Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

FYI hypolcites are alive and well

Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
09-30-2005 13:45
From: Jonquille Noir
One question, since you keep making the fact that yours is a REAL account a pivotal point... Did you keep the 512 of First Land for Strawbearry's personal use, or did you add it to Cocoa's land?

It's still hers, but it is right next door to Coco's, and I plan to create a third alt (a basic one) so we can group it.

coco

P.S. Oh, I see where you are going with this. It would be OKAY if I plan to role-play some other person entirely.

Well, dig this: Strawbearry works for Coco. She tests out all her products. She may even branch out to products of her own. But she and Coco will always be in business together, and I defy you to tell me there is something wrong with that. OR my use of pronouns, lol.
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
09-30-2005 13:46
From: Cocoanut Koala
OK, I'll take this on. (Then I gotta go to the store.)

-----

First Land is something that you get when you buy a new ACCOUNT. Because THAT player has never owned First Land.

It is a one-time thing that all new accounts get.

It is assumed it will be a REAL account for your household, and not just an account to get something quick and then delete.

When you get an account, that is your account forever, and you only get one chance at First Land with it. You also get a sign-on bonus with it, the ability to own 512 without paying tier

- and NOTICE how that is the SAME 512! Do you expect us to somehow pay tier on it, too? -

plus $500 a week.

It is often very scarce because some people game the system by buying up lots of land with alts they later delete.

But when we are running short on land (as we did after people taking advantage of an exploit), we will just release more, as there is no true scarcity. We will provide every new account with 512 of land. We release land in proportion to all the new accounts we get. We try to keep a rein on those who would abuse the system by creating a number of alts - you are allowed only five - but we can't always control that, so there may be shortages at times.

-------

Also, Cristiano, you keep harping on the cost of the thing. I don't really get that. In my case, anyway, whether it cost me $512 or $3000 was far less important than that it was contiguous to my plot.

I have bought from other players land near me. And with my alt, I bought her first 512, as is my right as a NEW, ACTUAL, PERMANENT ACCOUNT.

There is NOTHING gaming the system about that.

coco


I am speaking about the cost of it because it is a fundamental part of First Land - that even though the market for land is much higher, you are guaranteed to get a plot for $1/m. There seems to be a lack of understanding of tier is at issue here. You just blurred first land and the tier that is included with a premium account. A premium account includes 512m of tier (1024m of tier if you had a premium account prior to 1.2). That just says "You can own up to this much land without an additional fee". It does not give you the 512m of land. You have to buy the land. The 512m of land provided by the First Land program does coincide with the lowest tier size for a reason - so that once you own it, you have no additional fees.

The program has NOTHING at all to do with a premium account per se. You aren't elligible for it with each new premium account you buy. It was a new player incentive. You creating a second account does not make you a new player any more than my registering with Movielink with a second email address really makes me a new customer elligible for a first time movie download of $0.99 since I have already been a customer of theirs and rented before. First Land was set up to help new players with very limited financial resources and no experience in owning land get their first plot without the risk and costs associated normally with owning land. Established players using it just goes against the spirit of it. I am surprised you can't see that.
_____________________
Cristiano


ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less.

~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.

Cocoanut Koala
Coco's Cottages
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 7,903
09-30-2005 13:49
From: Cristiano Midnight
I am speaking about the cost of it because it is a fundamental part of First Land - that even though the market for land is much higher, you are guaranteed to get a plot for $1/m. There seems to be a lack of understanding of tier is at issue here. You just blurred first land and the tier that is included with a premium account. A premium account includes 512m of tier (1024m of tier if you had a premium account prior to 1.2). That just says "You can own up to this much land without an additional fee". It does not give you the 512m of land. You have to buy the land. The 512m of land provided by the First Land program does coincide with the lowest tier size for a reason - so that once you own it, you have no additional fees.

The program has NOTHING at all to do with a premium account per se. You aren't elligible for it with each new premium account you buy. It was a new player incentive. You creating a second account does not make you a new player any more than my registering with Movielink with a second email address really makes me a new customer elligible for a first time movie download of $0.99 since I have already been a customer of theirs and rented before. First Land was set up to help new players with very limited financial resources and no experience in owning land get their first plot without the risk and costs associated normally with owning land. Established players using it just goes against the spirit of it. I am surprised you can't see that.

