Ad Farmer Suspensions Have Started. :)
|
|
Avion Raymaker
Palacio del Emperador!
Join date: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 980
|
02-20-2008 11:55
From: Chris Norse You are only extorted if you choose to give in.
And yes you are at risk if the rules only mean what the person enforcing them says they mean. Or are you saying that Pissed off Linden may not get out of the wrong side of the bed one day and decide that what ever you are doing is against Community Standards? Chris, If an extortionist adfarmer crops up next to one of my hotels, and my tenants leave, then I'm just screwed if I don't give in. (without the ad farm rule). Let's keep in mind that SL is a business that we all choose to partake in; and we deserve some quality of service, and enforcement of "community" in return for our money. My business model simply depends on some reasonable level of community standards. I'm not just renting $800 a month worth of generic server space to experiment around with. Just like my tenants wouldn't want to be electronically assaulted or verbally abused, they also won't stand for living in a hellhole. The new adfarm rule is just another layer on top of our already immense set of ambiguous rules that get enforced every day by very human and fallible Lindens in the name of "community." We are in no more danger now than we were a month ago. How do we know that a pissed off Linden won't ban one of us for misinterpreting a simple altercation as verbal abuse? To me that's 10 times more ambiguous and dangerous than this extortion thing. Ironically, I strongly suspect that the adfarm rule was just the last straw; and a necessary evil, and that most of the Lindens feel just like you do: that SL was intended to be a place where people can do what they want to with their land. Unfortunately, a few rogue denizens with totally malicious and greedy intentions forced the Lindens' hand and ruined that for everyone. These people have no love of SL; they simply found a way to exploit people who love SL. It's sad that the Lindens had to make this rule, but it was simply necessary.
|
|
Har Fairweather
Registered User
Join date: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2,320
|
02-20-2008 11:56
From: Chris Norse Regulation in the 1700's meant trained. Even today if you take a double barreled rifle to a gunsmith and ask him to regulate it, he will adjust it so both barrels hit the same point. So training the men to hit as a cohesive unit is what is meant by regulation in this instance. A really good example of why it is important to figure out the intent of the Founding Fathers. What the words meant then can be and sometimes are startlingly different from what the same words are commonly thought to mean today. It's not only conditions that change; so does language itself.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
02-20-2008 11:58
From: Bradley Bracken I would argue your interpretation but I don't see how we can go down this route any further without it becoming a gun control debate. It was a bad idea on my part. Something I'd be happy to do in world with you. I was trying to discuss the issue of interpretation and chose a bad subject to do it with. Give me some time and see what I can come up with.  Actually that makes sense in a historical perspective. The Constitution was never meant to last 200 some odd years. At the time it was written the government wasnt interested in keeping guns out of the hands of the citizens, It needed well armed citizens because it couldn't afford a large standing army, but at the same time warfare was very common among the countries of Europe and we had just completed a War with England in recent memory and less than 15 years prior to that, one with France. Add to that the fact that the US was in a continual process of evicting the legitimate inhabitants of most of the land of the United states and pushing them westward. A well trained, well armed militia was exactly what was intended in the begining.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
02-20-2008 12:04
From: Chris Norse This is the most disturbing part of this all, no legal definitions and the "spirit" of the law.
If there is no law to follow the letter of, then we are all at risk at every minute of the day. I am going to go back to this Chris, before I have to run out to lunch. This will actually be much more in line with what I was trying to say anyway. In a previous thread I stated that I worked in hotel management for many years. Some of those in one of the few 5 star 5 diamond hotels in the United States. We did not have rules posted for every specific infraction that may occur within the hotel. We had one rule: Do not disrupt the other guests. If that rule was broke you were tossed out on your ass and no refunds. When a guest is paying as much as $500 - 2000 a night that can be a big chunk of change. I don't think you would find that unreasonable. I don't really see how SL is any different.
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
02-20-2008 12:16
From: Ciaran Laval Why not just make ban lines less intrusive, win win situation. The fact they exist at all is intrusion enough to 95% of the playerbase who innocently live near, or try to fly over, a parcel with ban lines active.
