Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Forum Nomic anyone? |
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:05
Casting my vote for DDG-0010 as YES.
_____________________
|
|
Danny DeGroot
Sub-legendary
Join date: 7 Jul 2004
Posts: 191
|
02-10-2005 11:07
I vote YES to DDG-010.
== danny d. |
|
Danny DeGroot
Sub-legendary
Join date: 7 Jul 2004
Posts: 191
|
Proposal DDG-011: Separation of State and Religion
02-10-2005 11:08
Proposed,
that, for simplicity's sake, the Game State shall contain no Rules with respect to The Badger Dance. == danny d. |
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:11
ACE-001 Proposal : Rule #13 shall be amended to so that the term "cynacism" is properly spelled "cynicism". The author of this proposal shall be considered both bitter and jaded. Ace, Ive amended the spelling and assume that this proposal isnt required _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:12
LMAO! sorry Amendment 1.1 to proposed rule 69 I can lick, suck or bite anyone I want, any time I want, whatever anyone thinks. Preferably Kris, Sio or Lotte. Pfft! Rejected by the Administrator as not meeting rule 13. The LMAO was the give away. _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:13
I vote yes to original proposal and to Siobhans ammendments. Proposal: Rule 9 1/2: Do not taunt rule 9. Secondary Proposal: Rule 333: Use of backspace is prohibeted except when Rule 13 is in effect. Rejected by the Administrator as not meeting the requriemetns of rule 13 _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:14
*whew*... How the hell are you keeping up with all of this, Catfart? - Ace Must... cut... and ... paste... faster _____________________
Cat
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:18
Proposing EGGY-004:
A Nomic support system shall be set up that will allow our most exalted Administrator to be relieved of the terrible burden of manually keeping track of votes and proposals. Also, EGGY-005: Players may elect to throw a Nomic party in SL, and rules elaborated there will be integrated with the existing Forum Nomic / Funky Voting Thread. Our beloved Nomic dictator CatFart may elect to supervise the game in person, through a delegate, or rely on any eventual support system that may be coded in the future. _____________________
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:19
Proposed, that the phrase "For simplicity's sake" as employed in EGGY - 003 be universally accepted as the minimum tone of thinly-veiled contempt for the intellectual capacities of fellow players which a proposal author may employ. == danny d. registered as DDG-011 _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:22
Proposed, that, for simplicity's sake, the Game State shall contain no Rules with respect to The Badger Dance. == danny d. registered as DDG_12 _____________________
Cat
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:25
Proposed, that, for simplicity's sake, the Game State shall contain no Rules with respect to The Badger Dance. == danny d. I vote NO to this proposal. _____________________
|
|
Lianne Marten
Cheese Baron
Join date: 6 May 2004
Posts: 2,192
|
02-10-2005 11:28
Vote Yes for LM-001, 002 and 003
And also ask the administrator to uphold rule 15 as it applies to SG-02, as "administrator" has five syllables. _____________________
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:30
Vote Yes for LM-001, 002 and 003 And also ask the administrator to uphold rule 15 as it applies to SG-02, as "administrator" has five syllables. LOL _____________________
|
|
Lianne Marten
Cheese Baron
Join date: 6 May 2004
Posts: 2,192
|
02-10-2005 11:30
Eggy-002: Vote Yes
Eggy-003: Players should show some restraint in offering proposals, so that the voting queue does not get out of hand, making it easier for us (and CatFart) to keep track of things. Vote Yes Eggy-003: For simplicity's sake, you may not vote for or against your own proposal. This shall not be used to retroactively cancel any votes. Vote No And I ask Eggy to renumber his proposals  _____________________
|
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:37
OMG! LOL! Well I think renumbering myself would be dangerous and it's up to CatFart to solve this little ambiguity.
_____________________
|
|
Kalleb Underthorn
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jul 2003
Posts: 40
|
02-10-2005 11:40
Proposal KALLEB-1,
Since it's exceedingly time consuming of my valuable work time, the person specified in rule 4 of this nomic (or any nomic containing this proposal) must here in submit a complete ruleset, as well as the time and date of validity to any persons whom may request it, at a fixed interval, via any medium of their choice. Requests for a synaposis must be posted in this nomic (as previously defined) as the form of a proposal. |
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:45
Vote Yes for LM-001, 002 and 003 And also ask the administrator to uphold rule 15 as it applies to SG-02, as "administrator" has five syllables. Curses!! I shall withdraw SG-02 and reword it. Hmm this could be a problem. _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:47
Proposal KALLEB-1, Since it's exceedingly time consuming of my valuable work time, the person specified in rule 4 of this nomic (or any nomic containing this proposal) must here in submit a complete ruleset, as well as the time and date of validity to any persons whom may request it, at a fixed interval, via any medium of their choice. Requests for a synaposis must be posted in this nomic (as previously defined) as the form of a proposal. Rejected as failing rules 13 and 15 _____________________
Cat
|
|
Kalleb Underthorn
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jul 2003
Posts: 40
|
02-10-2005 11:47
Proposal Kalleb-002,
Proposals may be confusing, only in the condition that said rule makes an appropriate use of a word containing 9 or more syllables. |
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:48
Hang on a second ppl
_____________________
Cat
|
|
Kalleb Underthorn
Registered User
Join date: 30 Jul 2003
Posts: 40
|
02-10-2005 11:49
Rejected as failing rules 13 and 15 BTW, Cynicism is also defined as being self-modivated.  And I don't once use a word with more than 4 sylabals. Also, there is no benchmark for what is difficult to understand. |
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
02-10-2005 11:53
I propose that all proposals be renumbered and prefixed according to the initials of the poster, the post number, date and time (gmt) of original proposition and it's user designated code in order that they are easily referenced back to the source. I propose Catfart get busy doing it and lists each proposal currently on the table in a new post, ordered and indexed with summaries using the new system.
 E.g. KU/216/19:40-02-08-2005/KALLEB-1 I think you should enact this just to make Catfart go through a hellish amount of work. lol |
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
02-10-2005 11:55
I would like to remind people that they can see proposals in a slightly more organized fashion at the SL wiki.
http://secondlife.com/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=ForumNomic _____________________
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:56
BTW, Cynicism is also defined as being self-modivated. And I don't once use a word with more than 4 sylabals. Also, there is no benchmark for what is difficult to understand. I'll accept the lack of long words. I'm not sure I understand your cynicism argument tho', what do you mean? I'll agree we are lacking some definitions _____________________
Cat
|
|
Catfart Grayson
Registered User
Join date: 16 May 2004
Posts: 264
|
02-10-2005 11:57
The following proposals are rejected as not meeting rule 13
EGGY-003 DDG-11 (Originally DDG-10) DDG-12 (Originally DGG-11) EGGY-004 EGGY-005 Oh, and what was the problem with Eggy's numbering? _____________________
Cat
|
