Rates go bye bye
|
|
Cubey Terra
Aircraft Builder
Join date: 6 Sep 2003
Posts: 1,725
|
02-16-2005 14:17
Ratings from Feb 10: Behavior Positive = 652 Appearance Positive = 607 Building Positive = 655 Given Positive 745
Behavior Negative = -5 Appearance Negative = -4 Building Negative = -5 Given Negative = -12
Ratings Feb 16: Behavior Positive = 177 Appearance Positive = 154 Building Positive = 193 Given Positive 252
Behavior Negative = 0 Appearance Negative = 1 Building Negative = 0 Given Negative = 0
IT's kind of sad to see the ratings go, even though technically they didn't mean a lot. I got most of my ratings my first six months, so I guess a great many of the newer players (esp. rate-miners) will have many times my ratings. Ah well.
_____________________
C U B E Y · T E R R A planes · helicopters · blimps · balloons · skydiving · submarines Available at Abbotts Aerodrome and XstreetSL.com 
|
|
Dan Rhodes
hehe
Join date: 5 Jul 2003
Posts: 268
|
02-16-2005 16:11
Whoa while walking around the welcome area I noticed some people still have 700+ rating in each field. ??? Is the decay still going on and just hasn't hit them yet or did they luck out and get to keep the $1 ratings while I got 3/4th of mine taken away?  What was the deal with 6 months? I may have missed that post .. what changed that caused ratings to not mean anything before this time?
|
|
Cubey Terra
Aircraft Builder
Join date: 6 Sep 2003
Posts: 1,725
|
02-16-2005 16:23
From: Dan Rhodes Whoa while walking around the welcome area I noticed some people still have 700+ rating in each field. ??? Is the decay still going on and just hasn't hit them yet or did they luck out and get to keep the $1 ratings while I got 3/4th of mine taken away?  What was the deal with 6 months? I may have missed that post .. what changed that caused ratings to not mean anything before this time? It's like this... because new players were gaming the ratings to boost their payouts, LL has decided to remove ratings from older players. I'm not sure how that balances things out, but that's what's happening. Any ratings older than 6 months are now gone.
_____________________
C U B E Y · T E R R A planes · helicopters · blimps · balloons · skydiving · submarines Available at Abbotts Aerodrome and XstreetSL.com 
|
|
Dan Rhodes
hehe
Join date: 5 Jul 2003
Posts: 268
|
02-16-2005 16:34
From: Cubey Terra It's like this... because new players were gaming the ratings to boost their payouts, LL has decided to remove ratings from older players. I'm not sure how that balances things out, but that's what's happening. Any ratings older than 6 months are now gone. I wish I knew what happened 6 months ago that caused all new ratings to be considered genuine. The newer players who ran around the last 6 months getting rated lucked out. I unfortunately have been going to SL parties with people I've already been rated by. So I was only able to get a few new ratings in the past 6 months.
|
|
Chip Midnight
ate my baby!
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 10,231
|
02-16-2005 17:06
It'll even out in another six months  I was always too much of a hermit to get rated much anyway. At least this way newer people who may be less able to easily absorb the resulting bonus reduction have quite a while to find alternate sources of income. I feel kinda naked now though, hehe.
_____________________
 My other hobby: www.live365.com/stations/chip_midnight
|
|
McWheelie Baldwin
Registered User
Join date: 9 Apr 2004
Posts: 154
|
02-16-2005 17:10
From: Dan Rhodes I wish I knew what happened 6 months ago that caused all new ratings to be considered genuine. The newer players who ran around the last 6 months getting rated lucked out. I unfortunately have been going to SL parties with people I've already been rated by. So I was only able to get a few new ratings in the past 6 months. Dan, You're misunderstanding the new system. Once a rating is six months old, it's removed. So a rating you get today will be there for 6 months. A rating recieved last month will have another 5 months to go. It's not that anything happened to invalidate ratings older than 6 months. The new system will routinely remove ratings after they have been around for 6 months. McW
|
|
katykiwi Moonflower
Esquirette
Join date: 5 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
|
02-16-2005 17:16
i think every one should make an effort to maintain zero ratings across the board and that way we will eliminate ratings since LL will not.
|
|
Dan Rhodes
hehe
Join date: 5 Jul 2003
Posts: 268
|
02-16-2005 17:16
From: McWheelie Baldwin Dan, You're misunderstanding the new system. Once a rating is six months old, it's removed. So a rating you get today will be there for 6 months. A rating recieved last month will have another 5 months to go. It's not that anything happened to invalidate ratings older than 6 months. The new system will routinely remove ratings after they have been around for 6 months.
