ok. The end is nigh
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
10-05-2009 16:50
From: Ciaran Laval Pure specultion based on the OP saying:
"what kind of details I'd like to see in profiles.. i.e. search by interests, rl age, marital status and other rl info"
That's the sort of info that would belong in the first life and interests tabs. I'm talking about... what might Linden Lab actually implement. And, you know, it could be anything.
|
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
10-05-2009 16:54
From: Argent Stonecutter I'm talking about... what might Linden Lab actually implement. And, you know, it could be anything. and so do you  so it might be something intrusive, which you know damn well I'll complain about, or it might be something that those of us not interested merely ignore.
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 16:59
From: Ciaran Laval When age verification was first introduced there was talk of your profiles showing your sex, age band and home city.
So female, 20 - 30, New York or Male, 40 - 50, Paris.
The suggestion wasn't popular but it would seem LL still want to use such details. Ah yes, the 'identity verification' flap. They went on that relationships were built on trust so you *needed* to know the RL details of people. As people can probably guess, the concept of sex verification went over REALLY well in the transgender community.
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
10-05-2009 17:08
From: Kara Spengler Ah yes, the 'identity verification' flap. They went on that relationships were built on trust so you *needed* to know the RL details of people.
As people can probably guess, the concept of sex verification went over REALLY well in the transgender community. It didn't go over well with the female community. Many saw it as a one step path to harassment. Trust was never going to be built on knowing someone's rl age, gender or location, but I feel LL still want to play this card.
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
10-05-2009 17:10
From: Ciaran Laval It didn't go over well with the female community. Many saw it as a one step path to harassment.
Trust was never going to be built on knowing someone's rl age, gender or location, but I feel LL still want to play this card. Ironic, since they have given so little for us to trust them about.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
10-05-2009 17:10
From: Ciaran Laval and so do you  so it might be something intrusive, which you know damn well I'll complain about, or it might be something that those of us not interested merely ignore. You wanted to know what the big deal was. The big deal is the possibility that it might be invasive. LL has a habit of doing that kind of thing. 
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
10-05-2009 17:13
Even if they did add this to our profiles, how would it be implemented? Would we enter it ourselves? Just like the rest of the profile, you could type anything you want there. It doesn't mean it is true. Or would they try a Real ID verification scheme?
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.
http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
|
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
10-05-2009 17:14
From: Argent Stonecutter You wanted to know what the big deal was. The big deal is the possibility that it might be invasive. LL has a habit of doing that kind of thing.  If it's invasive I have a Ceera Murakami Pitchfork to hand you and we'll go protest.
|
|
Aeslyn Dae
over and out
Join date: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 453
|
10-05-2009 17:16
From: Brenda Connolly [...] Or would they try a Real ID verification scheme? Well, maybe it'll be fun to have a date with Elvis. -- Aes
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 17:20
From: Treasure Ballinger I am president of a deaf online support group. You probably had the same laugh as I did when people were talking about 'ASL' then!  From: Treasure Ballinger My husband's cousin told me that it's 'wrong' to lock out family from FB.  Oh I find it tremendously handy! My family finds me there, most of them assume it is my primary social networking site, then they never look for me on other sites. 
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 17:28
From: Belle Loll I truly don't get the all the controversy of using voice or not in SL. It's a personal choice each person makes...as it should be. It is not like there is a text<->voice translator though. I have been to several support groups and such where it was stated or otherwise obvious that some of us were not using/could not use voice. Like when everyone there knows at least one person at the meeting who is Deaf it does not take a big leap to guess those people MIGHT not be able to use voice. Anyway, people tend to be jerks at times. Because it was easier for them to use voice they continued to do so. Then we get a split where none existed before.
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Tristin Mikazuki
Sarah Palin ROCKS!
Join date: 9 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,012
|
10-05-2009 17:30
From: Brenda Connolly Ironic, since they have given so little for us to trust them about. Has LL giving us ANY thing to trust them about?
