Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

2nd Citizen owner forces forum member to take avatar chosen by other members

Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
08-16-2006 10:51
From: Lewis Nerd
Stratics doesn't, although it gives the facility to add one if you do.

Isn't poster names sufficient? Or do people just skim read and discard posts from people they don't like? Personally I read everything if the thread interests me.

Lewis



why do I care what Stratics does? I have no intention of ever joining it. And for me, personally, no --poster names are not sufficient --though I'm willing to cop to it being a matter of personal preference on my part. It makes reading forums easier for me. Is that so hard to grok?
_____________________
Finning Widget
No Ravens in my Mailbox
Join date: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 591
08-16-2006 11:01
From: Kendra Bancroft
You may claim it's nonsense, Prok --but SC is not the only forum I frequent that asks that it's posters get an avatar.

It makes it easier to scan the forums :::shrug::: no more no less.

I've personally never advocated the particular avatar assigned to you, I would have just assigned your usual "raven".


Prokofy uses a raven? /corvus corax/? *keeens*
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
08-16-2006 11:02
I am astonished at the loathing I feel for a subset of the forums population.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
08-16-2006 11:04
From: Kendra Bancroft
why do I care what Stratics does? I have no intention of ever joining it. And for me, personally, no --poster names are not sufficient --though I'm willing to cop to it being a matter of personal preference on my part. It makes reading forums easier for me. Is that so hard to grok?


Actually it is rather difficult to grasp, both parts of your statement.

Do you have the attention span of a...... ooooh look something shiny.

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
08-16-2006 11:08
From: Lewis Nerd
Actually it is rather difficult to grasp, both parts of your statement.

Do you have the attention span of a...... ooooh look something shiny.

Lewis



No, Lewis -- I'm dyslexic. But thanks for being Christian in your attitudes.
_____________________
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
08-16-2006 11:16
Pretty good way to advertise your alternative - starting arguments with folks those preferences/tastes/whatever are different than yours.

Pretty much every time an opinion doesn't align with yours, you imply the poster must be stupid or something.... Great PR strategy.

scratch that one of 'lists of forums to visit'
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
08-16-2006 11:22
... and how was I supposed to know that?

Nice dig at my faith, which was totally irrelevant and had never come up in discussion. I give you 3½ out of 5 for trolling attempt.

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Finning Widget
No Ravens in my Mailbox
Join date: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 591
08-16-2006 11:26
From: Lewis Nerd
... and how was I supposed to know that?

Nice dig at my faith, which was totally irrelevant and had never come up in discussion. I give you 3½ out of 5 for trolling attempt.

Lewis


WATER! *coughcoughcoughcoughcoughcough*
pandastrong Fairplay
all bout the BANG POW NOW
Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,920
08-16-2006 11:27
From: Lewis Nerd
... and how was I supposed to know that?

Nice dig at my faith, which was totally irrelevant and had never come up in discussion. I give you 3½ out of 5 for trolling attempt.

Lewis


You were supposed to treat Kendra with the respect that she is due as a child of God, regardless of not knowing that she was dyslexic.

You just failed the Christianity Taste Test. :(
_____________________
"Honestly, you are a gem -- fun, creative, and possessing strong social convictions. I think LL should be paying you to be in their game."

~ Ulrika Zugzwang on the iconography of pandastrong in the media



"That's no good. Someone is going to take your place as SL's cutest boy while you're offline."

~ Ingrid Ingersoll on the topic of LL refusing to pay pandastrong for being in their game.
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
08-16-2006 11:27
From: Siggy Romulus
Pretty good way to advertise your alternative - starting arguments with folks those preferences/tastes/whatever are different than yours.

Pretty much every time an opinion doesn't align with yours, you imply the poster must be stupid or something.... Great PR strategy.

scratch that one of 'lists of forums to visit'


Stop twisting my words.