McW Ahh Thanks! .. thats what I was trying to find out lol. Okay that isn't so bad and clears up a lot. I read the annoucement and didn't realize it'd be a reoccuring deal.
|
|
Malachi Petunia
Gentle Miscreant
Join date: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
|
02-16-2005 18:30
From: someone I think every one should make an effort to maintain zero ratings across the board and that way we will eliminate ratings since LL will not. Nice concept, but as the game-theorists are fond of saying "you ain't seen nothing yet". In the world of the rateless, the one rated person gets the whole bonus pool. Or put in game theory jargon, the proposed system is a defector's paradise.
|
|
Huns Valen
Don't PM me here.
Join date: 3 May 2003
Posts: 2,749
|
02-16-2005 20:23
man darko is going to be PISSED
|
|
Alondria LeFay
Registered User
Join date: 2 May 2003
Posts: 725
|
02-16-2005 21:41
Wow, nifty.. I look like a noob! 22,27,19,20
Unfortunately my negs from my friendly ex-partner still stuck...
|
|
Francis Chung
This sentence no verb.
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 918
|
02-16-2005 21:49
Wow! Rates look so different now Before: Behaviour: +429/-0 Appearance: +427/-0 Building: +395/-0 Given: No idea - 400ish?/-0 After: Behaviour: +105/-0 Appearance: +103/-0 Building: +109/-0 I really wish we could "hold on" to previous rates, just for historical purposes. (Not to count for stipend bonuses or anything) We have all these SL legends that are walking around as newbs now. They should have something to show to represent their incredible contributions to SL. Alondria LeFay: Behaviour: 22 Appearance: 27 Building: 19 Kats Kothari: Behaviour: 23 Appearance: 22 Building: 30 Bel Muse: Behaviour: 23 Appearance: 14 Building: 13 Ama Omega: Behaviour: 6 Appearance: 6 Building: 4 Charlie Omega: Behaviour: 4 Appearance: 5 Building: 5 Idea: Maybe we could have another profile page. "Total Ratings Ever" It could be opt-in/opt-out, so people who're happy that their negs have been erased can keep them erased. So everyone can be happy 
_____________________
-- ~If you lived here, you would be home by now~
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
02-16-2005 22:33
From: Aces Spade i wonder if they will be reimbursing folks for the money they lost rating people from the past year? I wont rate anymore if they are going to decay every 6 months I paid 9050 to rate people. If I do not get back what was deleated, I will not rate people. I am so tired of only one side seemingly getting their way in this. And this whole situation has made me so angery.
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
02-16-2005 23:14
From: Magnum Serpentine I paid 9050 to rate people. If I do not get back what was deleated, I will not rate people. I am so tired of only one side seemingly getting their way in this. And this whole situation has made me so angery. You paid 9050, and the people you rated got a slight bump in their stipend bonus for their rating. You did not get anything in return, except perhaps someone rating you back in a quid pro quo fashion (how meaningful). The fact that ratings have a cost to give to someone gives them meaning - and a meaning which has been enjoyed by those who have had them - they have been more than rewarded time and again in their bonus over the past year for their ratings. My god, how much money do you want LL to endlessly pay out? There is absolutely nothing that you deserve any kind of refund for.
