Throwing them all in jail isn't a bad idea. All of them. ....
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Staying Home to watch the Inaguration? |
|
|
LittleMe Jewell
...........
Join date: 8 Oct 2007
Posts: 11,319
|
01-20-2009 16:32
Throwing them all in jail isn't a bad idea. All of them. .... _____________________
♥♥♥
-Lil Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it? ~Mark Twain~ Optimism is denial, so face the facts and move on. ♥♥♥ Lil's Yard Sale / Inventory Cleanout: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Triggerfish/52/27/22 . http://www.flickr.com/photos/littleme_jewell |
|
LittleMe Jewell
...........
Join date: 8 Oct 2007
Posts: 11,319
|
01-20-2009 16:41
I'm sure I'm going to get flamed for this, but this needs to be said. I've heard it said that Obama has made history by being elected as the first African-American President in the history of the United States. I do know what they mean, and it is a valid point. However...... I'd like to propose something else: Barak Obama is not the first African-American President of the United States. Before you get angry about that, read on and see why. For many many years we have heard about African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Italian-Americans, Jewish-Americans, etc., ad nauseum. While it is true that all these terms have American as the root, they still emphasize differences. "I am an African-American. You are not." I am an American. Period. This is not a country of people who are united by blood, religious beliefs, race, or any of that. This is a country where we are united by a shared belief that we are all equal, and deserve to live in freedom. We are Americans, and nothing but Americans. If you choose to celebrate your heritage, great, I'm all for it. But you are not a part of any hyphenated group in this country, you are an American. I am an American. We are all together. These hyphenated terms need to be dumped on the trash-pile of history and we all need to move forward as Americans, united by our one common cause, not divided by our differences that brought these hyphenated terms into play in the first place! _____________________
♥♥♥
-Lil Why do you sit there looking like an envelope without any address on it? ~Mark Twain~ Optimism is denial, so face the facts and move on. ♥♥♥ Lil's Yard Sale / Inventory Cleanout: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Triggerfish/52/27/22 . http://www.flickr.com/photos/littleme_jewell |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
01-20-2009 17:46
If only this were possible. My World, My Imagination |
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-20-2009 22:11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cael Merryman I hope he wasn't stupid enough to characterize non-theists as non-believers. Theists have as many things they choose to not believe in as non-theists. Those that choose to believe in the acceptable forms of the supernatural also have no monopoly on belief either. Yep, he did. Amazing how prejudice slides right through if the majority believes it. Atheists are not 'non-believers' by not believing in a theist point of view, any more than theists are non-believers for not joining in support of secular humanism. Both are beliefs. Pagans are not 'non-believers', even if many choose to not believe in the supernatural over the natural. So evidently if you don't believe in one of the beliefs that Obama can get his head around, you are a non-believer. Sad. There were better, much better ways, of saying it, as in 'a full spectrum of beliefs' or similar. I do agree with all your points. At the same time, I think it represents progress for him to have used even the unsatisfactory term 'non-believers'. For many decades it was acceptable to assume that all listeners in an American audience were Christians. Then, just a few decades back, it became more common for speakers to include 'our Jewish friends' (!!!) Only recently it's become usual to mention Muslim and Hindu listeners too. (The poor Buddhists seldom get a look-in.) But having listened to many, many speeches in recent years that purported to be All-Inclusive by mentioning "Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Hindus"--as if that exhausted all categories of possible listeners--I DO think it's good news that those who are NOT believers in the supernatural should be acknowledged. (Meaning no disrespect to those who do believe in the supernatural.) If only we had a true general forum here, we could get up a good discussion of how Chief Justice Roberts basically FORCED Obama to say 'so help me God'. But: we don't. (Any good SL build dedicated to the non-theist viewpoint?) |
|
eku Zhong
Apocalips = low prims
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 752
|
01-20-2009 22:32
almost any religion is the belief in the supernatural.
_____________________
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-20-2009 23:28
almost any religion is the belief in the supernatural. Yes; if there's no supernatural involved, then it's a philosphy, not a religion. More or less. Anyways.....so where is the SL build reproducing the Inauguration? Where's the Dick-Cheney-in-a-wheelchair avatar? |
|
Cael Merryman
Brain in Neutral
Join date: 5 Dec 2007
Posts: 380
|
01-21-2009 00:28
almost any religion is the belief in the supernatural. No. Most of the ones you accept, perhaps. Most pagan religions see it as an extension of the natural. Big difference. |
|
Cael Merryman
Brain in Neutral
Join date: 5 Dec 2007
Posts: 380
|
01-21-2009 00:37
Yes; if there's no supernatural involved, then it's a philosphy, not a religion. More or less. Anyways.....so where is the SL build reproducing the Inauguration? Where's the Dick-Cheney-in-a-wheelchair avatar? Wrong. The split between the natural and supernatural is not the line between religion and philosophy. It may cater to a need for a belief in free will so everyone can believe they can instantaneously achieve an enlightened state beyond their worldly experience or something, but it isn't necessary for religion and many religions do not require or have a belief in the supernatural. Some of us believe it is enough to have a strong awareness of the natural. Talk to many of the Wicca, Druids, or followers of Gaia and other pagan religions, among others. Look up Religious Humanism. Maybe go beyond Wikipedia and actually read on the subject(s). Many Buddhists do not believe in the supernatural, but, again, see all as an extension of the world, just perhaps not as many see it. |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-21-2009 03:06
No. Most of the ones you accept, perhaps. Most pagan religions see it as an extension of the natural. Big difference. "We place no reliance in virgin or pigeon Our method is science, our aim is religion." -- Aleister Crowley. _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
01-21-2009 05:34
I think Michelle Obabma will make a lovely First Lady. I loved the yellow dress she wore yesterday.
