These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Help stop the L$ from dropping, stop premium account allowances! |
|
slick McCoy
Registered User
Join date: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 47
|
03-03-2006 23:02
So many people blame the falling Linden on giving the basic accounts a weekly allowance but what about the premium accounts? 500 a week is 10x what the basic accounts get and most likely the premium users don't need an extra 2000 lindens a month while the basic account holders actually can use an extra 200 a month! Why take money away from those who need it most?
_____________________
|
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
![]() Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
03-03-2006 23:08
So many people blame the falling Linden on giving the basic accounts a weekly allowance but what about the premium accounts? 500 a week is 10x what the basic accounts get and most likely the premium users don't need an extra 2000 lindens a month while the basic account holders actually can use an extra 200 a month! Why take money away from those who need it most? Simple answer is dude, we're paying for those $L. If they discount the premium membership to just the value of the also included 512m worth of tier, then by all means, take my stipend away. And why do you need it most? Like your WANT is somehow more important than our want? There are no NEEDS in SL. Spending is entirely discretionarey. |
Michael Seraph
Second Life Resident
Join date: 9 Nov 2004
Posts: 849
|
03-03-2006 23:36
Questions we don't know the answers to:
How many people are on premium accounts? How many people are on basic accounts? How much money enters the economy because of these accounts? How much money enters in other ways (dwell etc)? How much money leaves the economy through payments to LL (uploads etc)? Until we know the answers to most of these questions, we can't really come up with a strategy to raise the value of the $L. Remember, when some self-styled expert in the forums tells you he/she has a solution to the perceived decline in the $L, he/she doesn't have the facts either. |
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
|
Will all the "sell your Lindens now" morons please shut up?
03-04-2006 00:10
So many people blame the falling Linden on giving the basic accounts a weekly allowance but what about the premium accounts? 500 a week is 10x what the basic accounts get and most likely the premium users don't need an extra 2000 lindens a month while the basic account holders actually can use an extra 200 a month! Why take money away from those who need it most? Because most of the premium members contribute to the system/world not only by paying their monthly membership fee, but aslo buy land and create/build CONTENT -- they are content producers, not just CONSUMERS and tourists. And the value of the Linden drops due to too many Lindens being injected into the system, so all the supposedly economic "experts" who are screaming about the fall in the value of the Linden are the same idiots who dump their $500L weekly stipend into Lindex AND THEY ARE THEMSELVES DRIVING THE VALUE OF THE LINDEN DOWN. |
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
03-04-2006 02:47
Questions we don't know the answers to:[...] How many people are on premium accounts? ![]() With a population of 150,000 this means 15,000 Premium Accounts (max). How many people are on basic accounts? How much money enters the economy because of these accounts? 135,000 * 50 L$/week = 6,750,000 L$ per week in Basic Account stipends. How much money enters in other ways (dwell etc)? How much money leaves the economy through payments to LL (uploads etc)? ![]() All the numbers mentioned above have an error margin of at least 20%. But still you can safely assume that nearly the same amount of money enters the economy through Basic and Premium stipends and, taken together, this is a lot of money - some 13 - 14 Million L$ (50,000 US$) every week. Until we know the answers to most of these questions, we can't really come up with a strategy to raise the value of the $L. Remember, when some self-styled expert in the forums tells you he/she has a solution to the perceived decline in the $L, he/she doesn't have the facts either. ![]() Looking for sound economic advice in the forums seems a suicidal strategy for a business IMHO. |
Clarrice Cinquetti
\m/ รดรด \m/
![]() Join date: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 259
|
03-04-2006 04:09
How about LOWER Tier prices so people buy L$ to buy more Land?
They keep taking this and taking that...how about giving something in return? _____________________
Wandering SL enjoying myself
![]() |
Introvert Petunia
over 2 billion posts
![]() Join date: 11 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,065
|
03-04-2006 04:34
Help stop the L$ from dropping, stop premium account allowances! Advocate a policy change if you wish, but you should probably give people a reason why they might care. Linden Lab will probably ignore you anyway, but if you are posting in a public forum to sell your case then sell it. |
ReserveBank Division
Senior Member
Join date: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,408
|
03-04-2006 04:43
So many people blame the falling Linden on giving the basic accounts a weekly allowance but what about the premium accounts? 500 a week is 10x what the basic accounts get and most likely the premium users don't need an extra 2000 lindens a month while the basic account holders actually can use an extra 200 a month! Why take money away from those who need it most? Bravo!!!! Another Voice in a Sea of Welfare Addicts. The Addicts won't give up their drug without a fight.. _____________________
![]() |
Jonas Pierterson
Dark Harlequin
Join date: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3,660
|
03-04-2006 04:46
The way you discuss welfare and project welfare onto our -paid for- stipends.. I can only imagine you must hate living off of welfare real world.
