Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Important! Adult shops, clubs and services in SL

Winter Ventura
Eclectic Randomness
Join date: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 2,579
11-25-2006 17:16
From: someone
Linden Answers thread: Help us deal with minors!
Winter Ventura
Today, 05:07 PM

Can you explain why several posts (all concerning the issue of your new TOS as it affects your assurance that minors would not have access to the adult grid), written by myself, and at least one other resident.. were simply deleted without comment?

Linden Labs, in establishing your new terms of services, you have placed all adult content providers on your service, in the untennible position of being liable for criminal prosecution, simply because you can not, or will not, give us the tools with which to screen customers/visitors for age. You furthermore have refused to do this screening yourself. Put succinctly, the phrasing in your Terms of Service now makes it "acceptable" for children.. minors... to wander into SL, and get a job in a sex club. as a prostitute.

Meanwhile.. it will be the people who hire these minors, even unknowingly, or who sell mature content to them.. who will now be named in lawsuits... and I have no beleif that you will protect the anonymity of residents when your records are subpeonaed. (can't spell it).

You have not provided us with adequate tools to protect minors from adult content.. beleive me, if you had, we'd be using it. Since you now refuse to "take responsibility" and control the gates of this world.. protecting the adults from this situation... and you refuse to provide the adults with the tools needed to screen minors themselves..

You just delete the posts, and try to keep the Public Relations image?

There are people in your world selling adult things.. very adult things. While I agree that Parents should monitor their child's behaviour.. we all know it's not happening. Since we can't have impassable doors, or impassable walls.. and we can't soundproof or cam-proof our playspaces and shops.. and you won't give us the assurance that all SL players are adults...

How is this major portion of your ecomony supposed to protect itself?
What tools will you give us?
When will you stop ignoring us, and actually respond to our concerns and needs?

I know I'm not the first person to ask these questions. And you're probably tired of hearing about it. Consider responding to them and helping us.. and I could be the last.


[...]
_____________________

● Inworld Store: http://slurl.eclectic-randomness.com
● Website: http://www.eclectic-randomness.com
● Twitter: @WinterVentura
Jopsy Pendragon
Perpetual Outsider
Join date: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 1,906
11-25-2006 20:41
From: Winter Ventura
...
the phrasing in your Terms of Service now makes it "acceptable" for children.. minors...




Sorry, serious pet peeve of mine... but...

Breaking the law (or the ToS) is not "Acceptable", simply because preventing the voliation is difficult or impossible.


Banning unverifieds FAILS to keep minors off the grid.... and it slams the door in the face of *MANY* potentially paying customers.

If you have an effective solution to this problem (and one that won't cause more problems than it solves), please do share it.

Until then, if you think LL should shoulder the legal liablities that adult vendors risk... then perhaps adult vendors need to be paying LL more than the rest of us who have no need for such services or coverage.

--
dammit where's my coffee.
Yinepuhotep Tsuki
Registered User
Join date: 1 Sep 2006
Posts: 5
11-25-2006 20:51
From: Lewis Nerd

bilbo... regarding HIV, STD's etc... that's all part of sexual promiscuity and people deviating from God's plan of one man/one woman together for life.


Sorry. Your God is not my God. Your God's plan does not apply to me, because He/She/It is not My God.
Strife Onizuka
Moonchild
Join date: 3 Mar 2004
Posts: 5,887
11-25-2006 21:41
It should be noted that the nZone article mentioned in the origional post is out of date. That article is used to base much of the supposition of the OP and later responses.

/327/ed/150997/1.html
_____________________
Truth is a river that is always splitting up into arms that reunite. Islanded between the arms, the inhabitants argue for a lifetime as to which is the main river.
- Cyril Connolly

Without the political will to find common ground, the continual friction of tactic and counter tactic, only creates suspicion and hatred and vengeance, and perpetuates the cycle of violence.
- James Nachtwey
Daisy Rimbaud
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 764
11-27-2006 08:20
I find it conspicuous just HOW many places have sex pose balls dotted around. Removing sex from SL would be like trying to remove it from RL (not that people haven't tried that).

Another thing that fascinates me is just how many times one stumbles over bondage devices of one sort or another. One is drawn to conclude that BDSM is popular with a rather larger section of the population than one might have supposed.
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
11-27-2006 10:52
From: Daisy Rimbaud
Another thing that fascinates me is just how many times one stumbles over bondage devices of one sort or another. One is drawn to conclude that BDSM is popular with a rather larger section of the population than one might have supposed.


Because BDSM is still somewhat societally shameful. It's gaining steam now, especially as women become more and more powerful in the sexual realm. (I did a stupid report on this once.) SL offers anonymity to those who want to explore in areas that either they aren't comfortable with in RL, or because they are too embarrassed to tell partners.
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
11-27-2006 11:11
Just a friendly reminder to please keep conversation on-topic and to be civil to each other, even if you disagree. Personal disputes are totally inappropriate for this forum -- which is a *friendly place to get help* -- and offending posters will be removed.