What am I supposed to do, hide behind an alt and just troll like everyone else does, or be free to share my opinions regardless of how people will misrepresent me to further their own agenda?

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
08-16-2006 11:36
From: Lewis Nerd
Stop twisting my words.

What am I supposed to do, hide behind an alt and just troll like everyone else does, or be free to share my opinions regardless of how people will misrepresent me to further their own agenda?

Lewis


How did I twist your words? How is someone expressing an opinion 'trolling' You are sharing your opinions, sure, but so are the other folks.

Or is that it - when you do it its sharing an opinion, when others do it its trolling or misreprenting you?

For instance - one person states their criteria for forums they post in - another states they like forum avatars as it helps them scan through posts..

And whammo - your all over them like fur on a weasle.. all up but calling them idiots.

Hell you all but say Kendra is an idiot in response to her saying she doesn't care what stratics does because she won't be going there.

I'm not twisting words - what I'm saying is as a PR person - you utterly suck.

I don't mean that in a mean way - its just how I see it - if you represent the forums you want people to go to, you're coming over as narrow minded and extremely judgemental..

That simple.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
08-16-2006 11:38
From: Lewis Nerd
... and how was I supposed to know that?

Nice dig at my faith, which was totally irrelevant and had never come up in discussion. I give you 3½ out of 5 for trolling attempt.

Lewis



It should have been enough when I told you it was easier for me to scan forums when an avatar is present. What the hell business is of your's to place JUDGEMENT on my preference? But no --you had to use my declaration of preference as a base for a rather lame ad-hominem. Good on ya!

But there you are with yet more judgement on my post -- I thought you folks didn't do that whole judgement thang.
_____________________
Kalia Meiklejohn
You make me itch
Join date: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 258
08-16-2006 11:53
It's an avatar.
Jesus.
Shut up.
Lorelei Patel
was here
Join date: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 1,940
08-16-2006 11:57
From: Kalia Meiklejohn
It's an avatar.
Jesus.
Shut up.



Well, that's one way to look at it.

Another is that it's not about an avatar. It's about a forum moderator changing a person's profile against their consent. And it's about that being done in a place that seems to have touted itself as a haven of freedom.
_____________________
============
Broadly offensive.
Kalia Meiklejohn
You make me itch
Join date: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 258
08-16-2006 12:10
It's all in good fun, to have an avatar is such a minor thing.
For all we care it can be a pile of sh*t.
Lorelei Patel
was here
Join date: 22 Feb 2004
Posts: 1,940
08-16-2006 12:20
It's not that it's just an avatar, I guess. It's being pressured into doing something you just don't feel like doing that is irritating.

I didn't cave in to fit along with the popular kids in high school, and I don't want to do it now. So I won't be posting there.

Now, why Prok feels the need to be there? That's one I can't answer.
_____________________
============
Broadly offensive.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
08-16-2006 12:26
From: Lorelei Patel
It's not that it's just an avatar, I guess. It's being pressured into doing something you just don't feel like doing that is irritating.

I didn't cave in to fit along with the popular kids in high school, and I don't want to do it now. So I won't be posting there.

Now, why Prok feels the need to be there? That's one I can't answer.


at least I can respect your answer, Lorelei.
_____________________
Lucky Merit
Unfeted
Join date: 2 May 2006
Posts: 58
08-16-2006 12:29
From: Kalia Meiklejohn
It's all in good fun, to have an avatar is such a minor thing.
For all we care it can be a pile of sh*t.


Since it's all in good fun, isn't it also such a minor thing not to have an avatar?

Seriously? I'm not trying to get in a fight. I'm just wondering what's the big deal if someone has no avatar selected?
_____________________
From: Aodhan McDunnough
SL is a massive exercise in tolerance. It's a living hell for those who are intolerant and an unending treat for the eyes for those who like to see such diversity.
April Firefly
Idiosyncratic Poster
Join date: 3 Aug 2004
Posts: 1,253
08-16-2006 12:33
Hey Sans, thanks for the excellent analogy. As usual, you are an island of sanity in a sea of chaos.