|
Jackson Callisto
Registered User
Join date: 3 Mar 2006
Posts: 46
|
03-04-2006 06:11
i see alot of people have no idea how supply and demand works.. if you think that the chump change of 50L the basic user get is going to make a big change if any at all your sadly mistaken. the lindenx rate is based apon supply and demand. if the volume of linden going in over weights the the need and volume going out it loses value that simple. If you think taking away someone 50L a week is all the sudden gonna cause masses to start buying linden in bulk then your in for a rude awaking.
people now a days dont cash out anything less then 50k.. some no less then 100k, and fact is there no demand for it. even if you take out the 50L a week given there still gonna be no demand for that high of volume.. people are just not buying linden in bulks of 50k in bulks of 100k+ at the rate that it is coming in. say you have casher A ,B , and C casher A cashes out 50k casher B cashes out another 50k casher C decided to cash out 100k you now have a total of 200k floating around lindenx now you got 3 buyers buyer A decides to buy 20k buyer B decides to buy 10K buyer C gonna splurge a bit and buy 50k only 80k out of 200k was actually taken out thats leaves a supply of 120k still lingering around. now you get 3 more people who decide to cash out in bulk that supply of linden now grows where the demand really doesnt.. and so forth the problem isnt within the game the problem is within the lindenx market. right now the volume going in and the volume going out is like try to seasaw with someone who 120lbs on one side and someone who is 500lbs on the other side. the only way to even it out is to either find somewhere to add weight to the lighter side or to drop some of the weight on the heavier side. thats what need to be focused on ways to even out the weight within lindenx itself not within the game, and intill that is done what i said earlier is just a fact.. if there is more supply then demand the value of that supply takes a loss |
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
![]() Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
03-04-2006 07:20
i see alot of people have no idea how supply and demand works.. if you think that the chump change of 50L the basic user get is going to make a big change if any at all your sadly mistaken. the lindenx rate is based apon supply and demand. if the volume of linden going in over weights the the need and volume going out it loses value that simple. If you think taking away someone 50L a week is all the sudden gonna cause masses to start buying linden in bulk then your in for a rude awaking. people now a days dont cash out anything less then 50k.. some no less then 100k, and fact is there no demand for it. even if you take out the 50L a week given there still gonna be no demand for that high of volume.. people are just not buying linden in bulks of 50k in bulks of 100k+ at the rate that it is coming in. say you have casher A ,B , and C casher A cashes out 50k casher B cashes out another 50k casher C decided to cash out 100k you now have a total of 200k floating around lindenx now you got 3 buyers buyer A decides to buy 20k buyer B decides to buy 10K buyer C gonna splurge a bit and buy 50k only 80k out of 200k was actually taken out thats leaves a supply of 120k still lingering around. now you get 3 more people who decide to cash out in bulk that supply of linden now grows where the demand really doesnt.. and so forth the problem isnt within the game the problem is within the lindenx market. right now the volume going in and the volume going out is like try to seasaw with someone who 120lbs on one side and someone who is 500lbs on the other side. the only way to even it out is to either find somewhere to add weight to the lighter side or to drop some of the weight on the heavier side. thats what need to be focused on ways to even out the weight within lindenx itself not within the game, and intill that is done what i said earlier is just a fact.. if there is more supply then demand the value of that supply takes a loss Have you looked at the volume figures? Today's is $788,587. |
Jackson Callisto
Registered User
Join date: 3 Mar 2006
Posts: 46
|
03-04-2006 07:28
and seen the amount of linden still avalable
Open Sell Orders Exchange Rate Sellers at this Rate Total Remaining Quantity L$278 / US$1.00 13 L$258,553 L$277 / US$1.00 27 L$1,714,000 L$276 / US$1.00 12 L$746,682 L$275 / US$1.00 15 L$1,257,492 L$274 / US$1.00 15 L$2,095,015 L$273 / US$1.00 13 L$566,701 L$272 / US$1.00 12 L$653,233 L$271 / US$1.00 8 L$392,894 L$270 / US$1.00 23 L$1,264,151 L$269 / US$1.00 7 L$206,163 L$268 / US$1.00 10 L$2,610,280 that is a lot of linden left in the market to be sold. even if thats the volume shown is what being taken out to orders there probably twice that amount that goes in |
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
![]() Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
03-04-2006 07:41
I don't think anyone's expecting all of that to sell today. I imagine some people are placing sell orders at different prices, some close to the price it currently selling at, some higher in case it moves upwards. Its probably more meaningful to look at the volumes around the price it's currently selling at, and compare... that's where the Lindens people expect to sell quickly will be.