Also, please remember from the Community Standards:
Intolerance
Combating intolerance is a cornerstone of Second Life's Community Standards. Actions that marginalize, belittle, or defame individuals or groups inhibit the satisfying exchange of ideas and diminish the Second Life community as whole. The use of derogatory or demeaning language or images in reference to another Resident's race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation is never allowed in Second Life.
_____________________
Brenda Archer
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 557
11-27-2006 11:58
From: Angelique LaFollette
Actually According to Roberts Rules of Order, Ishtara is responsible for Making the Motion, I Seconded, Now we are at the Point where we ask All those in Favor to Signify by a Call of Aye, (Or raising of the Hands in case of a silent Ballot, But because we can't actually SEE you raising your hand, I think we shouls stick with Aye). We then Give those opposed a Chance to Cast a Nay Vote, and after that, Declare the Motion Passed or failed.

Don't ask me how i Remember all this stuff.

Angel.


You haven't by any chance been involved with something like running a science fiction convention have you *grins* ?

I took one look at the new TOS and put a notecard giver in front of our new skybox, locked the teleporter to group only, and I had already downgraded it from XXX to hard R.

But there's no limit to the slippery slope on this subject... in either direction... I hear things from teenagers these days that are absolutely heartbreaking, in terms of the kinds of sexual values they are absorbing. I have already heard a fourteen year old call herself a "slut" here in SL. This is tragic.

The solution isn't to make adults into children... we do have a Constitution here I think... it's to make it obvious, as it usually is in RL, who the children are and let honorable conduct solve most of the hazard.

In other words, let everybody in... but mark clearly, visibly, on the avatar, who is a minor and who is an adult. For example, a different color name. One could also distinguish between unverified adults (R) and those who had voluntarily submitted their identifying info to an age verification service (X).

Then give us the scripting tools to lock people out and,

FOR GOD'S SAKE, WE NEED WALLS THAT BLOCK CAMERAS AND CHAT.
_____________________
Anya Ristow
Vengeance Studio
Join date: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,243
11-27-2006 12:52
I still don't get what's so mature about low-res hanky panky. Much of the clothing available in-world and the fantasy dolls people create for avatars does not say 'mature' to me, either. Increasingly, by the behavior of "residents" (look-at-me behavior, griefing, etc) it does not seem like an adult game, and maybe it's because the kinds of things that are so prevalent (ugly malls, slut clothes, sign griefing, casinos) are the kinds of things that actual adults don't have patience for. Perhaps SL could become more solvent if it made itself more attractive to actual adults. That might require effective zoning.

Or, maybe a bare-assed, fuglified avatar with a spinning plywood box on the head is the SL nitch. If so, of course it has to be free, because who's willing to pay for that?
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
11-27-2006 13:04
Actually, some of the avs out there look impeccibly real.

My av has my RL face, and some of the skins out there are incredibly detailed. I've seen some really good pics that could almost pass for RL people.

Either way, as I've stated before this week, just because you find something slutty doesn't mean that it is to someone else.

The Vatican used to think pants were slutty on women, that certainly shouldn't be everyone's standards. I think pasties and a G-string is slutty, doesn't mean that I think you should find it so either.

Either way, plenty of adults play this game, from 18 to 68 (that's the oldest proven to me).

SL is a role play world that allows adults to be anyone they want to be, whether it be an escort, or a writer. If you are talking about actual adults and SL, there are plenty of actual adults in the RW that are escorts, strippers, immature, bratty, spoiled... hell half the adult men I know act like kids.
Honee Ryder
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 15
11-27-2006 14:07
From: Anya Ristow
I still don't get what's so mature about low-res hanky panky. Much of the clothing available in-world and the fantasy dolls people create for avatars does not say 'mature' to me, either. Increasingly, by the behavior of "residents" (look-at-me behavior, griefing, etc) it does not seem like an adult game, and maybe it's because the kinds of things that are so prevalent (ugly malls, slut clothes, sign griefing, casinos) are the kinds of things that actual adults don't have patience for. Perhaps SL could become more solvent if it made itself more attractive to actual adults. That might require effective zoning.

Or, maybe a bare-assed, fuglified avatar with a spinning plywood box on the head is the SL nitch. If so, of course it has to be free, because who's willing to pay for that?


Sorry but as an adult, I find zoning of any kind extremely childish. It is wrong in RL and it is wrong in SL. When you get right down to it, zoning is saying "I cannot stand that someone else has different tastes than I do. Therefore, we must use force and threats to force all to conform."
Cannae Brentano
NeoTermite
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 368
11-27-2006 15:00
From: Honee Ryder
Sorry but as an adult, I find zoning of any kind extremely childish. It is wrong in RL and it is wrong in SL. When you get right down to it, zoning is saying "I cannot stand that someone else has different tastes than I do. Therefore, we must use force and threats to force all to conform."


