Lindens - is this *really* how you want things to be?
|
|
zaire Hansen
Registered User
Join date: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
04-03-2006 01:22
i am some what new here, and i dont agree with cencership. but i could see it comeing lits face it the flamming was getting hateful and hurtful. I have been in lot of game forums and there is allwas flamming but never have i seen it as hateful and hurtful as i have on this forum. i could be wrong but i bet thay are cracking down to stop the hateful and hurtful flaming. If i am wrong it well not have been the first time lol
|
|
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
04-03-2006 03:10
From: Satu Moreau Selador, the truth is of the matter, the Anshe banned thread was a matter that was between her and LL and only her and LL. She chose to air dirty laundry and spread her own account information, something that's not supposed to be done anywhere, much less the forums. I'm really not surprised it was taken down. The Anshe thread - although as I recall I don't think I specifically mentioned that - was of general interest once the first posting appeared. Whether or not that first posting was justified, once it had appeared the thread became of general public interest. A very large number of residents depend on Anshe's empire, and anything that threatened that was of immediate interest to them. Therefore I don't think the thread should have been removed, despite the appallingly bad behaviour of most of the people who contributed to it. This, to me, is a perfect example of why interfering in forums is a bad idea.
|
|
Spinner Poutine
Still rezzin or am I
Join date: 28 Oct 2005
Posts: 583
|
04-03-2006 03:14
Why the moving and locking anyway? If you don't like it, don't read it! If I start reading a thread that bothers me in whatever way, instead of responding, I just go to the next thread. It's as simple as that. Course I think some folks need the drama of it all I guess
_____________________
Can't we all just get along? Doughnuts,err Pie, for everyone 
|
|
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
04-03-2006 03:36
From: Tren Neva When you're in a forum, it's not a matter of real life vs non-real lifeness like a movie or a video game. You are having conversations just like you would have in real life, just using the internet as a tool to do so instead. All social standards apply to the forums just like they would in real life, and when you start saying things that would get you beat in real life on the forums, you should be beat in real life. I meant to comment on this in the other thread on the subject, but it had been closed by the ResMods. *deep sigh*. I think what the original poster was trying to say, but which he expressed badly, was that we should be held accountable for our forum behaviour in the same way we are in real life. That in real life if we insult someone to their face we can expect a punch on the nose; if we do it in the forums, we can get away with it. And the more ineffectual among us use this as an opportunity to attack and bully others, knowing that there will be no comeback. In that sense, I agree with him.
|
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
04-03-2006 03:49
From: Tren Neva When you're in a forum, it's not a matter of real life vs non-real lifeness like a movie or a video game. You are having conversations just like you would have in real life, just using the internet as a tool to do so instead. All social standards apply to the forums just like they would in real life, and when you start saying things that would get you beat in real life on the forums, you should be beat in real life. this is wishful thinking. there are a lot of non-real participants on this forum. some are only half real. the forums are a game as well. were they a forum on stamp collecting or overclocking your pc, then i would agree with you. however this is vbulletin support for a fantasy world of barbies, kens and space rangers and their twisted poseball escapades. no social standards apply because every one is doing their best to not be themselves. resmods are part of the game. by volunteering as resmods they've painted giant bullseyes on their forehead for the rest of us to point our popguns at.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 03:51
From: Jauani Wu this is wishful thinking. there are a lot of non-real participants on this forum. some are only half real. the forums are a game as well. were they a forum on stamp collecting or overclocking your pc, then i would agree with you. however this is vbulletin support for a fantasy world of barbies, kens and space rangers and their twisted poseball escapades. no social standards apply because every one is doing their best to not be themselves.
resmods are part of the game. by volunteering as resmods they've painted giant bullseyes on their forehead for the rest of us to point our popguns at. 100% agreed (except you left out Ninjas and pirates!)
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
Satu Moreau
Seldom seen ***** phantom
Join date: 22 Nov 2004
Posts: 65
|
04-03-2006 04:06
From: Selador Cellardoor The Anshe thread - although as I recall I don't think I specifically mentioned that - was of general interest once the first posting appeared. Whether or not that first posting was justified, once it had appeared the thread became of general public interest. A very large number of residents depend on Anshe's empire, and anything that threatened that was of immediate interest to them.
Therefore I don't think the thread should have been removed, despite the appallingly bad behaviour of most of the people who contributed to it.
