Broadly offending content ~ what is it for *you*?

The Christian Church has admitted to it and Mohammad the Islamic Profit had a 9 or so year wife, also schools have it and probably a few other places I can't think of.

I'd figure it goes on mostly in the home with family and the family friends.

Bdsm, I haven't heard of it at all having known bdsm people most of my adult life.

Most people know someone who has been abused, all the people I know who have come from ordinary families and it was parental or older siblings. I know 5 people, one is a bdsmer as an adult and the other 4 are not.

Really simple thing to do...if it offends you... don't go! Lias' example of the concentration camp.. while I find that not broadly but HIGHLY offensive, unless it's done in a historical context to point out the sins of it. Instead ofgetting people do AR it cause it didn't fit myy idea of right.... I'd just never go. No one is foring anyone to visit or witness anything in SL.. you can TP out at any time. .refuse a tp there.. etc.

Don't forget Gandhi.

Pep (A father at 15.)

And finally, this is SL, so this topic of child avatars/pedophilia is really based on histrionics and drama mongering.

If you want to label others, keep it to yourself and keep on moving since the majority of us do not want this issue of child avatars/nudity/pedophilia thrown in our faces repeatedly because some close minded person is on a rant.

Thankfully Linden Lab does not agree with you.
.

There are three key aspects, which are in breach of the Community Standards:

(1) participation by Residents in lewd or sexual acts in which one or more of the avatars appears to represent minors (or the depiction of such acts in images, video, textures, or text) is a violation of the Community Standards;

(2) promoting or catering to such behavior or representations violates our Community Standards. For instance, the placement of avatars appearing to represent minors in proximity to “sex beds” or other sexualized graphics, objects, or scripts, would violate our Community Standards, as would the placement of sexualized “pose balls” or other content in areas depicting playgrounds or children’s spaces;

(3) the graphic depiction of children in a sexual or lewd manner violates our Community Standards.

Actually no it's morelike LL doesn't agree woth you Lias.

Now in that entire blog..I don't see the words nude child avatar anywhere. ALL I see is child avatars being around or engaging in sexual activities.

She said to dismiss pedophilia as hysterics. And Linden Lab does not dismiss it as hysterics. Thankfully.

.

Or maybe you just enjoy being a jackass.

I never have.

What I might do to the TOS or CS or what laws I might get rid of or amend is totally irrelevant to the OP's question and would be way off topic as is Lias pedo rant.

There are any number of things that I find offensive at different levels of offense. I stated what I found "broadly"offensive. I guess you missed the OP's question.

You've used LL doesn't see it that way in quite a few posts. While I agree with and support the ageplay policy LL has, my beach rules are a lot more strict thanLL's own ageplay policy. I'm sure yo uhave a copy fom your plants.

and yes they are enforced. .but like I said not even LL's enforcement catches every violation of anything not is it acted upon immediately in all cases.

In other words this hysteria about virtual pedos... al lthis is going to do is make the actual onesgo undercover even more... .be more secretive and create groups where unless you're wel ltrusted you can'tge in.

Sigh...

There is no pedophilia in SL.

But there is virtual pedophilia, which is a "sexual perversion in which virtual children are the preferred sexual object".

I also do not understand the fascination with being a nude child avatar, or a child avatar dressed in the most sexiest manner possible.

Fine, make a child avatar, live your lollipop life, its fun, i understand. But when a child avatar is dressed in clothing generally reserved for adults in sexual situations, then i tend to think that person portraying the child avatar is getting turned on by looking at themselves dressed in a sexually alluring manner. Or else why do it? I mean, 1+1 = 2; and a spade is after all, a spade. If looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.

The bottom line is that some things are just inappropriate, and just because this is SL where everyone is adult does not make those things any less inappropriate, it makes it more so since people are more likely to assign some sort of rational to your intentions regardless of the fact that no children are being hurt - so you may end up labeled or silently identified as a pedo-like person because of some of the things i listed above.

And finally, this is SL, so this topic of child avatars/pedophilia is really based on histrionics and drama mongering.

If you want to label others, keep it to yourself and keep on moving since the majority of us do not want this issue of child avatars/nudity/pedophilia thrown in our faces repeatedly because some close minded person is on a rant.

There's no real Pedophiles in the internet either, but that doesn't stop poilce monitoring sites, siezing computers and arresting people.
Feel free to try to explain to a court and the media after you've been labeled on national news how SL isn't like the rest of the internet. I'm sure everyone will understand.

There's no real Pedophiles in the internet either, but that doesn't stop poilce monitoring sites, siezing computers and arresting people.
Feel free to try to explain to a court and the media after you've been labeled on national news how SL isn't like the rest of the internet. I'm sure everyone will understand.

Well, yeah, there are. There are people arranging to meet minors for sex, there are people exchanging child pornography. Those are both very real crimes.

They are slightly more serious than talking dirty to a fifty year old dude pretending to be a little girl.