At last...
This is his post after I added my dislike to the thread.
As the accused let me interject a few points here. And I'm not afriad to hide who I am, unlike the 1 day old alt on xstreet. LL has already invistegated and I've been talked to by the Gteam.
Yes Perverts have shown up, they're like cockroaches. .they keep breeding and infesting places, and they usually do something to get themselves caught banned and AR'd. THAT is the reason why it's hidden, and not just the "child av's" but ALL have to hide it. It's not done to hide from the eyes of LL.
I don't encourage adults and kids to dance with or do anything else with each other except casual chat. I don't even like adults trying to pick up adults.. NO sex means just that NONE... EVER... regardless of what age your av looks.
Also the beach doesn't promote anything in LL's Ageplay policy, which was given to me by a gteam member who was investigating this.
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2007/11/14/clarification-of-policy-disallowing-ageplay
Which clarifies ageplay as..
There are three key aspects, which are in breach of the Community Standards:
(1) participation by Residents in lewd or sexual acts in which one or more of the avatars appears to represent minors (or the depiction of such acts in images, video, textures, or text) is a violation of the Community Standards;
(2) promoting or catering to such behavior or representations violates our Community Standards. For instance, the placement of avatars appearing to represent minors in proximity to “sex beds” or other sexualized graphics, objects, or scripts, would violate our Community Standards, as would the placement of sexualized “pose balls” or other content in areas depicting playgrounds or children’s spaces;
(3) the graphic depiction of children in a sexual or lewd manner violates our Community Standards.
Now, with the post made on xstreet and that you felt you HAD to continue here. It's agianst LL's CS for harassment and griefing.
Also the "pics hitting the web", sounds like threat, more harassment.
The beach is run as a RL one would be and any pedos (AKA ageplayers in SL) that are caught and dealt with, but I can't be on 24/7 to police the area.
Now if it happened in a Welcome area, Help Island.. etc.. who would you blame? Govenor Linden cause he runs the land, or the people responsible?
Now with ageplay itself I see NO place for it at all, but shouldn't the offenders be the ones dealt with and not the people trying to run a legit place meant to be what it says in the group charter and land description? Even my rules state failure to report something seen, makes you just as guilty as the offender.
I can understand some not understanding the naturist lifestyle, it's not for everyone, but for those of us who ARE nudists in SL and RL, you don't need to go on a witch hunt (and being Wiccan IRL, that's something I deal with enough thank you).
All I did was create a place where people could practice the closest you can in SL to a RL naturist place. In no way shape or form do I condone ageplay, but I DO condone and support a nusist lifestyle sthat shold be free of persecution from narrow minds who know nothing about the lifestyle.
Yes Perverts have shown up, they're like cockroaches. .they keep breeding and infesting places, and they usually do something to get themselves caught banned and AR'd. THAT is the reason why it's hidden, and not just the "child av's" but ALL have to hide it. It's not done to hide from the eyes of LL.
I don't encourage adults and kids to dance with or do anything else with each other except casual chat. I don't even like adults trying to pick up adults.. NO sex means just that NONE... EVER... regardless of what age your av looks.
Also the beach doesn't promote anything in LL's Ageplay policy, which was given to me by a gteam member who was investigating this.
https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/features/blog/2007/11/14/clarification-of-policy-disallowing-ageplay
Which clarifies ageplay as..
There are three key aspects, which are in breach of the Community Standards:
(1) participation by Residents in lewd or sexual acts in which one or more of the avatars appears to represent minors (or the depiction of such acts in images, video, textures, or text) is a violation of the Community Standards;
(2) promoting or catering to such behavior or representations violates our Community Standards. For instance, the placement of avatars appearing to represent minors in proximity to “sex beds” or other sexualized graphics, objects, or scripts, would violate our Community Standards, as would the placement of sexualized “pose balls” or other content in areas depicting playgrounds or children’s spaces;
(3) the graphic depiction of children in a sexual or lewd manner violates our Community Standards.
Now, with the post made on xstreet and that you felt you HAD to continue here. It's agianst LL's CS for harassment and griefing.
Also the "pics hitting the web", sounds like threat, more harassment.
The beach is run as a RL one would be and any pedos (AKA ageplayers in SL) that are caught and dealt with, but I can't be on 24/7 to police the area.
Now if it happened in a Welcome area, Help Island.. etc.. who would you blame? Govenor Linden cause he runs the land, or the people responsible?
Now with ageplay itself I see NO place for it at all, but shouldn't the offenders be the ones dealt with and not the people trying to run a legit place meant to be what it says in the group charter and land description? Even my rules state failure to report something seen, makes you just as guilty as the offender.
I can understand some not understanding the naturist lifestyle, it's not for everyone, but for those of us who ARE nudists in SL and RL, you don't need to go on a witch hunt (and being Wiccan IRL, that's something I deal with enough thank you).
All I did was create a place where people could practice the closest you can in SL to a RL naturist place. In no way shape or form do I condone ageplay, but I DO condone and support a nusist lifestyle sthat shold be free of persecution from narrow minds who know nothing about the lifestyle.
.
