great woman. Ok, rant done. I've officially cleansed my spleen. You may now roll your eyes. ![]() _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Seven Okelli
last days of pompeii
Join date: 4 Dec 2008
Posts: 2,300
|
09-11-2009 11:59
Let's get together and show 'em how it's done! ![]() I was reading back and saw that I missed this offer - sorry, big guy, but I'm taken. . _____________________
:
: I met most of the people I know in Second Life through these forums. : I learned most of what I know of Second Life through these forums. : When I couldn't get inworld, these forums were the next best thing. : And sometimes these forums WERE the best thing. : |
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
09-11-2009 12:04
This reminds me of the time I was climbing Kilimanjaro with an old bf and he got altitude sickness and keeled over just at the most "flagrant delecto" moment. Honestly, I thought, I'd killed him! He went all puffy-looking in the tent we had and saucer-eyed and bloop! He went all limp. Anyway, the guide got some oxygen into him and he went off and puked. It turned out to be altitude sickness.
Then some mice got into the rice bag and the guide killed them by smacking the rice sack with a machete and we had to eat red rice for a day or two but that is another story for another time ... _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|
|
Smith Peel
Smif v2.0
Join date: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,597
|
09-11-2009 12:05
I was reading back and saw that I missed this offer - sorry, big guy, but I'm taken. . Yes, Seven is definitely spoken for ![]() _____________________
Wanna live in a giant wang? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/210/210/22/ Or just be bad in public? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/222/22/22/ |
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:06
Gosh!! I been told there were some times in history when women dominated. And if you ask my mother, they still control the Earth (although by cleverly leading their husbands to believe they are in the charge, in most cases!!). Well, we are clever that way, I guess. Once in a while, though, it would be nice to have OUR names inscribed on the commemorative plaques! Alright, fair enough. But can't we let bygones be bygones? ![]() We'll give it a shot. Consider yourself on probation. You refer, of course, to the nuts? ![]() As a synecdoche, standing for all the rest? Yes, of course. Ridiculous things that they are. And, in that context, how appropriate is that common term, "Nuts"! ![]() _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:07
Yes, Seven is definitely spoken for ![]() Awwwwwwwww !!! ![]() _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Alexander Harbrough
Registered User
Join date: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
|
09-11-2009 12:07
The operative word being . . . "behind" . . . Ok, rant done. I've officially cleansed my spleen. You may now roll your eyes. ![]() No eye rolling needed. I wasn't saying that they system was fair ![]() As for Elizabeth I and Victoria, though, they are still thought of as the rulers of their day, and regardless of the truth, credited with a lot by the majority (the majority not studying history to that depth). That may not have been any consolation to them at the time, but even in their day they were more public than any of the men doing any 'actual' leading. Good counterpoints, though. |
|
Laurin Sorbet
Stroppy Bollock-Chopper
Join date: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 844
|
09-11-2009 12:07
Eva, Cleopatra, and Indira were all, in some senses, "strong" women, I suppose, but not really very positive role models for powerful women . . . Isabella of Castile may be the one woman in this list who really ruled, unmolested by men, as a strong and important sovereign in her own right. Scylla, have you ever read about our Granuille? The REAL Grace O'Malley was another fine role model from history. _____________________
|
|
Smith Peel
Smif v2.0
Join date: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,597
|
09-11-2009 12:08
But the point is that paternity only becomes important in the first place because property (i.e., inheritance) is involved. Had culture not dictated that the sons (usually through primogeniture) inherited the MAN'S property, being sure of the paternity of the children would not be nearly so important. Hey wait..no.. back to evolution. Genes want to reproduce and organisms wanna pass their own genes on because they all think theirs are the best ones... Despite any flaws I have, I happen to know mine are the BEST! ![]() _____________________
Wanna live in a giant wang? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/210/210/22/ Or just be bad in public? http://slurl.com/secondlife/Conroy/222/22/22/ |
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:08
Scylla, have you ever read about our Granuille? The REAL Grace O'Malley was another fine role model from history. Only the popular folklore. But thanks for the suggestion: I will! _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Laurin Sorbet
Stroppy Bollock-Chopper
Join date: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 844
|
09-11-2009 12:11
Only the popular folklore. But thanks for the suggestion: I will! I shall wade through that shelf tomorrow and send you a recommendation inworld. _____________________
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:12
No eye rolling needed. I wasn't saying that they system was fair ![]() Yeah, I know you weren't. I just get . . . carried away sometimes. As for Elizabeth I and Victoria, though, they are still thought of as the rulers of their day, and regardless of the truth, credited with a lot by the majority (the majority not studying history to that depth). That may not have been any consolation to them at the time, but even in their day they were more public than any of the men doing any 'actual' leading. Well, I don't want to shortchange these women, either. Regardless of how they came to power, or how they managed to wield it, the ones you've mentioned WERE strong women, without question. The point I guess I was making was that they only achieved what they did in the face of a culture that really worked against them. _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:13
I shall wade through that shelf tomorrow and send you a recommendation inworld. Yay! Thank you! ![]() _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Solanghe Sarlo
Gypsy Free Thinker
Join date: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 644
|
09-11-2009 12:15
Lots of really smart stuff. I totally want to have your prim babies now. _____________________
The key to a contented life: Figure out who you are, what you are, fix what you can and make peace with the rest.
|
|
Solanghe Sarlo
Gypsy Free Thinker
Join date: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 644
|
09-11-2009 12:17
You refer, of course, to the nuts? ![]() /me cracks up! _____________________
The key to a contented life: Figure out who you are, what you are, fix what you can and make peace with the rest.
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
09-11-2009 12:18
I totally want to have your prim babies now. LOL! As long as there is no talking tummy involved! ![]() _____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
|
09-11-2009 12:35
Great reading. I have just found a really odd bug on my bosom. Like a damp wasp with a long tail. Looks like it wants to lay eggs. Time I got going and did some things in the real world.
Lovely afternoon. Sun shine. _____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
|