These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
An interesting bit of hypocrisy |
|
Lynn Lippmann
Toe Jammer
Join date: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 793
|
09-01-2005 05:22
We have the meeting log; can we get a full break-down (kneeling and begging our new government to release this data) on who attended the meeting?
_____________________
They give us new smilies
![]() |
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
09-01-2005 05:29
People speaking out in the public square (the forums) IS NOT analagous to a group getting to have a private meeting at LL headquarters with Philip and Robin. Groups may try to influence things, but your group is the ONLY group that enjoys this special status and relationship with Linden Lab. ... but your group is the ONLY group that enjoys this special status and relationship with Linden Lab. ![]() Of course, its too late now ![]() |
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
09-01-2005 05:33
If you want facts shut your mouth and open your ears long enough to hear it if you dont want the facts keep shooting your mouth off, you will look the fool later you can beleive what i have to say or not, its your choice but the LEAST you could do if you have any interest in FACTS is to listen to someone who was there God, just what we need another damn Prok with more mouth than ear and not enough good sense to gather facts from all sides before coming to some conclusions call me a liar and whatever else you want AFTER I have a chance to respond, or don't you care enough to hear 2 sides before asserting you know everything? Back to responding to all posts prior to the one I will edit. I will respond to everything prior to my edit post. Anything after that before I have a chance to respond will be ignored as you ignored me, so why would I give you any more than you offered me? Oh My! ![]() While I haven't yet offered my comments on the transcript, I *can* read and understand what I am reading perfectly well. No need for you, (who are you anyway?), to explain anything to me. I'm quite capable myself, but thank you. ![]() _____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
![]() Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
09-01-2005 05:34
Someone's issued a recall vote over the founder. Interesting. I wonder how they will handle this. My guess is they will just have the officer quit and rejoin. Some democracy huh? If not, those who disagree, should join the group and vote to recall. There are more of us than them. _____________________
|
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
09-01-2005 05:36
The group is easy to Find. 1) Metaverse Justice Watch 2) Anshe Chung Cocoanut Koala Juani Wu Prokofy Neva Shaun Altman Zeppi Schlegel (didn't he quit?) 3) Anshe Chung 4) there are more than 48 members, i won't bother to list them. It maybe interesting to note that they seem to unwilling to promote general members to officer status. The current leadership of this group seems very biased and lacking in general manners (especially when it comes to forum posting). I wonder if I could hold a meeting and get two of the top lindens to attend on short notice... doubtful at best, and I've been around 15% longer than Anshe. I am very grateful that Philip to a strong stance about open information disemination, despite Anshe's instance that she's better and more deserving of special consideration than the rest of us poor plebes. I wonder if the group will be as forthcoming when they receive the requested documentation. Thank you for posting this Anne! And yes, I was very pleased to read Philip's comments in that discussion. Though it comes as no surprise to me that he feels that way. Unlike what *some* people have been trying to claim in the past about the Lindens and their FIC. _____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
![]() Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
09-01-2005 05:37
Maybe it is a totally farfetched paranoid assumption, but ... somehow I am sure that during the course of a week Lindens have meetings with other residents and groups of residents, that are a lot more confidential than this. "My group"! Cute ![]() Of course, its too late now ![]() _____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
a lost user
Join date: ?
Posts: ?
|
09-01-2005 05:40
I guess my only real question after reading this whole thread would be... If there were no favoritism amoungst the Lindens... How do I get Phil to attend my group meeting??
|
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
|
09-01-2005 05:40
I want to know why Anshe and co are so silent today. They slighted everyone in SL by saying they are not on an equal footing with themselves. I think they should come here and justify that.
|
Lordfly Digeridoo
Prim Orchestrator
![]() Join date: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 3,628
|
09-01-2005 05:41
This is posted BC (Before Cereal).
Kudos to Editorial Hare for posting this log. Dear Anshe: (edited) for wanting an NDA of anything relating to the entirety of the SL population. You should be ashamed, stripped of all your land, and sent back to the fucking escort groups. Dear prok: (edited) for trying to play FIC. Dear Zeppi: I thought you quit, now you want to play cloak-and-dagger? (edited) Dear Huns: Kudos for stumbling upon it and helping to strangle this 800-lb gorilla in its bed. Dead Lindens: Kudos for not agreeing to do anything relating to secrecy and cloak and dagger bullshit. You did the right thing. Of course, I can't join this group, because a recall election is going on. A good way of keeping members out.. Besides, this group has been found out. Now they'll make a super secret organization so no one else can see except them. Open, indeed. Nevertheless, if anyone gets any information they want posted about this stupid fucking group, IM it to me and I'll post it under my own good reputation. (edited) I'll be back in 6 hours. I'll be just as angry then, Im sure. LF _____________________
----
http://www.lordfly.com/ http://www.twitter.com/lordfly http://www.plurk.com/lordfly |
Vestalia Hadlee
Second Life Resident
Join date: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 296
|
09-01-2005 05:42
I go to bed, and when I wake up there's an eleven page thread about that Hypocracy Post. Haven't read the whole thread yet, and I'm not sure I need to.
I can't say I'm surprised, but really, you people shouldn't make me laugh so hard before my first cup of coffee. Oldest manager's response in the world: A bunch of people with cute notions come to you in their seriousness with their ideas; you want to be polite and open without committing yourself to anything; so you say "Write it up for me so we can discuss it." If there's anything worthwhile to it, great. If not, no harm done and the people with cute notions can go home feeling they're making their contribution to society. _____________________
"Antipathy...against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. ."-- George Washington, Farewell Address 1793
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-01-2005 05:43
You must know that actually publishing such an offer would make your presence at the next meeting meaningless. There would be no way to independently verify that it wasn't a "token." Indeedy, and the 'damned if I do and damned if ya don't' aspect does make me giggle ![]() _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
![]() Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
I Was There
09-01-2005 05:45
OK OK
Enough of the conspiracy. 1st off, I was the one who requested and held the vote for press to leave for the FIRST MEETING. Just because this was bound to happen, and we wanted to establish a "diplomatic" relationship 1st. If everyone wanted to join to "hang out with Philip," what exactly do you think we could accomplish? Editorial (or your chicken sh*t alts, perhaps you want to guess before you are banned) Which leads me to this 2nd off, say goodbye to Editorial because he posted a chat log of MINE in which I gave no permission, against TOS. I have a background in media, and am a hearty advocate of freedom of the press, but there was a reason I didn't want the media there and you are looking at it. It was a 4/3 vote to ask the media to leave, but we didn't do it because we HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE. The way it was presented on this post, as some kind of conspiracy, is the EXACT reason I personally thought it should be private. I hope you stroked yourself good Editorial because you are strictly tabloid, not a real journalist. Go get a job on the Weekly World News, your muckraking skills should fit in perfect between the Bat Baby and the Aliens Shaking hands with Bush. Enjoy your sensationalist fame while you are here, and I ask the Lindens to IP trace the account as they were quoted without permission too. All persons who logged in under this account should be held accountable, and I don't need a secret "Illuminati" meeting to ask for fair repercussions. I can't speak for the group as a whole because everything we have done we voted for. If you want in, its open enrollment, please join and vote, but you MUST attend meetings, as this is not a "Party with the Lindens" group. Read the notecard, there is nothing that any resident should fear on our agenda (unless your association with a Linden gives you an unfair advantage against ANY other resident). I would actually ask any of you to point out anything on our agenda that causes you any concern. How I personally got involved was attending the town hall with Philip where the group was announced prior to the town hall and everyone who had a problem with the news from Philip was encouraged to join. If you weren't there, obviously such a radical shift in the landscape doesn't matter enough for you to arrive early and secure a place