And Porky killed this one.

So that's 2 of us who think that the locking of the thread was a stupid thing to do. We're a veritable army!

How about dogs?

Even without your bots.

If I promise not to post pics of cats, dogs, birds or vommit, can I just say this is the third thread I've appeared in today?

added: or ferrets

what was the logic behind the pic anyways..i didn't stick around long enough to read it.
i just didn't expect to see something like that right before dinner..

i hope they give her the power to edit things like that soon..that was just gross

Why do people have this need to quote entire posts, anyway?

If I promise not to post pics of cats, dogs, birds or vommit, can I just say this is the third thread I've appeared in today?

added: or ferrets

Even worse... quoting the full post of that immediately preceded theirs. I know that you can't always predict who will get in before you, but you do have time—what is it, five minutes?—to go back and edit.

Frankly, no one dragged you in kicking and screaming to look at cats- you don't like them stay the hell out- it's not like the thread title was misleading.

Just like there are degrees of law breakers in RL -- do you consider someone who ignores speed limits and speeds to be the same as a murderer?

I pay my membership every month, i am entitiled to read every thread on this forum and I do. I gave up hijacking the undying thread about 25000 posts ago so keep you tacky, corny non Sl related imagery in there. I assume thats why it is still there and not locked.

Also, dont tell me where to go and where not to go on these forums, I will go where I want and post what I want within reason.

But, and please don't take this personally, are they no worse?

We all know that Resident Answers is sort of like American democracy - a long-running experiment. There is a lot of leniency and free reign given in this forum, much moreso than the rest.

Yes, rulz iz rulz and we should all be held to the same standard for the same infractions. You have a valid point and I happen to agree with it.

What causes me to shake my head is that, in breaking more rules than others to call attention to non-enforcement, if the rules are now enforced, you may find yourself at the crappy end of the stick for it, being now guilty of not only posting off-topic pics but offensive ones at that. If the mods decide to begin enforcement with this incident, you would, and should, get the stronger measure taken against you - with little to say about it, since you used the offense to call for enforcement.

Personally, I would have just started a bird thread. Doesn't everyone like birds?

Kids! Kids!! Kids!!!

Yes, Porky's pic was in poor taste, but aren't we adults here? Can't we just roll our eyes and move on? There are so many truly disgusting things we're exposed to in this world every day that we shouldn't be thrown off balance by his school yard immaturity.

I don't want this forum to be come controlled and sanitized to the point of blandness. SL sure isn't. Anybody who doesn't want to deal with Porko can put him on their ignore list or simply not click on his links.

That said, if I ever got my hands on the Pork Rinds, I give him such a spanking. Where's that hair brush?

? I can still see the picture ?

Ahhh, a quote post!

Mute is your friend people. Make me go away.

either or an attempt to get himself banned by seeing how far he can push the mods. either way, it was in bad taste. bwa ha ha bad taste... get it? oh, nm.

How about dogs?

If I promise not to post pics of cats, dogs, birds or vommit, can I just say this is the third thread I've appeared in today?

added: or ferrets

You'll notice I didn't say you should stay out- I said if you didn't like it stay out- meaning the choice is yours. But if you choose to get into things you have to deal with what you find- same as we had to deal with your tasteless choice in posting.