Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Landbots 101

Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
03-22-2007 10:21
Weedy is right. It’s a sham and an outrage, and we ALL pay the price for it. (Except for those who own the bots.)


coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Joy Iddinja
Registered User
Join date: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 344
Oligarchy
03-22-2007 10:22
To me the real issue of the bots is in the whole economic system of SL. The appeal of running a business in SL (not just land but most businesses) for most people is the idea that this is a purely competititve market, for the most part. Getting into the game is relatively inexpensive compared to RL. Almost everyone produces the same way. And product, is basically standardized. This form of economic system benefits the most people, while still being for profit, capitolistic in nature.

By comparison, oligarchy (or another economic term, which I prefer, limited monopoly) benefits a small number of people, by making entry into the market very expensive, giving unfair advantage to some, and over the long run, driving up prices by mutual consent of the few competitors. Outside of total monopoly, this system benefits very few people.

Most people who come to second life do not do so for the land business. They do so for recreation and create small shops or businesses. LL should be attempting to create a world where the most people are made happy and bring in more people. If bots can do this to land sales, why not a bot that reads blueprints and builds houses. Yes the botmaster might have to texture the structure, but most of the work in building is the actual building. A builder using such a bot could get a bunch of free or low cost housing plans off the internet, or buy a book of housing plans, and just scan them, creating homes and businesses in an hour or two that would take a builder today 10 or 12 hours to finish. What about a bot that scans photos and dupicates skins or clothing?

If land can be so monopolized by a few, why not many other careers in SL?

If I got my jollies living in a world where big business ran the show, crushing the small businessman, I wouldn't have to pay tier to do it.
Reverend Herzog
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 111
03-22-2007 10:35
From: Daisy Rimbaud
However, if you eliminated all the land speculators, no-one would miss them; in fact, everyone would give a big cheer. The idea that they provide a service by snaffling all the cheap land and thus making it easier to get rid of land quickly is pretty thin. Actually, the land dealers who DO provide a service are arguably those who buy entire sims (that most residents couldn't afford) and resell them in affordable parcels. But those who just speculate are parasites.


Yes, there's the service of allowing motivated sellers to liquidate quickly, but you also forgot a few things.

Some land dealers add value to their properties by building houses on them. I used to do a lot of this before the bots appeared and forced me to work three times as long for a third to half the profit, but I still manage to throw in a custom build now and then.

Most land dealers have at least a sim or more of "stock" on hand at any given time, so if you're looking for a particular type of land ... say green waterfront or roadside or something ... you could spend hours combing the listings and hope the lister mentioned that aspect of the land in the description, you could spend hours flying around from sim to sim hoping to stumble over precisely what you're looking for at a decent price, or you could contact several land dealers and see what they have on hand. The third option is much faster and more likely to produce results.

Many land dealers are willing to rent out the parcels they own rather than sell them outright, thus allowing residents to have homes without carrying the tier themselves. Some also allow buyers to finance their purchases ... sort of a rent to own process.

Also, in my own case, I tend to buy larger parcels, say 2048s and larger, and divide them into 1024s and in some cases 512s before reselling them. Around half my customers are owners of neighboring parcels who wanted just a little extra land but couldn't afford the cost and/or tier to buy the large parcel, cut off what they wanted, and then resell the rest. It's unlikely they would have been able to convince an end user buyer to sell them the piece they wanted. This strikes me as a service.

There are also the "hidden" services you often fail to notice. My own land dealing gives me the time, funds, and land resources to support a lot of SL groups that are good for the community, such as the Arbor Project and Social Action of Second Life. I also frequently donate land to worthy causes, and in the past have sold a number of 512s at First Land prices to new residents, 512s that I had purchased for substantially more than that. I know many other land dealers who do similar things, such as Sarah Nerd and her freebie shops that allow new residents to gain a foothold in this world.

Other land dealers may offer additional benefits to the community. These are just the ones that I offer and am familiar with.
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 10:45
I don't see much difference between land traders and bots honestly. The bots are controlled by land traders and are simply a tool. Yes before the land bots were on the scene an average player did have a small chance of finding a deal on land, but still most of those deals went to land traders who spent all their time refreshing the search page. Now those deals simply go to the land dealers with the landbots.

Businesses always have to evolve and change thier business models as technology evolves. Those that don't go out of business or are consumed by the business that did adapt and change.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
A comment and a proposal.
03-22-2007 10:47
I saw this in one of the "many" previous threads on this subject, which I think more accurately addresses what is of concern here.


From: Enigma Cassavetes
Has anyone considered the economics of this?