on the town hall sims, then you have only your own indifference to blame. It was yours for the taking if you gave 2 sh*ts and made it a point to attend a town hall with the creator of this world you love, you could have been a part of this too. As for the reasons Philip took time to meet with people concerned enough to group over this, you can $peculate all you want as there is a significant amount of cash involved with other members of the group, but Philip knows there is a great concern about the currency exchange situation. It forever alters the landscape in SL and if you don't realize that, then why chime in here? A couple facts about me. I am not a land baron. My partner and I own about 15,000 meters. We don't sell. We are consumers. You can visit our Dancehall under construction the Mars Hotel in Pierce, but not our home due to peeping toms ( /120/cb/43895/2.html ). Our dancehall is attached to a "Hippie Amusement Park." We have tons of rides. We don't make anything there, BTW, everything except for the coaster ride is free to enjoy. The coaster costs L$10 to ride which goes to the coaster maker, not me. We allow this because he spent almost a month developing it for us, it's the least he could do and the cash we paid him really wasn't worth the time he put into it. It is also worth the L$10 a ride and if you catch me there, I'll be more than happy to give you a ride on it myself for free. I also have never used GOM. Paypal has blacklisted me for selling adult products with it, so I use IGE. I have no vested interest in it, but I was outraged that the mission changed enough that resident creations would be compromised by it. I neither produce content, nor profit from land sales or rentals. If I get L$10 in dwell I consider it a good day. My "stake" in Sl is I am a full time resident and I bought into the "Your World" argument. Please read my comments on the GOM sitch at /20/b5/59309/1.html and /20/8d/59490/1.html . Also note that Philip themed his blog on my "Jump the Shark" analogy at http://secondlife.blogs.com/philip/2005/08/jumping_the_sha.html . I sent Philip a leather jacket, I wore a shark on my back at the town hall in protest, and I was less than forgiving in my posts. I could hardly be accused of being buddy buddy with Philip at this point. If you thought I talked too much now, sit back I have a lot more to say. And Prok, save yourself your breath, I KNOW I don't speak for the group I have said that. This slime wants to make it appear I am working to keep your wallet fat, then he proves his credentials just by that. Save the lecture for your kids, I don't want to hear it. Let's get started shall we: I happened upon an unannounced meeting this evening which disturbed me a bit. This meeting was arranged by a group calling themselves the "Metaverse Justice Watch" or the MJW. They claim to be an open group, but at their organizational meeting they specifically said they wanted to keep certain "types" out of the group. They also wanted to request the Lindens remove all "press" from this meeting. Though the voice vote on removing the press appeared to pass they ended up not actually asking the Lindens. Happened by? Really now? Obviously you were part of this. You heard things from private group IMs including the vote that I STARTED about whether the press should be involved at this stage. Right off the bat you have shot your credibility, lying because your alt was a spy WHO OPENLY JOINED THE GROUP. What you think you were spying on is anyones guess, but the inconstancy of your story is glaring right about now. This meeting was supposedly open to the public, and it was held in the Linden recruitment center, but it was not announced, and Anshe Chung was voted the speaker at their organizational meeting before the group moved to the conference area. Despite having over 30 people in the group post the town hall, only 5 others besides my girlfriend and I attended the 1st post hall meeting (maybe because it was at Proks house, believe me if you didn't show up because of Prok I UNDERSTAND COMPLETELY). What can I say it was open and less than 10 people showed up, and Anshe was more organized than myself or anyone else, (and like we were gonna vote Prok to speak for any of us. His rhetoric often invalidates any points he might actually have, but this isn't a rant about Prok and his soapbox), so we asked Anshe to speak for all of us. While the words Anshe chose to use I DO have issues with, she basically did what the group requested. I will get back to my interpretation of Anshe's word later, but short story I blame it on language issues. If you sat in the 2 hour meeting, with the participants there, you would have asked Anshe to speak for you as well. You can believe me or not, I have no affiliation with Anshe besides this group, and to be honest, she has been accused of things I find distasteful. I know only 1 side of those stories, and frankly they were none of my business, so holding that against her would be less than fair when nominating the person who could communicate most effectively with Philip. I might add, that Anshe was the one who posted the invite to the group members for the pre-meeting in the voting tab of the group, again, open to anyone who cared enough to attempt to do something, so I stand by my vote in favor of having Anshe be the spokesperson. A collection of powerful and intelligent people, a couple of duck-squeezing, cause-seeking activists, a couple of attention-seeking prima donnae, and a whole lot of bad karma waiting to happen. If this group gains even a scintilla of power, I quit. I will not tolerate becloaked lobbyists meeting in secret to persuade the Lindens, and if they're going to be afforded extradordinary amounts of access to the leadership of SL then I'm seriously going to contemplate leaving. For all the complaints about the fictitious FIC, this organization appears to be infinitely worse and considerably more real. I'm beginning not to care, though. SL will become just as fucked up as TSO, and we can all just move on to the next in a long line of Metaverse-like programs. Bad Karma? Go down the bulletpoint list that was posted without permission. What part of our "becloaked" ideals has bad Karma? Please, use quotes. I'm sorry if TSO somehow burned you. Never been there. I'm sorry you weren't part of the group if you had something to say, but for every finger you point there are 4 pointing right back at you. You didn't make it your business to be on the sim for the town hall, you didn't start your own group, you didn't care enough about the GOM situation to do anything except possibly troll the forums, so don't try to discredit those of us who did. Your apathy does not invalidate our actions. Place the blame for your uninvolvement where it belongs. I confess, while some of the specific points in that notecard aren't disagreeable, I do dislike the "we = more money, so we're more better!" bit.Newsflash: Without the mass of "players, tourists, etc" coming in, Anshe Chung and such mean jack and squat. This is where I think Anshe's language issues come into play. Resident and tourist are different, no? A tourist pays there $10 for life (or stays for 6 days) and has not "stake" in SL. More on "Stake" later. The notecard is our position, the reason we didn't hand it over to the Lindens is because we didn't want our requests blown off with preprepared answers (well, thanks to Editorial, thats done). Our reasons for being there were directly related to GOM, but notice we didn't even approach the GOM sitch as they were prepared for that. We secured a regular dialog by asking what the requirements were to obtain it. You all know now, join the group, have your say and vote with us, but logistically, we can't all have face time with Philip. Therefore we have to elect representatives to meet with him stating what the group of in world resident who care enough to do something other than piss and moan on the forums wants to accomplish. More on this point later, as it deserves it, because Taco is stirring some sh*t again (see /120/3f/30108/1.html ). Or maybe you all forgot he was capable of "social engineering" and for the record, I think Taco's exploits are hilarious at starting a controversy where none existed. but his entering the fray now now, I guess I don't like so much because he is manipulating something that some of us take seriously to get his jollies. More on this later. Eh, the only way it's going to bother me is if any single person, who is peaceable and well-behaved, is forbidden entry. Otherwise, meh, if you care about SL enough to meet with others and talk about it, more power to you. Citizenship is a good thing. Thank you. NO ONE has been denied entry as far as I know. We have an agenda, yes, and it is effects you all yes. You have 3 choices. Join us, oppose us, or don't care. Exorcise your damn choice instead of condemning those of use who care enough about the future of SL that we invest our time (the most precious commodity of all) into something we believe in. Whether we do it for self interest or the interest of the group as a whole, I guess I can't speak for anyone but myself. But since I don't create content, I don't land baron, and I don't make a dime off SL it's fairly easy to see where I sit. Others I cannot speak for and will not guess. I am not one to scare easy, but the implications presented, if true, completely freak me out. While I agree that residents should have the ability to petition the Lindens in this manner, debating core policies and other practices that affect all of us should never be subject to the opinions of a small group of people, especially in a meeting not generally announced. This line of reasoning follows for opinions presented on these forums. Crucial decisions should always be presented in a form made clear to as many residents as possible before they