What you're missing here is others have a much of a right to avoid seeing what they choose not to see.

I don't care if someone wants to run the reformed church of latter day furry escorts, there are certain things on either end of the spectrum that should be permited but at the same time, I don't want to see.

I'm pretty liberal when it comes to second life and what should be permitted. I'm also very in favor of land owners being able to enjoy their land without other land owners intereference, and to a lesser extent, for everyone being able to enjoy second life without having to accidently stumble across areas they wish to avoid.
Jopsy Pendragon
Perpetual Outsider
Join date: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 1,906
11-27-2006 15:22
Slightly off topic with this, but I wanted to respond to Daisy & Seola...

I think that "power-play" in SL is popular because it offers an engaging RL "psychological" intimacy that helps compensate for cybering's lack of RL "physical" intimacy. (To me, cybering seems more like 'voyeuristic puppetry' than an 'immersive experience'.)

Romantic love also helps, but requires more investment of time, effort, and luck to find.... than, um, getting collared.

Trying something new and safety from consequences are compelling reasons to try something... but novelty isn't sustainable. Folks either find something in the activity that suits them... or they move on to something else that does. :)

But, more on topic:
I still think we have a very long way to go before 'cybering', the sale of scripts/prims to cyber, or photographs of avatars cybering or similar material will come anywhere near close to being taken seriously in court as "genuine pr0n".

Besides, a nearly photorealistic avatar should qualify as art. ;)
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
11-27-2006 16:56
From: Cannae Brentano
What you're missing here is others have a much of a right to avoid seeing what they choose not to see.


And as your right, you have the option to block out neighbors offensive material and not go to the places you don't wish to go to.

Not force people to do it.
Honee Ryder
Registered User
Join date: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 15
11-27-2006 17:09
From: Cannae Brentano
What you're missing here is others have a much of a right to avoid seeing what they choose not to see.

I don't care if someone wants to run the reformed church of latter day furry escorts, there are certain things on either end of the spectrum that should be permited but at the same time, I don't want to see.

I'm pretty liberal when it comes to second life and what should be permitted. I'm also very in favor of land owners being able to enjoy their land without other land owners intereference, and to a lesser extent, for everyone being able to enjoy second life without having to accidently stumble across areas they wish to avoid.


Very simple it is your responsability not to look at it. If that means you build a fence, then YOU build a fence. There is no right not to be offended. That we may be offended is the price we pay for living in a free society. But then no one can call modern day America truly free any more.
Angelique LaFollette
Registered User
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 1,595
11-27-2006 19:34
From: Brenda Archer
You haven't by any chance been involved with something like running a science fiction convention have you *grins* ?.


Attended, Yes, Organized, No.
A grounding in Roberts Rules is just something i learned as a Girl, and still retain today.

I agree with you that the Answer is Not to turn SL into some sugar coated Care Bears Nightmare. We ARE adults after all, and That means that SOME adult Content, and Conversation will Always be present whether some people see the Need for it or Not.

But as Adults, i think we need to learn to Accept Reality. and the existing Reality of SL IS that there Is a Chance that Minors will enter the grid, and Seek out any adult Material available, and i don't really consider it Too Honorous to take one or two extra precautions Even if that precaution amounts Only to haveing a Phantomed Prim over my doorway, that states "Over 18's Only". Is that enough? Well, Under the Law it is, and from a Moral, or Ethical standpoint we really do not have the Tools to do any more than Post Warnings, so Posting Warnings satisfies those criteria as well. If i owned an Adult Venue, Clearly Posted as Adult Only, and saw chat, or behaviour that led me to believe that the Person behind the Avie was Not of an age where it is appropriate that they be in my establishment, I Would Challenge, and question them, and if i was still not satisfied, i would ask them to Leave (I always asked first, explaining my reasons as i do, After that, I remove using Land tools).
I've been in this situation before in The Sims Online, where it was a Grid Open to Teens, and Adult content thrived as well (Though with nowhere Close to SL's versitility). I learned there, that i Had to do what i Had to do, to Protect Myself, And my Guests from sexually agressive Teens. I may have wished for it to be Different, But wishing doesn't make it so, and i Had to put the dreams aside, and Deal.

Responsibility is "Adult Content" also. The Children aren't, so We have to be.

Angel.
Jami Sin
i r noob
Join date: 3 Sep 2006
Posts: 109
11-27-2006 19:49
im offended...
_____________________
Brenda Archer
Registered User
Join date: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 557
11-27-2006 22:38
From: Angelique LaFollette
But as Adults, i think we need to learn to Accept Reality. and the existing Reality of SL IS that there Is a Chance that Minors will enter the grid, and Seek out any adult Material available, and i don't really consider it Too Honorous to take one or two extra precautions Even if that precaution amounts Only to haveing a Phantomed Prim over my doorway, that states "Over 18's Only". .


