Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Your region for free !!! no fees !!!

Dannoth Dagger
.
Join date: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 141
12-31-2008 09:11
IBTL!

Wow, 17 pages of IBTL.
_____________________
Kaimi Kyomoon
Kah-EE-mee
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 5,664
12-31-2008 09:13
From: Pserendipity Daniels

Hey, you got something right! My kids call me GOD, and I will leave the derivation of *that* acronym as a (pretty simple) challenge for you.
Is it because you're their Good Old Dad? Or because you are a higher authority on words than the OED and you write better than Sam Clemens?
_____________________



Kaimi's Normal Wear

From: 3Ring Binder
i think people are afraid of me or something.
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
12-31-2008 09:33
From: Dannoth Dagger
IBTL!

Wow, 17 pages of IBTL.


Add in my IBTL.. which isn't looking likely for some reason. Mods taking a full week of vacation?
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176

Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for

https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
Kaimi Kyomoon
Kah-EE-mee
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 5,664
12-31-2008 09:39
From: Raudf Fox
Add in my IBTL.. which isn't looking likely for some reason. Mods taking a full week of vacation?

I'm not really clear on why they will lock it.
_____________________



Kaimi's Normal Wear

From: 3Ring Binder
i think people are afraid of me or something.
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 09:52
From: Kaimi Kyomoon
I'm not really clear on why they will lock it.


The idea of advertising competing virtual worlds on the LL forum. They've been locked in the past.
_____________________
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:01
From: Kaimi Kyomoon
Is it because you're their Good Old Dad? Or because you are a higher authority on words than the OED and you write better than Sam Clemens?
Kaimi, what has happened? You usually have your reading glasses on. I champion the definitions in the OED against those in the M-W Dictionary of American English. I am also championing the use of "ain't" against a pedant.

Pep (Funny how poor some people are at comprehension)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Raudf Fox
(ra-ow-th)
Join date: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 5,119
12-31-2008 10:02
From: Love Hastings
The idea of advertising competing virtual worlds on the LL forum. They've been locked in the past.


And the fact that the ad is on the Resident Answers forum. I wouldn't complain if it had been in the classified ads forum.. well, at least not as much. ;)
_____________________
DiamonX Studios, the place of the Victorian Times series of gowns and dresses - Located at http://slurl.com/secondlife/Fushida/224/176

Want more attachment points for your avatar's wearing pleasure? Then please vote for

https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-1065?
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:04
From: Love Hastings
And I'm still waiting for Pep to respond to the history lesson on TINSTAAFL (that is, admit he was completely wrong) which he received at the hands of "the dragon". ;)
What history lesson? I haven't noticed any justification for TINSTAAFL other than the dogmatic refusal of a pedantic dragon to admit that he got it wrong inthe first place.

Pep (And still waiting for anyone else to admit to recognising that form rather than the vastly more widespread TANSTAAFL)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Lexxi Gynoid
#'s 86000, 97800
Join date: 6 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,732
12-31-2008 10:06
From: Pserendipity Daniels
By my counts this is the third time you have posted the same unfounded comment, which I answered elsewhere the first time.

Pep (But then, it is evident that you don't necessarily read threads before you post)

PS I am still waiting for anybody other than the error-prone dragon to claim that they knew of the existence of TINSTAAFL before this thread, or even prefer it as the initialism of the philosophy widely propagated by Heinlein

I've never heard of either. And still keep forgetting what they mean.

Initialism is an ugly looking word. Makes my skin crawl.
_____________________
Her Royal Highness Buttercup Meow the XXI
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:08
From: Pserendipity Daniels
What history lesson? I haven't noticed any justification for TINSTAAFL other than the dogmatic refusal of a pedantic dragon to admit that he got it wrong inthe first place.

Pep (And still waiting for anyone else to admit to recognising that form rather than the vastly more widespread TANSTAAFL)


From: Talarus Luan

Why wait? READ some of the 11,600 hits on Google for it and see what they say:

"Any freshman economics student knows the acronym TINSTAAFL – there is no such thing as a free lunch."

"One sounds better, one is more widely used. Message is the same, but my Economics prof preferred TINSTAAFL, so that's what I use."

"Engineers often say, "There is no such thing as a free lunch" (abbreviated TINSTAAFL) to imply that no benefit is without cost."

"Outside hacker circles the variant TINSTAAFL ("There is No Such Thing...";) is apparently more common, and can be traced back to 1952 in the writings of ethicist Alvin Hansen. TANSTAAFL may well have arisen from it by mutation."

"The Moon is a Harsh Mistress popularized the concept of There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch, or TANSTAAFL. (Actually, the phrase may have its roots in the writings of ethicist Alvin Hansen in 1952, only he used the phrase “there is no such thing as a free lunch” or TINSTAAFL.)"

From this research, it appears that the use of TINSTAAFL predates TANSTAAFL, hence:

http://books.google.com/books?id=d6JZryGvfxYC&pg=PA70&lpg=PA70&source=bl&ots=-GHHab8s5R&sig=z0_LgER-q75XVQZStj3MzGAxmzc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result

However, don't let facts get in the way of a good argument. :)


... 1952 in the writings of ethicist Alvin Hansen
_____________________
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:14
From: Love Hastings
BTW, by now going after American literature here and American culture in that other thread, on an server housed in the US, whose readership is on average American, you are now by *any* definition trolling.
Only if you are *extremely* sensitive and likely to be provoked by the tiniest hints of criticism that would be recognised (correct spelling: it has a Latin root) as humour if you had any such sense, despite claims to the contrary.

