Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

More Freedom In Rl Than Sl

Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
07-27-2007 11:32
ok i agree. so does the camera include a gesture or animation?
From: Michael Bigwig
You expect me to relax when you call me a racist! That's not just some thing you toss out as a joke ("taking a pis";)--that's just plain stupid. Jesus you people. Get a clue.
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
07-27-2007 11:37
From: Lindal Kidd
It's not a blurry connection, it's quite clear and specific. And it is not far from the point, it IS the point.

Follow the logic.

1. The primary drive for every living thing is to survive and perpetuate itself. Species that fail to follow this rule become extinct.

2. Man is a living creature. Therefore, the drive to survive and perpetuate ourselves is the most basic part of our nature. Everything else...from wars to morals to poetry to the washcloth on your towel rack...is secondary and can be traced back in one way or another to this one basic characteristic.

3. Anyone who ignores the above facts is going down an evolutionary dead end. (Seen any Shakers lately?) Any MMOG that ignores such a basic part of human nature will, similarly, be supplanted by others that do.

Or, if that line of reasoning is too abstract for you, let's just consider this one:

1. The SL sim owner decides whether his land will be PG or Mature rated.

2. The vast majority of sims in SL are rated Mature

3. The reason for that is because a lot more people want to be able to engage in activities that are unsuited for the limitations of PG sims, and the sim owners realize this.

4. As a first approximation, I estimate that if those activities are banned, the grid will diminish to the current crop of PG sims.

Disneyland is a great place to take the kids. I don't want to live there.


I totally agree. Sex is the meaning of life, according to our genetic program. It's impossible to ignore this simple fact and it would be foolish to attempt to ban sex from any environment where adult humans socially interact.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Michael Bigwig
~VRML Aficionado~
Join date: 5 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,181
07-27-2007 11:37
From: Nina Stepford
mike i wonder how many of your cameras and lights are used in sl pornography shoots everyday :)
they are beautiful cameras, ill grant you that. in fact, if the 35mm includes a gesture i will buy it.


At the moment there are no particular gestures other than the default SNAPSHOT one.

When you 'wear' the Nikon, it goes to your hand in the proper way it should. When you take a snapshot, it uses that animation, and matches up perfectly with the model and AV. It looks great.

And the flash is a dynamic area light.

Also, the camera turns on and off (showcased by a red light in front)

And when the camera is on the tripod, the flash will still work when you snapshot.

Thanks for the kudos. Stop by, and I'll give you a special deal. I realize I can be an ass sometimes...and I never mean to be.

FYI--I have NOTHING against sex in SL. Not one bit. I never have, never will. I'm not disputing that...things veered way off track, that's all.


:)
_____________________
~Michael Bigwig
__________________________________________________Lead Designer, Glowbox Designs
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 11:41
From: Aleister Montgomery
I totally agree. Sex is the meaning of life, according to our genetic program. It's impossible to ignore this simple fact and it would be foolish to attempt to ban sex from any environment where adult humans socially interact.


Who's banning sex?

Also, sex is definitely present in MY life but it's not the meaning of it. Everything I do in my life isn't for sex...especially now that I'm out of high school!

To quote the legendary poopmaster, "Maybe I'm just broken."
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
07-27-2007 11:43
From: Michael Bigwig
:)

That's very blurry. Sorry. I can follow a sequence of events back to the big bang, but why would I?

Telling me I'm wearing a designer shirt just to get laid is ludicrous. I'm more than happy with my girlfriend, and am not trying to impress anybody. Not with my shirt, the car that I drive, or the computer that I use.

Poppey said it best: I yam what I yam!

You can make all the ties to sex you want. That doesn't make SL a "hook up" tool. It's "Your World Your Imagination" not "Your Sex Drive Your Mature Land"

*shrugs*

In your mentality, SL (and actually ALL of creation) is for sex. That's not quite my point.


You wear designer shirts and pay attention to your appearance because you want to keep a certain social status: accepted by the herd and able to attract a mating partner. Obviously it worked, since you have a girlfriend.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Michael Bigwig
~VRML Aficionado~
Join date: 5 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,181
07-27-2007 11:48
From: Aleister Montgomery
You wear designer shirts and pay attention to your appearance because you want to keep a certain social status: accepted by the herd and able to attract a mating partner. Obviously it worked, since you have a girlfriend.



Not true. I look good, to feel good. Especially now that I don't need a woman. What is your argument for me wearing nice clothing now that I'm spoken for? To get sex?


Confidence is what women are drawn to--and wearing nice clothing can make you feel more confident, this is mainly what they are drawn towards. It's all about attitude. Confidence.