From: Sansarya Caligari
It's kind of like going to a home where you are not allowed to wear shoes inside the house. Take off your shoes at the door, show respect. That's all it is. Prok didn't like the rule, and a few others don't like the rule. Will the home owner not invite them back? Not in SC's case, but it does rankle when someone refuses out of spite to not take off their shoes, especially when they are given total freedom in the home.
_____________________
From: Billybob Goodliffe
the truth is overrated :D

From: Argent Stonecutter
The most successful software company in the world does a piss-poor job on all these points. Particularly the first three. Why do you expect Linden Labs to do any better?
Yes, it's true, I have a blog now!
Vivianne Draper
Registered User
Join date: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 1,157
08-16-2006 12:36
No, thats not true Coco. Both rules, the 'get an avatar' and the anti-spam are what you call unwritten rules. They are posted anywhere. To say that one is not a rule and the other is is think you can pick and choose which things you think ought to be rules. Either they are both rules, or there are no rules whatsoever. Obviously, since one can be permabanned for spamming, there is a rule against spamming -- written or not. Obviously, since one will be given an avatar if they do not choose one for themselves, getting an avatar is a rule.

I could further state that these are rules by talking about how the powers that be are now making a TOS box that you get at registration informing you about said rules. But lets not go there.

Lets forget all this stuff about rules. Becuase we can argue all day about whether unwritten rules are really rules and we wouldn't get anywhere other than frustrated.

The owner of the boards has made two REQUESTS. The first is that you do not spam. The second is that you get an avatar. You are a guest on that board. You do nothing to contribute to its creation or upkeep. The polite thing to do is to either acquiesce to these requests or to go elsewhere.

Obviously the owner got a little pissed off when someone not only rudely refused while inflicting his presence on the rest of us but DARED the owner to do something about it. So the owner did.

Yet the only problem you have, above and beyond calling me a liar which I most emphatically am not, is that the owner did something. Your precious Prokofy can be as rude as he likes -- hell he's even inspired you to rudeness now -- and you think that's perfectly fine.

Anyway don't make things out to be something they aren't mmkay? Makes you look stupid.



From: Cocoanut Koala
No. It absolutely does not have any such rule. That would be ludicrous.

The only rule is no automated-type spam.

The whole "get an avatar" thing was just a sort of fun thing.

Unfortunately, it got carried too far in this instance. Last I looked, the enforced avatar had been removed.

Really, this is beyond the pale. There was no such rule, and I am completely apalled that you would dare write the above post. You are damaging SC more than the original ill-considered action did.

You are the one presenting not a half-truth, but an outright lie. I'm willing to think it is just cause you didn't know better, though, having not been there from the beginning. You really did think this was an actual rule; it was not.

coco
Kalia Meiklejohn
You make me itch
Join date: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 258
08-16-2006 12:42
I personally don't care about who does and doesn't have an avatar.
I just think it's dumb to make a huge deal out of it.
I also think it should be handeled there and not everywhere. Let the forum admins and Prokofy deal with it themselves.
Lucky Merit
Unfeted
Join date: 2 May 2006
Posts: 58
08-16-2006 12:52
From: Kalia Meiklejohn
I personally don't care about who does and doesn't have an avatar.
I just think it's dumb to make a huge deal out of it.
I also think it should be handeled there and not everywhere. Let the forum admins and Prokofy deal with it themselves.


Yeah, I don't care about avatars either. But the idea of some folks wanting someone to have one so badly they forced it upon him is kind of yucky to me. Unfortunately, it does affect my decision about which forums to visit after these close. Not that that's likely to matter to anyone. :) I'm mostly a lurker.
_____________________
From: Aodhan McDunnough
SL is a massive exercise in tolerance. It's a living hell for those who are intolerant and an unending treat for the eyes for those who like to see such diversity.
Siobhan OFlynn
Evildoer
Join date: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 1,140
08-16-2006 12:53
From: Kalia Meiklejohn
I personally don't care about who does and doesn't have an avatar.
I just think it's dumb to make a huge deal out of it.
I also think it should be handeled there and not everywhere. Let the forum admins and Prokofy deal with it themselves.