Everybody is basically complaining about the immorality of this and it's possible load on db servers. In this respect I agree because "at this moment" Elanthius is in a monopoly position as regards having a fully functioning bot that can operate at speeds quicker than a manual player. I myself have applied my full vote quota but only so that LL have this issue flagged up to them. I want it flagged up to them because of where this development will go based on market principles.

To start with as I have said Elanthius "at this moment" has some market primacy because of the edge he has developed. In the near future others will either make Elanthius an offer he can't refuse for his software (not a sleeping with the fishes one I hope) or they will simplly build a faster and better bot. Furthermore, there will also be others who will see the opportunity of a quick buck who will release a copy for sale at a peanuts price hoping for mass sales.

That given; in the medium term we will see these bots widely available to anyone for free or so cheap it might as well be free.

So what happens then? Well there will be tens of thousands of them skipping all over the metaverse land and making db enquiries. This is what LL should be concerned about because when that happens they had better be ready to cope or they will have serious problems and that is why I want LL to have a heads up on this development through the proposal.

As regards the land economy things will soon return to normal. Let's say for the sake of argument market rate is L$15 sqm. A thousand people and myself will set our bots to search for land at L$14 and after a day of searching our bots return nil results or maybe catch a couple sale typo mistakes and some badly priced land. What do we do? Well the next day I'm sure we would send them out at L$14.5 sqm and so on and so on. If there is high demand for land then at some point we are going to have set our search range above L$15 and thus set a new market rate and of course vice versa for a slump in demand. In fact as I write this it becomes readily apparent that we will all be sending many bots out, some to buy at below market and others sent out set only to collect data on the above market land.

Therefore, in effect the land economy will remain the same in operation and principle, but it will just be a lot more faster, a lot more responsive/sensitive and a lot more informed. The only advantage a human buyer will have is the appreciation of a view and the setting of the land and so the market edge will return to skilled human players; that is untill the bots start taking 360 degree snapshots! Therefore I propose that the biggest threat and what should be the biggest concern at this moment is the future db load these bots will create.

Elanthius is just in the "financially fortunate" position in being the first to think and develop this product and also in the "morally unfortunate" position in being the first to think and develop this product in front of his peers.

Regards - Enigma Cassavetes



Of course if we or LL don't want to accept this inevitability then a simple fix would be to set all land sales to auction. The seller put's in their minimum price sets the length of auction time. At least under this scenario the bots provide a useful function and get the bidding going and gives time for the most slothful land baron to get around to the site and as long as the facility to sell to a specific person is retained (outside of the auction process) then I think this the fairest way forward. Anyone else think we should put this forward as a proposal? If it's good enough for LL's land selling process then it should be good for us.

Sy Beck
Reverend Herzog
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 111
03-22-2007 10:56
From: Sy Beck
Of course if we or LL don't want to accept this inevitability then a simple fix would be to set all land sales to auction. The seller put's in their minimum price sets the length of auction time. At least under this scenario the bots provide a useful function and get the bidding going and gives time for the most slothful land baron to get around to the site and as long as the facility to sell to a specific person is retained (outside of the auction process) then I think this the fairest way forward. Anyone else think we should put this forward as a proposal? If it's good enough for LL's land selling process then it should be good for us.


Two problems with it that come quickly to mind are the fact that it would make it difficult for someone who needs to tier down quickly to avoid a higher tier payment to do so, and its susceptibility to "eBay Fever" that often afflicts the LL land auctions, where bidders get so wrapped up in the necessity of being a winner that they bid the land up to ridiculously high levels. This latter would have detrimental effects on land prices.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
03-22-2007 10:56
From: tristan Eliot
I don't see much difference between land traders and bots honestly. The bots are controlled by land traders and are simply a tool. Yes before the land bots were on the scene an average player did have a small chance of finding a deal on land, but still most of those deals went to land traders who spent all their time refreshing the search page. Now those deals simply go to the land dealers with the landbots.

Businesses always have to evolve and change thier business models as technology evolves. Those that don't go out of business or are consumed by the business that did adapt and change.



You are , however, ignoring the use of mutiple bots - and increased reasources usage.

Somone said they use 40 bots i beleive?

Kin of hard to control 40 avatars w/o a bot.
Race Kidd
Registered User
Join date: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 6
03-22-2007 11:07
If you add a middle man [read: bots], you raise the price.

That's not difficult to figure out. If the bot is making money, which of course it is or we wouldn't be having this discussion, then the money has to come from somewhere.

The extra money comes from the inflated price that the buyer is paying.

The buyer pays more when there are middlemen involved. It's very basic math.