I'm not saying that before I was "taken" I didn't go to bars and clubs looking nice to meet a woman...yes, I did. But my point is: I'm not running a SL design firm to get in anyones' pants.

See my point?
_____________________
~Michael Bigwig
__________________________________________________Lead Designer, Glowbox Designs
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
07-27-2007 11:50
From: SqueezeOne Pow
Who's banning sex?

Also, sex is definitely present in MY life but it's not the meaning of it. Everything I do in my life isn't for sex...especially now that I'm out of high school!

To quote the legendary poopmaster, "Maybe I'm just broken."


That's why I said "according to our genetic program". What our brain tells us is a different issue of course. We rationalize a lot, based on our cultural roots and possibly religion. You may tell yourself that you desire a partner of the other gender mostly to share your life with someone else instead of being alone, to have someone to talk to who shares your interests, someone to get old with etc. But the reason that you desire all these things is that you are programmed to seek a partner in order to be fruitful and multiply. Even if you don't want to have kids, you do desire sex (evolution had no time to deal with contraception yet, so far the sex drive used to be enough).
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 11:52
From: Aleister Montgomery
You wear designer shirts and pay attention to your appearance because you want to keep a certain social status: accepted by the herd and able to attract a mating partner. Obviously it worked, since you have a girlfriend.


Except for the fact that not all people are attracted to the same kinds of "designer shirts". His definition could be something considered hideous to the general public. How can you tell he's trying to appeal to the "herd"?

I can't speak for Mike here, but I wear stuff that _I_ like to wear regardless of what my peers think. F#$& the herd is how this stallion rolls! ;)

Also, I honestly don't see anyone as my "peer" because that would imply there are people out there that AREN'T my peer. But that's another story...

Not everyone is going to fit into the same box. Not everyone does everything for sex. Sorry!
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 11:52
From: Michael Bigwig
Not true. I look good, to feel good. Especially now that I don't need a woman. What is your argument for me wearing nice clothing now that I'm spoken for? To get sex?


Confidence is what women are drawn to--and wearing nice clothing can make you feel more confident, this is mainly what they are drawn to that. It's all about attitude. Confidence.

I'm not saying saying that before I was "taken" I didn't go to bars and clubs looking nice to meet a woman...yes, I did. But my point is: I'm not running a SL design firm to get in anyones' pants.

See my point?



But since much of SL is a online dating game of musical chairs - many people are in that perpetual state that exists before you get to the "Especially now that I don't need a woman"

Arent they?
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 11:56
From: Aleister Montgomery
...You may tell yourself that you desire a partner of the other gender mostly to share your life with someone else instead of being alone, to have someone to talk to who shares your interests, someone to get old with etc. But the reason that you desire all these things is that you are programmed to seek a partner in order to be fruitful and multiply. Even if you don't want to have kids, you do desire sex (evolution had no time to deal with contraception yet, so far the sex drive used to be enough).


That may be true, but not everything I do in my life has to do with trying to find/keep a partner, either.

I am also in control of the aspects of my life you stated above to the point where I don't feel the need to act them out "playing house" where I would have more control over the outcomes and have less to deal with in terms of consequences.

You can't deny that this is the reason a good amount of people do all this in SL.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
07-27-2007 11:59
From: Michael Bigwig
Not true. I look good, to feel good. Especially now that I don't need a woman. What is your argument for me wearing nice clothing now that I'm spoken for? To get sex?


Confidence is what women are drawn to--and wearing nice clothing can make you feel more confident, this is mainly what they are drawn towards. It's all about attitude. Confidence.

I'm not saying that before I was "taken" I didn't go to bars and clubs looking nice to meet a woman...yes, I did. But my point is: I'm not running a SL design firm to get in anyones' pants.

See my point?


But why do you feel good when you look good? :) Your brain and body rewards you whenever you do something that biologically makes sense. A cat doesn't wash herself in order to keep the insulation of her fur functional and stay healthy and free of parasites - cats lick their fur because their senses tell them that they currently somehow don't smell right, and their body rewards them with a warm and fuzzy feeling when they're covered in their own scent.
It feels good to look good because it helps attracting a partner or keeping your current partner.

You say that you don't need a woman, but you do have a girlfriend. So you do need a partner; you are just content with the one you have. You subconsciously know that in order to keep her, you need to stay attractive for her. You also need to keep up a certain appearance for the rest of the herd (the human society around you), to avoid becoming an outcast. One of the reasons that you need a herd (a social environment) at all is that it allows you to find one or more sex partners.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 11:59
From: SqueezeOne Pow

You can't deny that this is the reason a good amount of people do all this in SL.