I dont think a fictitious scenario with imaginary numbers really proves much. |
Jackson Callisto
Registered User
Join date: 3 Mar 2006
Posts: 46
|
03-04-2006 07:45
right now in the bank of lindenx there a supply of 27,381,148 linden waiting to be sold. so with that much linden in there there no need to pay someone top dollar to just add to the ever so growing surplus of linden already there. once that number begins to drop or people start to buying larger bulk of linden the market value isnt going to change much. that volume of 900,000L is would be great if no one were to add to the amount of linden already there to be sold
|
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
03-04-2006 07:48
How about LOWER Tier prices so people buy L$ to buy more Land? They keep taking this and taking that...how about giving something in return? ![]() |
kerunix Flan
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2005
Posts: 393
|
03-04-2006 07:55
I don't care of L$ value, i always dealed with the L$ instability.
I'm against basic stipend removal, i don't care of premium stipend. |
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
![]() Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
|
03-04-2006 08:00
right now in the bank of lindenx there a supply of 27,381,148 linden waiting to be sold. so with that much linden in there there no need to pay someone top dollar to just add to the ever so growing surplus of linden already there. once that number begins to drop or people start to buying larger bulk of linden the market value isnt going to change much. that volume of 900,000L is would be great if no one were to add to the amount of linden already there to be sold At current volumes a very large proportion of those $L will turn over within the month. That seems about right, and I think in an exchange you would expect the daily volume to be a smaller number than the total supply. Do you imagine in RL markets that daily volume is anywhere near equal to total supply? |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
03-04-2006 08:09
Because most of the premium members contribute to the system/world not only by paying their monthly membership fee, but aslo buy land and create/build CONTENT -- they are content producers, not just CONSUMERS and tourists. |
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
03-04-2006 08:50
This whole discussion about "Basic Account holders do this and don't do that, Premium Account holders do so and so" gets a bit boring after a while.
![]() Why is it so hard to see, that "it takes every kind of people ..." to make our Second Life? There might be a bit of a difference between the behaviour and the typical occupations of Basic and Premium account holders. But don't forget, for example, that many Premium Account holders are here to have fun, too. And a lot of creators and business people in SL are on a Basic Account. It' s not that the type of account make a resident "good" or "bad" or "useful" or "business" or "creative" or ... The only factual difference I can see, is that Premium Acccount holders are customers for SL. They supply the company with a constant stream of revenues. As harsh as it may sound, Basic Account holders are of interest to LL only in so far, as their inworld activities finally provide an incentive for a Premium Account holder to spend some more money for tier, renting of a private sim, etc. This incentive can come in many different forms. This is a complex society. In the end all residents of Second Life are important for this virtual world, its growth, its beauty and its prosperity. ![]() |
Merlyn Bailly
owner, AVALON GALLERIA
Join date: 7 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
|
03-04-2006 10:38
This whole discussion about "Basic Account holders do this and don't do that, Premium Account holders do so and so" gets a bit boring after a while. ![]() Why is it so hard to see, that "it takes every kind of people ..." to make our Second Life? Gee, the same kind of whiny iodicy spouted by Rodney King, the crackhead who ran from police, then whined and fought with them until they lost it and whaled on his sorry ass. There might be a bit of a difference between the behaviour and the typical occupations of Basic and Premium account holders. But don't forget, for example, that many Premium Account holders are here to have fun, too. And a lot of creators and business people in SL are on a Basic Account. It' s not that the type of account make a resident "good" or "bad" or "useful" or "business" or "creative" or ... You're ignoring the fact that SL as it largely stands was built/created by those Premium account members who were, in fact, the ONLY SL members at the time -- LL did not start up freebie accounts until there were, what, about 50-60k members? The only factual difference I can see, is that Premium Acccount holders are customers for SL. They supply the company with a constant stream of revenues. And that "constant stream of revenue" is what keeps the servers running and pays for new servers for new sims. As harsh as it may sound, Basic Account holders are of interest to LL only in so far, as their