This, to me, is a perfect example of why interfering in forums is a bad idea. I understand it was a concern to her residents, but something like that should have been handled more discreetly, not the big stink raised about it. She could have simply come on the boards and said that there was currently difficulty with billing and so she might not be around for a few days or so. Something like that would have been sufficient, but she goes and blows a big hole wide open and endangers her own business. Not very prudent I'd think... Anyways, I'm trailing off topic.
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 13:44
From: Satu Moreau I understand it was a concern to her residents, but something like that should have been handled more discreetly, not the big stink raised about it. She could have simply come on the boards and said that there was currently difficulty with billing and so she might not be around for a few days or so. Something like that would have been sufficient, but she goes and blows a big hole wide open and endangers her own business. Not very prudent I'd think... Anyways, I'm trailing off topic. yes, it should be 100% acceptable for an inworld personality as large and as powerful as her (whose actions effect so many) to announce absence from the game and maybe prove that the alt is indeed here and can handle customer support until the main got the problems worked out and as ridiculous as her posts were, there was absolutly no doubt that she was who she said she was, not an alt
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-03-2006 16:38
From: Selador Cellardoor The Anshe thread - although as I recall I don't think I specifically mentioned that - was of general interest once the first posting appeared. Whether or not that first posting was justified, once it had appeared the thread became of general public interest. A very large number of residents depend on Anshe's empire, and anything that threatened that was of immediate interest to them. Therefore I don't think the thread should have been removed, despite the appallingly bad behaviour of most of the people who contributed to it. This, to me, is a perfect example of why interfering in forums is a bad idea. i dissagree if she had come on and announced that due to a book keeping error she would be unavailable over the weekend but her alt would be availabe that would have been of general interest. To come on, in direct violation of the TOS to attack LL's disciplinary policy and to air her dirty laundry was not of general interest to anybody we did not need to know why she was unavailble, or to her her demands for a apolgy again who's buisness was that? i for one am glad to see some sort of policeing here the uncivil behavior is tireing
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 16:42
From: stpaulsub Clio i dissagree if she had come on and announced that due to a book keeping error she would be unavailable over the weekend but her alt would be availabe that would have been of general interest. To come on, in direct violation of the TOS to attack LL's disciplinary policy and to air her dirty laundry was not of general interest to anybody we did not need to know why she was unavailble, or to her her demands for a apolgy again who's buisness was that? without the typical hysterics and threats, how would anyone have known the alt was really her?
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
04-03-2006 16:45
I think the question is... Should any of us be able to come on and say "Hey, LL banned me for not paying my bill."? That is what occurred. I don't care how much money the poster is worth, that IS what occurred. Is it okay for 1 poster, but not for the rest? Should we all be able to air our billing complaints? Please, please don't tell me that some of you "equality for all" people are actually suggesting it should be okay for some, but not for others.
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs Gallinas
|
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-03-2006 16:47
From: Mulch Ennui yes, it should be 100% acceptable for an inworld personality as large and as powerful as her (whose actions effect so many) to announce absence from the game and maybe prove that the alt is indeed here and can handle customer support until the main got the problems worked out and as ridiculous as her posts were, there was absolutly no doubt that she was who she said she was, not an alt The simple truth is, had she not rasied a stink there is avery good chance that very few people would have even noticed she was gone for teh weekend and for teh vast majority of SL residents her absence was of no real consequence, and a large number of posts to her thread were nothing but gloats where was the community interest served there? and as i said before had she just said her Alt would be handleing buisness til further notice, he rthread would not have been closed. there is no reason we cannot act like the educated adults we all are supposed to be and not like a swarm of dermestid beetles falling on a dead deer
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 16:48
From: Jonquille Noir I think the question is... Should any of us be able to come on and say "Hey, LL banned me for not paying my bill."? That is what occurred. I don't care how much money the poster is worth, that IS what occurred. Is it okay for 1 poster, but not for the rest? Should we all be able to air our billing complaints? Please, please don't tell me that some of you "equality for all" people are actually suggesting it should be okay for some, but not for others. i just think this case warrents it because if she defaulted, the effects would be substantial to uninvolved parties this is not me not being available to give someone a ride on the roller coaster, this is potential to lock people out of land they beleive they own this is the risk when LL is in charge of regulating all transactions and property
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-03-2006 16:51
From: Mulch Ennui without the typical hysterics and threats, how would anyone have known the alt was really her? who cares? a simple search in world would show that the primary was gone and the alt was there takin messages tadaaa and if you cannot get in world it really is of no interest
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-03-2006 16:54
From: Mulch Ennui i just think this case warrents it because if she defaulted, the effects would be substantial to uninvolved parties this is not me not being available to give someone a ride on the roller coaster, this is potential to lock people out of land they beleive they own this is the risk when LL is in charge of regulating all transactions and property i do not understand your logic? how does any of this relate to her violation of TOS? all she had to do was say contact my Alt and it would have been all ok so No it is not ok no matter what teh fall out might have been
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 16:56
From: stpaulsub Clio i do not understand your logic? how does any of this relate to her violation of TOS? all she had to do was say contact my Alt and it would have been all ok so No it is not ok no matter what teh fall out might have been i agree she acted like an ass and I have done the same thing, only without the threats and more to the point, without the thread being locked
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
stpaulsub Clio
Fear the Bubblegum Gurl!