The reason there is a lot of land for sale currently is: Land is currently priced higher than most people are willing to pay.

Most land sellers sell at the same price they used to (about 6 - 8/sqm). But now we have middle men, who raise that price 2-4, so land prices are what we see. (or land sellers sell at the same price as the bots. either way, it's academic.)

Don't think land bots affect the price? Ask yourself why every piece of land out there sells for just about the exact same price/sqm. Because that's where the bot runners have the formulas set. The total homogenization of land prices is not natural, it's what happens when prices are fixed by middle men.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
I still think auction is better.
03-22-2007 11:08
From: Reverend Herzog
Two problems with it that come quickly to mind are the fact that it would make it difficult for someone who needs to tier down quickly to avoid a higher tier payment to do so, and its susceptibility to "eBay Fever" that often afflicts the LL land auctions, where bidders get so wrapped up in the necessity of being a winner that they bid the land up to ridiculously high levels. This latter would have detrimental effects on land prices.



If you want to tier down quickly set the auction length to 24hrs or less or to the time remaining till your billing date.

Sounds to me like you are a land trader who is being beat up by bots and wants rid of them but still wish to retain your own ability to beat up on land sellers and land buyers
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:15
From: Colette Meiji
You are , however, ignoring the use of mutiple bots - and increased reasources usage.

Somone said they use 40 bots i beleive?

Kin of hard to control 40 avatars w/o a bot.


No different than 40 people clicking the refresh button constantly.
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:18
From: Race Kidd


Most land sellers sell at the same price they used to (about 6 - 8/sqm). But now we have middle men, who raise that price 2-4, so land prices are what we see. (or land sellers sell at the same price as the bots. either way, it's academic.)

Don't think land bots affect the price? Ask yourself why every piece of land out there sells for just about the exact same price/sqm. Because that's where the bot runners have the formulas set. The total homogenization of land prices is not natural, it's what happens when prices are fixed by middle men.


Got news for you but the land sellers are the "middle men". The bots are simply a buying tool.
Reverend Herzog
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 111
03-22-2007 11:19
From: Sy Beck
If you want to tier down quickly set the auction length to 24hrs or less or to the time remaining till your billing date.

Sounds to me like you are a land trader who is being beat up by bots and wants rid of them but still wish to retain your own ability to beat up on land sellers and land buyers


So how does insulting me prove your point? I am a land dealer and I am being beaten up by bots (as are we all, even non land dealers) and I do want rid of them. I've never made a secret of that. What I want is a level playing field for EVERYONE. You'll never get that with bots, since it'll always be the person with the fastest bot who gets all the land. Sure there have always been land swoopers, but in the past any resident who was willing to spend even a little time scanning the land listings had a chance of getting a low priced parcel. Land dealers had no magical powers that made them impossible to beat. Bot users, on the other hand, do have such an advantage.

Plus you didn't address the eBay Fever aspect of my response. I guess you were too busy thinking up ways to insult me rather than wasting your time on a logical, coherent, all-encompassing response.
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
03-22-2007 11:23
From: tristan Eliot
No different than 40 people clicking the refresh button constantly.


except its one person who owns all 40 bots. I see that as different.
Annabelle Vandeverre
Heading back to Real Life
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 609
03-22-2007 11:24
From: Sy Beck

Of course if we or LL don't want to accept this inevitability then a simple fix would be to set all land sales to auction. The seller put's in their minimum price sets the length of auction time. At least under this scenario the bots provide a useful function and get the bidding going and gives time for the most slothful land baron to get around to the site and as long as the facility to sell to a specific person is retained (outside of the auction process) then I think this the fairest way forward. Anyone else think we should put this forward as a proposal? If it's good enough for LL's land selling process then it should be good for us.


It's an interesting concept. On the surface, it appears that it would cut out the middleman (or bot), gaining a higher profit for the original seller of the land. I don't think the buyers would save any money, though - the eBay effect.

I would think that many of the land barons who win the Linden auctions would like to get more money. However, from what I understand, for some, their business model involves winning multiple sims and then parcelling them up and selling them off one at a time before claiming each of their subsequent sims (to keep tier down). They would likely therefore want to have the option of setting very short auction times.

Now for problems this could cause buyers: Perhaps a buyer wants a 512 lot and most any flat green would do. However, they must bid on auctions with a variety of end times, and may find themselves bidding on multiple auctions at a time to make sure that they get something. What happens when people win an auction and have changed their mind about the land because they've found something better?

