From: Enabran Templar
Funny thing is, Cocoanut, every time you tell your painful little story about how I didn't want to chat with you in-world, you neglect to mention our previous in-world meeting, weeks before, wherein you asserted that we were probably misunderstanding eachother, and that we should try and look at our interactions from a fresh perspective. I agreed to this cease-fire tentatively. Those who know me well know of the voice that follows all of my decisions, asking in grave tones if I am allowing sufficient room for humanity in the judgments I make upon conduct I don't appreciate. It's very hard for me to write someone off as a troublemaker with no internal reservation.
Then, a short time later, you attacked the faceless success of an in-world group who later turned out to be Bedazzle. Upon this revelation, you became significantly more diplomatic. That was enough to silence my voice of restraint. It was after all this vented vitriol that you sought another audience with Enabran Templar. (And this does not even begin to mention the bizarre, creepy coquettish tone you used to do so.)
As they say, "Fool me twice, shame on me." In any case, I usually have real work to do when I'm in-world.
That's the one I'm talking about, Enabran! Where you said you thought you maybe disliked the "coy coco" more than you did the forums coco. What are you talking about?
BIZARRE CREEPY COQUETTISH TONE? What on earth could you possibly be thinking? Surely you don't think I was coming on to you who is just practically still a MINOR???
I'm very much older than you, and happily married for quite some time, with two teenage daughters. I have a fairly playful personality when I'm not doing forum battle for some cause I hate having to do in the first place. I was being my usual self, and maybe that's what you were noticing, and scarcely said a THING to you anyway, during that conversation. Once told I was acting coy, I decided you really wouldn't be amenable to any sort of co-existance, much less any friendship, and just let the conversation drop.
I suppose some good-looking young guy might well be forgiven for taking normal talk as coquettish, as you no doubt have plenty of women being REALLY coquettish with you. But I said nothing to indicate any such thing. The only way I approached you is the way I would approach anyone else, of ANY age or sex.
Certainly I would NEVER come on to you, in my wildest dreams. In fact, I would never come onto ANYONE your age. And in fact I am married irl and have been for quite a few years, and believe me, my husband is a GREAT DEAL more attractive to me than you could ever possibly be in your wildest dreams, and I am happily satisfied could run rings around you in every department. You are vastly too young for me, and besides, as I've said, I'm not in the market.
I may be biased, as his wife, but I will happily state here and it is my right to state here there is absolutely zero way you could ever even hope to be lucky enough to lick his boots, so get THAT straight, punk.
I assumed when you said that to me, about being "coy," what you meant was you thought I was being manipulative or something. If you in fact that that I was actually coming onto you - or being coquettish! for god's sake! then you are vastly wrong.
If it WERE my inclination to rob the cradle - even while MARRIED, I might add - the absolute LAST young guy I'd choose would be you.
Apparently, what you are calling "coquettish" is simply my normal personality, which everyone, of every sex and every age and every other everything gets when they get me.
To think that you interpreted what to me is normal conversation as any sort of creepy come-on to you is revolting, to say the least.
coco