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
02-17-2005 00:11
MWAHAHA! *rubs hands together* All my negs are gone save for the one from the Radiks asshat! I can start griefing again! Note: Anyone who previously negged me who thinks that I should have retained those longer, just come over to Krittannia, point at any of my stuff and you can re-neg me. Simple  Oh, and to people who think they should get their money back for ratings... uh... the ratings system wouldnt be much of a money sink then, now would it? o.o I don't see the sense in the argument either. Many things you pay for in life are temporary, and you have to keep buying them if you want to continue using them. Like... um.... err.... Airfresheners! (It's early in the morning. Leave me alone.) btw anyone who has 9000 ratings is a dirty low down rotten rate whore. There aint NO WAY you can get that with honest and legitimate ratings. So stop complaining. You're the symptoms that they decided to enforce a cure on everyone because of!!! We should be bitching at YOU for ffs. So give it a rest, will ya?
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
02-17-2005 00:19
From: Kris Ritter MWAHAHA! *rubs hands together* All my negs are gone save for the one from the Radiks asshat! I can start griefing again! Note: Anyone who previously negged me who thinks that I should have retained those longer, just come over to Krittannia, point at any of my stuff and you can re-neg me. Simple  Oh, and to people who think they should get their money back for ratings... uh... the ratings system wouldnt be much of a money sink then, now would it? o.o I don't see the sense in the argument either. Many things you pay for in life are temporary, and you have to keep buying them if you want to continue using them. Like... um.... err.... Airfresheners! (It's early in the morning. Leave me alone.) btw anyone who has 9000 ratings is a dirty low down rotten rate whore. There aint NO WAY you can get that with honest and legitimate ratings. So stop complaining. You're the symptoms that they decided to enforce a cure on everyone because of!!! We should be bitching at YOU for ffs. So give it a rest, will ya? I am deeply offended in your post. I had great respect for you but no more. How can I be a rate whore when I have given out 3 times more ratings than I got in. If you do not understand this, what it means is I have given out 9050 ratings and got back 3000 Does taht sound like a rate Whore????? I demand an apology.
|
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
02-17-2005 00:30
From: Magnum Serpentine I am deeply offended in your post. I had great respect for you but no more.
I demand an apology. I lost all respect for you when you came here to cry about your money and ratings every day for the last month or so. Stop wallowing in your own self pity and either go enjoy SL or go do something else you do enjoy. Why the hell do you even log in if it all upsets you so much? Like beating yourself with sticks too, do you? As for giving/receiving negs... yes, that sounds EXACTLY like a rate whore! As for an apology, demand away, pal, but you aren't getting one. I actually wanted to write much worse, but I know what a sensitive little flower you are. Still.. you could always triple neg me! 
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
02-17-2005 00:34
From: Kris Ritter I lost all respect for you when you came here to cry about your money and ratings every day for the last month or so. Stop wallowing in your own self pity and either go enjoy SL or go do something else you do enjoy. Why the hell do you even log in if it all upsets you so much? Like beating yourself with sticks too, do you? As for giving/receiving negs... yes, that sounds EXACTLY like a rate whore! As for an apology, demand away, pal, but you aren't getting one. I actually wanted to write much worse, but I know what a sensitive little flower you are. Still.. you could always triple neg me!  I never treated you with dis-respect. You, by calling me a Rate Whore, have. I have not given you any negative ratings Infact I have only given 6 negative ratings in my life. My 9050 were all positive ratings. And no, I am not going to negative rate you.
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
02-17-2005 00:38
From: Magnum Serpentine I never treated you with dis-respect. You, by calling me a Rate Whore, have. I have not given you any negative ratings Infact I have only given 6 negative ratings in my life.
My 9050 were all positive ratings.
And no, I am not going to negative rate you. Magnum, the point you are missing is that you contributed to the whole rate whoring process. You cannot even begin to tell me that you gave out probably even half of those ratings with any consideration other than "here's a rating for you". That is not a rating - a rating with no meaning or value attached to it is meaningless. If every review is 5 stars, then a review system has no merit. The ratings system is fundamentally, irreparably broken - and a big part of it is the fact that people who could not build a freaming prim sit at the top of the building leader boards because of people just like you who hand out meaningless ratings. Kris may have put it hashly, but she is right. If it looks like a duck...