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
02-20-2008 12:18
From: Broccoli Curry The fact they exist at all is intrusion enough to 95% of the playerbase who innocently live near, or try to fly over, a parcel with ban lines active. People should have the option to live in isolation without shelling out 1675 USD and 195/month, if they so choose. Get over it.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims! House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
02-20-2008 12:25
From: Chris Norse Does that mean we can repeal the tax on fully automatic weapons now? Don't think they had automatic weapons in the 18th century, but perhaps it's time to repeal that pesky plutonium tax, too.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
02-20-2008 12:32
From: Qie Niangao Don't think they had automatic weapons in the 18th century, but perhaps it's time to repeal that pesky plutonium tax, too. I think that argument goes .. The citizens didn't have automatic weapons in the 18th century .. but then again neither did the government. Goes back to the Thomas Jefferson Quote - "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ---------------- Really if gun control is a necessity - And it does seem that it is .. It should be included with a Constitutional Amendment, rather than the tax and trade related system we have.
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
02-20-2008 12:59
From: Cristalle Karami People should have the option to live in isolation without shelling out 1675 USD and 195/month, if they so choose. Get over it. People should have the option to wander freely and enjoy the view without it being spoilt by ban lines or security orbs, without shelling out 167 USD and 195/month, if they so choose. Get over it. Then again, as you work with Chris, I can understand your 'firm viewpoint' - even if it's wrong - on this issue
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
02-20-2008 13:03
From: Broccoli Curry People should have the option to wander freely and enjoy the view without it being spoilt by ban lines or security orbs, without shelling out 167 USD and 195/month, if they so choose. Get over it.
Then again, as you work with Chris, I can understand your 'firm viewpoint' - even if it's wrong - on this issue People can wander freely - on public land and 51m above ground. Nonstarter.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims! House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
02-20-2008 13:08
From: Cristalle Karami People can wander freely - on public land and 51m above ground. Nonstarter. Ah the old "I pay for it so I can do what I like with it, regardless of how it negatively impacts anyone else" argument. Doesn't cut the mustard for me, sorry. Why be antisocial in a social environment? Why pay to be in isolation when you can just log out and be in the same position for free?
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
02-20-2008 13:11
From: Broccoli Curry Ah the old "I pay for it so I can do what I like with it, regardless of how it negatively impacts anyone else" argument. Doesn't cut the mustard for me, sorry.
Why be antisocial in a social environment? Why pay to be in isolation when you can just log out and be in the same position for free? I don't know why, but I am not going to impose my view on someone else and take away their ability to be alone if they want on land that they pay for. If 'your world, your imagination' only involves a limited amount of people or none at all, then that's their prerogative.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims! House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
02-20-2008 13:12
From: Broccoli Curry Ah the old "I pay for it so I can do what I like with it, regardless of how it negatively impacts anyone else" argument. Doesn't cut the mustard for me, sorry.
Why be antisocial in a social environment? Why pay to be in isolation when you can just log out and be in the same position for free? I think people should be able to keep their ban lines up. That way when they are busy playing with their horses people wont be able to wander by and accidentally see it.
|
|
Chris Norse
Loud Arrogant Redneck
Join date: 1 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,735
|
02-20-2008 13:13
From: Broccoli Curry Then again, as you work with Chris, I can understand your 'firm viewpoint' - even if it's wrong - on this issue
Actually, I work for her. She can fire me any time she sees fit. But I do admit her firm view point was one reason I volunteered to work for her.
_____________________
I'm going to pick a fight William Wallace, Braveheart
“Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind” Douglas MacArthur
FULL
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
02-20-2008 13:14
From: Colette Meiji I think people should be able to keep their ban lines up.
That way when they are busy playing with their horses people wont be able to wander by and accidentally see it. Rather than ruin the view for the neighbours, maybe they should log out and seek therapy for their perverted behaviour?
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
02-20-2008 13:16
From: Broccoli Curry Rather than ruin the view for the neighbours, maybe they should log out and seek therapy for their perverted behaviour? Well quite possibly. However since they are doing it anyway, I'd rather they did it behind banlines. I sure don't want to accidentally fly within earshot, do you?
|
|
Broccoli Curry
I am my alt's alt's alt.
Join date: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
02-20-2008 13:21
From: Colette Meiji Well quite possibly. However since they are doing it anyway, I'd rather they did it behind banlines.
I sure don't want to accidentally fly within earshot,
do you? I'd rather they didn't do it at all, to be honest... but as it hasn't yet been banned, like anything else like that which is "broadly offensive", if allowed to continue, should be way up in the sky out of everyone else's way. Surely they couldn't possibly have expected there not to be any concern from the existing neighbours about what they are doing there? Accepted, if you choose to move into somewhere that has something like that already established, there isn't much basis to argue except the moral viewpoint - but when they come in, existing neighbours opinions far outweigh theirs.