Of course they do - thats why its such a big part of second Life for a good amount of people.
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 12:00
From: Colette Meiji
But since much of SL is a online dating game of musical chairs...


But much of SL is also pretending you're a character in Star Wars, a robot, a medieval knight, etc.

The "playing house" crowd isn't neccessarily the majority even though you may see it that way. That is most likely because you surround yourself with like-minded people as do I.

Not everything in everyone's life is primarily about sex. No one can deny that it's in there, though!
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 12:06
From: Colette Meiji
Of course they do - thats why its such a big part of second Life for a good amount of people.


The actual amount of people doing so remains to be seen.

Even if sex IS a major part of SL...is that what you want people to think of when people think of SL?

Not the ability to build and script anything you can think of? Not the ability to learn from other cultures (language if you ever used voice chat ;)) Not the opportunity for artists of all kinds to create and show art in ways not possible IRL either because of physics or finances?

I think this is the core of the arguement here.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 12:08
From: SqueezeOne Pow
But much of SL is also pretending you're a character in Star Wars, a robot, a medieval knight, etc.

The "playing house" crowd isn't neccessarily the majority even though you may see it that way. That is most likely because you surround yourself with like-minded people as do I.

Not everything in everyone's life is primarily about sex. No one can deny that it's in there, though!


I do think the playing house crowd is a majority,

Becuase even the Goreans, Vampires, BDSM crowd all play house in their own way.

There is a steadily growing minority that see Second Life more as you (and it seems Michael and others) do - as less a place to have a virtual life and more a place to "be creative" or as an extension of real life.

Someday they may become a majority - but that wont make the people playing house wrong, just a smaller percentage of the whole.

----------------------------
Again I refered to all those industries being related to sex

- not primarily, necessarily, in all cases.

The primarily idea entered into the conversation later, for some reason.
Nina Stepford
was lied to by LL
Join date: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 3,373
07-27-2007 12:10
ok i m sold.
i am at your shop right now.
Aleister Montgomery
Minding the gap
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 846
07-27-2007 12:12
From: SqueezeOne Pow
That may be true, but not everything I do in my life has to do with trying to find/keep a partner, either.

I am also in control of the aspects of my life you stated above to the point where I don't feel the need to act them out "playing house" where I would have more control over the outcomes and have less to deal with in terms of consequences.

You can't deny that this is the reason a good amount of people do all this in SL.


Of course, a lot of things you do are meant to stay healthy and well fed. You need sunlight in order to produce substances that your organism requires, like vitamin D, so you will enjoy a day at the beach. Or a walk in the park, or perhaps sport activities out in the open, which also helps to keep your muscles trained. Everything that we enjoy has a certain biological reason, otherwise we wouldn't enjoy it. And the activity that humans usually enjoy most is sex.

In computer games and other virtual environments, we act out what our brain desires for reasons that are often beyond our conscious knowledge. For many people, this is sex (and the social interactions related to sex, which you described as "playing house";). If your RL sex life is interesting enough, you won't feel the need to have sex in SL. You will act out other desires here, usually also related to social interaction / social status / positive social feedback.
_____________________
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 12:13
From: Colette Meiji
I do think the playing house crowd is a majority,

Becuase even the Goreans, Vampires, BDSM crowd all play house in their own way.
I guess they can be looked at in that light...makes sense...

From: Colette Meiji

There is a steadily growing minority that see Second Life more as you (and it seems Michael and others) do - as less a place to have a virtual life and more a place to "be creative" or as an extension of real life.


That "minority" is what started in SL from what I've seen. It's not as though our "type" are a residual result after the fact. If that was the case, then SL would have started out being based on sex.

From: Colette Meiji

Someday they may become a majority
see above.

From: Colette Meiji

- but that wont make the people playing house wrong, just a smaller percentage of the whole.


I don't think being "wrong" had anything to do with it. And how did this discussion leap from the "just about sex" thread??
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 12:14
From: SqueezeOne Pow
The actual amount of people doing so remains to be seen.

Even if sex IS a major part of SL...is that what you want people to think of when people think of SL?

Not the ability to build and script anything you can think of? Not the ability to learn from other cultures (language if you ever used voice chat ;)) Not the opportunity for artists of all kinds to create and show art in ways not possible IRL either because of physics or finances?

I think this is the core of the arguement here.


Well this thread drifted to a discussion of how well Second Life would survive a ban on sex entirely.

You shot down my idea to limit the obviousness of sex in Second Life, remember?