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
02-17-2005 00:42
From: Magnum Serpentine I never treated you with dis-respect. You, by calling me a Rate Whore, have. Hello, Mr Spade. You're a spade! Mags, you're a rate whore. Plain and simple. Like I just said, you cannot possibly have 9000 rates from legitimate ratings. You had, like 3000 people file past your builds and go 'WOW! Thats amazing! *Rate*', did you? And another 3000 who saw your avatar and went 'WOAH! That's incredible! What a handsome chap! *rate*' and then of course you helped out 3000 others in just the nicest way that they rated you for your behaviour. Yuhuh. BTW, I'm the Pope. From: someone I have not given you any negative ratings Infact I have only given 6 negative ratings in my life. That's nice. And your point? From: someone My 9050 were all positive ratings. That's nice. And your point? From: someone And no, I am not going to negative rate you. Aww. Am I getting close yet?
|
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
02-17-2005 00:43
From: Cristiano Midnight Magnum, the point you are missing is that you contributed to the whole rate whoring process. You cannot even begin to tell me that you gave out probably even half of those ratings with any consideration other than "here's a rating for you". That is not a rating - a rating with no meaning or value attached to it is meaningless. If every review is 5 stars, then a review system has no merit. The ratings system is fundamentally, irreparably broken - and a big part of it is the fact that people who could not build a freaming prim sit at the top of the building leader boards because of people just like you who hand out meaningless ratings. Kris may have put it hashly, but she is right. If it looks like a duck... Bah. you type faster than me. *Neg rates C  ris*
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
02-17-2005 00:44
From: Cristiano Midnight Magnum, the point you are missing is that you contributed to the whole rate whoring process. You cannot even begin to tell me that you gave out probably even half of those ratings with any consideration other than "here's a rating for you". That is not a rating - a rating with no meaning or value attached to it is meaningless. If every review is 5 stars, then a review system has no merit. The ratings system is fundamentally, irreparably broken - and a big part of it is the fact that people who could not build a freaming prim sit at the top of the building leader boards because of people just like you who hand out meaningless ratings. Kris may have put it hashly, but she is right. If it looks like a duck... When I gave my ratings out, I never once asked people to rate me and when they asked shoud I rate you back, I said no. Maybe why I only got 3000 overall. Lots of people told me they appreciate the positive rating. One even said It turned their day around. but a lot of people ignored me when I rated them and that is just fine. I knew deep down they felt better because of my positive rating.
|
|
Magnum Serpentine
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,811
|
02-17-2005 00:48
I only receaved a combined total of 3000. Not 3000 Approval not 3000 build. I had about 500 build 1200 clothing and 1400 behaviour.
And I have been in Second Life a year. And I tried to rate 10 people a day because I thought I was making people feel better.
Sorry if I was wrong.
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
02-17-2005 00:48
From: Magnum Serpentine When I gave my ratings out, I never once asked people to rate me and when they asked shoud I rate you back, I said no. Maybe why I only got 3000 overall.
Lots of people told me they appreciate the positive rating. One even said It turned their day around. but a lot of people ignored me when I rated them and that is just fine. I knew deep down they felt better because of my positive rating. Then why is that not enough for you? You rated them, it's done - but instead you are complaining about deserving refunds, how much money you put in, blah blah blah. You rated them - what happens after that is irrelevant - especially ratings you gave over 6 months ago. You can't even tell me who you rated last week versus this week, let alone a year ago. Yes, rating people can have a positive effect, if you do it with some meaning. Again, just giving them out without any thought other than "here are some ratings" detracts from that, to the point of irrelevance.
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|
|
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
|
02-17-2005 00:51
From: Kris Ritter Hello, Mr Spade. You're a spade! Mags, you're a rate whore. Plain and simple. Like I just said, you cannot possibly have 9000 rates from legitimate ratings. You had, like 3000 people file past your builds and go 'WOW! Thats amazing! *Rate*', did you? And another 3000 who saw your avatar and went 'WOAH! That's incredible! What a handsome chap! *rate*' and then of course you helped out 3000 others in just the nicest way that they rated you for your behaviour. Yuhuh. BTW, I'm the Pope.
Kris, Quit eating those air fresheners - he gave out 9050 ratings, not received them. He is mad that the ratings he gave out disappeared. A noble angle, I suppose, but the end result is the same.
_____________________
Cristiano ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less. ~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more. 
|