_____________________
~ This space has been abandoned as I can no longer afford it.
|
|
Cristalle Karami
Lady of the House
Join date: 4 Dec 2006
Posts: 6,222
|
02-20-2008 13:24
From: Chris Norse Actually, I work for her. She can fire me any time she sees fit. But I do admit her firm view point was one reason I volunteered to work for her. And a fine job you do. Thanks much.
_____________________
Affordable & beautiful apartments & homes starting at 150L/wk! Waterfront homes, 575L/wk & 300 prims! House of Cristalle low prim prefabs: secondlife://Cristalle/111/60http://cristalleproperties.info http://careeningcristalle.blogspot.com - Careening, A SL Sailing Blog
|
|
Senga Tsarchon
Clinging to the future
Join date: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 185
|
02-20-2008 13:40
From: Bradley Bracken Don't come to these forums complaining when you see nothing but dead grass and weeds then. We could put slimy green prims in the woodchipper and use them as mulch.
|
|
Senga Tsarchon
Clinging to the future
Join date: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 185
|
02-20-2008 13:55
From: Bradley Bracken And please, EVERYONE. I am not trying to bring a discussion of gun control into these forums. I'm probably going to regret it. This is the best example off the top of my head of interpretation of a law.
Too late. Tsarchon's corollary to Godwin's Law: Once gun control in mentioned in any thread not originally about gun control, that thread is permanently off-topic.
|
|
Lias Leandros
mainlander
Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 3,458
|
Is That All There Is?
02-20-2008 15:45
Maybe the Lindens were just performing for the crowd for one week. The adfarmer next door to me has three cubes of porn over it's 16 meter square and the land is set for sale for $250000L. This has been Abuse Reported daily since midnight on the day the adfarm law came into effect.
I guess they were just making a good show of it.
_____________________
 http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107 Join in SL open enrollment CLUB JOBS to announce new DJ and Host Jobs for free. And on Avatar's United http://www.avatarsunited.com/groups/club-jobs
|
|
Raymond Figtree
Gone, avi, gone
Join date: 17 May 2006
Posts: 6,256
|
02-20-2008 15:55
From: Lias Leandros Maybe the Lindens were just performing for the crowd for one week. The adfarmer next door to me has three cubes of porn over it's 16 meter square and the land is set for sale for $250000L. This has been Abuse Reported daily since midnight on the day the adfarm law came into effect.
I guess they were just making a good show of it. Only two warnings given out today according to the blotter. And the suspension that I cut and pasted at the start of this thread has been the only one issued. Unless they don't put every incident on the blotter, it's a pretty meager showing.
_____________________
Read or listen to some Eckhart Tolle. You won't regret it.
|
|
Starfire Desade
Can I play with YOUR mind
Join date: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 404
|
02-20-2008 16:12
From: Raymond Figtree Only two warnings given out today according to the blotter. And the suspension that I cut and pasted at the start of this thread has been the only one issued. Unless they don't put every incident on the blotter, it's a pretty meager showing. Maybe they already got the ones cleared up that was hurting their full sim auctions.
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
02-20-2008 16:16
From: Senga Tsarchon Too late.
Tsarchon's corollary to Godwin's Law: Once gun control in mentioned in any thread not originally about gun control, that thread is permanently off-topic. Yeah, I know. It was such a bad idea. I regretted it immediately after, that's what I cut and run. A salute to Chris, though. He does follow the letter of the law as he says. We may not agree with what that means, but he does stand by it.
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|
|
Bradley Bracken
Goodbye, Farewell, Amen
Join date: 2 Apr 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
02-20-2008 16:19
From: Raymond Figtree Only two warnings given out today according to the blotter. And the suspension that I cut and pasted at the start of this thread has been the only one issued. Unless they don't put every incident on the blotter, it's a pretty meager showing. Yeah, I've been watching too. The one you pointed out has been the only one. There have been a lot of warnings though right up until today. When you consider that a huge percentage of the Ad Farms out there are owned by the same individuals, I think LL is giving them time to adjust their properties. My God, can you imagine how many some of them have? I'm not concerned. There's few actual extortionist ad farms left. Most have been reduced in price, pulled their ads, or have gone off the market. 3 - 6 months from now we'll see an entirely different landscape, if it even takes that long.
_____________________
My interest in SL has simply died. Thanks for all the laughs
|