Please have a backbone, Linden Lab
|
|
Meilian Shang
crass and pornographic
Join date: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 242
|
04-02-2005 18:52
From: Clarence Calliope My point? Don't rely on "government" to do your dirty work for you. The power of arbitration is an incredible responsibility and should only be used when absolutely necessary. Is that power necessary here? I don't think that matters, because you - the players - already have the power to get rid of these clowns. Use it. In other words, we should encourage LL to ignore its own TOS and turn SL into a free-for-all, totally eschewing its stated community goal of a peaceful, tolerant environment? Sorry, that's not what I want to pay LL for. I get enough of that in RL thank you, without paying extra.
|
|
Clarence Calliope
Registered User
Join date: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 4
|
04-02-2005 19:08
From: Meilian Shang In other words, we should encourage LL to ignore its own TOS and turn SL into a free-for-all, totally eschewing its stated community goal of a peaceful, tolerant environment?
Sorry, that's not what I want to pay LL for. I get enough of that in RL thank you, without paying extra. Maybe it's just me, but 14 pages of a thread about this matter alone (and I'm sure this is neither the first thread of its kind nor the last) would suggest that you AREN'T getting what you "want" to pay LL for, and that at this rate, you probably never will.
|
|
Neal Stewart
Registered User
Join date: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 48
|
04-02-2005 19:54
From: Clarence Calliope Why is everyone afraid of these people? Why does LL need to step in for them to be dealt with?
[...]
My point? Don't rely on "government" to do your dirty work for you. The power of arbitration is an incredible responsibility and should only be used when absolutely necessary. Is that power necessary here? I don't think that matters, because you - the players - already have the power to get rid of these clowns. Use it. I agree with some of your points here Clarence and have presented some arguments earlier in the thread. Another issue that Cristiano raised though in his initial post is that apparently Linden Labs are not responding adequately to RL death-threats. Admittedly there are some difficulties with establishing these in SL. For example, if someone says, "I'm going to hack your SL account, find out where you live and then come and kill you and your family with a ball-peen hammer" that's a pretty clear RL death-threat. But if they say something more vague like, "I'm going to shoot you in the face, SLNickname" it could be interpreted as an RL or SL threat. In any case, although there are many free-speech advocates in SL - like myself - I haven't yet heard any resident say that Linden Labs should cast a blind eye to RL death-threats. And if LL are responding inadequately to those, as Cristiano claims, that is a problem that needs to be looked at. -- Neal Stewart
|
|
Stephen Grayson
Transavatar Fyborg.
Join date: 23 May 2004
Posts: 108
|
04-03-2005 03:21
I don't want LL to have a backbone, I want them to have a cranium. There's a difference between griefers and intelligent mischeifemakers. I had quite good fun yesterday teleporting a greedy club owner into a cage (With the teleport message "I have a LOT of money for you!"  before interrogating them and convincing them that i would blow up the club. I believe that this type of behaviour adds "flavour" to Second Life, and mischeif with no malicious intent is, well, not malicious! As for political stuff, I don't think it should be thought about too much. But I don't want it to be a taboo subject. *Note: It is important to remember that the club owner ACCEPTED the teleport and eventually saw what I was doing and started to laugh.
_____________________
"Shut The <SOMETHING> Up  "- Ryen Jade
|
|
Stig Olafson
Lemmy stole my sideburns.
Join date: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 84
|
04-03-2005 11:24
From: Buster Peel When you talk about evil, you are talking about an abstract morality concept. "Evil" can't be defined without also defining "good", and both concepts are value judgements.
There are evil things that everyone agrees are evil, and good things that everyone agrees are good. Betwixt there is an ocean of gray. Personally, I think zelous imposition of ones own morals on others is evil. (Hence, my disdain for Theocracy.) I am asuming that you agree that racism and national-socialism fall squarely into the category that we can agree should be labelled "evil". If so, then we agree. If not, then why not? I'm not going to get dragged into a philisophical argument on what is good and what is evil, but there are acts and ideologies that will cause harm without caring that they do so (or even revelling in it), as this is essential to their very existance. Such acts and ideologies may safely be considered evil, without any need to go anywhere near the grey are, I reckon.
_____________________
There is no right time, there is only now.
|
|
Bruno Buckenburger
Registered User
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 464
|
04-04-2005 14:29
From: Buster Peel Who gets to define "evil"? ...
When you talk about evil, you are talking about an abstract morality concept. "Evil" can't be defined without also defining "good", and both concepts are value judgements.
...
If you say "some repression is good and other repression is bad", you are putting a few individual people in charge of defining good and evil for everybody. That's OK for everyone who agrees with those people, but, as they say, power corrupts. The bullwork that is supposed to protect everyone from evil is inevitably coopted and applied corruptly.
Buster Right on, Buster!
|
|
Bruno Buckenburger
Registered User
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 464
|
04-04-2005 14:33
From: Neal Stewart I agree with some of your points here Clarence and have presented some arguments earlier in the thread. Another issue that Cristiano raised though in his initial post is that apparently Linden Labs are not responding adequately to RL death-threats.
