Well, I guess Ageplay is now Officially banned

It doesn't matter which country you live in and what laws apply to you, some things are just morally wrong!
It is disgusting if you have sexual feelings towards children. And it doesn't matter if it is a real child or a bunch of pixels (even if a consenting adult is behind it). Getting sexual gratification out of children (AV's) is crossing the line. If you have these feelings towards children, seek help!
I'm not against ageplay (although I don't participate in it), but the second it turns sexual it's crossing the borders of all decency. It's a good thing LL is taking action against it!

No fury... just disappointment and passion about a subject which I think deserves defending. I cannot and will not just sit idly by as you guys defend people simulating sex with children without a single debate against.
Cant do it.
As to whether Jalestra was right about me? lol... I am flattered that you guys are talking about me.

You have stated that any depiction of a child having sex is child pornography. You have also stated that you have both read the book and seen the film Lolita, which depicts a grown man having a sexual relationship with a 12 year-old girl. Ergo you have consumed child pornography.

If you can make ugly accusations about me then why should I refrain from returning the favor?

I dont want to police anyones thoughts. I want people to get banned for having sex with children or viewing child pornography. Sorry if my moral stance has cause you guys any grief. I guess some people think child porn is ok..and others, like me...will speak up and say its not.

And, how do you suggest it be fixed on SL? Please do tell...

Yeah, according to you, ANY depiction of a child and a adult having sex is child porn.

You admitted not only to reading Lolita but seeing the movie.

?

Show me where two adults in SL having sex is having sex with children.

Yes, I stated that. The movie never depicted the sexual acts, it only insinuated them...so I will rest on my defence of that. The book... well, it was a little more graphic so... if YOU are making that interpretation of my definition, then yes, I am guessing I would have to admit that that is what it is. If you would now like to take the position of informing the Authorities in Australia, I will be happy to face the consequences of my actions.
I have read Lolita...yes, that is true.

It is...however...exactly as I stated before. completely off the point.

It's only "off the point" because you just found yourself calling yourself a criminal.

Fortunately, the rest of the world is more sane so you don't have to turn yourself in.

I never stated that two adults having sex is having sex with children. I wouldnt pretend to be able to show you that.

Okay, so insinuating a sexual act with a child is okay in your book?

Oh..I am glad I dont have to turn myself in. Although I have researched that the book Lolita is not banned in Australia, so I guess I wasnt in trouble anyway. However, the Depiction of child sex IS ileagal...so I guess there is that problem again huh?

Only when she reads it.

Because she is pure of mind.

Everyone else goes to jail.

It wasnt my book... and nope, I dont think that it is ok either. Do you think that its ok?

Really? Two adults having sex in SL are really just two adults having sex. But you would have us believe it's all about child sex.

If the simple "depiction of child sex" was illegal you would be in jail, sweetie.

So would nearly everyone.

You don't understand the difference between real child pornography and reading a book.

Yah.

Who is pure of mind? lol
Me? ...thanks very much for the compliment...but Im definately not.

I dont EVER think of having sex with a child though... so I guess I can rest easy on that one?

I wonder, are you contradicting yourself for fun?

You are the one who purchased it and read it. Not me.

I never said that. could you try and not put words into my mouth? I have never stated that sex between two adults is anything but just that. I have NEVER once stated that it is ALL about child sex.

I've never read the book neither. Nor have I watched the film.

I didnt purchase the book...where did you get the idea that I had purchased it?

alice, do you understand why real child porn is illegal? It wasn't always.

It's becasue real children are harmed in the process of making it. They are forced to engage in sexual acts and forced to be nude. They are incapable of consenting to this because they are not legal adults.

Not because it makes people think impure thoughts.

He probably just assumed that since you've read it you had bought it at some point. Kinda like you've made assumptions about us.