|
|
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
|
01-21-2009 09:26
Wrong. The split between the natural and supernatural is not the line between religion and philosophy. It may cater to a need for a belief in free will so everyone can believe they can instantaneously achieve an enlightened state beyond their worldly experience or something, but it isn't necessary for religion and many religions do not require or have a belief in the supernatural. Some of us believe it is enough to have a strong awareness of the natural. Talk to many of the Wicca, Druids, or followers of Gaia and other pagan religions, among others. Look up Religious Humanism. Maybe go beyond Wikipedia and actually read on the subject(s). Many Buddhists do not believe in the supernatural, but, again, see all as an extension of the world, just perhaps not as many see it. You certainly do seem emotional about the topic. I would question whether the patronizing and even hostile tone of your post serves your purpose, but that's for you to learn through experience, I suppose. At any rate, I don't see that you've made the case that "many of the Wicca, Druids, or followers of Gaia and other pagan religions" have no belief in the supernatural. You could always try again (assuming we're permitted to go on discussing this). |
|
Kaimi Kyomoon
Kah-EE-mee
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 5,664
|
01-21-2009 10:02
I hope he wasn't stupid enough to characterize non-theists as non-believers. Theists have as many things they choose to not believe in as non-theists. Those that choose to believe in the acceptable forms of the supernatural also have no monopoly on belief either. I think Michelle Obabma will make a lovely First Lady. I loved the yellow dress she wore yesterday. _____________________
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
01-21-2009 15:06
I actually looked at this as "We have made history in that enough of our country were able to get past the racial issues and elect a black person to be our leader". Given some of the racial issues that I still see going on in today's America, I am proud of my country for making that progress. Read my sig. ![]() _____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart “Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur FULL |
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
01-21-2009 15:18
I'm sure I'm going to get flamed for this, but this needs to be said. I've heard it said that Obama has made history by being elected as the first African-American President in the history of the United States. I do know what they mean, and it is a valid point. However...... I'd like to propose something else: Barak Obama is not the first African-American President of the United States. Before you get angry about that, read on and see why. For many many years we have heard about African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Italian-Americans, Jewish-Americans, etc., ad nauseum. While it is true that all these terms have American as the root, they still emphasize differences. "I am an African-American. You are not." I am an American. Period. This is not a country of people who are united by blood, religious beliefs, race, or any of that. This is a country where we are united by a shared belief that we are all equal, and deserve to live in freedom. We are Americans, and nothing but Americans. If you choose to celebrate your heritage, great, I'm all for it. But you are not a part of any hyphenated group in this country, you are an American. I am an American. We are all together. These hyphenated terms need to be dumped on the trash-pile of history and we all need to move forward as Americans, united by our one common cause, not divided by our differences that brought these hyphenated terms into play in the first place! You would like my husband. He happens to be a black man. Whaaa??? Did I actually say "black?" Yep, I sure did. If someone calls him African-American you will see the steam rise from his head. He will then inform them that he is not in Africa, he's never been to Africa, nor does he have any plans to ever go to Africa. He will then look you square in the eye and tell you he is an American, plain and simple. God, I love him. _____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
01-21-2009 15:19
You would like my husband. He happens to be a black man. Whaaa??? Did I actually say "black?" Yep, I sure did. If someone calls him African-American you will see the steam rise from his head. He will then inform them that he is not in Africa, he's never been to Africa, nor does he have any plans to ever go to Africa. He will then look you square in the eye and tell you he is an American, plain and simple. God, I love him. Good for him! /me applauds. _____________________
I'm going to pick a fight
William Wallace, Braveheart “Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur FULL |
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-21-2009 15:23
Read my sig. ![]() _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
eku Zhong
Apocalips = low prims
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 752
|
01-21-2009 15:43
Many Buddhists do not believe in the supernatural, but, again, see all as an extension of the world, just perhaps not as many see it. many Buddhist.. in fact shall we say ALL Buddhists in Japan are are also Shintoists... But to see something as an extension of the world because you want to or because it is part of your religion, doesnt make it any the less supernatural. _____________________
|
|
Cael Merryman
Brain in Neutral
Join date: 5 Dec 2007
Posts: 380
|
01-21-2009 15:43
You certainly do seem emotional about the topic. I would question whether the patronizing and even hostile tone of your post serves your purpose, but that's for you to learn through experience, I suppose. At any rate, I don't see that you've made the case that "many of the Wicca, Druids, or followers of Gaia and other pagan religions" have no belief in the supernatural. You could always try again (assuming we're permitted to go on discussing this). Paganism and religious naturalism are communities I am part of and you are not. There have been repeated polling of beliefs of the pagan communities since the first edition of Drawing Down the Moon. Druids, Witches and especially Wicca, the largest component of paganism, have large majorities that do not profess a belief in the supernatural, but rather feel that their powers and beliefs come from the natural world. Simple fact, repeatedly confirmed. Since pagans tend to not force beliefs even on members of the same community, there are many pagans that do believe in the supernatural, but they are not the majority. Whether you choose to believe that or not does not change that it is, in fact, fact. As to patronizing, I don't tell the average ACC fan about lacrosse or a Roman Catholic about RC dogma, but if bicycle racing or pagan religions come up as topics, I am qualified to speak on them, at least within generalities. Evidently patronizing means saying a fact that contradicts your assumptions. Sorry, no emotions, simple fact. You think the supernatural is required for religion. THAT was patronizing and was incorrect to boot. |
|
Ceka Cianci
SuperPremiumExcaliburAcc#
Join date: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,489
|
01-21-2009 15:46
us Chiricahua Apache do not have priests or pastors..we have shaman..everyone knows shaman are owner powerd..