-- Neal Stewart Neal, I would contend that LL is not responding adequately to Cristiano and that is his real beef. Until otherwise told, I am content with letting SL deal with these issues as they see fit. Since some of these related to threats may involve criminal matters, no one should be reading a play-by-play as to what is going on through the forums.
|
|
Bruno Buckenburger
Registered User
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 464
|
04-04-2005 14:34
From: Stephen Grayson I had quite good fun yesterday teleporting a greedy club owner into a cage (With the teleport message "I have a LOT of money for you!"  before interrogating them and convincing them that i would blow up the club. Hella cool, Stephen 
|
|
Barmovic Boffin
Registered User
Join date: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 87
|
04-07-2005 08:45
From: Cristiano Midnight Again, you can divert this all you want. This is about enforcement of existing policies, as defined by Linden Lab. I guess there are two ways of looking at forum threads, Cristiano. I tend to think of them as constructive conversations between people, which may range around the original topic. Maybe you think of them as precisely focussed responses to the first poster, which can be chastised for moving away from what he intended. I don't think the first poster owns a thread, or can be the judge of what is a "diversion". Perhaps others disagree ? In my opinion, in any discussion of the degree of stringency LL should apply in exercising control, the topics of value judgements, morality, freedom of speech and action, must inevitably arise and are not sufficiently offtopic to be squashed. You may remember an earlier post pointing out how the issue of disciplining harrassers was being confused with the issue of free speech. In my opinion it is fine for us to discuss both here. Indeed, it may be important. Because keeping them separate, and understanding the difference between them, is a critical matter. I'm sure EVERYONE here supports strong action against those who persecute others. Surely that is so obvious, its almost trivial to discuss, and I HAVENT SEEN A SINGLE POST HERE DISAGREEING. What people take issue with, is some posters muddying the water by trying to use this as an excuse to ask for increased intolerance against people with views different from their own. People who keep themselves to themselves, and interfere with no-one.
|
|
Fiorella Rocco
Registered User
Join date: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 14
|
Under Attack
04-11-2005 22:40
Happens to be that my club was bombed twice tonight. Once by c4 and the second time by a rocket. Both times the club was wiped out and all of the guests were thrown all over the sim.
I wrote reports about these people and so did all of the witnesses. Several people identified the bombers. I HOPE Linden Labs bans these folks forever...including their credit cards!
|
|
Merwan Marker
Booring...
Join date: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,706
|
04-12-2005 07:34
From: Fiorella Rocco Happens to be that my club was bombed twice tonight. Once by c4 and the second time by a rocket. Both times the club was wiped out and all of the guests were thrown all over the sim.
I wrote reports about these people and so did all of the witnesses. Several people identified the bombers. I HOPE Linden Labs bans these folks forever...including their credit cards! Sorry this happened to you Fiorella. If you haven't already, please vote at the thread in my tag-line below. Maybe eventually there will be enough of an impact for LL to change. Who would of thought something as basic as having the will to deal with intolerance would become an issue with them? 
_____________________
Don't Worry, Be Happy - Meher Baba
|
|
David Cartier
Registered User
Join date: 8 Jun 2003
Posts: 1,018
|
04-12-2005 08:42
From: Stig Olafson I am asuming that you agree that racism and national-socialism fall squarely into the category that we can agree should be labelled "evil". If so, then we agree. If not, then why not? National Socialism is just another political system, and not all that evil, really. It was actually pretty successful until Hitler started throwing all the butter money into guns, after skimming all the cream off the top. Workers' rights, retirement benefits and protection of the environment were all important issues in Germany during the thirties. Most of the economic recovery programs followed in the US during the depression were copies of things being done in Germany and other national-socialist nations.
|
|
David Cartier
Registered User
Join date: 8 Jun 2003
Posts: 1,018
|
04-12-2005 08:55
From: Barmovic Boffin I don't want to rub salt in the wounds of any US citizens here who are truly concerned for human rights and free speech, and I don't want to start a political bust-up, but let me just say that the long post about freedoms being based on the "american way" grated badly in my mind. From the European perspective Guantanomo bay lost americans the right to think of themselves like that. Its sad, but its true for us.
I kinow this isn't the place to discuss such things. All I'm asking is that you be a little more sensitive to world affairs and the presence on the forums of substantial numbers of non-americans. Such blatant and inappropriate self-congratulation just makes us think you don't know what is going on. Funny, I don't judge French or Romanian friends by the fact that their governments rounded up and assisted in the wholesale slaughter of their Jewish populations, or the mass murders that the French committed in Vietnam and North Africa in a vain attempt to hang on to their colonies. I don't judge Brits for the beastly way they continue to carry on in Northern Ireland or the fact that they brutally murdered millions of people in their own colonies. You can say what you like about the things that go on in Guantanamo, but they do seem to have stopped terrorist attacks in the US, which I consider to be worth any price. We demand our government keep us safe. Sometimes that safety carries an ugly pricetag.
|
|
Azrazael Faddoul
Registered User
Join date: 8 Apr 2005
Posts: 2
|
04-12-2005 15:12
From: someone in the form of cross burnings lol that one really got ya huh?
|
|
Maxi Manray
Registered User
Join date: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 4
|
04-12-2005 22:03
well i see fiorella has already posted here to let linden labs know that we are upset about this.
what fio failed to mention was that this also destroyed property ruining several animated items and totally losing some others. guess what? one of the people responsible for the attack is logged in tonight enjoying herself while fiorella is having to replace the lost and broken things which do equal real life money for her. this person got told to not do that again and gets to go on their merry way while fiorella has to replace about 15 real dollars worth of items for the club that she owns. its not right and i hope that maybe the lindens will grow some balls and do something instead of patting these people on the butt asking them nicely to not do things they know they shouldnt do in the first place.
im pissed off.
|