I'm all in favor of adults taking the responsibility... but it would be a huge help to be able to tell, in most cases, just by looking at the avie, which is how we do it in RL. All it would take is a differently colored name tag to do the trick.

Obviously some teenagers will sneak through... we were all teenagers once and many of us remember trying to pull stuff like that. But resigning myself to not having any tools to verify anyone means, for me, not moving beyond hard R for any of the public offerings of my large, free-to-join group.

This is self-censorship, which I wouldn't have to do if I could card the adults and put up real walls, as I would in RL. Putting up a sign does not reassure me enough. I'm not just trying to protect the adults, I feel a duty to do what I can to protect the minors, and until I have a fair guess as to who they are, I don't feel right taking the chance. Good thing I am not trying to make any money off SL right now.
_____________________
bilbo99 Emu
Garrett's No.1 fan
Join date: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 3,468
11-28-2006 02:59
From: Seola Sassoon
I think pasties and a G-string is slutty, doesn't mean that I think you should find it so either.


um .. just where in Cornwall did you stay Seola? :D

Someone mentioned art. Last night I spent an enthralling half an hour in an amusement arcade in a freebie session. Christ! I hate the bloody things in real life!
Well, I came away with a few lindens but my real pleasure was just looking at the other players. They looked just fabulous. The faces were almost photographic. The clothing textures were just so real I never knew my graphics card was so good!

Right, my on-topic 2 cents: Youngsters are among the most talented hackers in the world. Whether you create zones, put up fences, ask questions, post notices in rotating flourescent billboards, most determined youngsters will get through or past. The new TOS wording is unenforcable period.

What this thread seems to have wandered toward is whether the adult places should be quite so easily or even accidently accessed or even in some eyes I think if they should be here at all.
Well, it's life isn't it? You can't deny towns have red light districts and hell, sometimes you can't avoid driving through them unless you really want to take an enormous diversion. No teleporting in real life!
Daisy Rimbaud
Registered User
Join date: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 764
11-28-2006 03:16
The fact is, mature is mature. The warning is there already. I don't see the need for any additional warnings. Otherwise it becomes like those computer messages that say "Are you really sure you want to delete this file?" "Are you really REALLY sure?" and so on.

If a minor intrudes where he's not supposed to be, that's his fault. I can't stop him lying about his age, and I don't have a duty of care towards him.
yeeck Brickworks
Registered User
Join date: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 123
11-28-2006 06:26
From: Daisy Rimbaud
The fact is, mature is mature. The warning is there already. I don't see the need for any additional warnings. Otherwise it becomes like those computer messages that say "Are you really sure you want to delete this file?" "Are you really REALLY sure?" and so on.

If a minor intrudes where he's not supposed to be, that's his fault. I can't stop him lying about his age, and I don't have a duty of care towards him.


I personally think by allowing or restrict residents with payment info on file will be very sufficient enough to cover a lot of problems... :)
Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
11-28-2006 09:07
FYI:

Lewis Nerd incurred a "violation" on November 27, and has been permanently banned from the SL forums for "repeatedly making inflammatory posts disrupting the productive conversation of other Residents."

He also received a 3-day inworld suspension.

coco
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Coyote Momiji
Pintsized Plutonium
Join date: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 715
11-28-2006 09:37
From: yeeck Brickworks
I personally think by allowing or restrict residents with payment info on file will be very sufficient enough to cover a lot of problems... :)


Well, I'd /love/ to agree with you - unfortunately, I've known of at least two minors who were both members of long standing and were premium.

But, really, at that point... there's not a lot you can do.
Seola Sassoon
NCD owner
Join date: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 1,036
11-28-2006 12:06
From: Coyote Momiji
Well, I'd /love/ to agree with you - unfortunately, I've known of at least two minors who were both members of long standing and were premium.

But, really, at that point... there's not a lot you can do.


No one denies that there may have been a few minors here and there before, but at least there was something preventing the average teen from coming online. At least as premium, someone had to either give them thier card or give them one of thier own.
Winter Ventura
Eclectic Randomness
Join date: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 2,579
11-28-2006 12:25
From: Cocoanut Koala
FYI:

Lewis Nerd incurred a "violation" on November 27, and has been permanently banned from the SL forums for "repeatedly making inflammatory posts disrupting the productive conversation of other Residents."

He also received a 3-day inworld suspension.

coco


/139/bd/151520/1.html
[...]
_____________________

● Inworld Store: http://slurl.eclectic-randomness.com
● Website: http://www.eclectic-randomness.com
● Twitter: @WinterVentura
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10