I don't think I have blurred it.

But this sentence:

"The program has NOTHING at all to do with a premium account per se. You aren't elligible for it with each new premium account you buy."

That is where I disagree with you.

You ARE eligible for it, with each new premium account you buy, up to the five accounts per household you are allowed.

Plus let me mention again that this guy came to me in game and told me he had wanted to do this, with his wife, I think, and he is a relatively new player. So he asked the Lindens if it was okay, and then he bought five accounts so he could get 512's right next to each other. And the Linden said that was OKAY. (He came to me after he had read the other thread to tell me this.)

coco

P.S. and before I go to the store - I think a lot of this really has to do with those who were here longer. The land program has been the same since I joined in February, and I don't know much about all the history of it, how it was originally put in, what the Lindens said about it, or anything like that. I am telling you that the above has always been my understanding of it.
_____________________
VALENTINE BOUTIQUE
at Coco's Cottages

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rosieri/85/166/87
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
09-30-2005 13:53
From: Martin Magpie
Your saying no old timers gamed the system LOL that would be fine if it wasn't spoken about so freely "forum archives" they are a great tool for the truth.


No. I never said that. I said *your* posts are skewing the truth. My posts are all still here, no need to repeat myself word for word.
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
09-30-2005 13:53
so just for shits and grins let me throw this one at ya'll (damn been in the south too long lol)

If LL has the ability to ban all alt accounts associated with any and all credit cards why can't they ensure that no alt buys first land? I think the real issue here is with LL and perhaps this loop hole should be taken up with them. In the meantime hell yes its wrong to be pointing fingers at anyone who uses this loop hole especialy since we all know thats how some of SL's most noteable ppl got their start. How many of you made alts to create a group because you didn't trust anyone else in sl? Then you all made your land group land? hypocritical yes most definatly. At some point we all have to admit that none of use have been perfect angels in sl. yeah I admit that, I will however wag my finger at those of you who also know your not angels but are sitting there in judgement, tisk tisk. If I could freely name names I would have by now. You can deny your actions till the cows come home, that however does not make you innocent. Now just do me one favor and put down that pointing finger, it's just wrong.

Mar.
Kendra Bancroft
Rhine Maiden
Join date: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 5,813
09-30-2005 13:55
From: Cocoanut Koala
"Creepy."

The new in-way to marginalize people.

"Creepy" as in what happened in the other thread, where I became "creepy" for having two characters and speaking of them in the third person.

coco



Nahh--- I talk about Kendra in the third person all the time. That's because I'm not Kendra --My name is Madeleine and I have an AV in SL named Kendra. I don't find that part creepy at all.

In your case I find it creepy that you take every single post in every single thread as if it's personally about you. I also find it creepy when people intimate that they are laughing out loud as if it's somehow germaine to the topic at hand.
_____________________
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
09-30-2005 13:59
From: Cocoanut Koala
It's still hers, but it is right next door to Coco's, and I plan to create a third alt (a basic one) so we can group it.

coco

P.S. Oh, I see where you are going with this. It would be OKAY if I plan to role-play some other person entirely.

Well, dig this: Strawbearry works for Coco. She tests out all her products. She may even branch out to products of her own. But she and Coco will always be in business together, and I defy you to tell me there is something wrong with that. OR my use of pronouns, lol.



Pot, kettle black. Taking first land for your own purposes is not necessarily against the rules, but your accusations of others doing it, makes you look hypocritical at best.

You have proven yourself as a "Do as I say, not as I do" person. You speaking in third party is deeply creepy indeed. Strawbeary and Coco are one RL person. That person is responsible for any and all of the actions of your account.

I suggest you are the forum bully, not us.
_____________________
Jonquille Noir
Lemon Fresh
Join date: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,025
09-30-2005 13:59
I'm not really talking about roleplay. Roleplaying isn't neccessary just to have a 'real' alt. Some people use them to test stuff, or to just have some peace and quiet without being pestered. My question was more based on whether you intended this First Land to benefit Strawbearry, or to benefit Cocoa. Because if it's the latter, then it is gaming the system, in my opinion. If you bought it strictly for Strawbearry's use, then I actually have little problem with it. I choose not to do it myself with my own alt, but that's my personal choice. I would rather leave it for people who need it.