happen. If we are to have an open dialog, that initial dialog needs to be presented to everyone. I would like word from the participating Lindens on this one before I form a more concrete opinion. Philip said it should not be exclusive. I agree with him. The group is open. You know about it. Join and participate. Be a part of something. Make sure your voice is heard. No one is excluded, but the goal of our 1st meeting was to focus, so we we could be the united voice to speak for the majority. The notecard spells out our agenda. If you don't agree, come to the meetings and speak up. If we did something that favors us and excludes others, please say it and correct it. We were given an opportunity and we jumped at it. If you aren't the type to jump when opportunity knocks, don't blame us because we are. BE a part of it. Make it your own. We did this because we felt compelled to do it, not to exclude people. Philip gave us clear ground rules on what it would take to continue this dialog. His ground rules include EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO CARES ENOUGH TO BE A PART OF IT. I agree with the ground rules he set up and in fact think the groups agenda clearly qualifies that. Join up, then you won't feel like an outsider on the forums reading "news" from a tabloid who hates Prok I don't know any REAL Prok fans, but I am on the same side as him on certain things. If you oppose him on personality alone, you are not alone. But if per chance the guy is actually right, would you kill an opportunity to improve relations and communications because Prok is part of something that facilitates that? And the group was announced, but in the last few days things have been happening at a rapid pace, and there is only a certain amount of manpower to promote it. You know now, so if you don't take part, you have only yourself to blame. Citizenship nothing. Look at those people who attended the meeting. Look at what they do in life. Read comments like "This is what we feel makes us stakeholders. More like you and in contrast to e.g. merely tourists, users, consumers, players etc". This isn't about protecting anyone. It's about securing their places in SL. It's about ensuring that they can continue to profit from the artificial scarcity of land. This isn't a group devoted to justice. This is a group of high-profile profiteers who are afraid that their way of life is endangered. The GOM debacle has scared them. They need to get some surety that the Lindens aren't going to just wipe their businesses out tomorrow. Like I have said before, if people do things for self preservation that is what they do. I have no money to lose from the GOM thing. Check my status and finances and what I own and do here. I won't lose a dime no matter who LL co-opts ideas from. I joined on principle. If you had any other principles besides hating Prok and/or Anshe, you would join as well. You and me out can outvote Prok if hes wrong, and I am not a huge Prok fan, but I agree with with the nuts and bolts of our discussions/debates, even if his arrogant attitude makes me want to disagree with him on spite alone. We attended the meeting because a) we put ourselves in the position to do so b) we were in the right place at the right time to be a part of something Philip called this the bright spot of his week. We are doing something that others do nothing but whine and complain on the forums about. If you take offense at that statement look in the mirror. This was something you could have done to if you were dedicated and organized enough to get it done. Start up something that opposes what we represent. Encourage favoritism and non transparency if you think we are wrong. If thats how you feel and you care enough to invest time, energy and organization to do so, great more power to you. If you don't care enough, don't armchair criticize those of us who do and make progress. If you agree with the points, join up and make what we want to accomplish stronger. If you just want to bitch and criticize, understand YOU are the guy who says "yeah man Pink Floyd's new album isn't enough like Dark Side of the Moon Man." You complain SOLELY on the basis that you can't do it yourself. More on the definition of "stakeholders" later. haha double newsflash: Nobody there means jack or squat anyways.. .least not to me. So a group of folks think they have a larger 'stake' in SL.. B.F.D. Good for them.. They can have as many meetings and such as they want - whatever makes them happy in their SL..But none of it will mean jack to me... Won't change why I'm here, or what do.. and I think the day that somone with a different last name than 'Linden' tells me what I can do/say/or anything else in SL is the same day they should slate a 'second asshole' slider as a feature. Seen it all before - storm in a teacup, just a bunch of people playin el politico.. and if it floats their boat - more power to em. (of course one can't overlook the irony of one of the members who has a very vocal hate on for both 'select groups' and the Neuatleburgerwhatsamigigi Project - hehe hypocrisy at its finest!). Good point! If you don't want to be a part of it, who cares. If you do, join up. More on the "politico" thing later. Oh, the intentions are obscene, I can understand that. The best part was Anshe suggesting that the proceedings be protected by a non-disclosure agreement. That was definitely worth a smile. But I'm not worried about this silliness influencing Linden Lab. They're professionals, they're not going to be screwing anybody in favor of a few landowners with delusions of grandeur. Just as I can't defend Anshe's position on stakeholders, I can't defend her asking for a NDA. Philip's response should ease your mind he will not give us anything he will not give the public, and I agree and support that position. I think, if you look at it in context, Anshe was surprised at how easily Philip handed agreed to handing over the policies, and was just trying to let him know we wouldn't violate his trust if he did so. That however is just a guess. But what Editorial failed to disclose was that most of us, Prok included, wouldn't be a party of a NDA. Which brings up a good point, even his name is misleading. He says his name is Editorial which implies journalism which implies fairness and accuracy. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=editorial n 1.) An article in a publication expressing the opinion of its editors or publishers. 2.) A commentary on television or radio expressing the opinion of the station or network. adj. 1.) Of or relating to an editor or editing: an editorial position with a publishing company; an editorial policy prohibiting the use of unnamed sources. 2.) Of or resembling an editorial, especially in expressing an opinion: an editorial comment. If you took the post of a guy an avatar named EDITORIAL to mean telling both sides of a story, shame on you. Yeah You! He printed some facts, but he sure framed it with his OPINION. Check the name of this topic. Is he reporting a fact, or stating an opinion? You have your opinions too. Just because his opinion came first does not negate facts. I agree completely. While I didn't like one of Anshe's comments, who cares? It won't effect how I play SL, and if I ever get tired enough of it being "all about money" I can move on to other things. I think Second Life is great for it's social and creative values. So far, those are still around. To me it's just folks trying to feel important, or trying to take an active role in shaping SL. But as we've seen in the past, one newb can walk into the world and change things noticeably in a short period of time. Good point, there is 1 comment from Anshe everyone is focusing on. I have 10 things off the top of my head that Prok said I don't like. I can't mention them without violating TOS, but believe me, they exist. To discredit everything we have accomplished and are trying to accomplish because Anshe said 1 thing which you don't agree with is silly, considering there is a language thing going on. I don't happen to agree with things people have said in the group, thats why we have open membership and can vote. Don't like what Anshe says, join up and vote her position down (although I hope you have good enough sense to vote on issues, not on who's saying them) For example, I had a long stupid pointless argument with Prok for an hour, but when pressed, we stood on the same side of a particular issue. Because someone I don't like is of the same position as I should I abandon the position? C'mon now. Being forbidden doesn't really play into it, it's the not being told it's happening. If I form a group tomorrow that is dedicated to the interests of myself and like-minded individuals, can I have unannounced meeting with the highest level Lindens as well? Will my group get to critique LL internal policies? What is the real purpose of this group? How a many times have we heard "..because a select group of SLers (FIC) has the Linden's ears.."