Pep (Has it been a bad year for you or something? Perhaps you should consider seeing someone about your over-emotional reactions? Just trying to be constructive.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:18
From: Love Hastings
... 1952 in the writings of ethicist Alvin Hansen
And as The WhingeBot has pointed out elsewhere in this thread "fayre" is considered archaic and used by a minority because "fair" was considered by the large majority as better.

Pep (Talarus was arguing against himself, and you have painted yourself into a corner with him)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:18
From: Pserendipity Daniels
Only if you are *extremely* sensitive and likely to be provoked by the tiniest hints of criticism that would be recognised...


Sure, iff taken in isolation, you'd be right. But there's a pattern with your posts which builds a larger truth. And that truth is: troll.
_____________________
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:19
From: Pserendipity Daniels
And as The WhingeBot has pointed out elsewhere in this thread "fayre" is considered archaic and used by a minority because "fair" was considered by the large majority as better.

Pep (Talarus was arguing against himself, and you have painted yourself into a corner with him)


Wriggle and squirm all you want.
_____________________
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:20
From: Lexxi Gynoid
I've never heard of either. And still keep forgetting what they mean.

Initialism is an ugly looking word. Makes my skin crawl.
An honest opinion and as such to be respected.

Pep (I find the word "slavery" repugnant as well)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Lexxi Gynoid
#'s 86000, 97800
Join date: 6 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,732
12-31-2008 10:20
tough rat on lazy legs holding a rock.

troll-har

(brand new acronym, or italizism or whatever. Created 2008)
_____________________
Her Royal Highness Buttercup Meow the XXI
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:26
From: Love Hastings
Sure, iff taken in isolation, you'd be right. But there's a pattern with your posts which builds a larger truth. And that truth is: troll.
Your arguments falling apart? Recognising me as being right and falling back on over-emotional unsubstantiated opinions? You are entitled to think whatever you like, but you aren't correct. Just because I disagree with you and voice those disagreements logically doesn't make me a troll. Your irrational behaviour on the other hand is much closer to the recognised definition.

Pep (You remind me of those politicians whose best defence to a justifiable charge is simply to say the opposite more loudly and more often)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:29
From: Love Hastings
Wriggle and squirm all you want.
My using your own arguments against you is "wriggling and squirming"?

Pep (It seems to me you are now running on empty)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:29
From: Pserendipity Daniels
Your arguments falling apart? Recognising me as being right and falling back on over-emotional unsubstantiated opinions? You are entitled to think whatever you like, but you aren't correct. Just because I disagree with you and voice those disagreements logically doesn't make me a troll. Your irrational behaviour on the other hand is much closer to the recognised definition.

Pep (You remind me of those politicians whose best defence to a justifiable charge is simply to say the opposite more loudly and more often)


You can't argue, Pep. That you are a troll is irrefutable.

(I learned the "irrefutable" technique of being right from you - so thank you!)
_____________________
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:30
From: Pserendipity Daniels
My using your own arguments against you is "wriggling and squirming"?

Pep (It seems to me you are now running on empty)



No no. The wriggle and squirm dance is funny to behold. Keep going!
_____________________
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:30
From: Lexxi Gynoid
tough rat on lazy legs holding a rock.

troll-har

(brand new acronym, or italizism or whatever. Created 2008)
Lots of vacuous emotion.

Pep (or whatever)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 10:32
From: Love Hastings
You can't argue, Pep. That you are a troll is irrefutable.

(I learned the "irrefutable" technique of being right from you - so thank you!)
I have refuted it.

Pep (And one more time: You remind me of those politicians whose best defence to a justifiable charge is simply to say the opposite more loudly and more often)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Love Hastings
#66666
Join date: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 4,094
12-31-2008 10:34
From: Pserendipity Daniels
I have refuted it.


No! You can't! It's irrefutable.

From: someone

Pep (And one more time: You remind me of those politicians whose best defence to a justifiable charge is simply to say the opposite more loudly and more often)


Maybe if you say it louder...
_____________________
MortVent Charron
Can haz cuddles now?
Join date: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 1,942
12-31-2008 10:37
So pep, if the OED is the definitive reference to the English language... why so many volumes and changes?

It's not definitive, it's representative of how some see the English language.

It's no more definitive than any other dictionary
_____________________
==========================================

Bippity boppity boo! I'm stalking you!

9 out of 10 voices in my head don't like you... the 10th went to get the ammo
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
12-31-2008 11:01
From: MortVent Charron
So pep, if the OED is the definitive reference to the English language... why so many volumes and changes?

It's not definitive, it's representative of how some see the English language.

It's no more definitive than any other dictionary
Of course. I can see where you are coming from. Why bother with dictionaries . . .

It's their claim, not mine, and perhaps you missed my post about my affirming their status as a record of the langage not a snapshot - unlike just about any other dictionary.

Pep (And it tracks incorrect usage until it becomes accepted)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14