From: Cocoanut Koala
It's still hers, but it is right next door to Coco's, and I plan to create a third alt (a basic one) so we can group it.

coco

P.S. Oh, I see where you are going with this. It would be OKAY if I plan to role-play some other person entirely.

Well, dig this: Strawbearry works for Coco. She tests out all her products. She may even branch out to products of her own. But she and Coco will always be in business together, and I defy you to tell me there is something wrong with that. OR my use of pronouns, lol.
_____________________
Little Rebel Designs
Gallinas
DogSpot Boxer
vortex thruster
Join date: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 671
09-30-2005 14:00
I can't believe people are rehashing the same shit that Jeska put a stop to yesterday.
_____________________
Dogspot Boxer
Charter Member Of The Socially Inept Club

Our Motto:

We may be inept, but at least we're social
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
09-30-2005 14:01
From: Weedy Herbst
Pot, kettle black. Taking first land for your own purposes is not necessarily against the rules, .....



Well at least we can agree on that.

Mar
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
09-30-2005 14:02
From: DogSpot Boxer
I can't believe people are rehashing the same shit that Jeska put a stop to yesterday.


Are you referring to the thread starter?
_____________________
Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
09-30-2005 14:02
From: DogSpot Boxer
I can't believe people are rehashing the same shit that Jeska put a stop to yesterday.


Issues come and go on the forums all the time. There are issues we talk about today that are brought up about once every couple of months (and some that have been for over 2 years). Kind of the nature of the forums especially due to the fact that we are forever gaining new people. :)
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
09-30-2005 14:03
From: Martin Magpie
Well at least we can agree on that.

Mar


Do you agree with the second part? The part about hypocricy.
_____________________
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
09-30-2005 14:04
From: Jonquille Noir
I'm not really talking about roleplay. Roleplaying isn't neccessary just to have a 'real' alt. Some people use them to test stuff, or to just have some peace and quiet without being pestered. My question was more based on whether you intended this First Land to benefit Strawbearry, or to benefit Cocoa. Because if it's the latter, then it is gaming the system, in my opinion. If you bought it strictly for Strawbearry's use, then I actually have little problem with it. I choose not to do it myself with my own alt, but that's my personal choice. I would rather leave it for people who need it.



In my mind it doesn't matter which alt it is gonna benifit since they are all connected to the same real person in the end. Ahhh but it does in fact show a "grey area" funny how history has a way of repeating its self.

Mar
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
09-30-2005 14:05
From: Weedy Herbst
Do you agree with the second part? The part about hypocricy.



I quoted the statement I agreed with, as always.

Mar.
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
09-30-2005 14:07
From: DogSpot Boxer
I can't believe people are rehashing the same shit that Jeska put a stop to yesterday.



I do beleive you missed my point. Let me state it simply.

"I find it hypocritical for some ppl to be pointing fingers when in fact they have done the same themselves in the past." It's all just "good business" for some.

Mar
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
09-30-2005 14:12
I have a hypolcite on my ass. It's as big as an apple.
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon
Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.


Second Life Forums: Who needs Reason when you can use bold tags?
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
09-30-2005 14:15
From: Martin Magpie
Now just do me one favor and put down that pointing finger, it's just wrong.

Mar.


So sayeth the woman who has pointed fingers at those making personal attacks, while making them herself all the time.
_____________________
Cristiano


ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less.

~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.

Weedy Herbst
Too many parameters
Join date: 5 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,255
09-30-2005 14:15
From: Enabran Templar
I have a hypolcite on my ass. It's as big as an apple.


I told the nurse to prick your boil, I can't help if she got it backwards. :p
_____________________
Cristiano Midnight
Evil Snapshot Baron
Join date: 17 May 2003
Posts: 8,616
09-30-2005 14:16
From: Martin Magpie
I quoted the statement I agreed with, as always.

Mar.


Nah, you took the quote out of context to change its meaning to suit your purposes, as always.
_____________________
Cristiano


ANOmations - huge selection of high quality, low priced animations all $100L or less.

~SLUniverse.com~ SL's oldest and largest community site, featuring Snapzilla image sharing, forums, and much more.