*points outward* so watch out ![]() _____________________
|
|
Cael Merryman
Brain in Neutral
Join date: 5 Dec 2007
Posts: 380
|
01-21-2009 15:53
many Buddhist.. in fact shall we say ALL Buddhists in Japan are are also Shintoists... But to see something as an extension of the world because you want to or because it is part of your religion, doesnt make it any the less supernatural. Typical definitions of supernatural: 1. Of or relating to existence outside the natural world. 2. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces. 3. Of or relating to a deity. 4. Of or relating to the immediate exercise of divine power; miraculous. 5. Of or relating to the miraculous. 3 does not make believing in the Green Man supernatural; it comes from the fact that many religions do have their deities as supernatural and 3 is an extension of that. All of the other definitions make the supernatural clearly NOT an extension of the natural, but coexisting along side it as a different existence. While the supernatural of Shintoism is not an area that I can speak, supernatural as an extension of the natural is not part of the Judeo-Christian theology, especially the Christian. So, yes, thinking my deities are part and parcel and completely of the natural world means that they are not supernatural. There are religions that believe that their deities have both natural and supernatural components (and certainly that could extend to the 'clay vessel' argument for the imperfect knowledge of Jesus Christ while on earth), but that is not what I believe and is not the standard explanation of most neopagan views of the deities. They ARE of this world. |
|
Kaimi Kyomoon
Kah-EE-mee
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 5,664
|
01-21-2009 16:37
...bicycle racing... I am qualified to speak on them. _____________________
|
|
eku Zhong
Apocalips = low prims
Join date: 27 May 2008
Posts: 752
|
01-21-2009 17:38
Typical definitions of supernatural: 1. Of or relating to existence outside the natural world. 2. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces. 3. Of or relating to a deity. 4. Of or relating to the immediate exercise of divine power; miraculous. 5. Of or relating to the miraculous. 3 does not make believing in the Green Man supernatural; it comes from the fact that many religions do have their deities as supernatural and 3 is an extension of that. All of the other definitions make the supernatural clearly NOT an extension of the natural, but coexisting along side it as a different existence. While the supernatural of Shintoism is not an area that I can speak, supernatural as an extension of the natural is not part of the Judeo-Christian theology, especially the Christian. So, yes, thinking my deities are part and parcel and completely of the natural world means that they are not supernatural. There are religions that believe that their deities have both natural and supernatural components (and certainly that could extend to the 'clay vessel' argument for the imperfect knowledge of Jesus Christ while on earth), but that is not what I believe and is not the standard explanation of most neopagan views of the deities. They ARE of this world. sorry but a guy who lives in the sky and watches every single one of us ... is a little unnatural... never mind the concepts of heaven and hell.. and a lot of other things. Shintoism is based on the natural too .. but taken to supernatural levels. Paganism .. now there is a 'religion' that is more based in the natural than most. _____________________
|
|
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
|
01-21-2009 18:06
So has everbody oredered their Commemorative Obama Plate?
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
01-21-2009 19:14
Typical definitions of supernatural _____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/
"And now I'm going to show you something really cool." Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23 Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore |
|
Amaranthim Talon
Voyager, Seeker, Curious
Join date: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 12,032
|
01-21-2009 19:20
So has everbody oredered their Commemorative Obama Plate? They are on clearance at m local Walgreens- and I am not kidding. _____________________
"Yield to temptation. It may not pass your way again. "
Robert A. Heinlein ![]() http://talonfaire.blogspot.com/ Visit Talon Faire Main: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Misto%20Presto/216/21/155- Main Store XStreets: http://tinyurl.com/6r7ayn |