Should LL employees enable griefers?

I'll hafta go over there then. I don't like carrots. That means I'll never barf.

Yayyy!

Prok has repeatedly stated a preference for the male pronoun. Why are you neither of you able to extend even that much courtesy?

As if I care. You certainly have no credibility with me, acting like a fool with your retarded graphics. Trivializing this kind of thing makes you just as much at guilt as they are. And griefers do not hold any credibility with me at all.

Skepticism is healthy, when confronted with something that goes against your own experience, or what you have learned from people who you regard as knowledgable. Usually the skepticism will persist until a resonable arugment or the 'proof' of fable is obtained.

I think you can be skeptical of an idea, or a person, or both, but they don't necessarily have to be tied. After all, nobody is perfect and even the most knowledgable person can be mistaken.

I really don't think skepticism about a person comes into play until you reach a point where someone seems to keep pushing a concept or idea that has either been disproven, or which seems to benefit them personally rather than simply for the purpose of education.

Yeah. That.

Well I want people to stop acting like unintelligent goofs. But I don't get what I want either. Such is life. Any other unrelated nitpicking you want to bring up?

It's a Far Away Mystical land where everyone is upside down and the water spins down the plug hole in the opposite direction.

No, it isn't part of Australia

A ten foot allegation bit my cousin! I believe him cos he hardly ever sees stuff when he drinks from that big bottle, any more.

Are you sure?

Sounds like a crock to me.

Do they walk on the ceiling?

On the monkey bars, do they stand up?

No koalas?

Well I want people to stop acting like unintelligent goofs. But I don't get what I want either. Such is life.

Any other unrelated nitpicking you want to bring up?

Nope but we have these:

Most have not been trivializing it, rather, they have been saying that the evidence is hear say, and if there was actual evidence, then yes, that Linden should be terminated. Due to P's history, most people are very skeptical of his words and his take on actions.


Your own words...

It is much easier to change your own actions rather than anybody else's.



Can we call you male pronouns from now on?

All of the events are fact. that Woodbury says A linden wrote it is a fact.

...and yet, people keep posting here. .... they are feeding off the drama and the hate....And I'll keep pushing back, until either it stops, or LL bans me from the forums.

....that Woodbury says A linden wrote it is a fact.

That a Linden came and harrassed her acoompanied by a Woodbury goon is a fact.

Following this same logic, you are feeding off the drama and the hate by continuing to post here.

FACT: That somebody said something does not equal a fact. Please don't make me quote Inigo Montoya again.



Did you actually read the chat log? And you came away with that? Really, from the Linden trying to give a copy of his bear twice? There is not a single damning utterance in that chat log except against the blogger.

No, I started this thread, and I have an obligation to see it through til it's end. To leave it open undefended would be irresponsible, since prok can not comment herself. Perhaps LL sees this as an opportunity to get rid of another troublemaker., and thats why they won't lock it. I really don't know. But in any event, I do not shrug off my responsibilities.

Prok has repeatedly stated a preference for the male pronoun. Why are you neither of you able to extend even that much courtesy?

HE's just doing the same thing, by sending her a bear when she clearly said she didnt' want it, and saying it was 'an honor' to meet her, and being all bullshit polite.

Nobody thinks it's an honor to meet prok

Stay on topic. I am not much of a role player.

I hope you made Prok aware that you are representing him here and that he is happy with you doing so. You know, seeing as you seem to be speaking on his behalf and all. I know I wouldn't be regardless of who was doing the representing or how sterling a job they appeared to be doing. First thing I would say to such a person is pick a place to post this where I could respond myself, thank you.

The thread was never supposed to be about Prok. But of course, as expected, it ran way off course into that area. Since it's there, I can either let it devolve into a bash-fest, or do my part to keep people in check. I see only one choice that is honorable.