Here's another issue: What if I want to buy a total of 4096 sq.m., but the seller has the lots parcelled into 1024 lots? Currently, I can show up and buy each lot and join them together (and I have done this actually). Under the proposed system, I must win the auction for each lot, or try to contact the seller and convince him/her to take them out of auction and sell me all four at a good price, which means I could end up paying a lot more otherwise than I would have. Or I could take my chances at auction and end up maybe with just one or two of them.

I think there could be a workable way to do auctions, but it's far from a perfect solution.
_____________________
I am returning to my real life for personal reasons this summer. My store, $50 or less @ Annabelle's Garden and Home Decor, is now closed. Thank you to my customers for making my store successful in the short time I've been here. Get this before the bots do: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Nefrax/153/156/40
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:27
From: Annabelle Vandeverre
It's an interesting concept. On the surface, it appears that it would cut out the middleman (or bot), gaining a higher profit for the original seller of the land. I don't think the buyers would save any money, though - the eBay effect.

I would think that many of the land barons who win the Linden auctions would like to get more money. However, from what I understand, for some, their business model involves winning multiple sims and then parcelling them up and selling them off one at a time before claiming each of their subsequent sims (to keep tier down). They would likely therefore want to have the option of setting very short auction times.

Now for problems this could cause buyers: Perhaps a buyer wants a 512 lot and most any flat green would do. However, they must bid on auctions with a variety of end times, and may find themselves bidding on multiple auctions at a time to make sure that they get something. What happens when people win an auction and have changed their mind about the land because they've found something better?

Here's another issue: What if I want to buy a total of 4096 sq.m., but the seller has the lots parcelled into 1024 lots? Currently, I can show up and buy each lot and join them together (and I have done this actually). Under the proposed system, I must win the auction for each lot, or try to contact the seller and convince him/her to take them out of auction and sell me all four at a good price, which means I could end up paying a lot more otherwise than I would have. Or I could take my chances at auction and end up maybe with just one or two of them.

I think there could be a workable way to do auctions, but it's far from a perfect solution.

I have seen one land trader run his own auctions. Not sure how they worked out for him though.
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:29
From: Colette Meiji
except its one person who owns all 40 bots. I see that as different.

But is it really unfair? RL businesses automate all the time. Why should SL be any different?
Alazarin Mondrian
Teh Trippy Hippie Dragon
Join date: 4 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,549
03-22-2007 11:38
From: Strife Onizuka
I would suggest doing the throttling based on IP address or CC. Additionally unverified accounts would only be able to see properties that have been on the market for at least 10 min (this way you wouldn't have people using an unverified account to do the searching and a verified to do purchasing.

Strife, are the bot-operators using the bots to acquire land using the 'buy for group' option? If so, it should be a simple move for LL to disable the ability for unverified accounts to buy land. While this wouldn't get rid of land abuse entirely it would be a major disincentive in that bot-runners would have to go through all the bother verifying their bots. And in the process find themselves running out of credit cards.

One further step along that path would be for LL to set it so that only premium accounts can purchase land whether for private or group ownership. I think that move alone would stop most bots and bot-runners in their tracks.
_____________________
My stuff on Meta-Life: http://tinyurl.com/ykq7nzt
http://www.myspace.com/alazarinmobius
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Crescent/72/98/116
Kitty Barnett
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2006
Posts: 5,586
03-22-2007 11:40
From: tristan Eliot
But is it really unfair? RL businesses automate all the time. Why should SL be any different?
It's unfair because bot owners aren't paying a cent for their disproportionate use of resources.

Make it L$10/search and everyone wins. The normal buyer spends an insignificant amount of money to browse the land sales, the land barons have to weigh spending a possibly large amount of L$ to grab a good deal cutting into their own profit, and bot owners would quickly go bankrupt.
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:41
From: Kitty Barnett
It's unfair because bot owners aren't paying a cent for their disproportionate use of resources.

Make it L$10/search and everyone wins. The normal buyer spends an insignificant amount of money to browse the land sales, the land barons have to weigh spending a possibly large amount of L$ to grab a good deal cutting into their own profit, and bot owners would quickly go bankrupt.

That would work, but i'm not sure how an added tax would go over with the population.
Alazarin Mondrian
Teh Trippy Hippie Dragon
Join date: 4 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,549
03-22-2007 11:42
From: Kitty Barnett
It's unfair because bot owners aren't paying a cent for their disproportionate use of resources.

Make it L$10/search and everyone wins. The normal buyer spends an insignificant amount of money to browse the land sales, the land barons have to weigh spending a possibly large amount of L$ to grab a good deal cutting into their own profit, and bot owners would quickly go bankrupt.