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 17:32
From: Ciaran Laval That's how the places have evolved, it's an issue of choice. No, voice is not always an issue of choice. I was at a non-social group and some people were using voice. Their choice as they said it was an individual option and I was not required to use it. Sure enough, a few minutes later they were complaining that I was not on voice too.
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
10-05-2009 17:48
From: Kara Spengler As people can probably guess, the concept of sex verification went over REALLY well in the transgender community. No kidding. From: Ciaran Laval It didn't go over well with the female community. Many saw it as a one step path to harassment. And no kidding again.
_____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 18:38
From: Ciaran Laval Trust was never going to be built on knowing someone's rl age, gender or location, but I feel LL still want to play this card. You mean you do not insist on seeing the passport of everyone you meet?  It is frustrating though, I think LL is missing the point that trust is, well, trust. Assuming it is handled like the age verification it became it will be like a bad door lock. I would much rather have someone who I can tell has integrity promise they will not open an unlocked bathroom door than put that lock between me and someone who wants to open it. Did that analogy make any sort of sense? 
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Ciaran Laval
Mostly Harmless
Join date: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 7,951
|
10-05-2009 18:41
From: Kara Spengler You mean you do not insist on seeing the passport of everyone you meet?  It is frustrating though, I think LL is missing the point that trust is, well, trust. Assuming it is handled like the age verification it became it will be like a bad door lock. I would much rather have someone who I can tell has integrity promise they will not open an unlocked bathroom door than put that lock between me and someone who wants to open it. Did that analogy make any sort of sense?  Yes that makes sense, trust is something you earn. Some people do take advantage there but trust is something we feel, not something you grant by virtue of a piece of paper.
|
|
Kara Spengler
Pink Cat
Join date: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,227
|
10-05-2009 19:10
Right, there is absolutely nothing some 3rd party can do to make me trust someone who I do not get the sense of trust from, and vice versa.
_____________________
Those Lindening Lindens!
'O predictable experience, O predictable experience, Never shalt we define thee. Our users think that means no lagging, But we say they want no shagging. O predictable experience, O predictable experience, We love you null expression.'
|
|
Melita Magic
On my own terms.
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,253
|
10-05-2009 23:22
From: Scylla Rhiadra And no kidding again. Just found out my credit card was stolen. Most likely via itunes. (All roads point there.) Since I had given someone online an itunes gift certificate it really makes me wonder if they could've somehow gotten into my account that way. Who knows? I think people who do not shy away from revealing too much online are being foolish. Any time I have let my guard slip even a bit, it's come back to bite me right in the butt. If LL begins putting people's real information into their SL profiles without express permission, they should face lawsuits. If they do so with express permission, it's still putting people in harm's way, in my opinion. Especially women.
|
|
Tegg Bode
FrootLoop Roo Overlord
Join date: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,707
|
10-06-2009 00:26
From: Argent Stonecutter A distinction without meaning.
You talk about respect, but you're not prepared to grant us the respect of actually reading what we're writing.
I did not ask that voice be removed.
I merely asked that the impact of voice be acknowledged. It had an effect. If you can't recognize that effect, if you're still looking for scapegoats, you're in denial.
If you can't see how as badly managed an introduction of new features for "social networking" could be just as divisive, you're missing an important point. I didn not say you wanted it to be removed. I acknowledge Voice had an major impact, but that impact is both positive and negative, and in the long run I think the positive far outweighs the negative. It's only divisive because of the extremists at each end stuffing it up for the rest of us, they force communities to divide because they don't respect the view of others, features don't kill communities, people kill communities..........blah.blah.blah.... And if they add the option of RL dating , it will be the same the NO RL info Brigade vs the RL info for everyone brigade, they will divide the comunities ruining it for the majority who just want the freedom of choice to use it or not.