Join date: 2 Sep 2004
Posts: 607
|
04-03-2006 17:03
ohh fine be that way! agree with me! dang it! now what am i sposed to say!?!? hugggz
_____________________
From: someone David Valentino: I think I just like to play with the balls
|
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
04-03-2006 17:05
From: Mulch Ennui i just think this case warrents it because if she defaulted, the effects would be substantial to uninvolved parties this is not me not being available to give someone a ride on the roller coaster, this is potential to lock people out of land they beleive they own this is the risk when LL is in charge of regulating all transactions and property This is the price of not paying your bills when they come due. It's the price of business. Should the rules be different for her? That's really all that needs to be aswered. Should the rules be different for her than for me, or for you, or for any one of us that doesn't pay the dues they KNOW it costs to do business here? For whom, exactly, should the rules not apply to?
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs Gallinas
|
|
Sansarya Caligari
BLEH!
Join date: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,206
|
04-03-2006 17:11
From: Jonquille Noir This is the price of not paying your bills when they come due. It's the price of business. Should the rules be different for her? That's really all that needs to be aswered. Should the rules be different for her than for me, or for you, or for any one of us that doesn't pay the dues they KNOW it costs to do business here? For whom, exactly, should the rules not apply to? I think this raises an interesting question, which is: What do renters or citizens of communities owned by one person do when that person cannot pay the bill? How does Linden Lab help those customers, if at all? Kind of risky to be one of those who are paying tier to an entity other than LL.
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 17:12
From: Jonquille Noir This is the price of not paying your bills when they come due. It's the price of business. Should the rules be different for her? That's really all that needs to be aswered. Should the rules be different for her than for me, or for you, or for any one of us that doesn't pay the dues they KNOW it costs to do business here? For whom, exactly, should the rules not apply to? i hear you i just think since so many people are effected by her possible liquidation that is should be the very rare exception; not because she pays them so much money, but because of the volume of people who are invested in her (the people who live on land she pays tier for) any problems anshe has with the laboratory that causes her to lose other peoples land will reflect badly on LL, not anshe either way, I can think of no more effective advertisement of the danger of living in her land then the thread in question personally, i think she shot herself in the foot short term, long term she has proven wiley enough to stay in the game
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
04-03-2006 17:19
I see it in a very different light... be careful what you pay for in SL. NONE of this belongs to you. None of it. Really, I mean none of it. The land you're renting could be gone tomorrow, either through owner financial error, owner fraud, or just simply LL deciding, eh fuck it. (Read the ToS, you agreed to it.) The clothes I sell you could vanish from your inventory, or be corrupted, and there is NOTHING but my good nature (snort) that will get it back for you. Each US dollar you convert to Lindens is a gamble no smaller than pumping dollars into a slot machine, and you really hold no greater odds of it coming back to you. The only difference is, the slots are subject to perusal and verification, and SL is not.