No, because at 10L$ per search that's still chump change for even your beginner baby land-baron / bot-runner. It only hits the regular residents and blocks out new as-yet unverified residents from using the search function.
_____________________
My stuff on Meta-Life: http://tinyurl.com/ykq7nzt
http://www.myspace.com/alazarinmobius
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Crescent/72/98/116
tristan Eliot
Say What?!
Join date: 30 Oct 2005
Posts: 494
03-22-2007 11:45
From: Alazarin Mondrian
No, because at 10L$ per search that's still chump change for even your beginner baby land-baron / bot-runner. It only hits the regular residents and blocks out new as-yet unverified residents from using the search function.

Just uploading pics at 10L each adds up fast to more than chump change. Imagine a charge for every time the bot or person queried the system every few seconds.
Homer Antler
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 105
Just need a new way of selling land...
03-22-2007 11:45
From: Daisy Rimbaud
SL as a virtual "other world" ought to operate in ways analagous to the real world. Land sales are things that should be done in person in a leisurely fashion, just as one might buy land in RL. Having the whole land-buying procedure distorted by a handful of parasites who are only concerned with SL for how much money they can squeeze out of it, has a large negative impact on everyone else.


IMO I think the whole real estate system in SL has to be changed to fix this issue.

What motivated me to do this? I had many huge parcels of land in good old SIMs. Great view, much better to terraform and lots of traffic. However, I decided to sell some to cut my tier. I had two choices, one list it at a high value (which it deserves) and dream on for someone to buy it OR list it at the market price and sell it fast.

Since I had to cut down on tier, option two was pretty much my choice.

Why do I have to sell a good piece of land at market rate? To me the whole land search system is messaged up.

This is why I am working on a much better solution. It will work more like real world real estate. People can continue to use the current system in parallel to my system but I think it will be a useful tool for anyone who is in my situation.

I will share more information about the system in the next few days. I have been working on a prototype solution and it will be ready in the next few days for anyone to test. IM me inworld.
Sy Beck
Owner of Group ???
Join date: 9 Feb 2007
Posts: 202
e-bay answered Rev'd.
03-22-2007 11:53
From: Reverend Herzog


Plus you didn't address the eBay Fever aspect of my response. I guess you were too busy thinking up ways to insult me rather than wasting your time on a logical, coherent, all-encompassing response.


Sorry if you took offence, not intended. I thought that there would be no need to respond to "your" e-bay allusion. I think you'll find that e-bay is popular because people get "good" deals on it both buyer and seller. If both sides to e-bay weren't happy it wouldn't exist. Furthermore, the only reason you get a "fever" at the LL auctions is because there are more items than bidders pn any given day. This means it's always a demand market. I'm sure the Lindens realise this and are happy to keep it that way. Especially when we know from other strings that they have 200 sims on the shelf ready to go at any minute. So they are controlling the supply to keep this fever going.

There is a quantum leap of difference though if all in world sales were done by auction. There would be a glut to choose from on and bid on. The only time there would be a fever is on highly desirable land. Buyers would be far more disciplined in putting in a maximium bid as they would know there would be something similar coming along in hours. Not days or weeks as is the case with LL auctions.

Hope this addresses your point.
Johan Durant
Registered User
Join date: 7 Aug 2006
Posts: 1,657
03-22-2007 12:04
From: Alazarin Mondrian
No, because at 10L$ per search that's still chump change for even your beginner baby land-baron / bot-runner.

Given the number of seconds in a day, divided by 5 for the throttling, times 10 for the suggested charge, that's L$172,800 (almost $650) per day to run a single bot.
_____________________
(Aelin 184,194,22)

The Motion Merchant - an animation store specializing in two-person interactions
Annabelle Vandeverre
Heading back to Real Life
Join date: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 609
03-22-2007 12:12
From: Johan Durant
Given the number of seconds in a day, divided by 5 for the throttling, times 10 for the suggested charge, that's L$172,800 (almost $650) per day to run a single bot.


If the botmasters are running a modified client that bypasses the search throttles by reaching deeply into code, why wouldn't they be able to bypass the fee for searching too? This could have the unintended result of giving normal buyers even more difficulty searching for cheap land.

I am intrigued with the idea of not being able to buy land for a group using an unverified account. Then again, depending on where one is in the world, it could be easy to get enough credit cards to verify a huge army of bots. Especially on a U.S. college campus.
_____________________
I am returning to my real life for personal reasons this summer. My store, $50 or less @ Annabelle's Garden and Home Decor, is now closed. Thank you to my customers for making my store successful in the short time I've been here. Get this before the bots do: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Nefrax/153/156/40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9