_____________________
Level 38 Builder [Roo Clan]
Free Waterside & Roadside Vehicle Rez Platform, Desire (88, 17, 107)
Avatars & Roadside Seaview shops and vendorspace for rent, $2.00/prim/week, Desire (175,48,107)
|
|
Katheryne Helendale
(loading...)
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,187
|
10-06-2009 02:35
From: Melita Magic Thanks Smith.
I think that would make both parties more comfortable with the idea.
I'd still prefer social networking not be part of THIS particular platform (and it might surprise you to know I'm in those other ones) but I've learned a while ago that with LL "resistance is futile." This. There's plenty of social networking opportunities all over the web for anyone who wants to partake of them. I use SL to escape the RL overload, not to add to it. You mentioned this earlier, and I agree: IF e-dating features are going to be incorporated into SL, I'd be fine with a toggle that allows me to opt completely the hell out of it. The only thing I use my 1L panel for is to let people know that I don't mix RL and SL.
|
|
Katheryne Helendale
(loading...)
Join date: 5 Jun 2008
Posts: 2,187
|
10-06-2009 02:52
From: Brenda Connolly Even if they did add this to our profiles, how would it be implemented? Would we enter it ourselves? Just like the rest of the profile, you could type anything you want there. It doesn't mean it is true. Or would they try a Real ID verification scheme? For the love of God, don't give them any ideas! They're already halfway there as it is! 
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
10-06-2009 03:24
From: Tegg Bode It's only divisive because of the extremists at each end stuffing it up for the rest of us, they force communities to divide because they don't respect the view of others, features don't kill communities, people kill communities..........blah.blah.blah....
You make it sound like a choice. I've tried it. I can't use it. Not won't. Can't.
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
10-06-2009 05:58
From: Melita Magic Just found out my credit card was stolen. Most likely via itunes. (All roads point there.) Since I had given someone online an itunes gift certificate it really makes me wonder if they could've somehow gotten into my account that way. Who knows?
I think people who do not shy away from revealing too much online are being foolish. Any time I have let my guard slip even a bit, it's come back to bite me right in the butt.
If LL begins putting people's real information into their SL profiles without express permission, they should face lawsuits. If they do so with express permission, it's still putting people in harm's way, in my opinion. Especially women. Ugh! I'm sorry to hear about the card, Melita; that really sucks. It's remarkable how LITTLE information is actually required to hunt someone down. I have, to my certain knowledge, been sort of "cyberstalked" by at least one person, who was working for the most part not on direct and concrete information, but on hints that I had dropped over time. He was able to figure out where I worked at that time, information that could have led (and for all I know, perhaps did lead) to a pretty exact identification of my RL identity. Fortunately, he was a friend, and someone I actually do trust not to take it any further. But he might have not been. And once the cat is out of the bag, so to speak, it's hard to go back, at least without recourse to an alt. I have been indiscreet enough over time in the past that there is a fair amount of RL info about me floating around out there. It's a slippery thing, because it DOES come to seem an issue of "trust" with your closer friends (and certainly with lovers). The most important tip I give to noobies, and especially women: do NOT reveal anything about your RL that might conceivably help someone track you down. I live in a city of about four and a half million: the size of the population was not really adequate to protect me.
_____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|
|
Smith Peel
Smif v2.0
Join date: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 1,597
|
10-06-2009 06:19
From: Scylla Rhiadra I live in a city of about four and a half million: the size of the population was not really adequate to protect me. /me Googles Canadia cities of 4.5 million.... OK tasteless joke... but see how easy it is to let revealing info slip?! :X
|
|
Scylla Rhiadra
Gentle is Human
Join date: 11 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,427
|
10-06-2009 06:20
From: Smith Peel /me Googles Canadia cities of 4.5 million....
OK tasteless joke... but see how easy it is to let revealing info slip?! :X LOL, yeah. But I think I've already given away my city of residence many times in this thread. NOT very clever, eh?
_____________________
Scylla Rhiadra
|