? The hypocrisy is mind-boggling. Actually, I am kind of glad this happened. This is exactly the type of thing needed to illustrate what the real problem is. It wasn't hidden. Were you at the town hall? Should we have sent a singing telegram to you to tell you? We were given an opportunity (a rare one) and we jumped at it. Should we be condemned because we didn't send out a prim invite with particles and a landmark to every single resident of SL? Be realistic here. 90% of anything is just showing up. Philip agreed with things we brought to his attention. Why do you think we were given a meeting? Look at the transcripts to the town hall and what lead up to it, and the forums regarding his announcement. He understands the great concern over the precedent, and he chose to face the consequences when confronted about the overall ramifications. Would you be happier if he hid out and didn't address what he knows is a polarizing issue? If you want to know the "real purpose" of this group, join and find out. Don't be a lazy do-nothing who demands everything spoon fed in bite size chunks so you understand it. It is open enrollment, you just need to be smart enough and give a damn enough to be where things happen. I explained how I found out about this group. If you were where I was, why weren't you in the group. Were you at the town hall on the main sim? Don't let YOUR indifference make me seem like a bad guy for giving a damn and going OUT OF MY WAY to be where things were happening. There was no secret, but there was no publicist either. Which bothers you more, the fact we didn't go out of our way to inform you or the fact we made progress without the "benefit" of your whiny complainy forum noises? And since you brought it up, care to explain what the "real problem" is you are alluding to? I though we had a good start, if you clue me in, maybe we can add it to the notecard after you get off your ass, join the group, and do something besides make whiny complaining noises when we don't send you a personal invite to initiate progress and change. Pass the buck, you didn't do something so those of us who did suck right? What do you do for a living that gives you this sense of entitlement without contributing anything? I'm curious as to why the following exchange of views wasn't highlighted from the transcript above: Philip Linden: I think that things this group may do should be uniformly public. Philip Linden: Therefore we will look at what is OK for all of SL to read. Robin Linden: Plus, that would put this group at an unfair advantage relative to the rest of the community, which it sounds like we're trying to avoid. Philip Linden: Exactly. Anshe Chung: Yes, this makes sense Prokofy Neva: Yes the point is to get it public for all not just a select few, that's how it will have relevance. Britsurfer Bauer: freedomof information is the key for all parties Philip Linden: Having a group like this be the ones to disseminate and explain this kind of policy Philip Linden: to the SL community would be a great thing. Philip Linden: If I may also add: Philip Linden: If we make something like this effective, Philip Linden: there will doubtless be the issue of how one becomes a member Philip Linden: as a resident, Philip Linden: of the folks who site around this tabke.... Mulch Ennui: open enrollment Hiro Queso: Its open membership Philip Linden: let me suggest the following: Philip Linden: you guys come up with a solution to that.... Philip Linden: and we will require that we will participate Margaret Mfume: t presentation of our ideas Philip Linden: only to the extent that your choices are fair and open Philip Linden: I would suggest.... Philip Linden: that perhaps you require a commitment in time and energy, Philip Linden: as the way to filter who is to come here, Philip Linden: as that may allow this to both open and focused and effective Shaun Altman: agree Philip Linden: just a thought. Anshe Chung: Time, energy and stake Philip Linden: my personal feeling is that stake, however, Anshe Chung: Whereas we need to work on a practical method to count those Philip Linden: cannot relate specifically to money or to land. Summarizing, Philip Linden states that the process must be open and disciplined, and any sort of filtering process cannot relate to wealth, ownership, or personal popularity. Others in the group - though perhaps not all - agree with him. Further, though Robin Linden's comment - "Any resident of SL should be able to participate or not, as they choose -- it should be a right of residency in good standing." - could be alarming in one context, we don't know what context she was speaking from. She might - might - have defined "residency in good standing" as not currently banned and having a good history of payment to the company. Anshe Chung's comments are ingratiating to the Lindens, self-serving, and fairly silly - but then what do you expect? I'm more concerned that that group chose her as spokesperson; that demonstrates a lack of common wisdom necessary to push through the agendas the group was discussing. But as far as the Lindens go, I see corporate diplomacy toward customers, coupled with some fairly firm pronouncements about a completely level "political" and/or "legal" system. I've been critical of Philip Linden on some issues in the past, but here I think he handled the situation very well. I hope he continues to define some firm and basic egalitarian standards. So I won't panic yet. Anshe was chosen because out of the 7 that bothered to show up, she was the most qualified. Maybe I would be better or my gf, but we have only been in world for a couple months, we lack the confidence to sit across from the CEO, so I would have declined even if asked. There is NO WAY IN HELL I WOULD EVER LET PROK SPEAK FOR ME. The other people present voted for Anshe. We were the only people present. If others would have shown, maybe the results of the spokesperson would have changed. Aside from some linguistic issues regarding stakeholders, I say Anshe certainly spoke for those of use who cared to attend. What was requested by Philip, and we ALL agreed to was that it was open enrollment. That means even you who read and criticize this. I may think you are a prick, but you are welcome to join and entitled to contribute. That was how this was set up, and that is how it shall stay. Philip even conditioned his own participation on open enrollment. No one is lying or hiding things from you. Read the notecard, it is all about keeping information public. You have the opportunity, what you do with that opportunity is up to you at this point. Be a player or be a spectator, but a critic only criticizes because they cannot do themselves. _____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours.
http://forums.secondcitizen.com/ |
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
![]() Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
I was there part 2
09-01-2005 05:45
I am npt sure what to think of this. If it was an open meeting, why are people just finding out about this now is my first concern. Then I read past your select highlighted areas and found stuff you left out like: Philip Linden: No, Philip Linden: I am not a big fan of NDAs. Philip Linden: I think that things this group may do should be uniformly public. Philip Linden: Therefore we will look at what is OK for all of SL to read. Robin Linden: Plus, that would put this group at an unfair advantage relative to the rest of the community, which it sounds like we're trying to avoid. Philip Linden: Exactly. Anshe Chung: Yes, this makes sense Prokofy Neva: Yes the point is to get it public for all not just a select few, that's how it will have relevance. I am just curious how these select people were chosen to attend the meeting. Anyone who was in the group was informed when and where the meetings were. No one was chosen to attend because we were a small enough group to fit on a sim. Logistically, next time we do this, everyone won't be able to attend, we will have to pick representatives, as the group will be too large to sit in 1 sim to "hang out with philip" vote for and nominate the reps. Its OPEN ENROLLMENT Who elected these people? I do not want them being delegates for me. Why did this happen? I am very confused. We took it upon ourselves to do something and Philip agreed we were off to the right start to getting something done. Join us and elect who you want if you don't agree with the choices that were made. And if you disagree with what was agreed upon in the notecard, please tell me. Right here in the forum. What part do you object to and why? You don't have to , you could join the group vote. But that requires more than 4 sentences in a forum. You think you can commit that much, or is that it? If that is all the "stake" you are willing to invest, then that is the extent of your participation. Possibly because the thread is about highlighting the hypocrisy of a couple of the individuals present. Would have to have Editorial speak to that to be sure though. I guarantee you if this had been another group, that didn't include the two most prolific SLers present that spoke at this meeting, we would hear about how pernicious it was, regardless of the content of the meeting. Editorial isn't' as concerned with facts as with sensationalism He made his name before he gets what he gets for violating the TOS. As far as the 2 you speak of, I most often disagree with 1 of them and am apathetic at best. We agree on a common cause. Should I switch my opinion based on who agrees with me? The strangest thing about to me was that they actually got Philip and Robin to attend. Anshe must carry considerable weight with SL. Wonder if she bought LL? ![]() If could be financial or it could be Philip knows he had to answer for a decision he made. It could be another thing, but when fate deals you a nice hand do you complain or seize the day? Certainly Prok and Anshe have a lot of financial "stake" here, but I don't think personally they would bail on SL and kill the cash cow over GOM, do you? That hand would be too high "stakes" of a hand for any of them to play, don't you think? Oh, didn't you get the memo Lo? They have invested more money in SL, therefore they are "stakeholders", not just mere mortals like the rest of us serfs. It only stands to reason they should be able to get their fingers into LL's internal policies regarding employee conduct! *groan* Do you even know of the major issues behind why we want to know LLs internal policies? Search the forums, a Linden DJed an inworld event and another modeled for a residents store. We , as a group, feel that the last name Linden on an avatar is equivalent of a "Uniform" on a police officer. In other words they