Pendari Lorentz
Senior Member
Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 4,372
09-30-2005 14:18
From: Enabran Templar
I have a hypolcite on my ass. It's as big as an apple.



:eek:

err, if you ever visit Neualt, I beg you not to sit on my furniture. Thanks you! :D
_____________________
*hugs everyone*
Jake Reitveld
Emperor of Second Life
Join date: 9 Mar 2005
Posts: 2,690
09-30-2005 15:58
So I finally created an alt account. No you can't know who it is. I went out and bought some first land at lunch. Now I am trying to decide whether to sell it, or transfer it to my main. I could even sell it to my main so my new alt can afford a good skin, or cross dress in Aimee Webers panties.

I suppose it makes me an unethical bastard. But really "transferring first land to alt accounts" is not covered under the ten zen precepts or the theravedic 10 million principles or whatever they have. I suppose I am a bad buddhist, but I try.

And really right now my whole opinion of this is "so what." I mean when was the last time any coroporation failed to take utter advantage of a known loophole. Hell its all we can do to keep them from violating the laws where no loophole exists. Sl is a platform not a game. Ethics are thus optional, because a business man does not make an excuse, he makes a profit!

It really is time for a New topic. Maybe we could start an initiative to have all people who cannot spell banned from the forums for the thir offense or something. And a perma ban for bad grammar?

remember kids, pay attentionin english and take typing cause mispelled words make baby jesus cry. or sink ships, or the bad Nazi's win WWII, or encourage the spread of communism and impeded the progress of truth, justice, liberty and the american way.
_____________________
ALCHEMY -clothes for men.

Lebeda 208,209
Siggy Romulus
DILLIGAF
Join date: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 5,711
09-30-2005 16:00
Well that kinda makes your sig line on topic.
_____________________
The Second Life forums are living proof as to why it's illegal for people to have sex with farm animals.

From: Jesse Linden
I, for one, am highly un-helped by this thread
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
09-30-2005 16:10
From: Cocoanut Koala
On the topic, I didn't know about this early buying up of lifetime accounts, and I don't know if any of those who said I was unethical to buy a 512 First Land with my second account did that.

On the other hand, I've been told that people DO such things as these, snapping up lots of land to make their contiguous spots.

Common sense also tells me that probably most people - especially new people, who don't realize it is supposedly a huge no-no - who do get a second account and then also avail themselves of the 512 opportunity along with the other things that come with a new account.

I have explained that while I was against buying up all the First Land for one's own land business, or just to make a quick profit, may indeed be unethical. On the other hand, it may also just provide a better service, in that how much a lot costs is probably less important than that it is right next to your own lot. At least that is true in my case.

And I am pretty certain that others who criticized my action have done the same thing (some others, not all of the others) - bought a second account (a real account they intend to use) - and bought 512 with it, next to the land they already have.

I don't see why this thread would be shut down, unless it is just to shut Martin up. Is it considered reposting of an old thread? Does that mean one can never discuss the subject again?

I don't think that's what they mean by reposting an old thread. I've seen lots of threads closed, then the topic restarted by someone else. I think it means mainly reposting to complain about your old thread getting closed.

Am I wrong?

And thank you, Martin, for coming to my support.

coco

I have never bought first land, thanks.

I have ONE 4096 account, which caused me quite a bit of inner turmoil for me, whilst considering even purchasing it. We were told by a high ranking Linden point blank, that SL was on the brink of financial failure, after a protest against the 1.2 changes. This is why I was so unsure about buying that 4096, and I waited until the last possible moment, and so did Cris. So much for Cat's conspiracy theories.

Many of the folks who disagreed with you, on principle, mind you, were never eligible for 4096, because they weren't in SL then. The only people I know for sure that bought multiple 4096 accounts are today some of our leading land barons.

Tu Quoque based on heresay is just lame Coco.

You know one thing I always notice about those who embrace blatant hypocrisy and espouse conspiracy theories? That they always say "Thank you for agreeing with me", to their equally jaded allies. Funny how those who think differently than them don't do that very often, if at all...
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
Jeska Linden
Administrator
Join date: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 2,388
09-30-2005 16:19
There is no obvious constructive discussion going on in this thread and as such it is being closed.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7