I still think if there was a smarter interface to label your ads and content to segregate them better you could reduce the visibility of sex. Obviously relying on people to self control they content isnt working for that.

Perhaps an ad interface that asks a lot of questions

"Does this product contain nudity" y/n
"Does this product contain sexual themes" y/n
"Does this product contain graphic violence" y/n

and so on .. that sort of thing

then the advertizement interface would label the ad into the appropriate catagory and send it there.

People could game the system sure - but it would cut out the ignorant ad placers.

I do think if there were a "red light district" rating/area - people looking for/selling sexual content would flock to it. Simply becuase it would be inherrently advertizing the services of the things that take place there.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 12:19
From: SqueezeOne Pow

That "minority" is what started in SL from what I've seen. It's not as though our "type" are a residual result after the fact. If that was the case, then SL would have started out being based on sex.


The people who started second life did not (in many cases) see it as mainly an extension of Real life.

If you read through the archives sexual content came pretty early.

In addition creative and interested in sexual content are not always seperate things.

and of course statistically the early adopters are a definite Minority now, and have been for quite some time.
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 12:24
From: Aleister Montgomery
If your RL sex life is interesting enough, you won't feel the need to have sex in SL. You will act out other desires here, usually also related to social interaction / social status / positive social feedback.


I agree with the conclusion but disagree with the path to it.

Not everyone is tuned into sex at the same level. Some have very little active interest in it, some are nymphos and there are plenty in between.

You're also ignoring the ways in which people want sex are different...preference isn't just what gender you're into. It's also the way you go about it. A vast majority of the world only likes their sex with real people...whether that's someone physically in front of you or a RL picture.

You're also treating the symptom as the subject. Sex isn't what drives us. It's procreation and survival of our race. Sex is part of that, but not all of it. There's also violence.

Our instincts are to neutralize a percieved threat to us or our family by whatever means neccessary as well as catching food. It's only been through the introduction of the concept of "civility" that we generally seek to resolve situations non-violently and are able to get our food through through non-violent means.

This would explain why combat is as popular as it is in western culture in general and video games in particular.

If you were to say "everything we do in our lives is somehow tied into the survival of our race" then I would agree with you completely. It's not all sex.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
07-27-2007 12:34
From: SqueezeOne Pow

You're also ignoring the ways in which people want sex are different...preference isn't just what gender you're into. It's also the way you go about it. A vast majority of the world only likes their sex with real people...whether that's someone physically in front of you or a RL picture.



How is a real person responding and reacting to you, even if by typing text, less real than an airbrushed photo? Even the interactive porn doesn't respond like a real person does. SL sex is more than pose balls and prim penises. You don't even have to be in the same sim with the other person to have a damn good experience in IM with them.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart

“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind”
Douglas MacArthur

FULL
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
07-27-2007 12:37
From: Chris Norse
How is a real person responding and reacting to you, even if by typing text, less real than an airbrushed photo? Even the interactive porn doesn't respond like a real person does. SL sex is more than pose balls and prim penises. You don't even have to be in the same sim with the other person to have a damn good experience in IM with them.


I think that sums things up pretty well.

I even know people who enjoy porn who put down cyber sex , I find that pretty ironic.
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 13:50
From: Chris Norse
How is a real person responding and reacting to you, even if by typing text, less real than an airbrushed photo? Even the interactive porn doesn't respond like a real person does. SL sex is more than pose balls and prim penises. You don't even have to be in the same sim with the other person to have a damn good experience in IM with them.


Sex is also more than a good read. Communication between two people is not only words but tone of voice, body language, etc.

RL porn media and SL sex are both equally fake. They simulate and symbolize actual sex. Some people care more for the interraction aspect and some care more for the physical aspect of it. Many people are more easily convinced they are having sex with someone when there's a RL picture instead of 2001 quality graphics showing two people moving around while you type with someone...who may not actually look ANYTHING like what they lead you to believe.

It's okay if you're into it. You don't have to justify or explain yourself to me. I, like many, am just not into that form of fake sex!

It'll be okay!
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
SqueezeOne Pow
World Changer
Join date: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,437
07-27-2007 13:53
From: Colette Meiji
I think that sums things up pretty well.

I even know people who enjoy porn who put down cyber sex , I find that pretty ironic.


I'm not sure what this is summing up as it doesn't really have anything to do with what we were just talking about.
_____________________
Semper Fly
-S1. Pow

"Violence is Art by another means"

Visit Squeeze One Plaza in Osteria. Come for the robots, stay for the view!http://slurl.com/secondlife/Osteria/160.331/203.881
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8