I'm with you Kalia. Where is the beating a dead horse smiley? Oh, it's at Second Citizen. :D
_____________________
From: Starax Statosky
Absolute freedom is heavenly. I'm sure they don't have a police force and resmods in heaven.


From: pandastrong Fairplay
omgeveryonegetoutofmythreadrightnowican'ttakeit


From: Soleil Mirabeau
I'll miss all of you assholes. :(
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
08-16-2006 12:54
From: Vivianne Draper
No, thats not true Coco. Both rules, the 'get an avatar' and the anti-spam are what you call unwritten rules. They are posted anywhere. To say that one is not a rule and the other is is think you can pick and choose which things you think ought to be rules. Either they are both rules, or there are no rules whatsoever. Obviously, since one can be permabanned for spamming, there is a rule against spamming -- written or not. Obviously, since one will be given an avatar if they do not choose one for themselves, getting an avatar is a rule.

I could further state that these are rules by talking about how the powers that be are now making a TOS box that you get at registration informing you about said rules. But lets not go there.

Lets forget all this stuff about rules. Becuase we can argue all day about whether unwritten rules are really rules and we wouldn't get anywhere other than frustrated.

The owner of the boards has made two REQUESTS. The first is that you do not spam. The second is that you get an avatar. You are a guest on that board. You do nothing to contribute to its creation or upkeep. The polite thing to do is to either acquiesce to these requests or to go elsewhere.

Obviously the owner got a little pissed off when someone not only rudely refused while inflicting his presence on the rest of us but DARED the owner to do something about it. So the owner did.

Yet the only problem you have, above and beyond calling me a liar which I most emphatically am not, is that the owner did something. Your precious Prokofy can be as rude as he likes -- hell he's even inspired you to rudeness now -- and you think that's perfectly fine.

Anyway don't make things out to be something they aren't mmkay? Makes you look stupid.

You may have a point there. Come to think of it, I don't recall seeing the anti-spam rule written down anywhere, either.

However, I will say that the anti-spam rule was known and well understood. If someone posted "Get a Free I-Pod Here" it was dealt with immediately.

That is entirely different from the fun thing of demanding an avatar. I have been on been on the SC forums from its inception, and you have not. My impression of it has always been that the no-spam rule was indeed a rule, but the avatar thing was a joke that developed over time ("Get an avatar or Gabe will kill you!";).

Moreover, Vivianne, you are a Jinny-come-lately to those forums, yet you dare to lecture me in one post after another about how "rude" I am, and so forth. (Not to mention your tiresome Prok references.)

Since the beginning, I have worked to publicize those forums and help them grow. Ask Alex/FIC. He knows, and he's honest enough to tell you that is true. So don't you lecture me about being rude or anything else.

The simple fact of the matter was it was horrible to use forum powers to enforce a disgusting avatar on a poster, and what is going on now - aided and abetted by you - is an attempt to paint it as someone refusing to go along with the rules, which was absolutely NOT the case.

Again, I give you something of a pass because you were not there from the beginning, and you may indeed feel this is how it all went down.

coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Whimsycallie Pegler
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,003
An interested observer
08-16-2006 13:16
I think there is just a bit of college mentality going on at 2nd Citizen's site... maybe complete without a bit of hazing. It is like kids that experience thier first bite of true adult freedom. So yeah, there is some acting out going on over there.

Me personally, there are a lot of people there who I have come to appreciate. I am going to wait for awhile and see what I think. I am hopeful that things will be different but interesting. I can always choose not to read it if I hate it.
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12