should be acting in an official capacity of the LL, not for 1 resident. That equals a conflict of interest or an unfair advantage. If they won't do it for everyone, why should they be allowed to do it for 1 or 2 select friends? If you find fault with that logic please tell me why? And if your answer is they should be able to enjoy SL too; we agree. But they should do so as a player without the benefit of a Linden last name, and their alt should not be associated with their Linden name at all. They should just be a regular player, NOT a Linden. Explain yourself then, what is the problem with this? Tell me what business encourages conflict of interest (besides national government). (edited) Here Here, i agree. the problem is typing faster than him. He is a fast dood. I can out talk and out logic about anyone but his speed on the keys often boggles my mind. If you can do it, and out logic him, and shut him up, ill give you $L500. I haven't seen it done yet, he gets off too much on the argument himself to ever shut up and give an inch. We don't represent Prok and he doesn't represent us. Can I make it any more clear without violating the open enrollment thing? I was on the phone earlier today with a well know person who asked me if I was invited to this meeting tonight. I asked what meeting, and said no I wasn't invited. I didn't give it a second thought. Not only am I a stakerholder in Second Life, I consider myself a major SL stakeholder and have been since the day I joined! As a major stakeholder in Second Life, I am committed to openness and the free flow of information - thus I request the following: 1) The name of this group 2) The officers names 3) The founding officer's name 4) Members Names ![]() 1) Metaverse Justice Watch 2) Look it up 3) Not sure myself, but i agree with the "Mission Statement" found in the notecard 4) Look it up lazy ass Yeah, you're right. Personally, though, I think the Linden reaction, and the obvious fact that others in the group did not necessarily take the same approach as several "powerful" (heh, that's funny) individuals, is the bigger story. Those of us who don't represent the barons have EQUAL say as the barons. Something to think about before some of you cast stones, no? I started a post last week about a group I called the LCC. Land Controlling Community. /120/91/58812/1.html Some people laughed at the idea. The more I think about this meeting the more I see how correct I was. Two of the biggest land holder I know were in this group. If there was an announcement about this I wouldn't feel so uneasy. Prok has blasted the Lindens just for talking technical aspects in IRC with some player yet this meeting is acceptable? If it was an open meeting, why was it not handled like a town hall? The LCC is very real, this is living proof. Own lots of land, pay LL bills, get their ear. This is not sitting well with me at all. Can someone confirm this is an actual chat log and meeting agenda? Confirmed The town hall limits questions to one per resident, thereby eliminating follow ups. The forum we requested and received allowed us follow up through a representative. Aside from the comments Anshe made that may seem elitist, she DID speak for the group and we not only approved but applauded her on speaking the agenda and focusing on what the group requested. As successful as Anshe is, she was basically put in a very intimidating position of speaking to the CEO of a major company (not to mention what he has accomplished through the real player platform) and I am sure she was nervous. I can't really excuse the choice of words she used except to think about what she was trying to say that language made difficult. Do you think she said consumer in a bad way? If so i can publish the chat transcript where i asked if I was invited because I was a consumer not producer and she assured me it was for anyone, not just the elite. Should I be condemned because I agree with the land barons on certain issues (which you would know about if you were a part of it)? If she come on this forum and grants permission for me to do so I will. But with out her doing so I will be violating the same TOS rules as Editorial did printing this, which I won't do because I value being here and am not hiding. This is me. I have 1 alt. You can find it if you are a good detective, but I am not gonna just volunteer it. I love Sl, and thats my "stake" in this. I ask anshe to not only give her permission to publish what she said when I asked if I Was invited as a mere consumer, but anything else she said in the 2 meetings I attended prior to the philip meeting and the 1 meeting post. I think some of you would be surprised. I did record every log, but with out the permission of every resident who attended and spoke, i cannot publish it. If I could do so, as Editorial has felt the need to do violating the TOS, I'm sure you wouldn't be as suspicious as some of you apparently are now. To be honest forthright and fair, I haven't read the forum post you mentioned, but I'm sure you will all see I have more than enough on my plate answering these paranoid baseless allegations ATM. I hope to read it soon and comment. I agree, and it is almost comical. I just hope next time there is an announcement. As a side note: open enrollment doesn't mean squat if the general population doesn't know what the group is called. Did you attend the town hall with Philip? If the answer is no, what the hell did you expect, a personal invitation on a monogrammed doily? If this is a fabricated meeting it was well done. If not all I can say is for those that think they are better than me better get a grip on thier ankles and pull real hard. When they hear a POP then they might smell Reality instead of that putrid odor of thier anus. Now while some of the points of intrest do need to be looked at. The tone of those that have an arrogant stance that they feel they have the right to control others reeks of stupidity. I have been off the forums for quite a while keeping my mind wrapped around RL and dealing with the hardships therin. However, this this is simply wrong and as has been stated time and again should have been brought to the publics attention. Whats even sadder is with the "Guidelines" of the forum rules we are unable to directly address specifics without the possiblity of being chastized for assaulting someone. People need to wake up as whats happening RL with our World Leaders is starting to take place right here in our own world of SL with the "Money Power Defacto" thinking they can influence the creators and Leaders of SL. Sad at best. Sincerely, Shadow Weaver Wasn't fabricated. However I never stated or implied I was better than you. If something was said by Anshe I apologize, and although I can't speak for her, if you read the transcripts of the meetings and group IMs we had you would know Anshe doesn't look down on you either. I can't post those without permission however, I hope you understand that and that you take me at my word, but if you don't, there's nothing I will ever post that will change your mind. The goal of the group was not to control others at all. Read the notecard, we want transparency meaning equality for all. At no time did we ask for anything more than other residents could get. I don't know the mechanism that got the meeting approved, but would you turn it down if you had a chance to do what we did? I didn't' think so. Just look t what our goals were and what we actually did when given the opportunity. Ignore the bylines and "editorialism" if you can long enough to see what actually happened. Some of the more reasonable only had an issue with a perceived elitism or personalities, not what we tried to accomplish and what we stated we wanted to accomplish. I only hope that spreads faster than the conspiracy theory. It's more fun to play Rosswell aliens, but look at what was published. Who actually has issues with our mission and how we tried to forward that mission (besides those who think they are entitled to a personalized invite on a doily simply because they exist)? Cool! it really is open enrollement, I'm in! (find>groups>metaverse justice watch>join) I can't wait to share our group's new agenda with our overlords! Finally, we can get rid of you riffraff! I like this key: ! Taco! Can I buy you spoon Taco, because you surely Enjoy Stirring the sh*t He Imed me and told me he was Illuminati nice But without burrito boy i wouldn't even know about this post, so i guess i have to thank his nacho cheesiness seen any good upskirts lately Taco? or did you all forget about that? Are you $ure you want the an$wer to that que$tion? Yeah, triviawhen was the last time I was on the leaderboard? Could the recent GOM situation have scared people to the degree that now they want a seat at the table and thus be protected from it happening to them? It is comical! ![]() ![]() You seem to know everything, answer this smart guy: How does that effect me, a consumer? I don't know, it i$ $ure to confu$e me more. Math ha$ never been one of my $trong point$. But Con$piracy theorie$ are, huh? Again, where i have i stood on the leaderboard? But Lo, you gotta see 'teh funneh' in it - 'Yesterday I invented FIC , now I are one!' Honestly I find this soooo humorous on so many levels.. .just when I'm done laughing my arse off at one part, I see another part that makes me giggle anew. As for 'fuck him' - well I wouldn't subject lil freddy to that kind of hypothermia ![]() (edited) is insane, I really can't defend him Now please quote me where I claimed FIC anything? Go Ahead, the key word is QUOTE! Do you even know what that means "throwing crap at the wall and see what sticks" boy? Indeed, the Linden reaction heartens me. In any case, no, I don't own a shitload of sims, no, I don't pay my current monthly income to LL every month in bills, and I generally don't have much use