15-yr-old Blind and Deaf Dog Kicked To Death

Aww, don't cry "Nolan". I'm new here. You are just being a paranoid hippy.

I'm sick for seeing that dogs aren't people? Haha, ok. I guess when someone is completely disconnected from reality, they think that anyone that's living in reality is "sick". Interesting.

I agree with you about how awesome dogs are, but that doesn't make them people. Sandwiches are pretty awesome too. Sandwiches also aren't people.

I agree that people who treat animals that way also treat - or are more likely to treat - people in the same callous manner. No question about it.

And Skankleberry - dogs are too people too!

coco

yeah, there is no excuse for maliciously hurting animals or children or any innocent for that matter. scum like that need to be punished harshly, fined, jailed whatever is decided upon by a jury of their peers...I signed the petition, thank you for posting this.

God you really are a moron and a heartless p.o.s
me hopes someone does this to you pretty damn soon, come visit me sometime. i'm sure there are quite a bit of people who would love for you to voice that

Hahaha, I would destroy you, fool.

Provided by Dictionary.com:

Fool n.

* One who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding.
* One who acts unwisely on a given occasion: I was a fool to have quit my job.
* One who has been tricked or made to appear ridiculous; a dupe: They made a fool of me by pretending I had won.
* Informal. A person with a talent or enthusiasm for a certain activity: a dancing fool; a fool for skiing.
* A member of a royal or noble household who provided entertainment, as with jokes or antics; a jester.
* One who subverts convention or orthodoxy or varies from social conformity in order to reveal spiritual or moral truth: a holy fool.
* A dessert made of stewed or puréed fruit mixed with cream or custard and served cold.
* Archaic. A mentally deficient person; an idiot.

Stankleberry, please for the record: Pick which definition you meant when you labeled Kinga a fool. I find that it's prudent to be discreet in every correspondence I enact with anyone, in-game or not. Please be very precise and clear on your meanings and tell us exactly what you mean. Thank you.

* One who is deficient in judgment, sense, or understanding.
* One who acts unwisely on a given occasion: I was a fool to have quit my job.
* One who has been tricked or made to appear ridiculous; a dupe: They made a fool of me by pretending I had won.
* Archaic. A mentally deficient person; an idiot.

There you go.

Kinga cannot be all of those. Being made a fool and being a fool are entirely two different things. I do not bring this up to offend anyone, I just wish that when we discuss issues that we are clear on our meanings.

He is all of them at the same time. Trust me.

Please provide evidence then. Thank you.

Evidence that the guy that threatened me is a fool? Are you guys acting like morons on purpose or something, to mess with me?

No dogs were actually injured or killed to harvest your email addresses.

It's only a threat when your welfare and/or the welfare of those you care for is directly affected. The remark by Kinga may be a threat in their mind but it is an empty threat unless they know personal information about you ... e.x. your home address, your home town, your real name, phone # etc. etc. Without that implied knowledge it's more of an empty threat. I would say anyone that threatens anyone indirectly like this through the internet is issuing an empty threat. They may truely have specific rational reasons behind this empty threat, but until they have a way of enacting it, it means nothing. For some people this may be a way of venting frustration. I would beg you Stankleberry to try to understand the reasons behind everyone else's discontent regarding this matter.

????? What are you babbling about? Did I say that it was a real threat and that I'm afraid for my life? No. I said that the guy that threatened me is a fool because he would get destroyed if he ever tried to follow through on his threat. How is that difficult to understand?

You are underestimating someone you don't know. To state that you can outrightly "destroy" somone seems a little aloof. I would never on my life assume that I could best anyone in any skill I possess. To me, everyone is equal until you prove yourself (through less than honest means) below me.

The mere fact that that person threatened me on a message board because of my views tells me that I am better than him. Only fools say such foolish things. Now do you understand?

My question would be... what is a bigger loss to society, a 15 year old dog, which dies from a single kick, or a fetus in the last trimester, who is intentionally killed by sucking out his or her brain? I would think people would be more outraged by partial-birth abortions than about a dog, but our society ignores it.

And your retort that you can outrightly destroy them isn't? I would argue that many people here have taken offense to some of your postings. I sit by in amusement, wondering how to critically and intelligently counter anything you post. I have remained out of this bickering, for good reason. I don't like to see people fight. Can't we all just get along and stop getting on each other's nerves?

Oh, so you know HER personally?

Hahaha, watch out, Kevn. These people are going to have a mental breakdown on you now.

You have to know someone personally to know they're a fool?

I don't *looks up*

Exactly.

But you said *he* qualified for all those definitions - all that based on one post? Wow, Kreskin, you truly ARE amazing!