inworld activities finally provide an incentive for a Premium Account holder to spend some more money for tier, renting of a private sim, etc. This incentive can come in many different forms. This is a complex society. Actually, LL began offering free accounts as a way of introducing more people to SL faster, in the hopes that they would soon upgrade to Premium (as I did, after being messed over by two landlords in a row, so I could own my _own_ damn land). Unfortunately, the DI given to high-traffic sites like clubs/casinos with camping and artificial "events" (basically dressup contests) injected by clubs/casinos has thrown that off: the freebies are now "working" at camping on autopilot (zombies) in order to make money, rather than upgrading and receiving their $500L/wk as paid members. And the Premiums who are basically tourists, in SL only for "fun and games" instead of contributing by being landholders and building/creating, are dumping their Lindens on Lindex, thereby creating an artificial glut in the Linden, and driving the exchange rate down (and then bitching because they're getting less for their Lindens). In the end all residents of Second Life are important for this virtual world, its growth, its beauty and its prosperity. ![]() And a fair number of them are dragging down the quality of life in SL, just as in RL, the productive members work and the nonproductive ones are on welfare, are addicts of one kind or another (camping and/or slots), and hassle everyone else who actually does anything useful, while whining about their rights and how beautiful diversity is. |
Pham Neutra
Registered User
Join date: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 478
|
03-04-2006 11:12
Gee, the same kind of whiny iodicy spouted by Rodney King, the crackhead who ran from police, then whined and fought with them until they lost it and whaled on his sorry ass. ![]() My, did we have a bad week, did we? I hope you have lots of fun this weekend - inside and outside of SL. Get well soon! |
Michael Seraph
Second Life Resident
Join date: 9 Nov 2004
Posts: 849
|
03-04-2006 12:04
I didn't realize that the point of SL was to work. I thought it was to do whatever I wanted.
My position is still very simple. We don't have the data. We don't know the most basic facts about the money supply. And it's obvious we don't. The self-styled experts are quickly reduced to name calling in any thread dealing with this stuff. They can't support their arguments with hard facts, because they don't have them. So what do they do? They start calling their skeptics things like "lazy" and "welfare addicts" and "communists" and go off on weird rants about Rodney King. If you have facts, present them. Calling your skeptics "welfare addicts" is counterproductive. It shows you don't have the facts to back up your claims and it shows you don't really understand the meaning of the word "welfare". Which only serves to raise doubts about your understanding of basic economics. |
HalfPint Camus
Registered User
Join date: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 21
|
03-04-2006 12:46
Bravo!!!! Another Voice in a Sea of Welfare Addicts. The Addicts won't give up their drug without a fight.. yanno dude, you really need to look up exactly what welfare is, just because someone has a basic acct doesn't mean they are welfare people.. why pay for something we are not going to use.. difference.. land.. thats it! if you don't want to own land, than why pay for a premuim acct. Get OFF your high horse and quit your whining! |
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
![]() Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
03-04-2006 14:11
Actually, LL began offering free accounts as a way of introducing more people to SL faster, in the hopes that they would soon upgrade to Premium (as I did, after being messed over by two landlords in a row, so I could own my _own_ damn land). I'm a Basic account user. I am not a "free" account user. And I pay more money to Linden Labs through Tony and Alliez than a Premium account user would... without adding to the inflation/exchange rate problem... in fact the Lindens I buy mean I, the Basic user, are part of the solution to your problem. And the Premiums who are basically tourists, in SL only for "fun and games" instead of contributing by being landholders and building/creating, are dumping their Lindens on Lindex |
Sebastian Saramago
Common Brilliance
![]() Join date: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 62
|
03-04-2006 17:11
So many people blame the falling Linden on giving the basic accounts a weekly allowance but what about the premium accounts? 500 a week is 10x what the basic accounts get and most likely the premium users don't need an extra 2000 lindens a month while the basic account holders actually can use an extra 200 a month! Why take money away from those who need it most? we pay more, thats why. We put more real money in the Linden pocket, so we get a bit more. What do you want? walfair for the poor? _____________________
Your sole holds no discrimination for how it receives a laugh, a smile and the company of a Friend.
|