for in-game money except insofar as I'm a clothes and gadget freak who isn't so hot with texturing and is hot enough to do gadgets, but also lazy. (Sure, I'm a content creator in a minor sense - I do make games and gadgetry and builds of my own... but LL isn't getting but $45 from me, plus, indirectly, another $18 or so due to my involvement in Neualtenburg.) I'm STILL a stakeholder in Second Life; I wish it to remain and grow and expand. You are more invested than me. I pay $25 a month plus my yearly membership. Sure wish it was important enough for you to join us. Sorry you didn't see it as important as I did, otherwise I am sure you would have been there at the town hall and meetings after! ... This meeting was arranged by a group calling themselves the "Metaverse Justice Watch" or the MJW. They claim to be an open group, but at their organizational meeting they specifically said they wanted to keep certain "types" out of the group. They also wanted to request the Lindens remove all "press" from this meeting. Though the voice vote on removing the press appeared to pass they ended up not actually asking the Lindens... <<<< Editorial >>>> EH - If you would be so kind as to drop a note card on me inWorld with the names of the people who voted to remove the press from this meeting I would be very appreciative. Thank you. ![]() I not only initiated the vote, but I voted to remove the press for the very reasons that buzzards like you would take 1 statement from an unorganized group who was granted 1 meeting with Philip which we impressed enough on him, who created this world, to parlay into more meetings to further an agenda that I outright am calling you out to find fault with. You have the contents of the notecard find fault with it oh high and mighty one. My GF Sansarya voted the "press" stay, but I am sure you will tear her up too because she doesn't agree with "I spend 2 mins making a forum post therefore I AM" mentality. You can be a part or cry until your mamma burps you that you weren't at the first meeting, but nothing is stopping you from joining and being part of the next. Or would that sweep the high horse right out from under you? I have joined this group. I am now a stakeholder too! ![]() Great! Welcome! So a friend of mine asks for the name of the group, and then joins. Then he asks when the next meeting is. He is informed that the next meeting is only open to "representatives". It's 14-0 and it's not even halftime yet! GO METAVERSE JUSTICE WATCH TEAM! Let's be honest boy. Your friend TACO asked ME, and he asked when he could hang out with the Lindens too. Or is all this transparency applied to anyone else but you and yours? Join yourself, hack, and vote for a Representative. But if your friend Taco is who you vote for, ask yourself, would you rather accomplish the goals set in the notecard or get an upskirt of Jill? About time you joined! LoL Odd you haven't joined, critic. Those who criticize, can't. Face it and go crying to mamma. "Representatives" of what?????? ![]() 2 in a row. You are vying with Prok for the "I love to hear myself speak" award. Dammit, *I* want to know what dental plan the Linden employees have. ![]() Thank you, a good natured joke in the middle of all this hate. We could use that in the group to lighten things up when Prok pulls out his soapbox There is such sweet irony that Anshe is the spokes person of this group! ![]() Which do you enjoy more, reading your own words or smelling your own farts? The group is easy to Find. 1) Metaverse Justice Watch 2) Anshe Chung Cocoanut Koala Juani Wu Prokofy Neva Shaun Altman Zeppi Schlegel (didn't he quit?) 3) Anshe Chung 4) there are more than 48 members, i won't bother to list them. It maybe interesting to note that they seem to unwilling to promote general members to officer status. The current leadership of this group seems very biased and lacking in general manners (especially when it comes to forum posting). I wonder if I could hold a meeting and get two of the top lindens to attend on short notice... doubtful at best, and I've been around 15% longer than Anshe. I am very grateful that Philip to a strong stance about open information disemination, despite Anshe's instance that she's better and more deserving of special consideration than the rest of us poor plebes. I wonder if the group will be as forthcoming when they receive the requested documentation. Didn't "one of us" request the documentation added to the library? And why weren't YOU at the town hall? I'm tired of you lazy people shifting the blame onto us who try to do something Promote? A group less then a week old needs to worry about promotions? Explain that please. And as far as your capacity, shoot for the stars you may reach it. Aim for the crapper and I bet you do make that too. DO you want to reach the stars or the crapper? Explain why you weren't at the town hall and THEN bitch about who gets promoted. I have transcripts for the 2 meetings after town hall and before the meeting with Philip, and the 1 meeting after. I have no problem releasing transcripts, but I cannot do so unless others allow it. There was considerable debate over stake. Nothing was resolved, but stake equaling investment of time, money, or energy seems to be a factor we all agree on I have no idea what Jill meant by "in good standing," but if you show up once a month, I think you should have less stake then if you are here 3 hours or more a day. Others in the group have different ideas of stake, but my guess is that they wont be sharing it with the bottomfeeders And let me clarify what I mean by bottomfeeders: Those who can't tell what an editorial is. Those who attack a group because of personal feelings of 1 or 2 of its members. Those who don't care enough to do anything but armchair quarterback on the forums. Those that take 1 statement that was made with a language barrier and crucify the efforts and hard work of a whole group. Those who can't be bothered to join, but can complain all day long on the forums. Those who can't, but who criticize those who can. Those who are more interested in smelling thier own farts then giving time for facts, as opposed to editorials Like I said boy, you will look like the fool as the facts come out. Join if you want, do something instead of whining and complaining on your armchair. And I am only one voice who was there. Plenty more made this a success, and I thank them all, even that butt wipe Prok who i disagree with AT LEAST 90% of the time, and Anshe, language issues aside. Aside from her linguistics on the one single solitary statement that you all "do nothings" harp on like you found the holy grail, she spoke what we asked honestly and straightforward. If you bothered to make SL important to you, you would have known about the group. You couldn't be bothered to make town hall so you cry about those of us who could and acted instead of whining on the forums. We did something, succeeded, and even Philip was impressed by the the snowball we started You are faced with 2 choices now, whiners: 1) Sit here and whine on the forums 2) Do something I know it is much harder to actually do and accomplish something, but does that justify your whining if you can't be bothered to try. We may not have gotten the meeting and it would have been a setback, but the fact is our organization, our methods, and our ability to put aside differences for a greater good allowed us to accomplish something And this isn't the end. Philip gave us the ground rules to continue this dialog, and we intend to keep it. Don't like it, join. Won't join, Then STFU because obviously you don't care enough to do anything but smell you own farts. For those of you who waited to here what I had to say, I really truly thank you and will now answer any questions you might have that I am allowed to answer vie the TOS. To those who couldn't wait, since you couldn't give me the courtesy to hear my side, I can't give you the courtesy to indulge your games Think about that. I asked you to let me answer when Taco informed me about this thread, and i had pages to answer. If you couldn't spare me the time to answer, prrofread and spellcheck, why should I spare you the time? One good fart deserves another. And this group does not want to be an in world government Philip it seems, and I have interst If you want a meeting with Philip, help him realize his dream by cultivating an in world government it seems thats what he said in the group I would certainly be willing to help and know of other who would as well, as it is beyong the current group just make sure it has open enrollment and you allow for those of us who disagree with you it just seems really crappy how hard some of us worked on maiking this a win/win for everyone, how much infighting, how much BS from Prok I had to put up with, only to have the vultures on the forums make up thier mind on the universe and creationism based on 1 editorial. _____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours.
http://forums.secondcitizen.com/ |
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
![]() Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
|
09-01-2005 05:45
I'm not jumping on the LL band wagon just yet, as they agree to this bullshit secret meeting to begin with. I find that shit distrubing.
_____________________
|
Tang Lightcloud
Sweet & Juicy
![]() Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 377
|
Huh?
09-01-2005 05:46
What I find hypocritical is that Profoky Neva was in attendance doing the very thing he so blantaly accused the "FIC" of doing. By his own definition, this appears to be very FICish: secret meeting held with Lindens to pursue special favors for a select group. He has gained notority over the past 6 months by running his mouth long and hard--- and that now is what qualifys him to have the "Linden ear", oh yes and he is a stake holder.