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs Gallinas
|
|
Mulch Ennui
15 Minutes are Over
Join date: 22 May 2005
Posts: 2,607
|
04-03-2006 17:23
From: Jonquille Noir I see it in a very different light... be careful what you pay for in SL. NONE of this belongs to you. None of it. Really, I mean none of it. The land you're renting could be gone tomorrow, either through owner financial error, owner fraud, or just simply LL deciding, eh fuck it. (Read the ToS, you agreed to it.) The clothes I sell you could vanish from your inventory, or be corrupted, and there is NOTHING but my good nature (snort) that will get it back for you. Each US dollar you convert to Lindens is a gamble no smaller than pumping dollars into a slot machine, and you really hold no greater odds of it coming back to you. The only difference is, the slots are subject to perusal and verification, and SL is not. lets say she has 1000 customers living on her servers do you think 1000 people whill blame her or the laboratory if "their" land and possestions just disappear into the void? i don't think an exception is a good thing to make her happy, i want the exception to keep 1000 people from leaving SL and blamining the laboratory for it
_____________________
I have of late--but wherefore I know not--lost all my mirth, that this goodly frame, the earth, seems to me a sterile promontory, this most excellent canopy, the air, look you, this brave o'erhanging firmament, this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours. http://forums.secondcitizen.com/
|
|
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
04-03-2006 17:23
The point I was making is nothing at all about whether or not Anshe should have originally started that thread. That is nothing to do with it. Irrelevant so far as this discussion is concerned.
The point I was making was that Anshe having made that original post, should the thread have been removed?
I think it should not, because it was of importance to many people in sl.
And the wider point I was making is that should postings be interfered with at all? If you close a thread, you are by definition, giving a poster the 'last word'. That gives an unbalanced view of a discussion. And if you close the thread while those who breathlessly wait, their fingers hovering over their keyboard, for their favourite enemy to post, are engaged in the usual nastiness, it is possible that the thread might well become more balanced, with the opposing point of view gradually emerging. I have seen this happen with threads which are left alone.
The arguments against resident moderators are so many I can't even be bothered to type them all. The arguments for are, in my view very limited.
And the next time I try to contribute to a thread and find that it has been closed, I think I will close down sl for the day and go and play Oblivion.
|
|
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
|
04-03-2006 17:27
From: Mulch Ennui lets say she has 1000 customers living on her servers do you think 1000 people whill blame her or the laboratory if "their" land and possestions just disappear into the void? i don't think an exception is a good thing to make her happy, i want the exception to keep 1000 people from leaving SL and blamining the laboratory for it To answer this, I'll just post my response to Enabran's very astute thread... From: someone Good question, Enabran. Not being a Linden, I can't answer a yes or no, but of course that won't stop me from throwing in my .02 Lindens on the subject. For most businesses, I believe we are fungible. (teehee.. okay, got that out of the way.) If a top designer, builder or scripter goes the way of the do-do, there will be others to step in and fill that tier of the heirarchy. They may already have the skill, talent and creativity to do it. The brand would no doubt be missed, along with whatever made it so prominent, but trends will shift toward what's available. When it comes to businesses like Anshe's, well.. I don't think it's quite that easy. SL is still a blind gamble to run a business in. Moreso even than a RL business, which is enough of a gamble in itself, but which has RL laws to protect our investments, and grace periods to run in the red. There probably aren't many people willing to make the kind of monetary investment it would take to run an empire of that size on such a transient platform, and with the kind of ToS SL requires us to agree to. Shutting down such a whale would hurt LL's bottom line.. in the short term. In the long term, it would be benefitial to the bottom line, provided that enough residents step up to fill that gap. That would mean less tier discount, less group land discount, and therefore more money for LL. That's how I see it realistically. Ideally, I hope that we're all subject to the same terms and conditions. I hope that anyone else would have their account frozen the same way I would if I didn't pay my bills. I would like to think that we're all equal in LL's eyes, and that we're all subject to the same hard and fast rules. (Which are few and far between for LL, but pay-to-play certainly seems to be one of the few.) That's the ideal, but I certainly wouldn't be starting any crusades if that turned out not to be the case. (There would be enough of those without mine.) LL is a business, with overhead and payroll and everything else that comes along with that. If LL doesn't make those costs, and a profit to boot, we're all out of a job, because they'd shut down. __________________ Pay special attention to where it talks about the short term, verses the long term.
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs Gallinas
|
|
StoneSelf Karuna
His Grace
Join date: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,955
|
04-04-2006 09:36
From: SuezanneC Baskerville The lack of similarity between using the SL forums and living in the Soviet Union during the cold war is really quite pronounced. From: resmod Thats because it is a violation of the forum guildlines to directly contest any application of the rules in the forums. do not question
_____________________
AIDS IS NOT OVER. people are still getting aids. people are still living with aids. people are still dying from aids. please help me raise money for hiv/aids services and research. you can help by making a donation here: http://www.aidslifecycle.org/1409 .
|