A Diabolic Partner

I googly-woogled it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj5k_eXpIH4

black and white, to boot!

.

Somehow I don't believe you. But for the sake or argument, I'll give it a go.

First, I only argued against your claim that you can't trust *any* subs. You have a broken proof to back that claim up. I've already pointed out the fallacy, but you don't want to accept it.

So fine. One way to disprove a claim is to provide a counter example.

You can trust Lexxi. For two reasons. First, she doesn't have a deceitful bone in her body. That I've ever seen, anyway. However she reacts to you is all her. Secondly, I have never, nor will I ever, tell her how to interact with you (or anybody else). So you can trust her. So your claim that you can't trust *any* sub is false.

No doubt you don't believe me, and won't accept my counter example. If so, you win, don't trust subs. You are beyond convincing.

...

Can you know who to trust? Of course you can't. So I'm sure your attitude of trusting none of them works well for you. I do recall pointing out that such an attitude should logically lead you to actually trust nobody, regardless of D/s orientation (or lack thereof).

I'm sure you'll simply throw some more insults my way and continue your trolling assholery. But I live in hope... (not really).

That's quite alright, Pep. It's all about YOU, and that's all that matters.

You really shouldn't. Cause most of them have hydrogenated oil in the bread and that shit will kill you.

*sigh*

Yeah, well . . . I remain a bit skeptical that you, or Jig for that matter, have "explained" everything all away: it all seems a bit too neat to me.

But, given the fact that Jig herself has pulled the plug, there's not much point in pursuing it, is there?

/me directs the band to play "Nearer My God to Thee" while she resumes her post on the bridge, saluting as the bow tips towards the sky . . .

and so soon after presumably putting it in...

its the complete honesty that will be your downfall...

I must admit I have read none of the thread except for the OP's opening statement. That being said.........

Is this anything like a "Put a penny in a jar every time you have sex for the 1st year you are married. Then take a penny out of that jar every time you have sex after that and you will never empty the jar.", kind of things?

No it is more like a Swear Box

The late Wilfred Brambell is better known for playing the "dirty old man" in this classic comedy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y60VeA3GhJs

Don't worry about it - we are trying to keep this thread going until Friday, when Jig can start a new one.

Here is a summary:

Mickey thinks Pep and Jig are sort-of psychological twins.
Love and Pep have coherent arguments. (It's a programming thing - dont worry about it.)
Smith is concerned about Pep's diet.
I've offered Jig a cut price deal and have returned to watching old comedy films.
Tarina thinks Jig is too honest.
Scylla is going down with the ship.

'Wilfrid Brambell' please.

Pep (I wonder if he is related to Titus?)

It's usually a good idea if you don't want to look silly.

/327/0f/336169/1.html#post2536806

Pep (echo . . . echo . . . echo . . . )

"Broken proof"? In what way is it broken? You have not offered any counter-refutation to my argument at all, merely thrown out emotional invective. "Pointed out the fallacy"? Where? I have seen no such argument from you.

Well, actually, it isn't - one swallow doesn't make a summer - but you probably can't even do that!

So *YOU*, a demonstrably unreliable "authority" (you have broken public promises on this forum) are attempting to assure me, with *no* concrete evidence whatsoever, that someone you have never met in real life, and whose incoherent paranoid ramblings in the forum and in group chat inworld suggest that "she" does not even trust herself, is inherently trustworthy? And you seriously believe this is a valid argument?

So now you are trying to convince me by making an assertion of your *OWN* behaviour? Behaviour which has historically been demonstrated publicly as unreliable? You're like a used car salesman saying "Trust me, this vehicle will never break down". I simply don't believe you, as your statement is unprovable, and your self-interest and track record suggests that you would be more than likely to lie. You *really* don't have a clue about rational argument do you?

Why should I? You have lied to me in public before.

Of course I win - because my argument is simple, coherent, and relies for its power on the underlying basis of Dom/sub relationships: that the primary allegiance of subs is to their Doms.

Pep (You may believe that emotional arguments know of no refutation, but they cut no ice with me. )

OMG, I channeled Pep! Brain bleach please!!!!!

Yes, Wilf Bramble's his cousin - I think he does the cartoons.

This is why I left the undying thread.

When you are like this, there is almost no point to talking at all.

Why would you leave the thread because of him? Just put him on ignore. You shouldn't leave something you enjoy because of one person. Besides, he posts more out here than on the thread.

I dunno. Leaving seemed like a good idea at the time.

I did try turning off images and ignoring him, but it's a weird way to read the thread. It turns into more of a puzzle than anything else, like listening to a conversation through a wall.

Also, Pep had invited me to the thread. Twice (or maybe even three times), before I finally gave in, and he more than once encouraged me to post.

In fact, Pep has been quite kind to me, particularly in an old thread of mine "Talk me out of adopting a child" (/327/dd/297894/1.html) -- if you look at his posts there, you see quite a different person from the argumentative, pig-headed man who's currently goading Love.

Anyway, I don't want to whine about it any more. I was just trying to make a point in *this* thread about the impact of certain ways of discussion.

IM me.
(That cost me 100 lindens so you better. Last night I paid Hal $900)

If he does... make sure he gives you the $100 to cover that invitation.

I might send her the $100 for that one (if I remember when I get inworld). It made me laugh.

OMG what a great idea. Lets ALL send Jig $100.

Yes, a splendid idea.

Or perhaps send her L$1000 so she can start a new thread to delight and mesmerize us all with its appropriateness on this particular forum.

If money is going to be tossed about, regardless....why don't you all donate it to charity, so that at least someone would benefit.