I wonder if me and my friends held a meeting to discuss our concerns with the metaverse --- the platform --- if any Lindens would show up? Im a stake holder. However, I guess my kung fu is not as good as you kung fu? Maybe your righ Pham, maybe Phillip himself is spending hours throughout the week showing up at the mere requests of his peasants having private meetings. Think Ill schedule one tonight with Phillip and Linden staff to discuss the merits of my Anal Bleaching table . . . its be soooo overlooked. ![]() |
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
![]() Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
|
09-01-2005 05:51
Yes! Yes! this is just the kind of person we should have representing us! No shit Kris, jebus wtf. I have to say I am suprized by the list of officers to say the least. _____________________
|
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
![]() Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
|
09-01-2005 05:53
Prok is insane, I really can't defend him Now please quote me where I claimed FIC anything? Go Ahead, the key word is QUOTE! Do you even know what that means "throwing crap at the wall and see what sticks" boy? . Certainly zygot, just as soon as you quote... key word is QUOTE here, boy, where I attributed that to you... child... are we done yet... infant? I'd like to see your QUOTE there 'glint in the milkmans eye'.. My comment is toward Prokofy himself and her innane ramblings of the shadowy 'FIC' which she is now trying to start... So why not go lick that crappy wall clean fool? Siggy. PS. your such an eloquent spokesperson for this group.. please continue to post, frequently and often ![]() _____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread |
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
![]() Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
|
09-01-2005 05:53
What I find hypocritical is that Profoky Neva was in attendance doing the very thing he so blantaly accused the "FIC" of doing. By his own definition, this appears to be very FICish: secret meeting held with Lindens to pursue special favors for a select group. He has gained notority over the past 6 months by running his mouth long and hard--- and that now is what qualifys him to have the "Linden ear", oh yes and he is a stake holder. I wonder if me and my friends held a meeting to discuss our concerns with the metaverse --- the platform --- if any Lindens would show up? Im a stake holder. However, I guess my kung fu is not as good as you kung fu? Maybe your righ Pham, maybe Phillip himself is spending hours throughout the week showing up at the mere requests of his peasants having private meetings. Think Ill schedule one tonight with Phillip and Linden staff to discuss the merits of my Anal Bleaching table . . . its be soooo overlooked. ![]() I hear ya Tang! jebus crips _____________________
|
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
|
09-01-2005 05:54
it just seems really crappy how hard some of us worked on maiking this a win/win for everyone, how much infighting, how much BS from Prok I had to put up with, only to have the vultures on the forums make up thier mind on the universe and creationism based on 1 editorial. Apologies for my language. You did a shit job. A really shit job. The fact you had a group, or any meetings with the Lindens, was a surprise to everyone. That fact alone makes this whole group thing a win for nobody but yourselves. |
Malachi Petunia
Gentle Miscreant
![]() Join date: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
|
09-01-2005 05:54
I just want to know how much tier I have to buy to sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom
![]() |
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
![]() Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
|
09-01-2005 05:56
Anyone who was in the group was informed when and where the meetings were. No one was chosen to attend because we were a small enough group to fit on a sim. Logistically, next time we do this, everyone won't be able to attend, we will have to pick representatives, as the group will be too large to sit in 1 sim to "hang out with philip" vote for and nominate the reps. Its OPEN ENROLLMENT We took it upon ourselves to do something and Philip agreed we were off to the right start to getting something done. Join us and elect who you want if you don't agree with the choices that were made. And if you disagree with what was agreed upon in the notecard, please tell me. Right here in the forum. What part do you object to and why? You don't have to , you could join the group vote. But that requires more than 4 sentences in a forum. You think you can commit that much, or is that it? If that is all the "stake" you are willing to invest, then that is the extent of your participation. Editorial isn't' as concerned with facts as with sensationalism He made his name before he gets what he gets for violating the TOS. As far as the 2 you speak of, I most often disagree with 1 of them and am apathetic at best. We agree on a common cause. Should I switch my opinion based on who agrees with me? If could be financial or it could be Philip knows he had to answer for a decision he made. It could be another thing, but when fate deals you a nice hand do you complain or seize the day? Certainly Prok and Anshe have a lot of financial "stake" here, but I don't think personally they would bail on SL and kill the cash cow over GOM, do you? That hand would be too high "stakes" of a hand for any of them to play, don't you think? Do you even know of the major issues behind why we want to know LLs internal policies? Search the forums, a Linden DJed an inworld event and another modeled for a residents store. We , as a group, feel that the last name Linden on an avatar is equivalent of a "Uniform" on a police officer. In other words they should be acting in an official capacity of the LL, not for 1 resident. That equals a conflict of interest or an unfair advantage. If they won't do it for everyone, why should they be allowed to do it for 1 or 2 select friends? If you find fault with that logic please tell me why? And if your answer is they should be able to enjoy SL too; we agree. But they should do so as a player without the benefit of a Linden last name, and their alt should not be associated with their Linden name at all. They should just be a regular player, NOT a Linden. Explain yourself then, what is the problem with this? Tell me what business encourages conflict of interest (besides national government). Here Here, i agree. the problem is typing faster than him. He is a fast dood. I can out talk and out logic about anyone but his speed on the keys often boggles my mind. If you can do it, and out logic him, and shut him up, ill give you $L500. I haven't seen it done yet, he gets off too much on the argument himself to ever shut up and give an inch. We don't represent Prok and he doesn't represent us. Can I make it any more clear without violating the open enrollment thing? 1) Metaverse Justice Watch 2) Look it up 3) Not sure myself, but i agree with the "Mission Statement" found in the notecard 4) Look it up lazy ass Those of us who don't represent the barons have EQUAL say as the barons. Something to think about before some of you cast stones, no? Confirmed The town hall limits questions to one per resident, thereby eliminating follow ups. The forum we requested and received allowed us follow up through a representative. Aside from the comments Anshe made that may seem elitist, she DID speak for the group and we not only approved but applauded her on speaking the agenda and focusing on what the group requested. As successful as Anshe is, she was basically put in a very intimidating position of speaking to the CEO of a major company (not to mention what he has accomplished through the real player platform) and I am sure she was nervous. I can't really excuse the choice of words she used except to think about what she was trying to say that language made difficult. Do you think she said consumer in a bad way? If so i can publish the chat transcript where i asked if I was invited because I was a consumer not producer and she assured me it was for anyone, not just the elite. Should I be condemned because I agree with the land barons on certain issues (which you would know about if you were a part of it)? If she come on this forum and grants permission for me to do so I will. But with out her doing so I will be violating the same TOS rules as Editorial did printing this, which I won't do because I value being here and am not hiding. This is me. I have 1 alt. You can find it if you are a good detective, but I am not gonna just volunteer it. I love Sl, and thats my "stake" in this. I ask anshe to not only give her permission to publish what she said when I asked if I Was invited as a mere consumer, but anything else she said in the 2 meetings I attended prior to the philip meeting and the 1 meeting post. I think some of you would be surprised. I did record every log, but with out the permission of every resident who attended and spoke, i cannot publish it. If I could do so, as Editorial has felt the need to do violating the TOS, I'm sure you wouldn't be as suspicious as some of you apparently are now. To be honest forthright and fair, I haven't read the forum post you mentioned, but I'm sure you will all see I have more than enough on my plate answering these paranoid baseless allegations ATM. I hope to read it soon and comment. Did you attend the town hall with Philip? If the answer is no, what the hell did you expect, a personal invitation on a monogrammed doily? Wasn't fabricated. However I never stated or implied I was better than you. If something was said by Anshe I apologize, and although I can't speak for her, if you read the transcripts of the meetings and group IMs we had you would know Anshe doesn't look down on you either. I can't post those without permission however, I hope you understand that and that you take me at my word, but if you don't, there's nothing I will ever post that will change your mind. The goal of the group was not to control others at all. Read the notecard, we want transparency meaning equality for all. At no time did we ask for anything more than other residents could get. I don't know the mechanism that got the meeting approved, but would you turn it down if you had a chance to do what we did? I didn't' think so. Just look t what our goals were and what we actually did when given the opportunity. Ignore the bylines and "editorialism" if you can long enough to see what actually happened. Some of the more reasonable only had an issue with a perceived elitism or personalities, not what we tried to accomplish and what we stated we wanted to accomplish. I only hope that spreads faster than the conspiracy theory. It's more fun to play Rosswell aliens, but look at what was published. Who actually has issues with our mission and how we tried to forward that mission (besides those who think they are entitled to a personalized invite on a doily simply because they exist)? Can I buy you spoon Taco, because you surely Enjoy Stirring the sh*t He Imed me and told me he was Illuminati nice But without burrito boy i wouldn't even know about this post, so i guess i have to thank his nacho cheesiness seen any good upskirts lately Taco? or did you all forget about that? Yeah, triviawhen was the last time I was on the leaderboard? You seem to know everything, answer this smart guy: How does that effect me, a consumer? But Con$piracy theorie$ are, huh? Again, where i have i stood on the leaderboard? Prok is insane, I really can't defend him Now please quote me where I claimed FIC anything? Go Ahead, the key word is QUOTE! Do you even know what that means "throwing crap at the wall and see what sticks" boy? You are more invested than me. I pay $25 a month plus my yearly membership. Sure wish it was important enough for you to join us. Sorry you didn't see it as important as I did, otherwise I am sure you would have been there at the town hall and meetings after! I not only initiated the vote, but I voted to remove the press for the very reasons that buzzards like you would take 1 statement from an unorganized group who was granted 1 meeting with Philip which we impressed enough on him, who created this world, to parlay into more meetings to further an agenda that I outright am calling you out to find fault with. You have the contents of the notecard find fault with it oh high and mighty one. My GF Sansarya voted the "press" stay, but I am sure you will tear her up too because she doesn't agree with "I spend 2 mins making a forum post therefore I AM" mentality. You can be a part or cry until your mamma burps you that you weren't at the first meeting, but nothing is stopping you from joining and being part of the next. Or would that sweep the high horse right out from under you? Great! Welcome! Let's be honest boy. Your friend TACO asked ME, and he asked when he could hang out with the Lindens too. Or is all this transparency applied to anyone else but you and yours? Join yourself, hack, and vote for a Representative. But if your friend Taco is who you vote for, ask yourself, would you rather accomplish the goals set in the notecard or get an upskirt of Jill? Odd you haven't joined, critic. Those who criticize, can't. Face it and go crying to mamma. 2 in a row. You are vying with Prok for the "I love to hear myself speak" award. Thank you, a good natured joke in the middle of all this hate. We could use that in the group to lighten things up when Prok pulls out his soapbox Which do you enjoy more, reading your own words or smelling your own farts? Didn't "one of us" request the documentation added to the library? And why weren't YOU at the town hall? I'm tired of you lazy people shifting the blame onto us who try to do something Promote? A group less then a week old needs to worry about promotions? Explain that please. And as far as your capacity, shoot for the stars you may reach it. Aim for the crapper and I bet you do make that too. DO you want to reach the stars or the crapper? Explain why you weren't at the town hall and THEN bitch about who gets promoted. I have transcripts for the 2 meetings after town hall and before the meeting with Philip, and the 1 meeting after. I have no problem releasing transcripts, but I cannot do so unless others allow it. There was considerable debate over stake. Nothing was resolved, but stake equaling investment of time, money, or energy seems to be a factor we all agree on I have no idea what Jill meant by "in good standing," but if you show up once a month, I think you should have less stake then if you are here 3 hours or more a day. Others in the group have different ideas of stake, but my guess is that they wont be sharing it with the bottomfeeders And let me clarify what I mean by bottomfeeders: Those who can't tell what an editorial is. Those who attack a group because of personal feelings of 1 or 2 of its members. Those who don't care enough to do anything but armchair quarterback on the forums. Those that take 1 statement that was made with a language barrier and crucify the efforts and hard work of a whole group. Those who can't be bothered to join, but can complain all day long on the forums. Those who can't, but who criticize those who can. Those who are more interested in smelling thier own farts then giving time for facts, as opposed to editorials Like I said boy, you will look like the fool as the facts come out. Join if you want, do something instead of whining and complaining on your armchair. And I am only one voice who was there. Plenty more made this a success, and I thank them all, even that butt wipe Prok who i disagree with AT LEAST 90% of the time, and Anshe, language issues aside. Aside from her linguistics on the one single solitary statement that you all "do nothings" harp on like you found the holy grail, she spoke what we asked honestly and straightforward. If you bothered to make SL important to you, you would have known about the group. You couldn't be bothered to make town hall so you cry about those of us who could and acted instead of whining on the forums. We did something, succeeded, and even Philip was impressed by the the snowball we started You are faced with 2 choices now, whiners: 1) Sit here and whine on the forums 2) Do something I know it is much harder to actually do and accomplish something, but does that justify your whining if you can't be bothered to try. We may not have gotten the meeting and it would have been a setback, but the fact is our organization, our methods, and our ability to put aside differences for a greater good allowed us to accomplish something And this isn't the end. Philip gave us the ground rules to continue this dialog, and we intend to keep it. Don't like it, join. Won't join, Then STFU because obviously you don't care enough to do anything but smell you own farts. For those of you who waited to here what I had to say, I really truly thank you and will now answer any questions you might have that I am allowed to answer vie the TOS. To those who couldn't wait, since you couldn't give me the courtesy to hear my side, I can't give you the courtesy to indulge your games Think about that. I asked you to let me answer when Taco informed me about this thread, and i had pages to answer. If you couldn't spare me the time to answer, prrofread and spellcheck, why should I spare you the time? One good fart deserves another. And this group does not want to be an in world government Philip it seems, and I have interst If you want a meeting with Philip, help him realize his dream by cultivating an in world government it seems thats what he said in the group I would certainly be willing to help and know of other who would as well, as it is beyong the current group just make sure it has open enrollment and you allow for those of us who disagree with you it just seems really crappy how hard some of us worked on maiking this a win/win for everyone, how much infighting, how much BS from Prok I had to put up with, only to have the vultures on the forums make up thier mind on the universe and creationism based on 1 editorial. Wow bad English, rude responses and general bad taste. Nice spokesman. Speaks volumes for this group indeed. _____________________
|
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
|
09-01-2005 05:59
hmmm boycott there products land and services and they are non-stakeholders? hehe hehe.. Where is Ulrika when you need her! ![]() I swear I feel like the past year did not happen. To think, people were afraid of little ole Neualtenburg back in the day. ![]() Neualtenburg citizens very much have a stake in SL. And our government experiment and artisit guild are just two things we do to see what works in an online world. But the group as a whole would NEVER push our project and our government practices on the rest of SL. Only those who want to be governed by our system, and on our land, are the ones that have to deal with Neualtenburg. A group like the MJW should not only be voluntary to join, it would also need for SL residents to voluntary allow this group to speak for us. And I don't think that is going to happen with *every* SL resident. I know for a fact there are people in that group that don't even think like me, much less would I let them speak for me. I'm not saying I disagree with all the requests of the group. But personally, we each as individuals already have the ears of the Lindens, and we have all the tools we need to speak with them. Open town hall meetings with residents and Lindens are great. Specific topics thought of by residents to talk about, great too! But I don't think there needs to be a specific group for this to happen. At least not a group that could have the potiential to affect SL as whole. _____________________
*hugs everyone*
|
Catherine Cotton
Tis Elfin
![]() Join date: 2 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,001
|
09-01-2005 06:05
FUCK gov't in SL.
_____________________
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
![]() Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
09-01-2005 06:05
2nd off, say goodbye to Editorial because he posted a chat log of MINE in which I gave no permission, against TOS. I have a background in media, and am a hearty advocate of freedom of the press, but there was a reason I didn't want the media there and you are looking at it. LOLOLOL. And thats right about where I stopped reading. The thread title is so apt ![]() |
Jsecure Hanks
Capitalist
Join date: 9 Dec 2003
Posts: 1,451
|
09-01-2005 06:07
Excellent, welcome back Kris, I missed you
![]() |